Commit Graph

707 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Félix Malfait f663cd3c68 Move open-record-in to object metadata and member preference (#23614)
Replaces the per-view "Open in" setting with a two-level model,
following up on #23422 / #23424 and superseding the closed #23446 and
#23457:

- `objectMetadata.openRecordIn`: `SIDE_PANEL` | `RECORD_PAGE` |
`USER_CHOICE` (default `USER_CHOICE`)
- `workspaceMember.openRecordIn`: `SIDE_PANEL` | `RECORD_PAGE` (default
`SIDE_PANEL`), editable in Settings > Experience

The rule: records open where the member prefers, unless the object pins
them, and never in a panel there is no room for (mobile always resolves
to the record page).

## Why

Having the setting on views, objects and members at once was heavy, and
view-level resolution was fragile: a chip rendered outside a view
(notes, front components, kanban cards pointing at another object) had
no view to read from, which is the class of bug behind #23422.
Resolution is now context-free: it needs only the object, the current
member and the viewport, so chips behave identically everywhere by
construction.

## Changes

**Object level**
- New `openRecordIn` enum column on `objectMetadata`, editable through
`updateOneObject` and surfaced in Settings > Data model > Object >
Layout ("Open records in": Member preference / Side Panel / Record Page)
- Standard definitions pin `workflow`, `workflowVersion`, `dashboard`
and `messageCampaign` to the record page (matching the previously
hardcoded list) and `calendarEvent` to the side panel (it has no curated
record page); everything else, including `workflowRun`, follows the
member preference
- Apps can set it in `defineObject()` via the object manifest

**Member level**
- New `openRecordIn` standard field on `workspaceMember`, persisted
through the existing settings path (same as `colorScheme`) and exposed
in Settings > Experience

**View level (deprecated)**
- `view.openRecordIn` is no longer read or written by the frontend; the
"Open in" entry is gone from the view options dropdown
- The column, DTO field and inputs are kept for one release for API
compatibility: the output field carries a `deprecationReason`, the
inputs keep accepting the value with a `Deprecated:` description (NestJS
silently drops input fields that have a `deprecationReason`, which would
have been a breaking change)

**Upgrade (2.27)**
- Fast instance command adds the `objectMetadata.openRecordIn` column
defaulting to `USER_CHOICE`
- Workspace command adds the `workspaceMember.openRecordIn` field
- Workspace command seeds the object column from the standard
definitions (any non-`USER_CHOICE` value), then lifts deliberate
per-view record page choices onto objects the definitions don't pin

**Debt removed**
- `canOpenObjectInSidePanel` hardcoded object list and its test
- `ObjectOptionsDropdownLayoutOpenInContent` and the `layoutOpenIn`
dropdown wiring
- `DefaultViewOpenRecordIn`
- Context-store/view-based resolution in `useResolveOpenRecordIn` (now
reads object metadata + member + viewport)
- Front components no longer guess from the current view: an explicit
side-panel call honours a pinned object and the viewport, nothing else

## Verification

- Ran the three upgrade commands against a live database: column
created, the pinned standard objects seeded per workspace (record page
pins plus calendarEvent to side panel), member field backfilled to
`SIDE_PANEL`; seed rerun is a no-op
- Seed command verified on a simulated pre-upgrade workspace (index view
set to record page on company): pins the standard objects plus company,
idempotent on rerun
- Both packages typecheck and lint clean; affected unit suites and the
application sync, view creation and metadata cache integration specs
pass

---------

Co-authored-by: Thomas des Francs <tdesfrancs@gmail.com>
2026-07-31 18:28:55 +02:00
github-actions[bot] d2085e60c8 i18n - docs translations (#23653)
Created by Github action

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-31 17:19:26 +02:00
Raphaël Bosi 0f06fccdee Make page layout tab layoutMode diffable and default standalone pages to vertical list (#23596)
Reported on Discord: an app declared a `STANDALONE_PAGE` layout with one
`FRONT_COMPONENT` widget and got a small bordered card instead of a
full-bleed page, and setting `layoutMode` afterwards changed nothing.

Two bugs:

- `pageLayoutTab.layoutMode` was `toCompare: false`, so it was written
once at create and never diffed again. Changing it in a manifest and
redeploying was a silent no-op, and `updatePageLayoutTab(layoutMode:)`
was accepted by the API then dropped by the runner's update sanitizer.
- A manifest tab that omits `layoutMode` defaulted to `GRID` regardless
of page layout type, and a `GRID` tab always renders its widgets as
cards on a 12-column grid. Standalone pages now default to
`VERTICAL_LIST`, where a lone widget owns the tab.

Also fixes the SDK scaffolder (`twenty add page-layout` emitted a tab
with no `position`, which does not typecheck) and the docs claim that a
single widget is always full-bleed.

Worth knowing for review: this does not migrate workspaces holding
legacy `CANVAS` tabs. The standard-app sync only runs against a fresh
schema, so those rows stay `CANVAS` and keep rendering correctly through
the derived presentation.


<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23596?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
2026-07-31 13:12:19 +00:00
github-actions[bot] 91c585196d i18n - docs translations (#23624)
Created by Github action

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-31 11:31:36 +02:00
github-actions[bot] 8abc8f4bc9 i18n - docs translations (#23618)
Created by Github action

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23618?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-31 09:35:47 +02:00
Félix Malfait 7b7e4a5eca docs: fix inaccuracies found auditing the docs against v2.27.0 (#23616)
Prompted by user feedback: *"The documentation doesn't always reflect
the latest release. Some articles are outdated or incomplete."*

I audited every English page under `packages/twenty-docs` against the
code at v2.27.0, verifying each checkable claim (commands, env vars,
enum members, payload shapes, prop tables, API routes) against source in
`packages/`. Anything without a `file:line` citation proving the docs
wrong was dropped.

**Result: 414 findings across 226 pages — 75 critical, 169 major, 170
minor.** The feedback is accurate, and understates it in the
developer-facing sections.

This PR fixes a first slice. The full findings list is below so the rest
can be picked up.

---

## What this PR changes

**Removes the `twenty-ui` component reference** (25 English pages + 325
translations). The section predated the extraction of the design system
into the `twenty-ui` package:

- Not one import path resolved. `twenty-ui/display` and
`twenty-ui/components` are not export subpaths (real ones:
`data-display`, `feedback`, `icon`, `input`, `navigation`, `surfaces`,
`layout`, …), and ~20 more examples imported `@/ui/...` paths no longer
in twenty-front.
- Three documented components no longer exist: `SoonPill`,
`AutosizeTextInput`, `MenuItemCommand`.
- `Chip`'s props table documented the deleted `EntityChip`.
`ProgressBar`'s entire API was replaced
(`duration`/`delay`/`easing`/`barHeight`/`autoStart` →
`value`/`barColor`/`countdownDurationInMs`/…).

It was also unreachable from the navigation, so the pages were indexed
and searchable but maintained by nobody. Storybook is the live source of
truth here, which is why this is a deletion rather than a repair.

**Legal FAQ.** Corrects the workspace deletion timeline to match clause
4.9 of the DPA the product itself generates (~90 days from live systems,
a further ~90 for backups, isolated throughout) instead of the previous
claim of immediate removal with 7-day backup retention. Rephrases the
support-access answer to describe what the product actually does: access
is on by default and can be disabled in Settings → General → Security,
rather than the previous claim that it requires the customer to report
an issue and grant access.

**Self-hosting setup page.** The SMTP configuration block used
`<ArticleTabs>/<ArticleTab>`, leftovers from the pre-Mintlify site.
Those components are undefined here, so the Gmail/Office365/smtp4dev
instructions were not rendering at all. Converted to `<Tabs>/<Tab>`.

**Removes a fabricated Enterprise gate.** A Warning on the app
publishing page claimed cross-workspace sharing of tarball apps requires
an Enterprise key and that the Distribution tab shows an upgrade prompt.
No such gate exists in code, and its link target didn't exist either.

**Link and asset fixes.** Retargeted the two `docs.json` redirects whose
destinations 404'd; fixed the Code of Conduct link (file lives under
`.github/`); fixed the app-roles example link to
`examples/hello-world/src/roles/default-role.ts`; pointed the Contribute
frontend card, four `/developers/extend/apps/getting-started` links and
one `/twenty-ui/display` link at real pages; dropped two `<img>` tags
whose files are absent from the repo.

After this PR: every internal link and image reference resolves, all 171
navigation entries resolve to a file, and no redirect destination is
dead.

---

## Audit: what else is wrong

### Root causes

The failures aren't random rot. Four mechanisms produce nearly all of
them:

1. **Nothing links renaming a symbol to updating the page that documents
it.** Whole pages describe APIs returning zero grep hits:
`MessageQueueServiceBase`, `useScopedHotkeys`/`PageHotkeyScope`,
`@Gate`, `SoonPill`.
2. **"Coming soon" is written once and never revisited.** Nine features
are documented as unavailable that have shipped.
3. **Pages are dropped from navigation but left on disk.** 55 were
unreachable yet still indexed and searchable.
4. **Docs written from intent rather than from code.** One case is
provably born-stale: the `front-components` limitations table was
written in a commit that landed *after* the commit which polyfilled the
APIs it lists as unsupported.

### Priority 1: pages that actively break the reader

**Workflow template variables are wrong across 12 pages.** The largest
cluster — 16 critical findings, one root cause. Record-event triggers
expose the record under `properties.after`/`properties.before`; manual
triggers under `payload`; webhook triggers store the posted body flat
with no wrapper. Docs use `{{trigger.object.*}}`, `{{trigger.body.*}}`,
`{{trigger.subject}}` throughout. Search Records returns `{ first, all,
totalCount }`, not an array, and the resolver is Handlebars, which
doesn't accept `[0]` indexing at all — so `{{searchRecords[0].name}}`
and `{{searchRecords.length}}` cannot work. Iterator exposes
`currentItem`, not `item`/`index`. Evidence:
`generate-fake-object-record-event.ts:44-60`,
`workflow-schema.workspace-service.ts:501-517`,
`find-records.workflow-action.ts:111-117`,
`workflow-iterator-result.type.ts:2-3`,
`twenty-shared/src/utils/evalFromContext.ts`. Every workflow tutorial on
the site is copy-paste-broken. Highest-value fix in the audit, and
mostly mechanical.

**Self-hosting runbook commands don't work.** Backup names a container
and database that don't exist (service is `db` → `twenty-db-1`; database
is `default`, not `twenty`). Restore runs `docker compose stop
twenty-server twenty-front`, neither of which is a service — the compose
file defines `server`, `worker`, `db`, `redis`, and there's no separate
frontend service. The "unable to log in" fix runs `yarn` and `npx nx
database:reset` inside the production container, whose Dockerfile
deletes `npm`/`npx` and ships only `dist/`. Someone following the backup
page ends up with no backup.

**API, webhook and OAuth contracts are wrong.** The documented webhook
payload (`event`, `data`, `timestamp`) is not what the server sends —
the real body is `targetUrl`, `eventName`, `objectMetadata`,
`workspaceId`, `webhookId`, `eventDate`, `userId`, `workspaceMemberId`,
`record`, optional `updatedFields`
(`transform-event-batch-to-webhook-events.ts:34-46`). Any integration
written from that page fails to parse. `GET /oauth/authorize` doesn't
exist (server serves `/oauth/register`, `/token`, `/revoke`,
`/introspect`; authorization is served by the frontend at `/authorize`).
`/oauth/register` never returns a `client_secret` —
`token_endpoint_auth_method` is hard-coded `'none'` — so the documented
response and the "store it securely" warning are fiction, and the Client
Credentials section is unusable with a DCR client. PKCE is mandatory,
not "recommended". Batch limit is 200, not 60 (`QUERY_MAX_RECORDS =
200`), making the derived throughput estimates ~3.3x off.

**Contributor onboarding teaches removed APIs.** `queue.mdx`,
`hotkeys.mdx` and `feature-flags.mdx` are wrong at essentially every
step. Documented nx targets `twenty-server:database:migrate:prod`,
`twenty-server:test:unit` and `npx nx start` aren't real targets and
fail outright. `local-setup.mdx` never mentions
`packages/twenty-utils/setup-dev-env.sh`, the supported entry point.
Both style guides teach the `${({ theme }) => ...}` pattern, which now
returns **zero** hits in twenty-front against 929 files using
`themeCssVariables`. `frontend-commands.mdx` still lists Craco; the
frontend is Vite.

**SSO configuration is substantially fiction.** Twenty supports exactly
two protocols, OIDC and SAML. The docs omit OIDC entirely, present
Google Workspace and Microsoft Entra ID (separate social-login toggles)
as SSO providers, list configuration fields matching neither form, and
instruct the reader to click a **Test Configuration** button that exists
nowhere in the codebase.

**Data model.** The field-type table documents two types that don't
exist (`Domain`, `Long Text`) and omits three users can actually pick
(`Files`, `Full Name`, `Rich Text`). The filter-operator table is wrong
for every field type listed: Text has none of its four documented
operators, Date is missing six of nine.

**Import guidance that fails silently.** `DD/MM/YYYY` is documented as
supported; import uses plain `new Date(value)`, so `15/03/2024` is
always rejected and `03/15/2024` always read US-style — and the sibling
`fix-import-errors.mdx` says the opposite. The company sample CSV is
unusable as written (`Domain / Domain Label` headers don't exist; real
ones are `Domain Name / Link Label`).

### Priority 2: shipped features documented as unavailable

This is the specific complaint in the feedback. Each is a one-line fix.

| Documented as | Reality |
|---|---|
| AI Agent action "Coming soon" (2 pages) |
`WorkflowActionType.AI_AGENT` ships, in the picker, no feature flag |
| "There is no built-in if/else logic" (2 pages) |
`WorkflowActionType.IF_ELSE` ships |
| Webhook event filtering "may be added in future releases" (2 pages) |
per-webhook `operations` array with `*.created` / `person.*` / `*.*`
wildcards |
| Many-to-many "coming in H2 2026" | Junction Relations shipped as
public beta; Twenty's own how-to documents it |
| Email campaigns "available soon" (2 pages) | MessageCampaign object,
send/stats jobs, unsubscribe topics all ship |
| CC/BCC "not yet available" | exists on Send Email |
| Workflow retry "on our roadmap" | run-level retry command plus
per-step `retryOnFailure` |
| front-components limitations table | `getBoundingClientRect`,
`offset*`/`client*`/`scroll*`, `getComputedStyle`, `getElementById` all
polyfilled |
| Node SDK "does not exist" | `twenty-client-sdk@2.27.0` ships and is
documented elsewhere in these docs |

Four "coming soon" claims were checked and are **still accurate** —
webhook trigger authentication, dashboard-level filters, dashboard
timezone, background-job priority. Leave them.

One needs rewording rather than promotion: **gauge charts** are
described as on the roadmap, but the upgrade command
`2-3-workspace-command-...-delete-gauge-widgets` says support was
*removed*.

### Priority 3: structural

**30 orphaned pages remain** after the twenty-ui deletion: 15 of 18
`developers/contribute/*`, all 6 `user-guide/getting-started/*`, plus
`self-host.mdx`, `key-rotation.mdx`, `extend.mdx`,
`views-pipelines/overview.mdx`, `ai/capabilities/mcp.mdx`,
`data-migration/how-tos/export-faq.mdx`,
`extend/capabilities/{apis,webhooks}.mdx`. Each needs an explicit
decision: re-add, or delete plus redirect. Two look worth re-adding
rather than deleting — `user-guide/ai/capabilities/mcp.mdx` is accurate,
documents a shipped feature that's a plan line-item, and is reachable
only via a legacy redirect; `views-pipelines/overview.mdx` is linked
from three in-nav pages.
`user-guide/getting-started/capabilities/implementation-services.mdx`
must be merged rather than deleted, since three in-nav pages deep-link
it.

**Duplicate pages.** `getting-started/core-concepts/glossary.mdx` and
`user-guide/getting-started/capabilities/glossary.mdx` are 99%
identical. `developers/extend/webhooks.mdx` and
`developers/extend/capabilities/webhooks.mdx` are 88% identical and
carry the same wrong payload. `workflow-branches.mdx` and
`use-branches-in-workflows.mdx` are both in the sidebar and give
*contradictory* branch-creation instructions.

**Other.** 44 pages have no frontmatter `description`. The Russian
locale is 14 pages behind every other locale, including the entire
document-generator tutorial.

### Still needs a human owner

The legal FAQ promises breach notification "within 48 hours" while
clause 4.6 of the generated DPA (`dpa-template.constant.ts:178`) targets
72. Per direction, the docs keep 48h — a stricter public commitment than
the contract is a deliberate choice — but the DPA and the docs still
disagree, and someone owning the DPA should decide which moves.

Claims about SOC 2, GDPR attestation, backup cadence and AI-training use
could not be substantiated from the repository either way and need the
same treatment.

### Preventing recurrence

Three cheap guards would have caught most of the 75 criticals:

- **A CI check** that every navigation page resolves, every internal
link and image resolves, and no `.mdx` outside `l/` is orphaned. Catches
the entire structural third. This PR leaves the docs in a state where
such a check would pass.
- **Generate the volatile tables from their source enums** — field
types, workflow actions and triggers, filter operands, permission flags,
chart types, env vars — rather than hand-maintaining them. These
accounted for a large share of the major findings.
- **Treat "coming soon" as an expiring assertion**: tag each with the
symbol it depends on and fail the docs build when that symbol appears in
code.

## Suggested order for the rest

1. Workflow variable syntax across the 12 tutorial pages — largest
cluster, mechanical, most directly matches the feedback.
2. Self-host backup/restore/troubleshooting commands — highest blast
radius per reader.
3. Webhook payload and OAuth endpoints — blocks integrators.
4. The nine "coming soon" claims — one line each, and the most visible
form of "docs don't reflect the latest release".
5. Decide the 30 remaining orphans.

## Test plan

- [x] Every internal link and image reference in the docs resolves
- [x] All 171 navigation entries resolve to a file on disk
- [x] No `docs.json` redirect destination is dead
- [x] No inbound links to the deleted `twenty-ui` pages remain
- [x] `docs.json` structure intact after edit (138 redirects, 14
languages)
- [ ] Visual check of the self-hosting SMTP tabs once the docs preview
builds

---
_Generated by [Claude
Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01AnUNYYdkN3PMTPb2m6CnqC)_

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23616?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
2026-07-31 07:13:56 +00:00
github-actions[bot] 7a9b32e662 i18n - docs translations (#23608)
Created by Github action

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-30 20:58:37 +02:00
github-actions[bot] c17cb49fb9 i18n - docs translations (#23602)
Created by Github action

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-30 19:02:19 +02:00
BOHEUS cc8fac46c3 Add licensing section to legal FAQ (#23560)
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23560?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
2026-07-30 18:36:22 +02:00
github-actions[bot] 550aeafd90 i18n - docs translations (#23589)
Created by Github action

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-30 17:20:41 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 2be01df271 docs: state v1.23 as prerequisite for cross-version upgrades (#23575)
Fixes #23568

The upgrade guide stated v1.22 was enough before jumping to a 2.x
release. In practice that path fails during the workspace migration with
`column ViewSortEntity.subFieldName does not exist`. Going through v1.23
first works.

Changes in
`packages/twenty-docs/developers/self-host/capabilities/upgrade-guide.mdx`:
- Cross-version upgrade section now says v1.23+ instead of v1.22+,
example updated to v1.23 -> v2.0
- "Before v1.22" section renamed to "Before v1.23" and its instructions
updated

Only the English source is edited, the `l/<locale>/` copies are
Crowdin-managed and will resync.

Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul.rastoin@gmail.com>
2026-07-30 14:22:55 +00:00
martmull 65155fe50c feat(apps): add enqueueJob to run a logic function on the workers (#23527)
Closes twentyhq/core-team-issues#2742

A logic function run is capped by its own `timeoutSeconds` (900s max),
so anything that can't finish in one run — a full re-sync, a per-record
fan-out, a rate-limited third-party API — had no way to continue. This
adds a way to hand that work to the workers.

## What it looks like for an app author

```ts
import { enqueueJob } from 'twenty-sdk/logic-function';

await enqueueJob({
  logicFunctionUniversalIdentifier: '9f1c3d7e-51b8-4a29-8f0d-7c4e2a6b1d33',
  payload: { cursor: nextCursor },
  retryLimit: 3,
  priority: 2,
  delayMs: 60_000,
});
```

The target runs in its own process with its own timeout budget. The
classic shape is a function that enqueues *itself* with the next cursor
until there is nothing left.

## Changes

**twenty-shared** — `EnqueueJobInput` / `EnqueueJobOptions` /
`EnqueueJobResult` in `application`.

**twenty-server** — new `application-job` module under
`core-modules/application`, following the `application-key-value`
pattern:
- `enqueueJob` mutation on the metadata API, `@AuthApplication`-scoped
- the lookup is scoped to `applicationId` + `workspaceId` — that's the
authorization boundary, an app can only enqueue its own logic functions,
anything else is `LOGIC_FUNCTION_NOT_FOUND`
- pushes a `LogicFunctionTriggerJob` onto the existing
`logicFunctionQueue`, so the enqueued run goes through the same executor
(and the same execution throttling) as every other trigger
- the queued run inherits the caller's `userId`/`userWorkspaceId`, so
its app access token carries the same permissions as the function that
queued it

**Job options** are range-checked via `ResolverValidationPipe`, since
the values come from application code and an unbounded delay or retry
count would let an app pin work in the shared queue:

| Option | Default | Range |
|--------|---------|-------|
| `retryLimit` | `0` | `0`–`10` |
| `priority` | queue default | `1`–`10` (lower first) |
| `delayMs` | `0` | `0`–7 days |

`retryLimit` defaults to `0` rather than inheriting the server-route
path's `3`: retries re-run the whole handler, so opting in should be the
author's explicit choice.

**twenty-sdk** — `enqueueJob` in `twenty-sdk/logic-function`, same shape
as `runAgent`/`kv`.

**Docs** — new "Background Jobs" page under Extend → Apps → Logic, plus
nav and overview entries.

**Generated** — regenerated `twenty-front/src/generated-metadata` and
`twenty-client-sdk/src/metadata/generated` for the new mutation.

## Tests

- `application-job.service.spec.ts` — 5 unit tests: job options mapping,
defaults, acting-user propagation, application-scoped lookup, not-found
- `enqueue-job.integration-spec.ts` — 5 integration tests: rejects a
non-`APPLICATION_ACCESS` token, enqueues a function the app owns,
rejects a function owned by another application, rejects an unknown
identifier, rejects out-of-range options

All green locally, along with `typecheck` for
`twenty-server`/`twenty-sdk` and oxlint/oxfmt on the touched files.

## Notes for review

- The target is addressed by `universalIdentifier`, matching `runAgent({
agentUniversalIdentifier })` and
`ServerRouteDispatchResult.targetLogicFunctionUniversalIdentifier`.
Addressing by `name` would be friendlier, but logic function names
aren't validated for uniqueness within an app — happy to add it as a
convenience if you'd rather.
- `enqueueJob` returns as soon as the job is accepted; it can't return
the target's result, since the queue driver's `add` returns void.
Documented, with a pointer to the KV store for handing results back.

---
_Generated by [Claude
Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01QrYvGonS3HMdeuMAVjs5hR)_

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23527?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->

---------

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-30 14:20:34 +00:00
github-actions[bot] cdeebb1a18 i18n - docs translations (#23559)
Created by Github action

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-30 13:09:47 +02:00
github-actions[bot] 9a1a057d8f i18n - docs translations (#23555)
Created by Github action

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23555?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-30 11:35:44 +02:00
Raphaël Bosi 40dd01c47d Document current front component limitations (#23549)
Front components are still under active development, but the docs did
not say so, and two of the three field reports we got on Discord were
misdiagnosed because the sandbox fails silently.

Adds a "Current limitations" section to the front components page
covering layout measurement, DOM access, events, CSS scoping, storage
and network, with the workaround for each. Also corrects the testing
page, which claimed front components get "browser APIs" when the sandbox
only implements a partial DOM.

Every limitation was checked against the code rather than copied from
the roadmap, which turned up a few stale entries: CSS imports work,
`aria-*`/`data-*` now cross, and `MutationObserver` throws on
`.observe()` rather than silently never firing.

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23549?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
2026-07-30 09:01:35 +00:00
github-actions[bot] 58ebbe0394 i18n - docs translations (#23523)
Created by Github action

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23523?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-29 18:54:49 +02:00
github-actions[bot] 8707ebb7ac i18n - docs translations (#23515)
Created by Github action

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-29 17:23:57 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 4ec65ed08d System view tooling explicit params key naming (#23506)
# Introduction
View field system always result from a field existence, the application
universal identifier should be the related field one
Same but for views and object

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23506?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
2026-07-29 14:33:40 +00:00
Paul Rastoin 0c545bcdeb [BREAKING-CHANGE] Centralize system View viewField side effect (#23081)
# Introduction

Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/2669

Part of the `isSystemSideEffect` engine-ownership effort. Until now, a
custom object's default **INDEX** table view (`All {objectLabelPlural}`)
and its view fields were built imperatively in `ObjectMetadataService`
with random `v4()` identifiers, while `twenty-standard` authored its own
copies with hardcoded literals. The two never converged, an object
rename could drift the view, and nothing marked these rows as
engine-owned.

This PR makes the metadata side-effect engine the **single owner** of
the INDEX view and its view fields, on name-free deterministic
identifiers, for custom and standard objects alike.

## Core design

- **Name-free deterministic identity.** The INDEX view identifier
derives from `object identifier + ViewKey.INDEX`
(`getSystemViewUniversalIdentifier`); each view-field identifier derives
from `view identifier + field identifier`
(`getViewFieldUniversalIdentifier`). An object rename (with a pinned
object identifier) keeps the same view, losslessly.
- **`isSystemSideEffect: true` is provenance.** Every INDEX view / view
field the engine emits is flagged system-owned, so manifest deletion
inference never drops it. The flag follows the view: a view field
inherits its parent view's flag.
- **The engine is the sole owner of the INDEX view.** It always emits
it; a caller providing one with the same derived identifier is a genuine
conflict surfaced by the engine's reserved-identifier collision, not
silently deferred.

## Changes

### Shared (`twenty-shared`)

- `getIndexViewUniversalIdentifier` →
`getSystemViewUniversalIdentifier`, now taking a `viewKey` (generalizes
to any singleton engine-owned view).
- Standard field identifiers extracted into a new
`STANDARD_OBJECT_FIELDS` constant, so both an object's `fields` and its
INDEX view read the same field identifiers.
- `buildStandardObjectIndexView` derives the standard INDEX view +
view-field identifiers from `STANDARD_OBJECT_FIELDS`, replacing the
hardcoded literals in `standard-object.constant.ts`.

### Metadata side-effect engine (custom objects)

- **`objectSystemFieldsAndIndexViewOnCreate`** (replaces
`objectSystemFieldsOnCreate`): on object creation, provisions the 7
reserved system fields **and** the INDEX view with one view field per
displayable system field, all `isSystemSideEffect: true`.
- **`fieldIndexViewFieldOnCreate`** (new): on field creation, provisions
the field's INDEX view field. Object created in the same batch →
visible, positioned before the system view fields; pre-existing object →
hidden, appended (preserving the historical `createOneField` behavior).
Both branches resolve the INDEX view by its derived identifier (single
map access, never a scan).
- **`fieldSystemViewFieldsOnDelete`** (new): on field deletion,
cascade-deletes every engine-owned view field displaying it.
- **`objectSystemSideEffectsOnDelete`** (extended): now also
cascade-deletes the object's engine-owned views and their view fields
(in addition to system fields, indexes, searchFieldMetadata). Every
lookup walks a foreign-key aggregator down from the deleted object, so
the work is proportional to what the object owns, never to workspace
size.
- Object-create and field-create positions are derived from the same
caller-input field list, so the INDEX view layout is contiguous with no
handler-ordering dependency.
- `view` / `viewField` added to the side-effect companion metadata names
for `fieldMetadata` and `objectMetadata`.

### Reserved-identifier invariant

A caller can never define an entity whose identifier collides with one a
system side effect produces: caller inputs are forced
`isSystemSideEffect: false` at every entry point (API and app-manifest
transpilers), and the engine raises
`RESERVED_SYSTEM_UNIVERSAL_IDENTIFIER`, aborting the operation, when a
system emission lands on a caller-claimed identifier. Covered by a new
engine-level test.

### Caller-side provisioning removed

The imperative INDEX view + view-field provisioning is removed from
`ObjectMetadataService.createOneObject`. The record-page `FIELDS_WIDGET`
view is intentionally left caller-side and deferred to the follow-up
(see below).

### `twenty-standard` convergence

Standard INDEX views and their view fields converge on the same
derived-identifier + `isSystemSideEffect: true` scheme as the engine.
`twenty-standard` syncs through the from/to migration path (which never
runs the side-effect engine), so it authors this INDEX surface itself,
matching what the engine produces for custom objects.

## Rollout

Two `2.26.0` workspace commands, running after the `2.25`
messageCampaign commands:

- `upgrade:2-26:reconcile-index-view-universal-identifier` re-owns the
INDEX views of the **twenty-standard and workspace-custom applications**
and all their view fields to the derived identifiers with
`isSystemSideEffect: true`, in a single per-workspace transaction. Each
view field identifier is keyed on the application of the **displayed
field** (an app or user column on a standard INDEX view converges too).
Soft-deleted views and view fields are skipped: one can coexist with an
active successor on the same derivation inputs and both would derive the
same identifier. Children reference the view by primary key, so the
re-own is lossless.
- `upgrade:2-26:demote-and-backfill-application-index-view` handles
**manifest-installed applications**, which never had their INDEX view
auto-provisioned: every caller-authored INDEX view of another
application is demoted to `key: null` (a plain additional view under its
manifest identifier), then every application object gets the
engine-owned INDEX view and its full view-field layout backfilled
through the migration pipeline's legacy path (no side-effect expansion),
views committed before view fields across applications since a view
field belongs to the application owning its field. Idempotent and
retry-safe: engine-owned INDEX views are neither demoted nor
re-backfilled, and view creation and view-field creation are gated
independently, so a retry after a partial failure still backfills the
missing view fields of an already-committed view.

Both support `--dry-run` and invalidate the full flat-maps closure
(parents aggregate the re-owned identifiers, children resolve them as
universal foreign keys, and page-layout widget universal configurations
resolve view PKs at cache-build time).

The `2.25` `upgrade:2-25:add-message-campaign-name-field` command is
adapted to resolve the campaign INDEX view by its INDEX key on the
object instead of by universal identifier: it now runs before the
reconcile, on workspaces still holding legacy identifiers.

## ⚠️ Breaking change

This PR **mutates 187 previously hardcoded universal identifiers** — the
standard objects' INDEX views and their view fields (the literals
removed from `standard-object.constant.ts`), now derived.

- **Handled by the `2.26` commands above** for all existing workspaces.
- **The INDEX key is now engine-reserved.** The flat view validator
rejects caller-created INDEX views (API and manifest inputs are forced
`isSystemSideEffect: false`) and enforces a single non-deleted INDEX
view per object; `view.key` is no longer a comparable/updatable
property, so no writer can promote or demote a view after creation.
`ViewManifest.key` is deprecated and ignored (manifest views are always
additional views, so old apps keep syncing and demoted views are not
promoted back); the REST/GraphQL create path now rejects `key: INDEX`.
In-repo example apps (`hello-world`, `document-generator`) no longer
declare it.
- **12 declared-but-never-seeded standard INDEX view field identifiers
deleted** (the former `preservedViewFields` on `timelineActivity`,
`workflowRun` and `workspaceMember`): after the reconcile, no workspace
row references them.
- **`computeFlatViewFieldsToCreate` now derives view field identifiers**
instead of drawing `v4()` ones, which also changes what the committed
`1-23` record-page backfill produces going forward (deliberate,
documented in-code).
- **Record-page views and view fields are not affected** (identifiers
unchanged).
- **In-repo apps: `twenty-last-contact` updated.** It was the only app
declaring explicit INDEX view fields (10 columns across `allPeople` /
`allCompanies` / `allOpportunities`) through manifest `viewFields`.
Those target identifiers are now engine-owned and derived, so the
manifest inputs no longer resolve and install failed with `View not
found`. The app now declares only its fields; the engine's
`fieldIndexViewFieldOnCreate` provisions the matching INDEX view field
automatically. No other app under `packages/twenty-apps` references any
of the 187 mutated identifiers, and apps that target standard views
point at record-page views (e.g. `real-estate` →
`opportunityRecordPageFields`) or their own objects (`twenty-partners`),
all unchanged.

### Loss of granularity for app maintainers

The engine now owns the INDEX view field of every field a caller adds to
an object, so app maintainers lose direct control over those columns.
Previously an app could target the engine-owned INDEX view with an
explicit manifest `viewField` and set its `position` and `isVisible`.
Now `fieldIndexViewFieldOnCreate` appends a **hidden** view field in
caller-input order on field creation, so:

- Columns an app previously showed at a **dedicated position** and
**visible** (e.g. `twenty-last-contact`'s last-contact columns) become
**hidden** and **appended in input order** after install.
- There is currently **no manifest way to override** the
engine-provisioned INDEX view field's position, visibility, or size.

This is a deliberate regression accepted for the sake of
single-ownership, and app maintainers should expect their INDEX columns
to move/hide after upgrading. A follow-up override API will let
maintainers reclaim per-field control over the engine-provisioned INDEX
view field.

## Testing

- Unit specs for each handler: object create (system fields + INDEX
view/view fields, override, position offset), field create (same-batch
vs existing-object, non-displayable noop, no-INDEX-view noop), field
delete, object delete (fields/indexes/searchFieldMetadata/views/view
fields cascade, reverse-relation view field on another object).
- Engine-level test for the reserved-identifier collision.
- `twenty-standard` guard test that its INDEX views/view fields stay on
the derived scheme and stay system-owned.
- Integration test: full engine provisioning of the INDEX view/view
fields on object creation, same view id preserved across an object
rename, and cascade delete on object deletion.

## Follow-up

The full record-page stack (record-page view, its view fields, view
field groups, page layout / tab / widget) is still built imperatively
and moves into the engine in
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/2721.
2026-07-29 13:32:21 +00:00
github-actions[bot] 2304d19c8e i18n - docs translations (#23483)
Created by Github action

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23483?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-29 11:34:30 +02:00
BOHEUS 6d60fac92f Dashboard doc fix (#23475)
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23475?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
2026-07-29 08:46:26 +00:00
github-actions[bot] 3e9e75e774 i18n - docs translations (#23466)
Created by Github action

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-29 00:41:50 +02:00
github-actions[bot] f84f242f9d i18n - docs translations (#23460)
Created by Github action

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23460?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-28 22:55:47 +02:00
github-actions[bot] 5b10869a2b i18n - docs translations (#23455)
Created by Github action

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-28 21:00:14 +02:00
github-actions[bot] 9acc5c192f i18n - docs translations (#23452)
Created by Github action

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23452?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-28 19:20:40 +02:00
BOHEUS e5ac9f5b8b Docs update (#23429)
Follow-up based on comments from
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23266

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23429?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: cubic-dev-ai[bot] <191113872+cubic-dev-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-28 16:37:49 +00:00
github-actions[bot] 30aee1dee5 i18n - docs translations (#23389)
Created by Github action

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23389?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-27 21:03:52 +02:00
github-actions[bot] bd5d5a3c4e i18n - docs translations (#23381)
Created by Github action

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-27 19:16:50 +02:00
BOHEUS 975b5c256c Documentation update ( Legal FAQ and more ) (#23266)
New legal section and minor fixes

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23266?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
2026-07-27 16:47:22 +00:00
Paul Rastoin 68b26f00ba Type PageLayout manifest type prop with PageLayoutType (#23375)
Closes #23373

`PageLayoutManifest.type` was typed as `string`, so `definePageLayout({
type: 'NOT_A_VALID_PAGE_LAYOUT_TYPE' })` compiled fine.

It is now typed as `` `${PageLayoutType}` ``, which rejects arbitrary
strings while keeping both forms assignable:

```ts
type: PageLayoutType.STANDALONE_PAGE
type: 'STANDALONE_PAGE'
```

A string enum member is assignable to its own literal type, so ``
PageLayoutType | `${PageLayoutType}` `` would have been the same type as
`` `${PageLayoutType}` `` alone. Going the other way (`type:
PageLayoutType` on its own) is strictly narrower and would break every
app manifest in `packages/twenty-apps` plus the `create-twenty-app`
template, which all pass raw strings.
2026-07-27 16:45:10 +00:00
github-actions[bot] ad3291f4b4 i18n - docs translations (#23338)
Created by Github action

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23338?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-27 09:46:37 +02:00
martmull 4f9fd6f674 feat(applications): restore the application custom settings tab (#23256)
## Summary

Restores the application **custom settings tab** feature that was
removed in #22156. This reverts that removal so applications can again
expose a custom settings tab via a front component.

## Changes

- Restore the `SettingsApplicationCustomTab` component and its tab
entry/rendering in `SettingsApplicationDetails`.
- `ApplicationManifestMigrationService` syncs
`settingsCustomTabFrontComponent` from application manifests again
(`syncDefaultRoleAndSettingsCustomTab`), resolving the front component
from `settingsCustomTabFrontComponentUniversalIdentifier`.
- Remove the deprecation annotations added by #22156:
- `ApplicationDTO.settingsCustomTabFrontComponentId` (drop GraphQL
`@deprecated`)
-
`ApplicationManifest.settingsCustomTabFrontComponentUniversalIdentifier`
- the `settingsCustomTabFrontComponentId` column comment on
`ApplicationEntity`
- Regenerate the corresponding GraphQL schema/types to drop the
`@deprecated` reason.

The DB column was never dropped, so no schema migration is required.


---
_Generated by [Claude
Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01A6aoLa5kZjba9C3uwo6nay)_

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23256?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
2026-07-27 06:52:04 +00:00
github-actions[bot] 8326fd186f i18n - docs translations (#23324)
Created by Github action

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-26 20:51:07 +02:00
martmull 1ee08ff92b docs: set correct credit cost for workflow steps and app logic functions (#23297)
The Credits page listed the app logic function row as "A small fraction
of a credit / Thousands per credit", which understates the rate.

A workflow step and a logic function run each cost a flat 100
micro-credits (`workflow-executor.workspace-service.ts:353`,
`logic-function-executor.service.ts:536`), i.e. $0.0001, or 10,000 runs
per credit. Since the two rows carried the same rate stated twice,
they're merged into one.

Also adds a note that Call Recorder and Last contact don't consume
credits for their logic function runs. They're in
`MARKETPLACE_BILLING_EXEMPT_UNIVERSAL_IDENTIFIERS`, which is 2 of the 3
apps currently in `MARKETPLACE_VETTED_APPLICATIONS`. The note is
explicit that the exemption covers only the per-run charge, since those
apps still bill metered work (recorded call minutes) through
`chargeCredits`.

## Test plan

Docs-only change. Rates cross-checked against
`workflow-executor.workspace-service.ts` and
`logic-function-executor.service.ts`; the exempt list against
`marketplace-billing-exempt-applications.constant.ts` and
`marketplace-vetted-applications.constant.ts`.

Co-authored-by: Martin <martin@twenty.com>
2026-07-26 16:53:49 +00:00
github-actions[bot] ab3d921218 i18n - docs translations (#23292)
Created by Github action

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23292?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-24 19:05:04 +02:00
Félix Malfait 6cc7ed7570 Make solo tabs first-class: derived presentation, native editing, unified widget header (#23109)
## Why

Full-page record tabs (Timeline, Tasks, Notes, Files, Emails, Calendar,
Flow) were encoded by storing a `CANVAS` layout mode. That made them a
separate species: editing one didn't feel native (no drag handles, no
way to add a second widget, the tab couldn't adapt), and the widget
pipeline was full of `layoutMode === CANVAS` branches.

This PR replaces the stored mode with two derived rules and one unified
header grammar:

> **Presentation is derived from content, never stored.**
> A list tab with exactly **one widget** renders it **solo**
(full-bleed, it owns the tab). Anything else is a **stack** of boxed
cards. **Edit mode always shows the stack structure.**

No widget taxonomy, no per-type branches: any lone widget owns its tab.

## What

**Presentation model**
- `getTabPresentation({ widgets, layoutMode, isInEditMode })`: solo iff
a list tab has exactly one widget in view mode; grid tabs (dashboards)
and edit mode are always stacks. The pinned left panel is always a
column (a surface rule, not a widget rule).
- Solo view rendering is identical to the old CANVAS rendering
(container height, internal scroll).
- Stacked widgets in the main tab area get one bounded slot rule
(`max-height` + own scroll) so no widget swallows the tab;
pinned/side-column stacks keep their flowing behavior. This only binds
on user-composed mixed tabs, which could not exist before.

**Native editing (the point of the PR)**
- Every record-page tab is edited through the same vertical-list editor:
drag handle, reorder, remove, add widget. Add a second widget to a
Timeline tab and it becomes a stack; remove back down to one and it's
solo again. Nothing is stored, nothing to migrate.
- Fixes the stuck-drag bug found while testing the preview: widgets
publishing header info republished a fresh object on every render
(activity cards build their action from non-memoized hook returns), and
since the widget chrome reads that state above the widget content, any
tab with an activity card sat in an infinite render loop. The loop
starved React's transition lane, which dnd-kit's drop teardown waits on,
so the drag clone and drop outlines froze on screen after a drop. The
header hook now republishes only on real value changes and routes
onClick through a stable wrapper, so callers need no memoization. The
page-layout drag provider also disables the Feedback drop animation so
clone cleanup is synchronous at drop time.

**Unified widget header API**
- A widget's content can publish header info to its chrome via
`usePublishWidgetHeaderInfo({ count, primaryAction })`: a count rendered
in grey next to the title, and a primary action (icon button with
accessible name) on the right in view mode. Instance-scoped state keyed
by widget id, so third-party widgets (front components) can use the same
seam later; the hook no-ops outside a page layout (stories, previews)
and is safe to call with inline, non-memoized values.
- A solo widget's header only appears when the widget published
something: the tab label already names it, so a bare title row adds
nothing. Timeline/Flow tabs stay exactly as today.
- Emails, Tasks, Notes, Files, Calendar publish their count (query
totals, not loaded-page lengths) and action (Compose, New task, New
note, Add file) and stop rendering internal title rows ("Inbox 12", "All
5"): exactly one header per widget everywhere, same grammar.
`ComposeEmailButton`, `AddTaskButton` and the title/button plumbing in
`NoteList`/`AttachmentList`/`TaskList` are deleted.

**Object-aware tabs**
- The hardcoded `SYSTEM_OBJECT_TABS` title allowlist is gone. A tab
renders based on whether the target object supports its widgets: widgets
that read through a relation (Tasks, Notes, Files, Timeline) require the
relation field to exist and be active, while Emails and Calendar
aggregate through the messaging timeline, so a missing participants
relation is fine (Company) and a deactivated one is an explicit opt-out.
System objects on the shared default layout keep exactly Home +
Timeline, now by derivation instead of hardcoded titles.

**Data cleanup**
- Seeds (frontend defaults, server standard template, `twenty app`
scaffolder, docs) write `VERTICAL_LIST`;
`PageLayoutTabLayoutMode.CANVAS` is `@deprecated`, kept read-only for
layouts persisted before this change (they render correctly through the
derivation; no data migration, by design: an in-place flip can't pass
the widget-position/tab-layoutMode validator atomically, and it isn't
needed).
- Locale catalogs are intentionally untouched: the i18n pipeline
extracts and translates the new header labels on main; they fall back to
their English source until then.

## Deliberate view-mode changes (approved)

- A lone widget of any type now owns its tab full-bleed: lone Fields tab
(mobile/side panel), lone rich-text Note tab, lone chart, and the
message-thread page lose their card box.
- Activity tabs show the unified header (title, grey count, + action)
instead of their internal "Inbox 12"-style rows.

Everything else is pixel-parity, including solo scroll behavior and
dashboards.

## Test plan
- `nx typecheck twenty-front` / `twenty-server`: clean; oxlint/oxfmt on
the changeset: clean
- 239 suites / 1474 tests across page-layout, activities, side-panel
pass, including new tests for `getTabPresentation` (count-based,
edit-mode override) and `usePublishWidgetHeaderInfo` (publish, cleanup
on unmount, no-op outside a widget, referential stability across
re-renders with inline actions, latest-onClick wrapper)
- `getTabsRenderableForTargetObject` tests covering missing vs
deactivated relations, Emails/Calendar without a participants relation,
and non-relation widgets
- Stuck-drag repro verified fixed end to end against a local stack with
an instrumented dnd-kit: before the fix the affected tab committed ~65
renders/second at idle and drops never tore down; after it, idle commits
are flat and every drop cleans up
2026-07-24 15:02:02 +00:00
github-actions[bot] ae2c8978d1 i18n - docs translations (#23258)
Created by Github action

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-24 13:12:20 +02:00
github-actions[bot] a3a6a55051 i18n - docs translations (#23250)
Created by Github action

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-24 11:26:33 +02:00
martmull fb52635d2a Add defineUninstallLogicFunction hook for applications (#23227) 2026-07-24 10:41:22 +02:00
github-actions[bot] d1b556f4a8 i18n - docs translations (#23244)
Created by Github action

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23244?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-24 09:30:24 +02:00
Abdul Rahman 148dc6dfaa Let server route resolvers answer the caller synchronously (#23233)
## Problem

A server route resolver can only return a dispatch target (`{
workspaceId, targetLogicFunctionUniversalIdentifier, payload }`), and
`ServerRouteTriggerService` always acks `202 {queued:true}`. The target
function runs off the queue, after the response has been sent, so its
return value can never reach the caller.

That makes it impossible to integrate a provider whose webhook URL has
to be proven with a handshake on the same response. Slack's Events API
is the case that surfaced it: `url_verification` sends `{ type,
challenge }` and will not accept the Request URL unless the challenge
comes back on that POST.

## Change

A resolver may now return a `Response` (the existing
`LogicFunctionHttpResponse`) instead of a dispatch target. The route
sends it as-is via `buildRouteTriggerResponse` and enqueues nothing.

- Reuses the marker and builder that HTTP route triggers already use, so
there is no new response shape.
- Dispatch results behave exactly as before; the resolver error path is
unchanged, just hoisted out of `parseResolverResult` so it runs before
the branch.
- SDK: `ServerRouteResolverResult` becomes `ServerRouteDispatchResult |
LogicFunctionHttpResponse`.

Additive: a resolver that returns a dispatch target sees no behavior
change. Previously, returning this shape threw
`RESOLVER_INVALID_RESULT`.

## Testing

`server-route-trigger.service.spec.ts` gains a case asserting the
resolver's response is sent verbatim and nothing is enqueued. 15/15
pass.

## Context

Split out of #22984 (Slack conversational assistant), which needs this
to complete the Slack Events URL verification. That PR depends on this
one merging first.

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23233?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
2026-07-24 08:56:34 +02:00
github-actions[bot] f52643d170 i18n - docs translations (#23186)
Created by Github action

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-22 19:03:33 +02:00
Abdul Rahman 04d1c2035c feat(connections): run a logic function on connection provider connect (#23167)
## What

Adds an optional `onConnectLogicFunctionUniversalIdentifier` field to
the connection provider manifest. When set, the referenced logic
function is dispatched right after an OAuth connection is successfully
established for that provider.

This gives apps a first-class "on connect" hook — e.g. the Slack app can
resolve the workspace's `team_id` via `auth.test` and claim the `team_id
-> workspaceId` mapping in the SERVER key-value store immediately on
connect, instead of racing against later events.

Follow-up to the app key-value store PR (#23089).

## How

- **twenty-shared**: add `onConnectLogicFunctionUniversalIdentifier` to
`ConnectionProviderManifest`.
- **twenty-sdk**: expose the field in `defineConnectionProvider` and
validate it is a UUID `universalIdentifier`.
- **twenty-server**:
- add a nullable `onConnectLogicFunctionUniversalIdentifier` column to
`ConnectionProviderEntity` (+ fast instance command / migration).
  - map the field through the

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23167?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
2026-07-22 17:38:01 +02:00
github-actions[bot] 50ec77daf8 i18n - docs translations (#23179)
Created by Github action

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23179?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-22 17:20:27 +02:00
martmull f59bda1dbf feat(server): queued-only server-route dispatch (#23134)
## Context

Follow-up to the incident where 500s and latency spiked around 6pm until
the Recall webhook was disabled. Server routes
(`/webhooks/server/:resolverUid`) ran the resolver **and** the target
logic function synchronously inside the API request, so any handler
throw became a 500 and any slowdown past Svix's delivery timeout marked
the delivery failed — Svix redelivered, feeding load back into the API
in a self-sustaining storm.

## What changed

- Every server-route request acks with **202 `{ queued: true }`** as
soon as the resolver returns; the target runs on `logicFunctionQueue`.
Signature verification stays synchronous in the resolver and still
rejects with a non-2xx. External senders never observe target latency or
failures.
- The resolver contract is unchanged from main: `{ workspaceId,
targetLogicFunctionUniversalIdentifier, payload? }`.
- The target lookup still happens synchronously before enqueueing,
scoped to the resolver's application registration, so unknown targets
404 as before.
- Endpoints whose caller must read the response body (challenge
handshakes, Slack commands) should use `httpRouteTriggerSettings`
routes.

Final diff is 4 files: the server-route service, its spec, the
integration spec, and the docs page. Trigger jobs, fan-out, message
queue, shared types, and SDK are all untouched.

## Tests

- `server-route-trigger.service.spec.ts`: 202 ack + enqueue,
unknown-target 404 without enqueue, resolver auth/contract/error
mapping.
- Integration: `server-route-trigger-authorization.integration-spec.ts`
asserts the 202 queued ack (run locally against a seeded DB, green).
- `typecheck` + `lint:diff-with-main` + `oxfmt` clean.

## Notes

- **Breaking for existing server-route resolvers**: responses are always
202; the target's return value no longer reaches the caller. Existing
resolvers returning response bodies must move those endpoints to
`httpRouteTriggerSettings`.
- A queued target's handler failure is recorded in execution logs but
not retried (same as other queue-executed functions today); retry
semantics are deliberately out of scope here.
- Follow-up candidates: retry-on-failure semantics for queued
executions, `addBulk` for single-round-trip fan-out, declarative
signature verification to take resolver code out of the request path,
moving the call-recorder 250s artifacts import off the API request path.
- Companion PR #23135 (call-recorder): no app change needed for dispatch
— queued dispatch applies by default.
2026-07-22 14:57:18 +02:00
github-actions[bot] 41c32a04e4 i18n - docs translations (#23162)
Created by Github action

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-22 13:17:44 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 3ee8b72aa3 twenty-sdk env var to disable prov check (#23155)
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23155?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
2026-07-22 11:51:06 +02:00
Abdul Rahman 4c4a154d31 key-value storage for applications (#23089)
## What

Key-value storage for applications, as proposed in
twentyhq/core-team-issues#2391 — built on the existing `keyValuePair`
entity:

- Nullable `applicationId` relation on `keyValuePair` + a new
`APPLICATION_VARIABLE` type (fast instance command included)
- GraphQL CRUD on the metadata schema (`appKeyValue`, `setAppKeyValue`,
`deleteAppKeyValue`), requiring an `APPLICATION_ACCESS` token —
`applicationId` always comes from the token, never from arguments, so
apps can't touch each other's entries
- `kv.get` / `kv.set` / `kv.delete` helpers in
`twenty-sdk/logic-function`

## Scopes

- **`INSTALL`** (default): entries are private to one workspace install;
arbitrary JSON values
- **`GLOBAL`**: entries are shared across every install of the app, with
claim semantics — the value is always the claiming `workspaceId` and
only that workspace can overwrite or delete the key (guarded writes,
race-safe via insert-if-absent)

Since `applicationId` identifies an install (one row per workspace),
GLOBAL entries are stored under the registration owner workspace's
install so all installs of the same app share one namespace.

The GLOBAL scope is what enables cross-workspace webhook routing: e.g.
the Slack app's `serverRoute` resolver (running in the owner workspace)
can resolve `kv.get('slack:team:' + team_id, { scope: 'GLOBAL' })` to
find the workspace that connected that Slack team — without a workspace
being able to hijack another's mapping.

## Follow-ups

- Wire the Slack assistant PR (#22984) to write the claim at connect
time and read it in the events resolver
- `kv.*` access from front components

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23089?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
2026-07-22 11:19:44 +02:00
github-actions[bot] c503d4c4aa i18n - docs translations (#23136)
Created by Github action

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-21 20:59:03 +02:00
github-actions[bot] 9742c21a99 i18n - docs translations (#23125)
Created by Github action

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23125?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->

Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
2026-07-21 18:58:59 +02:00