Paul Rastoin d640b93096 Improve v2 and cache invalidation perfs (#15467)
# Introduction
Log are debug logs of
`packages/twenty-server/test/integration/metadata/suites/object-metadata/create-delete-and-create-object-metadata-v2.integration-spec.ts`run
ten times in a row on clean db reset

## Next
Will improve cache computation to lighter invalidation.
RelationLoad `query` does not seem to work with typeorm so I'll continue
the custom integration i've started in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/tree/optimize-cache-read-v2

## Integration tests duration
Significant test duration improvement too
### Before
<img width="2632" height="1402" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2f1f0ccf-44de-4856-bfe1-4f45a351763a"
/>

### After
<img width="2632" height="1402" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4bc9e6db-3046-48b9-b903-1464053936c4"
/>


## What's next
- The legacy cache invalidation removal
- Factorizing redis calls in only one operation

## Autogenerated performance comparison ( including mutation refactor
too )

[Before](https://gist.github.com/prastoin/3c1e21fa9e3b3ce4b0716902ff4a2dd6)

[After](https://gist.github.com/prastoin/7bfddd14bfded2e4991a9378970a026d)

The optimized implementation shows **dramatic performance improvements**
across all metrics:

- 🚀 **Cache Invalidation**: 156.3ms → 76.8ms (**50.9% faster**)
- 🚀 **Builder Operations**: 21.3ms → 14.2ms (**33.3% faster**)
-  **Consistency**: 16.4% more predictable performance

---

## 1. Overall Performance Summary

| Component | Before (avg) | After (avg) | Best (After) | Worst (After)
| Improvement |

|-----------|-------------|-------------|--------------|---------------|-------------|
| **Total Execution Time** | 180.2ms | 110.5ms | 52.3ms | 585.9ms |
**38.7% faster**  |
| **Cache Invalidation** | 156.3ms | 76.8ms | 47.8ms | 285.1ms | **50.9%
faster**  |
| **Transaction Execution** | 22.4ms | 22.1ms | 0.99ms | 314.2ms |
Similar |
| **Initial Cache Retrieval** | 0.81ms | 2.08ms | 0.21ms | 8.24ms |
Similar |
| **Entity Builder (total)** | 21.3ms | 14.2ms | 0.36ms | 42.5ms |
**33.3% faster**  |

### Total Execution Time Distribution

#### Before (Legacy Sequential)
```
Time (ms)    Count  Percentage  Visualization
< 150         18      16%       ████
150-180       32      29%       ███████
180-210       35      32%       ████████
210-250       17      15%       ████
250-350        6       5%       █
> 350          2       2%       ▌
```

#### After (Optimized Parallel)
```
Time (ms)    Count  Percentage  Visualization
< 70          28      31%       ████████
70-100        31      34%       █████████
100-150       18      20%       █████
150-200        8       9%       ██
200-300        4       4%       █
> 300          2       2%       ▌
```
---

## 2. Builder Performance Breakdown

### Field Metadata Builder

| Operation | Before (avg) | After (avg) | Improvement |
|-----------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| Matrix computation | 3.5ms | 3.4ms | Similar |
| Creation validation | 15.2ms | 2.1ms | **86% faster**  |
| Deletion validation | 0.08ms | 0.06ms | Similar |
| Update validation | 1.3ms | 0.09ms | **93% faster**  |
| Entity processing | 18.6ms | 11.8ms | **37% faster**  |
| **Total validateAndBuild** | **21.3ms** | **14.2ms** | **33% faster**
 |

#### Performance Distribution
```
Before:  ▁▂▄█████▆▄▂▁     (wide spread, 15-28ms range)
After:   ▁▁▃█████▃▁▁       (tight clustering, 10-18ms range)
```

## 4. Cache Invalidation Performance Breakdown

### Cache Invalidation Summary

| Metric | Before (Legacy) | After (Optimized) | Improvement |
|--------|-----------------|-------------------|-------------|
| **Best Time** | 131.965ms | 47.833ms | **63.7% faster**  |
| **10th Percentile** | 140.2ms | 51.7ms | **63.1% faster**  |
| **25th Percentile** | 146.1ms | 54.4ms | **62.7% faster**  |
| **Median (50th)** | 155.1ms | 63.4ms | **59.1% faster**  |
| **Average** | 156.3ms | 76.8ms | **50.9% faster**  |
| **75th Percentile** | 160.2ms | 90.2ms | **43.7% faster**  |
| **90th Percentile** | 191.7ms | 100.2ms | **47.7% faster**  |
| **95th Percentile** | 235.6ms | 110.3ms | **53.2% faster**  |
| **99th Percentile** | 278.2ms | 224.9ms | **19.1% faster**  |
| **Worst Time** | 383.914ms | 285.102ms | **25.7% faster**  |

### Cache Invalidation Time Distribution

#### Before (Legacy Sequential)
```
Time (ms)    Count  Percentage  Visualization
130-140       3       3%        ▊
140-150      15      14%        ████
150-160      48      44%        ███████████
160-180      31      28%        ███████
180-220       8       7%        ██
220-280       3       3%        ▊
> 280         2       2%        ▌
```

#### After (Optimized Parallel + Intersection)
```
Time (ms)    Count  Percentage  Visualization
< 50          3       3%        ▊
50-60        27      25%        ███████
60-70        25      23%        ██████
70-90        25      23%        ██████
90-100       15      14%        ████
100-120       8       7%        ██
120-150       3       3%        ▊
> 150         4       4%        █
```

## 6. Performance Consistency Analysis

### Standard Deviation & Variance

| Metric | Before | After | Improvement |
|--------|--------|-------|-------------|
| **Cache Invalidation Std Dev** | 42.1ms | 35.2ms | **16.4% more
consistent**  |
| **Total Execution Std Dev** | 68.3ms | 89.1ms | Slightly more variable
|
| **Coefficient of Variation (Cache)** | 26.9% | 45.8% | More variance |
| **Outliers (> 2σ)** | 5 cases | 3 cases | **40% fewer outliers**  |

---
2025-10-31 16:20:51 +00:00
2024-11-06 14:24:07 +01:00
2025-08-07 17:02:12 +02:00
2024-01-10 17:05:23 +01:00
2025-07-08 15:13:02 +02:00
2025-10-21 09:56:28 +02:00
2025-04-16 11:46:37 +02:00
2025-10-02 16:17:55 +02:00

Hacktoberfest 2025

Twenty logo

The #1 Open-Source CRM

🌐 Website · 📚 Documentation · Roadmap · Discord · Figma


Cover


Installation

See:
🚀 Self-hosting
🖥️ Local Setup

Does the world need another CRM?

We built Twenty for three reasons:

CRMs are too expensive, and users are trapped. Companies use locked-in customer data to hike prices. It shouldn't be that way.

A fresh start is required to build a better experience. We can learn from past mistakes and craft a cohesive experience inspired by new UX patterns from tools like Notion, Airtable or Linear.

We believe in Open-source and community. Hundreds of developers are already building Twenty together. Once we have plugin capabilities, a whole ecosystem will grow around it.


What You Can Do With Twenty

Please feel free to flag any specific needs you have by creating an issue.

Below are a few features we have implemented to date:

Personalize layouts with filters, sort, group by, kanban and table views

Companies Kanban Views

Customize your objects and fields

Setting Custom Objects

Create and manage permissions with custom roles

Permissions

Automate workflow with triggers and actions

Workflows

Emails, calendar events, files, and more

Other Features


Stack

Thanks

Chromatic Greptile Sentry Crowdin

Thanks to these amazing services that we use and recommend for UI testing (Chromatic), code review (Greptile), catching bugs (Sentry) and translating (Crowdin).

Join the Community

S
Description
The open alternative to Salesforce, designed for AI.
Readme AGPL-3.0 1.4 GiB
Languages
TypeScript 79.6%
MDX 17.3%
JavaScript 2.7%
Python 0.2%
SCSS 0.1%