## What this is close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/2622 A **POC / discussion branch** implementing the runner-scoped alternative to the `__warmedUpCache` design in [core-team-issues#2622](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/2622). Not for merge as-is — meant to diff against that plan. ## Problem `deriveSearchVectorAsExpressionForTsVectorField` scans the entire `flatSearchFieldMetadataMaps` (`Object.values(...).filter(...)`) once per object created in a migration. On install that's `O(objectsCreated × totalSearchFields)` — the quadratic #2622 targets. Only **one** of the three call sites is actually hot: - `create-object` (runner) — global maps, called per created object → the quadratic - export DDL — maps already built **per object** (O(k)) - `update-field` rebuild — one field, gated on `rebuildSearchVector` ## Approach Instead of a private `__warmedUpCache` side-channel on `FlatEntityMaps<T>` + drain-on-hydration, this keeps the index in the **consumer**: 1. `derive` now takes `targetSearchFieldMetadatas` (already scoped to the tsVector field) instead of scanning the map itself. 2. The runner builds a `Map<tsVectorFieldMetadataId, searchFields[]>` **once per migration**, lazily, and threads it through the action context. Safe because `searchFieldMetadata` creates are ordered before `objectMetadata` creates (`computeOrderedMigrationActions`), so the map is complete on first use. → `O(totalSearchFields)`. 3. `getTargetSearchFieldMetadatasForTsVectorField` (O(total) filter) stays as the fallback for the one-off callers (export, field-update) and when the accessor isn't provided. ## Why this over `__warmedUpCache` - **No `FlatEntityMaps<T>` type widening**, no convention-only privacy, no id/universalIdentifier drain to keep in sync. - **No referential-integrity obligation.** The index only ever contains entities present in the map, so the "search field created-then-deleted before its object hydrates" case (deferred as an edge in #2622) can't put a stale id into an aggregator and crash `derive` via the `-orThrow` lookup. - **One `derive` path**, not "aggregator + direct-filter fallback for export". - Blast radius: ~220 lines, mostly a new util + test. ## Benchmark (micro, isolated function) Median of 7 trials, 10 search fields per object, running the real shipped utils — old = `getTargetSearchFieldMetadatasForTsVectorField` once per object (identical to the old inline scan), new = `buildSearchFieldMetadatasByTsVectorFieldId` once + N lookups (both assert they resolve the same fields): | objects | total search fields | old (scan/obj) | new (index once) | speedup | |--------:|--------------------:|---------------:|-----------------:|--------:| | 50 | 500 | 2.08 ms | 0.06 ms | 33× | | 100 | 1,000 | 9.26 ms | 0.12 ms | 77× | | 200 | 2,000 | 36.2 ms | 0.23 ms | 160× | | 400 | 4,000 | 151 ms | 0.40 ms | 379× | | 800 | 8,000 | 701 ms | 0.92 ms | 766× | Confirms the old path is quadratic (~4× per doubling of object count) and the new path is linear (sub-ms throughout). **Caveats — read these before trusting the speedup:** - This is the **isolated derivation function**, no DB / DDL / inserts. In a real `create-object` action the derive is a small fraction of per-action cost, so the end-to-end win is far smaller than the ratios above. - A default workspace has ~20–30 objects, where the **old** code already costs only ~1–2 ms total across the whole install. The quadratic only becomes material (>50 ms, the runner's slow-action threshold) around **200–400 objects**. - The measurement that should actually gate this — `[install-perf] create:objectMetadata` on a real install against a real DB with a few hundred objects — has **not** been run yet. The micro-benchmark bounds the upside and locates the knee of the curve; it does not prove end-to-end payoff. ## Not done on purpose - **No end-to-end benchmark yet** — step 0 should still be measuring `[install-perf] create:objectMetadata` on a real large install to confirm the quadratic is worth removing at all. - Relies on the ordering invariant (commented at the build site). The fully self-contained variant is to put the object's search fields on `FlatCreateObjectAction` (builder change) — deliberately left out to keep this runner-scoped. ## Checks `nx typecheck twenty-server`, `nx lint:diff-with-main twenty-server`, new util spec + existing `generate-workspace-schema-ddl` spec all green.
The #1 Open-Source CRM
Website ·
Documentation ·
Roadmap ·
Discord ·
Figma
Why Twenty
Twenty gives technical teams the building blocks for a custom CRM that meets complex business needs and quickly adapts as the business evolves. Twenty is the CRM you build, ship, and version like the rest of your stack.
Learn more about why we built Twenty
Installation
Cloud
The fastest way to get started. Sign up at twenty.com and spin up a workspace in under a minute, with no infrastructure to manage and always up to date.
Build an app
Scaffold a new app with the Twenty CLI:
npx create-twenty-app my-app
Define objects, fields, and views as code:
import { defineObject, FieldType } from 'twenty-sdk/define';
export default defineObject({
nameSingular: 'deal',
namePlural: 'deals',
labelSingular: 'Deal',
labelPlural: 'Deals',
fields: [
{ name: 'name', label: 'Name', type: FieldType.TEXT },
{ name: 'amount', label: 'Amount', type: FieldType.CURRENCY },
{ name: 'closeDate', label: 'Close Date', type: FieldType.DATE_TIME },
],
});
Then ship it to your workspace:
npx twenty app:publish --private
See the app development guide for objects, views, agents, and logic functions.
Self-hosting
Run Twenty on your own infrastructure with Docker Compose, or contribute locally via the local setup guide.
Everything you need
Twenty gives you the building blocks of a modern CRM (objects, views, workflows, and agents) and lets you extend them as code. Here's a tour of what's in the box.
Want to go deeper? Read the User Guide for product walkthroughs, or the
Documentation for developer reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stack
TypeScript
Nx
NestJS, with BullMQ,
PostgreSQL,
Redis
React, with Jotai, Linaria and Lingui
Thanks
Thanks to these amazing services that we use and recommend for code review (Greptile), catching bugs (Sentry) and translating (Crowdin).
Join the Community
Star the repo ·
Discord ·
Feature requests ·
Releases ·
X ·
LinkedIn ·
Crowdin ·
Contribute





