Félix Malfait 2a21eb46c0 perf: cap to-many relation records per parent and inline chips in table (#22206)
## Problem

Record table views that show a to-many relation column (e.g. Workflows
with a "Runs" column) get slow and janky to scroll when some records
have many related records.

Two root causes, found by profiling the page live:

1. **Backend over-fetch + unfairness.** Nested one-to-many relations
were loaded with a single flat limit of `QUERY_MAX_RECORDS_FROM_RELATION
* parentCount` shared across *all* parents in the page (`WHERE
parentColumn IN (ids) LIMIT 60*N`, no per-parent cap). A single hot
parent can consume the entire budget — returning thousands of rows for
one cell, and potentially starving sibling parents of records they
actually have. The `limit * parentCount` shape shows the original intent
*was* a per-parent budget; it was just implemented as a global limit.

2. **Frontend DOM explosion.** `ExpandableList` mounts the *entire*
child array inline (clipped with `overflow: hidden`) when unfocused, and
mounts all children for measurement when focused. A cell with 2,000+
relation chips mounts ~14k DOM nodes — one observed page reached ~55k
nodes for 43 rows, producing 100–300 ms main-thread long tasks on every
scroll.

## Fix

- **Backend:** load one-to-many relations with a true **per-parent** cap
via a `LATERAL` join — each parent runs its own indexed, `LIMIT`-ed scan
that stops after the per-parent budget. This is `O(perParentLimit ×
parentCount)` and never reads or sorts a parent's full relation set. The
per-parent query is built through the workspace query builder (so it
stays schema-qualified and keeps the soft-delete predicate) and wrapped
as a `FROM` subquery; read/row-level permissions are enforced when
records are hydrated by id, as elsewhere in the relation loader.
Many-to-one is unchanged.
- **Frontend:** add an opt-in `maxInlineCount` to `ExpandableList` so
to-many relation cells mount only a small inline preview; the expand
dropdown still renders the full fetched set. Fully backward compatible
(no cap → identical behavior).

## Why LATERAL over a window function

A windowed `ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY parent) <= limit` is correct
and fair too, but a window function **cannot stop early within a
partition** — it must read every matching row (and sort it). Measured on
skewed data (one parent with ~4k children, on the existing single-column
join index, PG16):

| Approach | Time | Buffers | Rows read from the hot partition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-PR (`LIMIT 60×N`) | 1.6 ms | 91 | ~180 total, early-stops, but
**unfair** (starves siblings) |
| Window (`ROW_NUMBER`) | 3.7 ms | 128 | **all ~4k + sort** |
| **LATERAL (`per-parent LIMIT`)** | **0.5 ms** | **57** | **~60, index
early-stop** |

LATERAL matches the pre-PR read cost while being fair, needs no new
index, and scales independently of how large any single relation is.

## Verification

- Backend integration test (`nested-relation-per-parent-limit`): a
parent with 65 children is capped at 60 while a sibling with 3 keeps all
3 — passes.
- `EXPLAIN ANALYZE` on the generated SQL: Index Scan with the `LIMIT`
pushed into the per-parent lateral (early-stop).
- Frontend unit test for the `ExpandableList` cap.
- Manual check on a table cell with 40 related records: exactly 10 chips
mount inline (down from 40), no console errors, chips still clickable
and the overflow count reflects the true total.
2026-06-27 15:12:43 +02:00
2026-06-11 11:02:28 +02:00

Twenty logo

The #1 Open-Source CRM

Website · Documentation · Roadmap · Discord · Figma

Twenty banner


Why Twenty

Twenty gives technical teams the building blocks for a custom CRM that meets complex business needs and quickly adapts as the business evolves. Twenty is the CRM you build, ship, and version like the rest of your stack.

Learn more about why we built Twenty


Installation

Cloud

The fastest way to get started. Sign up at twenty.com and spin up a workspace in under a minute, with no infrastructure to manage and always up to date.

Build an app

Scaffold a new app with the Twenty CLI:

npx create-twenty-app my-app

Define objects, fields, and views as code:

import { defineObject, FieldType } from 'twenty-sdk/define';

export default defineObject({
  nameSingular: 'deal',
  namePlural: 'deals',
  labelSingular: 'Deal',
  labelPlural: 'Deals',
  fields: [
    { name: 'name', label: 'Name', type: FieldType.TEXT },
    { name: 'amount', label: 'Amount', type: FieldType.CURRENCY },
    { name: 'closeDate', label: 'Close Date', type: FieldType.DATE_TIME },
  ],
});

Then ship it to your workspace:

npx twenty app:publish --private

See the app development guide for objects, views, agents, and logic functions.

Self-hosting

Run Twenty on your own infrastructure with Docker Compose, or contribute locally via the local setup guide.



Everything you need

Twenty gives you the building blocks of a modern CRM (objects, views, workflows, and agents) and lets you extend them as code. Here's a tour of what's in the box.

Want to go deeper? Read the User Guide for product walkthroughs, or the Documentation for developer reference.

Create your apps

Learn more about apps in doc

Stay on top with version control

Learn more about version control in doc

All the tools you need to build anything

Learn more about primitives in doc

Customize your layouts

Learn more about layouts in doc

AI agents and chats

Learn more about AI in doc

Plus all the tools of a good CRM

Learn more about CRM features in doc


Stack

Thanks

Greptile      Sentry      Crowdin

Thanks to these amazing services that we use and recommend for code review (Greptile), catching bugs (Sentry) and translating (Crowdin).

Join the Community

Star the repo · Discord · Feature requests · Releases · X · LinkedIn · Crowdin · Contribute

S
Description
The open alternative to Salesforce, designed for AI.
Readme AGPL-3.0 1.4 GiB
Languages
TypeScript 79.6%
MDX 17.3%
JavaScript 2.7%
Python 0.2%
SCSS 0.1%