Done :
- add isUnique prop availability on gql update/create fieldMetadata
resolvers
- add unique index creation logic at update & creation
- add unique index deletion logic at update
- update unique index if field name updated
- edge cases : can't have default value and unique fields / standard
default value excluded from index (where clause) / can't have composite
unique fields / can't create unique fields on MORPH
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1222
# Introduction
- ~~returning deleted field on deleteOneField~~ postponed for later
cannot build dto from flat atm
- refactor createFieldInput transpilation to handle multiple errors
instead of throwing
- renamed extract function
# Introduction
- Migrated the `deleteOneField` handler to new workspace migration v2
style
- Refactored the build to expect `flatObjectMetadataMaps` that he
instantly translate at the be beginning
Commented `ObjectMetadataServiceV2` as it's still not implemented
neither used
In this PR, we add some validation logic and rules in both FE and BE to
ensure field permissions are handled correctly for relation fields.
- (BE) Only one field permission per fieldMetadata is accepted per
input. This is already guaranteed in the FE. It was added to help
guarantee that, when looking within the field permissions input for a
potential field permission on a relationTargetFieldMetadataId for a
relation field, there can only be 0 or 1.
- (FE) Only field permission with new values are sent to save, to avoid
sending contradictory field permissions for related fields. E.g. let's
say I have an existing field permission restricting read permission on
company's people field. By definition I also have one on person's
company field. If I update this field permission to enable the read
permission by updating company's people field, in the previous logic I
was also going to send for upsert the existing obsolete field permission
on person's company. Thus the server does not know which is the right
value so we should only send the new value.
- (BE) If the server receives two contradictory field permissions on two
related fields, e.g. on company's people with canRead = null and
person's company with canRead = false, it throws an error.
Created:
- Services
- Resolvers
- Controllers
- Tests for services
- Integration tests for GraphQL and Rest
Updated the Rest API playground
Added new feature flag `IS_CORE_VIEW_ENABLED`
Updated `viewFilter` `operand` and `view` `type` to be enums rather than
strings and generated migration file.
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1259
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In this PR
- Introduction of readableFields and updatableFields in
objectMetadataItem selector to ease filtering from a developer
experience perspective ( + to help developers think to do it). In
discussion @lucasbordeau @charlesBochet
- Remove non-updatable field from CSV import process (@etiennejouan)
- QA fix / Non-readable fields should not show on show page
- QA fix / It should not be offered to create a kanban view on a
non-readable field
- QA fix / It should not be offered to create view groups on a
non-readable field
- QA fix / Rating field should have a readonly mode
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Introduction
Following recent `FlatObjectMetadataMaps` manipulation, transpilers
utils introduction in https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13620
Refactored the field metadata service and validator to iterate over
`FlatObjectMetadataMaps` instead of `FlatObjectMetadata[]`.
The object metadata service v2 is shadow coding
In this PR
1. Fix delete and soft-delete repository methods for repositories where
permission checks are NOT bypassed: they need to have a selection of
columns to return by default. To match what we did for insert I set it
to `'*'` by default. But I feel this may be bug prone as developers will
not necessarily think to fill the right values in. Maybe we should
change the api to use selectable fields by default. @charlesBochet
2. Add field permission seeds and enable field permission feature flag
in dev
We had two mistakes in updateMany orm behavior:
- format of manyInput should be done earlier
- relation connect/disconnect does not support batching and should be
computed for each input at last moment
As per title, I believe calling i18n is bad because it's a singleton.
This singleton is being set back and force by users in
i18n.middleware.ts
Strategy:
we need to load the translations dynamically! Should be straight
forward:
- singleton (i18nService) containing all translationMessages
- singleton also containing a map of i18n instances loaded for each
locale => I've checked it's not heavy on RAM at all
- some methods to get the translation for a messageId x locale or the
whole i18n instance
==> use it everywhere, this PR only takes care of data model translation
In this PR:
- refactor timelineActivity computation to batch it
- make sure to pass the authContext to insert-query-builder in order to
pass user information to timelineActivity
- refactor message-participant /calendar-participant creation to batch
more
- fix favorite on view race condition (FE)
- deprecate PARTIAL_CALENDAR_EVENT_FETCH_LIST syncStage as we will
deprecate partial vs full notion (we will just leverage cursor emptyness
or not)
- introduce calendar / messging SCHEDULED syncStage that will allow
better performance granularity later
- activate quick message import after message list fetch to speed
performance on small message lists
# Introduction
As discussed with Charles we will introduce a new command to convert
seeded twenty instance into `flatObjectMetadatas` `flatFieldMetadatas`
mocks but later.
We can think of this PR as a partial freeze of this command result run
even tho the template might not be strictly the same in the end.
For the moment we only extracted few objects with their fields in order
to start testing newly introduced tools
used scripts ( not committed and written on the fly ):
https://gist.github.com/prastoin/bdfae0da1e3e9c66ae21c972afbd0d1ehttps://gist.github.com/prastoin/30029989bf57de9303e3f7ec235271ee
# Introduction
The workspace migration runner v2 now computes the next
flatObjectMetadataMaps post current ws migration action has been run
So the following one have an up to date informations
## Still TODO
~~Remove any contextual information from workspace migration v2 and
consume the optimistic cache to retrieve them~~
## Next steps
- Create flat-object-metadata-maps testing toolbox and flat-object/field
testing toolbox
- Implement strong coverage on every created utils/transpiler and
applyWorkspaceMigrationAction method
## Context
This PR fixes a REST API metadata schema mismatch that occurred after
the webhook and apiKey migration from workspace entities to metadata
level.
## The Issue
After PR #13576 deleted the webhook and apiKey workspace entities, the
metadata OpenAPI specification ended up in a broken state:
- The `/metadata` endpoints still had paths for `/webhooks` and
`/apiKeys`
- But the schema definitions were missing (they were previously pulled
from workspace entities)
- This created dangling references in the OpenAPI document
## The Fix
Added proper schema definitions for webhook and apiKey directly in
`computeMetadataSchemaComponents`:
- `Webhook`, `WebhookForUpdate`, `WebhookForResponse`
- `ApiKey`, `ApiKeyForUpdate`, `ApiKeyForResponse`
## Why the CI is Failing
The CI breaking changes detection is comparing:
- **Main branch**: Has a broken OpenAPI document with endpoints that
reference non-existent schemas
- **This branch**: Has the fixed OpenAPI document with proper schemas
The OpenAPI diff tool can't even parse the main branch's document due to
the missing schema references, hence the error -- tested locally
In this PR we adapt field permission to two things
1. Connect: the recent insertion of the connect feature introduces the
possibility to have "connect" objects in typeORM's expressionMap's
valueSet, where we previously only had column names (if i followed
correctly). For instance for a person object that a N - 1 relationship
to company, person will have both companyId and company as possible
valueSet keys for the upsert. We need to reflect that in our
`getColumnNameToFieldMetadataIdMap` util that returns a map containing
every possible value we could encounter in valueSet. In an attempt to
tie this to the schema generation where this is introduced, I created
the shallow util extractGraphQLRelationFieldNames (probably ill-named -
im willing to update the name if @etiennejouan has a better idea?) to
remind us that these two are linked.
2. CreateMany: When calling query builders methods directly on custom
object (like we do in graphql-create-many-resolver), we need to be
careful to call them with a selection of readable fields. We had a
debate on whether we should compute this selection containing all
readable fields by default under the hood when no selected fields are
indicated. I am still not 100% convinced as I think it should remain the
caller's responsibility, but this case reminds us that it could easily
be forgotten by developers - although it is all the more the case as we
don't have seeds yet that help us realize that ([PR on the
way](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13646)).
When upserting a fieldPermission on a 1 <-> N relation field, we should
upsert the same fieldPermission on the relationTargetFieldMetadata to
avoid inconsistencies.
Raphaël Bosi