# Introduction
related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1833
In this PR we're starting the sync-metadata and standardIds deprecation
by introducing `twenty-standard` application that will regroup every
standard object such as company and opportunities. But also the
`custom-workspace-application` which is an app created at the same time
as a workspace and that will regroup everything configure within the
workspace ( custom objects fields etc )
## What's done
On both new workspace and seeded workspace creation:
- Creating a custom workspace app
- Creating a twenty standard app
- Refactored the seed core schema and workspace creation to be run
within a transaction in order to handle circular dependency foreignkey
requirements ( which is deferred for app toward workspace )
- Updated workspace entity to have a custom workspace relation (
nullable for the moment until we implem an upgrade command to handle
retro comp )
- Integration testing on user, workspace creation deletion and expected
default apps creation
- ~~Soft deleted user on `deleteUser`~~ Done by marie and rebased on it
## What's next
- Update seeder to propagate the `twenty-standard` workspace
`applicationId` to every standard synchronized entities ( cheap and fast
iteration through the about to be deprecated sync-metadata as an easy
way to synchronize standards metadata entities ).
- Update seeder to propagate the `custom-workspace-application`
workspace `applicationId` to anything custom ( `pets` and `rockets` )
- Prepend `custom-workspace-application` `applicationId` to every
metadata API operations ( create a specific cache etc )
- Upgrade command on all existing workspace to create a custom app and
associate its applicationId to any existing custom entities
- Make `universalIdentifier` and `applicationId` required for any
syncable entity
**Root Cause**
Many-to-one relation filters were being exposed under the relation name
(e.g., `company`) instead of the corresponding foreign-key attribute
(e.g., `companyId`).
**Change**
- Detect many-to-one relation metadata and remap those filter keys to
`<fieldName>Id`.
- Removed some unused code unrelated to this fix.
## Problem
The ESLint rule `graphql-resolvers-should-be-guarded` introduced in
#15392 was failing on main because the guard `SettingsPermissionsGuard`
had inconsistent naming.
## Root Cause
The guard was named `SettingsPermissionsGuard` (with an 's') which was
inconsistent with other permission guards:
- ✅ `CustomPermissionGuard`
- ✅ `NoPermissionGuard`
- ✅ `ImpersonatePermissionGuard`
- ❌ `SettingsPermissionsGuard` (inconsistent!)
The ESLint rule checks if guard names end with `PermissionGuard`, but
`SettingsPermissionsGuard` ends with `sGuard`, so it wasn't recognized
as a permission guard.
## Solution
Renamed the guard to be consistent with the naming convention:
1. ✅ Renamed file: `settings-permissions.guard.ts` →
`settings-permission.guard.ts`
2. ✅ Renamed export: `SettingsPermissionsGuard` →
`SettingsPermissionGuard`
3. ✅ Renamed internal class: `SettingsPermissionsMixin` →
`SettingsPermissionMixin`
4. ✅ Updated all 122 references across 44 files in the codebase
5. ✅ Renamed test file: `settings-permissions.guard.spec.ts` →
`settings-permission.guard.spec.ts`
## Testing
- ✅ `npx nx run twenty-server:lint` passes
- ✅ `npx nx run twenty-server:typecheck` passes
- ✅ No references to the old name remain in the codebase
- ✅ All previously failing resolver files now pass ESLint validation
## Related
Fixes issues introduced in #15392
## Overview
This PR strengthens our permission system by introducing more granular
role-based access control across the platform.
## Changes
### New Permissions Added
- **Applications** - Control who can install and manage applications
- **Layouts** - Control who can customize page layouts and UI structure
- **AI** - Control access to AI features and agents
- **Upload File** - Separate permission for file uploads
- **Download File** - Separate permission for file downloads (frontend
visibility)
### Security Enhancements
- Implemented whitelist-based validation for workspace field updates
- Added explicit permission guards to core entity resolvers
- Enhanced ESLint rule to enforce permission checks on all mutations
- Created `CustomPermissionGuard` and `NoPermissionGuard` for better
code documentation
### Affected Components
- Core entity resolvers: webhooks, files, domains, applications,
layouts, postgres credentials
- Workspace update mutations now use whitelist validation
- Settings UI updated with new permission controls
### Developer Experience
- ESLint now catches missing permission guards during development
- Explicit guard markers make permission requirements clear in code
review
- Comprehensive test coverage for new permission logic
## Testing
- ✅ All TypeScript type checks pass
- ✅ ESLint validation passes
- ✅ New permission guards properly enforced
- ✅ Frontend UI displays new permissions correctly
## Migration Notes
Existing workspaces will need to assign the new permissions to roles as
needed. By default, all new permissions are set to `false` for non-admin
roles.
Until this is done: [Make workspaceMembers
non-system](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/15688)
Let's make that update to allow us to have workspaces with
workspaceMember not being system object, to allow user to customize
their data model.
**Before**
- any user with workpace_members permission was able to remove a user
from their workspace. This triggered the deletion of workspaceMember +
of userWorkspace, but did not delete the user (even if they had no
workspace left) nor the roleTarget (acts as junction between role and
userWorkspace) which was left with a userWorkspaceId pointing to
nothing. This is because roleTarget points to userWorkspaceId but the
foreign key constraint was not implemented
- any user could delete their own account. This triggered the deletion
of all their workspaceMembers, but not of their userWorkspace nor their
user nor the roleTarget --> we have orphaned userWorkspace, not
technically but product wise - a userWorkspace without a workspaceMember
does not make sense
So the problems are
- we have some roleTargets pointing to non-existing userWorkspaceId
(which caused https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14608 )
- we have userWorkspaces that should not exist and that have no
workspaceMember counterpart
- it is not possible for a user to leave a workspace by themselves, they
can only leave all workspaces at once, except if they are being removed
from the workspace by another user
**Now**
- if a user has multiple workspaces, they are given the possibility to
leave one workspace while remaining in the others (we show two buttons:
Leave workspace and Delete account buttons). if a user has just one
workspace, they only see Delete account
- when a user leaves a workspace, we delete their workspaceMember,
userWorkspace and roleTarget. If they don't belong to any other
workspace we also soft-delete their user
- soft-deleted users get hard deleted after 30 days thanks to a cron
- we have two commands to clean the orphans roleTarget and userWorkspace
(TODO: query db to see how many must be run)
**Next**
- once the commands have been run, we can implement and introduce the
foreign key constraint on roleTarget
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14608
As title
- adds decorators in twenty-sdk
- update twenty-cli load-manifest to it gets @FieldMetadata infos +
testing
- update twenty-server so it CRUD fields properly, using
universalIdentifier
- Fix UI so we can update managed objects records
- move FieldMetadata items from twenty-server to twenty-shared
Here is what the PR does:
- Surface password state in validatePasswordResetToken, returning
hasPassword so the client can tell whether a user is setting or changing
their password.
- Consume that flag throughout the front end (mock data, stories,
GraphQL types) and update the Reset/Set Password modal to swap the
heading/button label and success toast accordingly.
- After a successful password set/reset, immediately update the
logged-in user’s hasPassword flag so the Settings screen reflects the
new state without a reload.
Modal has two states now - reset password modal uses change password
state since it made intuitive sense.
<p align="center">
<img width="404" height="397" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c54cc581-1248-4395-833d-0202758e1947"
/>
</p>
<p align="center">
<img width="403" height="393" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d8a39a95-27e6-4037-86f2-1f74176002ba"
/>
</p>
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
groupMode should be undefined if no groupby is set on the secondary
axis!
This default value is also the reason -- all the logic -- where
groupMode was checked for conditional rendering -- for eg
, negative data labels when there is no groupby -- the labels should
appear below wasn't happening -- since there was always a default to
groupMode!
changes -
- getting rid of the default value on the bar chart DTO for groupMode
- on front -- make sure groupMode is only set when the secondary axis
gets groupBy id and proper cleanup
Prevent users from creating v2 chart types via the api.
Only created unit tests and not integration tests (since it's not that
important, and the v2 will be released soon), but tested via the api
playground.
# Introduction
This PR aims to deprecate having to manually handle optimistic side
effect foreign key addition in the whole v2 experience.
This PR implements the strong basis + builder refactor of the optimistic
computation of a given flat entity maps with its related flat entity
maps ( runner needs a small refactor on actions type definition first )
Flat entity maps updates through mutations are now only scoped to the
generic entity builder ( very isolated )
## What's next
- Refactor actions v2 type definition to gain grain over `metadataName`
and action operation ( `create` `delete` `update` ).
from `{type: 'create_view_field'}` to `{metadataName: 'view_field',
type: 'create' }`
- Use new optimistic tool computation tools
- Only invalidate impacted flat maps cache
## New tools
Strictly dynamically typed new flat entity maps tools
- `addFlatEntityToFlatEntityAndRelatedEntityMapsThroughMutationOrThrow`
-
`deleteFlatEntityFromFlatEntityAndRelatedEntityMapsThroughMutationOrThrow`
## Unit test
Adding basic unit testing coverage to introduced tools
## `FlatEntityValidationArgs`
From
```ts
export type FlatEntityValidationArgs<T extends AllMetadataName> = {
flatEntityToValidate: MetadataFlatEntity<T>;
optimisticFlatEntityMaps: MetadataFlatEntityMaps<T>;
mutableDependencyOptimisticFlatEntityMaps: MetadataValidationRelatedFlatEntityMaps<T>;
workspaceId: string;
remainingFlatEntityMapsToValidate: MetadataFlatEntityMaps<T>;
buildOptions: WorkspaceMigrationBuilderOptions;
};
```
To
```ts
export type FlatEntityValidationArgs<T extends AllMetadataName> = {
flatEntityToValidate: MetadataFlatEntity<T>;
optimisticFlatEntityMapsAndRelatedFlatEntityMaps: MetadataFlatEntityAndRelatedFlatEntityMapsForValidation<T>;
workspaceId: string;
remainingFlatEntityMapsToValidate: MetadataFlatEntityMaps<T>;
buildOptions: WorkspaceMigrationBuilderOptions;
};
```
## Context
Having rollout feature for new workspaces creates bad experience for new
users and doesn't bring as much value as existing ones anyway. Removing
migration v2 from default feature flag and the whole concept of default
feature flag
# Introduction
When creating a view with v2 flag activated in production result in race
condition due to request being slow and //.
That's why we're introducing a batch create on view field here
closing https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1836
## In v2
- batch create view field endpoint is available
- frontend will target the new endpoint
## In v1
- batch create view field endpoint is not available
- frontend will stick to old fake batch view field creation loop
## Polish
- use persist view field is quite verbose as contains two data model we
could aim to create an update many view fields in order to standardize
new pattern
## Tests
### makeSureDashboardNamingAvailableCommand
Case 1: no dashboard custom object
Case 2: with dashboard custom object
### SeedDashboardViewCommand
Case 1: no existing view
Case 2: with existing view
changes -
- make iframe side panel to match others -- ie use SidePanelHeader for
title
- make url optional in configuration to match that of the other widgets
(allow partial saves) - render No data status when error or no url
- split widget sizes into two -- graph widget sizes and widget sizes
(graph widgets are a subset of chart widgets)
Paul Rastoin