# Introduction
We need to be able to create custom workspace application on all
workspaces, even pending and ongoing etc
Right now the upgrade devx only allows and expect active or suspended
workspace to be passed to runOnWorkspace.
## WorkspacesMigrationRunner
Created an intermediate class `WorkspacesMigrationRunner` that expect an
array `WorkspaceStatus` to be fetched for the current command to be run
on
The `ActiveOrSuspendedCommandRunner` statically passes both `SUSPENDED`
and `ACTIVE`, whereas the create workspace custom application passed all
the enum values
## DataSource
Workspace that are not fully init don't have a `workspace_schema` so
they don't have `dataSource`
Made a not very elegant check to see if current workspace we're about to
create dataSource on has one historically
Which means that dataSource is now optional, it had only one impact on
an existing command and the desired devx will become consuming existing
services that do not expect dataSource ( or at least yet )
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/15692, fixes
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14678
The issue was:
- When a user is signing up, they are asked for their first name and
last name with which we fulfill their workspaceMember entity for the
workspace they are signing up to (which is the one they are creating if
they are not joining an existing workspace). user.firstName and
user.lastName remain empty
- When we create a record, we are using user.firstName and user.lastName
to fulfill the text field "createdByName", which intends to save the
name of the creator at the moment of the creation. This field is then
use 1) when filtering on createdBy (as a trick to be able to filter by
this, since we don't have filters on nested fields, ie we dont have
filters on person.createdByWorkspaceMember) 2) to display the user
creator when a user has left a workspace - otherwise we rely on the
dynamic createdByWorkspaceMember.firstName and lastName
- So filtering on createdBy was not working as createdByName is empty.
We did not see that in dev mode because we have seeded users with names
The fix
- When we create a record, we use workspaceMember.firstName and
workspaceMember.lastName as we should.
- When an existing user joins a workspace, they are asked to give their
name again so that we set their workspaceMember name
- This will not fix the history of the records (they will still have
createdByName empty so the filter will not work properly), but a command
to fix it would be very long as it would iterate over all the records of
each active workspace
The long-term view is to get rid of user and to store the name in
userWorkspace
## Overview
This PR replaces the dynamic agent handoff system with a more
predictable planning-based router that decides upfront how to handle
multi-agent coordination.
## Major Changes
### 🔄 Architecture Shift: Handoffs → Planning
**Removed:**
- `AgentHandoffEntity` and handoff tracking system
- `AgentHandoffService` and `AgentHandoffExecutorService`
- Dynamic agent-to-agent transfers during execution
- Handoff tool generation and description templates
**Added:**
- `AiRouterService` with two strategies: `simple` (single agent) and
`planned` (multi-agent)
- `AgentPlanExecutorService` for executing multi-step plans
- Plan validation (cycle detection, dependency resolution)
- `UnifiedRouterResult` type with discriminated union
### 🤖 New Standard Agents
Added two new specialized agents:
- **Researcher Agent**: Web search, fact-finding, competitive
intelligence
- **Code Agent**: TypeScript function generation for serverless
workflows
### 🏗️ Router Refactoring (Latest)
Split router responsibilities into focused services:
- `AiRouterStrategyDeciderService`: Decides simple vs planned strategy
- `AiRouterPlanGeneratorService`: Generates and validates execution
plans
- `AiRouterService`: Coordinates between services (reduced from 426→275
lines)
### ⚙️ Configuration Improvements
- Added `outputStrategy` to agent definitions (`direct` vs `synthesize`)
- Removed hardcoded special cases for workflow-builder
- Added `plannerModel` field to workspace entity
- Increased `MAX_STEPS` from 10 to 25 for complex workflows
### 📝 Agent Prompt Refinements
Significantly simplified prompts for better clarity:
- Workflow Builder: 51→36 lines
- Helper: 49→28 lines
- Data Manipulator: Enhanced with sorting guidance
### 🔍 Enhanced Debugging
- Plan reasoning and step count in data message parts
- Router debug info with token usage tracking
- Better logging throughout execution pipeline
## Benefits
1. **Simpler Mental Model**: Router decides upfront vs dynamic transfers
2. **Better Predictability**: Users see the plan before execution
3. **Cleaner Architecture**: SRP with focused services
4. **Configuration Over Code**: Agent behavior via config, not hardcoded
logic
5. **Plan Validation**: Catches invalid dependencies and cycles
## Migration Notes
- Database migration removes `agentHandoff` table
- Adds `plannerModel` column to workspace table
- No API breaking changes (agent endpoints unchanged)
## Testing
- Integration tests updated to remove handoff dependencies
- Agent tool test utilities simplified
- Plan validation covered by new logic
## Next Steps (Future PRs)
- Parallel execution of independent plan steps
- Dynamic re-planning based on results
- Plan caching for common routing patterns
- Error recovery strategies in plan executor
## Context
Deprecating legacy ObjectMetadata from cache in favor of flat entities.
Introducing utils to build byName/byNameSingular/byNamePlural in
isolated cases
## Next
- I had to introduce a util to build from flat to legacy
objectMetadataMaps, we should instead use flat maps directly when needed
(datasource, schema generation, etc)
- Deprecate metadata version in the cache
- Use the new cache strategy for flat entities with permissions and
feature flags and inject in the global datasource context
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1629
To do before requesting review :
- filter update
Migration to come in an other PR
Strat :
1/ Null transformation
- [x] Transform NULL equivalent value to NULL in field validation in
common api - pre-query - with feature flag
- [ ] Same logic in ORM (Not done, complex to handle feature flag here)
- [x] Transform NULL value to equivalent in data formatting in ORM -
post-query
2/ Migration (in other PR) for fieldMetadata not nullable with default
defaultValue (empty string, ...)
- [ ] Remove NOT NULL db constraint
- [ ] Update record value to NULL
- [ ] Update field metadata : isNullable:true
- [ ] Update uniqueIndex whereClause (also for standard uniqueIndex)
- [ ] Activate feature flag
3/ Update metadata creation
- [x] No more default default value
- [x] Update standard field nullability
- [x] Remove index default whereClause for standard field
4/ Update filter
- [x] When filtering on NULL or empty string, be sure all records are
returned (the one with NULL + the one with "")
5/ Test
- [ ] Strat. to do
# Introduction
Two things:
- Enforcing non nullable workspace custom application Id for any
workspace
- Fixing front non editable data models following
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15911 that associate any custom
entities to an applicationId. The front was putting everything as
readonly when under an app ( we will have to handle the twenty standard
application in the future too )
## Fallback
### Migration
The non nullable migration will fail when released, that's why it's
being swallowed and re-run in an upgrade command post workspace custom
application creation for those that miss one. Allowing the migration to
pass in the end
The typeorm migration still need to exists for any new workspaces
### GetCurrentUser
In order to dynamically display isReadOnly in data model settings we're
fetching the workspaceCustomApplicationId through the `getCurrentUser`
If not fallback this endpoint would throw until we're handling existing
workspaces that do not have a custom workspace application
The fallback should be removed post release
# Introduction
Cleaner and fewer scope version of
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15745 ( removed sync-metadata
hack through, too ambitious migration and upgrade )
Please note that this PR won't have any interaction with the existing
sync-metadata
Which mean that the sync metadata does not update the standard entities
applicationId and universalIdentifier, and it won't we will deprecate it
on favor of a workspace migration aka twenty-standard app installation
## API Metadata
Any operation going through the api metadata nows automatically scope
the related entity to the workspace custom application instance. (
optionally passing an applicationId to allow current hacky implem of app
sync service )
We need to either ignore the tests or remove the cli status check from
the blocking status badges for a PR to be merged
## New workspace
Already handled in previous
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15625, when a workspace is
created it gets created a twenty standard and custom workspace instance
All his views and permissions will be prefilled to the its twenty
standard app instance with a specific universalIdentifier
## New universalIdentifier
At the contrary as before with standardIds, universalIdentifier are
unique for a given workspace
This means that createdAt field of both object company and opportunity
will have a unique universalIdentifier whereas they share the same
standardId
## FlatApplication
Introduced the flatApplication and cache. Will migrate existing
`MetadataName` to be `SyncableMetadataName` in a following PR
## What's next
Next we will describe a twenty standard app configuration as json that
will be used to generate a workspace migration that will be run instead
of the sync metadata, in a nutshell we aim to deprecated the sync
metadata
So we can standardize any entity to have a non nullable applicationId
and universalIdentifier
## Upgrade command
Introduced an upgrade command that will create a custom workspace
instance for any workspace that do not have one in order to align with
the new behavior when creating a new workspace
While investigating the issue a customer was facing, I discovered that
before records and after records could be in different order, making the
orm event and timeline activity engine mix records
## Context
Implementing a single service managing all the cache scoped to a
workspace, this will be dynamically injected as a WorkspaceContext in
the app during a request lifetime (ingested by the future global
datasource for example).
Usage:
```typescript
this.globalWorkspaceOrmManager.executeInWorkspaceContext(
authContext,
async () => {
// Everything here will have access to a workspaceContext, containing all the cache data + a ready to use datasource with workspace scoped metadata, permissions, feature flags, etc...
// Internally will call loadWorkspaceContext
}
```
Note: executeInWorkspaceContext will probably be owned by a higher level
service later and not only the ORM.
```typescript
private async loadWorkspaceContext(
authContext: WorkspaceAuthContext,
): Promise<WorkspaceContext> {
const workspaceId = authContext.workspace.id;
const cache =
await this.workspaceContextCacheService.get<WorkspaceContextData>(
workspaceId,
[
'objectMetadataMaps',
'metadataVersion',
'featureFlagsMap',
'permissionsPerRoleId',
],
);
return {
authContext,
objectMetadataMaps: cache.objectMetadataMaps,
metadataVersion: cache.metadataVersion,
featureFlagsMap: cache.featureFlagsMap,
permissionsPerRoleId: cache.permissionsPerRoleId,
};
}
```
The cache retrieval strategy is as followed:
```
- Check if there is an ongoing promise fetching data from the cache =>
return the promise.
- Check in the local cache entry if lastCheckedAt has expired. If not,
return as it is without querying redis.
- Check in redis the cache entry hash and compare with local cache entry
hash, if they are the same return the local cache entry data
- Check in redis the cache entry data, if it's there return it and store
it into the local cache entry data and update local cache entry hash. If
it's not there recompute the data by querying the DB and update both
redis and local cache
```
Resolves [Dependabot Alert
74](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/security/dependabot/74).
Upgraded `graphql-upload` from `13.0.0` to `16.0.2`. Type exports
changed. API remains the same.
Tested the following upload flows:
- profile picture
- workspace logo
- rich text editor (image, video, file)
- record profile picture
- file associated to record.
They all work as intended, nothing breaks.
## Summary
This PR adds configurable response format support for AI agents,
allowing them to return either plain text or structured JSON data based
on a defined schema.
## Key Features
### 1. Agent Response Format Configuration
- Added `AgentResponseFormat` type supporting:
- `text`: Returns plain text responses (default)
- `json`: Returns structured JSON based on defined schema
- New `AgentResponseSchema` type moved to `twenty-shared/ai` for sharing
between frontend/backend
### 2. Settings UI
- New `SettingsAgentResponseFormat` component for configuring response
format
- Visual schema builder for defining JSON output structure
- Real-time validation and preview
- Integrated into agent settings tab
### 3. Workflow Integration
- AI Agent workflow action automatically uses agent's configured
response format
- Output schema dynamically generated from agent's response format
- Workflow variable picker shows structured fields for JSON responses
- Backward compatible with existing text-only agents
### 4. Backend Implementation
- Added `convertAgentSchemaToZod` utility to validate JSON responses
- Agent executor service handles both text and JSON generation
- Automatic agent creation/cloning when adding AI agent steps to
workflows
- Unique agent naming with conflict resolution
### 5. Database Migration
- Migration `1763622159656-update-agent-response-format.ts`
- Sets default `responseFormat` to `{"type":"text"}` for existing agents
- Updated all standard agents with proper response format
## Changes by Module
### Frontend (`twenty-front`)
- 🆕 `AgentResponseFormat` type
- 🆕 `SettingsAgentResponseFormat` component
- ✏️ Updated `WorkflowEditActionAiAgent` to support response format
configuration
- 🗑️ Removed deprecated `useAiAgentOutputSchema` hook and
`AiAgentOutputSchema` type
### Backend (`twenty-server`)
- 🆕 `AgentResponseFormat` type in agent entity
- 🆕 `convertAgentSchemaToZod` utility for schema validation
- ✏️ Updated `AiAgentExecutorService` to handle both text and JSON
generation
- ✏️ Updated `WorkflowSchemaWorkspaceService` to generate output schema
from agent config
- ✏️ Enhanced `WorkflowVersionStepOperationsWorkspaceService` with agent
creation/cloning
- 🆕 Agent naming constants for conflict resolution
### Shared (`twenty-shared`)
- 🆕 `AgentResponseSchema` type
- 🆕 `ModelConfiguration` type moved to shared package
- Updated exports in `ai/index.ts`
## Code Quality
- Removed useless comments following code style guidelines
- All linter checks passed
- Type-safe implementation with proper TypeScript types
## Testing
- ✅ Database migration tested
- ✅ Agent creation/cloning in workflows verified
- ✅ Response format switching (text ↔ JSON) validated
- ✅ Backward compatibility with existing agents confirmed
## Migration Notes
- Existing agents will have `responseFormat: {type: 'text'}` set
automatically
- No breaking changes - all existing functionality preserved
- Agents can be updated to use JSON format through settings UI
## Problem
When accessing file URLs like `/files/attachment/{token}/{filename}`,
the server was returning 500 errors with no logs. The issue was that the
route pattern `*path/:filename` was not properly extracting parameters,
causing `request.params[0]` to be undefined.
## Solution
- Changed route from `@Get('*path/:filename')` to
`@Get(':folder/:token/:filename')` for explicit parameter extraction
- Simplified `extractFileInfoFromRequest` to use named route parameters
directly instead of complex path parsing
- Removed unnecessary logging that was added during debugging
- Added test to verify route parameters are correctly extracted and
passed to FileService
## Testing
- Added unit test that verifies folder, token, and filename parameters
are correctly passed to the service
- Test will catch any future regressions where route parameters are not
properly extracted
Context -
- refactoring v1 and v2 seeds to test v2 dashboard flag both on and off
Right now, the db reset command fails if the feature flag is off
- whenever there is a groupBy field -- we should add a default groupMode
- we already do that on the front -- but implementing the same on server
so that api users get the same response
This is also the reason why the second seed on dashboards lags a lot --
because on that particular dashboard's widget -- we set groupBy but no
groupMode (in seeding util) -- and the effect of limiting the bars to
fifty runs depending on the groupMode
# Introduction
Remove the v2 feature flag for view-field field-metadata and
object-metadata metadata entities
## Some details
- Disabled nestjs-query for object metadata creation and explicitly
calling it
- removed all v1 integration tests files
## Remarks
Not remove v2 referencing in both filenaming right now will handle that
globally later
## Breaking change
Due to object metadata resolver createOne standardization had to rename
the input from `CreateObjectInput` to `CreateOneObjectInput`
# Introduction
While removing the v1 https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15823 I've
encountered the method `objectMetadataService.deleteObjectsMetadata`
that I didn't wanted to migrate as it is and if it's not challenging its
existence legitimacy.
## Motivations
In a nutshell on a workspace deletion object metadata and field metadata
cascading deletion is correclty handled
But that's not the case for all of a workspaces entities ( roles,
workspaceMigrations ) I suspect that we did not defined the foreignKey
explicitly through `typeorm`
## Battle testing v2
I still decided to give a try to a complex operation in the v2 such as a
workspace all object metadata deletion.
Spoiler it failed due to object being interdependent between them and
not being topologically sorted ( morph relation can introduce circular
dep anw ).
Note: Even after removing the delete field on delete object aggregator
we end up with an equivalent circular dep error which an object and its
field metadata identifier connection.
## Elegant `DEFERRED` and `DEFERRABLE` foreign keys
The most safe, low level solution would be to make all field relations
deferrable and start the runner transaction as deferred. But this
requires a quite invasive migration of existing FK
## On cascade solution
I've opted for the quick fix, on object or field deletion spread
cacasde.
It's pretty safe as the builder priorly validates the deletion and and
its related entities integrity
Only for both field and object deletion action types in v2 runner
## Integration coverage
Added a test that will scan a new workspace database core schema tables
and expect now result after workspace deletion through its only user
deletion
## Context
inferDeletionFromEntities only accepts a set of keys for each entities
that needs deletion. This could be error-prone if tmr we want to add a
new side effect and forget to add the entity when in practice you want
to delete all entities that are in the fromToAllFlatEntityMaps (this is
the case for applications for example)
- Users with a single workspace are allowed to update their email across
`core.user` and `workspace_xyz.workspaceMember`.
- The latter happens asynchronously (built it like this for non-blocking
with multiple workspaces), but since we restrict the email update
functionality to a single user, we can also update the email in
workspaceMember synchronously - I left asynchronous there to receive
feedback on whether we should move to synchronous or not.
- Merged main and resolved conflicts to ensure we use the
`SettingsPermissionGuard` and the updated `workspace.service.ts` code.
One edge-case that I was trying to communicate on Discord:
Say that an admin is a member of multiple workspaces. Therefore, they
can allow roles with PROFILE_INFORMATION permission to update their
email.
<p align="center">
<img width="553" height="115" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/80382b1f-a9e3-4dac-b606-c2defeb2c330"
/>
</p>
However, since the admin is part of multiple workspaces, he/she cannot
even update own email - the field stays disabled, leading to some
confusion.
<p align="center">
<img width="545" height="255" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5e6d27db-c9a8-4d5e-9ab6-65c77beae5b4"
/>
</p>
However, the workspace can have another member with admin role or some
other role that has PROFILE_INFORMATION permission flag. That user will
be and should be allowed to update email, so we cannot hide `email` from
dropdown options.
<p align="center">
<img width="585" height="283" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a670d3ac-cf48-4865-a425-b909093d8420"
/>
</p>
The behavior is fine imo, just a little confusing for members with more
than one workspace.
I have also tested the flow by signing up to YC workspace with my org
google account (twenty.com), then changing email to my personal address.
- After changing, I need to login using Google with my personal account
to access YC workspace again.
- If I login using Google with org google account (twenty.com), a new
user account is created.
This behavior is consistent with Notion and Linear.
Finally, as for the verification of email, the user is asked to verify
email while they're logged in, but just in case they logout without
verifying, the next login would force them to verify their email in the
email/password flow.
However, for Social/SSO, they must verify before they logout or else
they'd have to contact support for assistance. I have not looked into
how to show verification screen while logging in via Social/SSO yet, but
if that's something critical for completeness here, I shall revisit it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Etienne