Fixed issue #13869
Added flag to prevent selection of content inside ScrollWrapper based on
value of preventTextSelection flag this will prevent selection of its
all child. For to select title and description I added custom css for
that to allow selection for title and description.
Demo :
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d10a7e5f-6498-4f8d-9aa2-26f48559ce23
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Fix issue: #13742
Step number look better then without number so did't removed that
Added description in H2Title component
Not added new description shown in figma because it is to large and
H2Title truncate after 2 lines
We can add this figma content only if we do not use H2Title component
<img width="719" height="553" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1aae680f-de4e-424b-baf7-c0d402581d28"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Parallel code path to read and write core views when
IS_CORE_VIEW_ENABLED.
Migrated view key to an enum.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Closes#13861
`All Objects` has been renamed to `Objects` and `Name` has been replaced
with `All Objects`. There was no specification of whether the `Data full
access` card had to be implemented or not. Do let me know if that needs
to be removed or something needs to be changed in its configuration.
Attaching a loom recording of the changes:
[Loom
Recording](https://www.loom.com/share/42b54e9386b14619bc1118e95eb62293?sid=10ac8e8a-475b-4870-bd36-64742cd8c3c5)
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
On field selection, we need to retrieve the fieldMetadata to set the
filter type. Current code was using the current step filter
fieldMetdataId instead of the new one.
Also adding a special behaviour for Select filter: it behaves as
arrays/multiselect but the opearands are not the same.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Closes#13862
The `padding-right` for `StyledCheckboxCell` was previously set to
`16px`, causing it to be pushed in. It has now been reduced to `8px`.
The read column in the table appeared as the third column regardless of
whether update was restricted or not. Now, the read column appears as
the last column if update is restricted, otherwise, read appears before
update column.
Attaching a recording for verification:
[Loom
Recording](https://www.loom.com/share/ebd07db6c4d04900aa18f3a1ba71e770?sid=75b33043-dc80-4e2d-82ae-f183efa6faa2)
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/32d20ca0-fa50-427c-92e8-638884d86de3
- code needs refactoring
- ~~missing stack behaviour (I dont think its easy to add something
similar here, but will give it a try) - I suspect it will look crowded~~
- ~~the notification counter - boards have it on top right, but on
tables we cant do that since the rows could be longer than the scrolling
container , therefore I added it on top left corner~~
- ~~needs to test with large set of data for both boards and tables
(pagination)~~
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
This PR introduces the usage of record fields in the manipulation of
table columns and board fields.
Since all of the actual system relies on states like tableColumns,
recordIndexFieldDefinitions and the likes, it was required to implement
temporary utils that modifies those states in parallel of the new
generic currentRecordFields, to keep a working product.
With this PR though, currentRecordFields becomes the single source of
truth that gets saved to DB, and the remaining work is just to make the
switch with this new state on all components that are plugged to
tableColumns and the like.
This will be done in another PR.
# Implement Morph Frontend Settings
Possiblity to create a morh relation from the Settings !
## Overview
Morph object system with new frontend settings UI for configuring morph
relations.
## What Changed
- **New Components**: `SettingsDataModelFieldMorphRelationForm`,
`SettingsMorphRelationMultiSelect`
- **Form System**: React Hook Form + Zod validation for morph relation
configuration
- **Preview System**: Live preview of field configurations with
validation
- **State Management**: Enhanced component state handling for complex
form interactions
## Technical Details
- **Architecture**: Restructured field input/display components for
better maintainability
- **Types**: Added comprehensive TypeScript types for morph relations
(`isFieldMorphRelation`, etc.)
- **Validation**: Dynamic validation rules based on field types and
relation patterns
- **Performance**: Optimized rendering with proper state management
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Issue: https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13913
Motivation/Problem:
Bulk delete and query paths were composing filters differently, causing
mismatches. In some cases this led to invalid or empty GraphQL filters
(e.g. {"and":[{}]}), breaking delete operations.
Fix:
Unify filter composition (combinedFilter) across queries and bulk
delete, ensuring consistent handling of base filters + soft-deleted
clause. Also adjusted record filter grouping logic to avoid dropping
filters when no groups exist.
Result:
Filtered queries and bulk deletes now behave consistently and reliably
without producing broken filters.
---------
Co-authored-by: root <root@DESKTOP-E2VOJGE>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Quick fix : make workflow version available in runs.
This would global refactor. We should not have both version and run flow
here.
I will probably stop using the same component in both at some point and
rather duplicate. Versions and Workflow will use version. Runs will use
flow.
This PR prepares and simplify option dropdown for using record fields.
I had a problem while trying to use currentRecordFields directly with
ordering so I stayed with the actual column definition system.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR adds a new RecordField abstraction to mimick the behavior of
RecordFilter, RecordSort and other similar concepts that allow to have
something that is not related directly to views.
It is closely following the same pattern with an Effect component to
initialize it from views and CRUD hooks to modify it.
Although for this concept we save to view fields automatically for every
modification.
This PR does not implement saving to view fields, it is just a parallel
code path that is meant to be built to see if everything behaves the
same then we'll remove the old code path at the end by saving record
fields instead of the many states for columns, fields definitions, etc.
Charles Bochet