Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Félix Malfait f663cd3c68 Move open-record-in to object metadata and member preference (#23614)
Replaces the per-view "Open in" setting with a two-level model,
following up on #23422 / #23424 and superseding the closed #23446 and
#23457:

- `objectMetadata.openRecordIn`: `SIDE_PANEL` | `RECORD_PAGE` |
`USER_CHOICE` (default `USER_CHOICE`)
- `workspaceMember.openRecordIn`: `SIDE_PANEL` | `RECORD_PAGE` (default
`SIDE_PANEL`), editable in Settings > Experience

The rule: records open where the member prefers, unless the object pins
them, and never in a panel there is no room for (mobile always resolves
to the record page).

## Why

Having the setting on views, objects and members at once was heavy, and
view-level resolution was fragile: a chip rendered outside a view
(notes, front components, kanban cards pointing at another object) had
no view to read from, which is the class of bug behind #23422.
Resolution is now context-free: it needs only the object, the current
member and the viewport, so chips behave identically everywhere by
construction.

## Changes

**Object level**
- New `openRecordIn` enum column on `objectMetadata`, editable through
`updateOneObject` and surfaced in Settings > Data model > Object >
Layout ("Open records in": Member preference / Side Panel / Record Page)
- Standard definitions pin `workflow`, `workflowVersion`, `dashboard`
and `messageCampaign` to the record page (matching the previously
hardcoded list) and `calendarEvent` to the side panel (it has no curated
record page); everything else, including `workflowRun`, follows the
member preference
- Apps can set it in `defineObject()` via the object manifest

**Member level**
- New `openRecordIn` standard field on `workspaceMember`, persisted
through the existing settings path (same as `colorScheme`) and exposed
in Settings > Experience

**View level (deprecated)**
- `view.openRecordIn` is no longer read or written by the frontend; the
"Open in" entry is gone from the view options dropdown
- The column, DTO field and inputs are kept for one release for API
compatibility: the output field carries a `deprecationReason`, the
inputs keep accepting the value with a `Deprecated:` description (NestJS
silently drops input fields that have a `deprecationReason`, which would
have been a breaking change)

**Upgrade (2.27)**
- Fast instance command adds the `objectMetadata.openRecordIn` column
defaulting to `USER_CHOICE`
- Workspace command adds the `workspaceMember.openRecordIn` field
- Workspace command seeds the object column from the standard
definitions (any non-`USER_CHOICE` value), then lifts deliberate
per-view record page choices onto objects the definitions don't pin

**Debt removed**
- `canOpenObjectInSidePanel` hardcoded object list and its test
- `ObjectOptionsDropdownLayoutOpenInContent` and the `layoutOpenIn`
dropdown wiring
- `DefaultViewOpenRecordIn`
- Context-store/view-based resolution in `useResolveOpenRecordIn` (now
reads object metadata + member + viewport)
- Front components no longer guess from the current view: an explicit
side-panel call honours a pinned object and the viewport, nothing else

## Verification

- Ran the three upgrade commands against a live database: column
created, the pinned standard objects seeded per workspace (record page
pins plus calendarEvent to side panel), member field backfilled to
`SIDE_PANEL`; seed rerun is a no-op
- Seed command verified on a simulated pre-upgrade workspace (index view
set to record page on company): pins the standard objects plus company,
idempotent on rerun
- Both packages typecheck and lint clean; affected unit suites and the
application sync, view creation and metadata cache integration specs
pass

---------

Co-authored-by: Thomas des Francs <tdesfrancs@gmail.com>
2026-07-31 18:28:55 +02:00
Weiko 25bd2897a3 Add weekly layout to record calendar (#22819)
## Summary

- Add a week layout to record calendar views and persist the selected
layout.
- Render `DATE` calendars as an all-day week and `DATE_TIME` calendars
as an hourly week.
- Add an optional end date field across calendar configuration,
metadata, persistence, and complete-view upserts.
- Use configured end values for ranged and multi-day events, with a
one-hour fallback when a `DATE_TIME` end is absent or invalid.
- Keep calendar cards consistent with the existing compact view,
including checkbox selection and whole-card record opening.
- Gate the weekly layout and end-date behavior behind the public Labs
`IS_CALENDAR_WEEK_VIEW_ENABLED` workspace feature flag.

## Week interactions

- Show overlapping timed events side by side and cap the visible records
at two per day.
- Display start and end times on timed cards, enforce a readable
30-minute minimum height, and keep today’s text contrast stronger.
- Drag timed events between days and times with 30-minute snapping while
preserving their duration, including zero-duration events.
- Show a create button when hovering a 30-minute slot; keyboard users
can focus a day, move the slot with the arrow keys, and reach the same
contextual action.
- Initialize new records with the selected slot time and a compatible
writable end value one hour later.
- Show the workspace time zone and current-time indicator in timed
weeks; date-only weeks keep the all-day section without an hourly grid.

## Configuration and data loading

- Only allow end fields that match the start field type, and prevent
selecting the same field for both boundaries.
- Load records whose ranges overlap the visible period so month and week
layouts display the same relevant records.
- Resolve and persist calendar end fields when updating existing views
through `upsert_complete_view`.
- Fall back to Month and ignore the configured end field while the flag
is disabled, without overwriting either persisted setting, so
re-enabling restores the previous configuration.
- Expose the flag in Labs and keep it default-off for workspaces without
a stored value; enable it in the development seeder.

<img width="1285" height="808" alt="Screenshot 2026-07-15 at 15 50 17"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b7e3f7f1-ca77-492f-8cce-cca186ebca0b"
/>
2026-07-15 16:30:18 +02:00
Félix Malfait 23f5ba9ebf feat: add resizable kanban column width (#21828)
## What & why

Lets users resize the columns of a Kanban (record board) view. Requested
by a user; the design avoids the "ragged board" problem by making the
width a **single shared value**.

## Behaviour

- A drag handle appears on the right edge of every column header.
- Because all columns read **one** width value, dragging any handle
resizes **every** column together — they can never end up mismatched.
- Width is clamped between **150px** and **400px** (default **200px**).
- The width is **persisted per view** and restored on reload.

## Approach

**Backend** — a new nullable `View.kanbanColumnWidth` field, threaded
through the existing view-level setting pattern (the same one
`kanbanAggregateOperation` / `shouldHideEmptyGroups` use), so it gets
create/update/manifest/override support for free:
- entity column + `ViewOverrides` + `@WasIntroducedInUpgrade`
- `CreateViewInput` / `UpdateViewInput` (`Int`, `@Min(150)`/`@Max(400)`)
+ `ViewDTO`
- flat-view editable properties, entity-properties config, compare-type,
standard-view + manifest converters
- a fast instance command adding the `core.view` column

**Frontend** — the value hydrates into a view-scoped atom and drives a
single CSS variable set on the board container, which both column
headers and bodies read. Live dragging only writes that CSS variable (no
per-move React re-render); the final width is committed to the atom and
persisted via `updateView` on pointer-up.

## Nullability / defaults

`kanbanColumnWidth` is nullable — `null` means "never resized" and the
UI falls back to the 200px default, so existing rows need no backfill.

## Validation

- `nx typecheck twenty-server`  and `nx typecheck twenty-front` 
- `nx lint:diff-with-main twenty-server` ; frontend lint fixes applied
(split constants to one-per-file, removed `useRef`-for-state in favour
of `useState`).
- Draft pending a final green CI run (the dev container reclaimed
`node_modules` mid-session; re-running locally).

## Test plan

- [ ] Drag a kanban column edge → all columns resize together, clamped
150–400px
- [ ] Reload → width persists for that view; other views unaffected
- [ ] A view that was never resized still renders at 200px

https://claude.ai/code/session_016Qe6oDBkhVbrq2QkXBJ5nE

---
_Generated by [Claude
Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_016Qe6oDBkhVbrq2QkXBJ5nE)_

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21828?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-19 15:58:13 +02:00
Félix Malfait b010599000 fix(server): preserve kanban/calendar fields in view manifest sync (#19946)
## Summary

The `fromViewManifestToUniversalFlatView` converter hardcoded five view
fields to `null` instead of reading them from the manifest:
- `mainGroupByFieldMetadataUniversalIdentifier`
- `kanbanAggregateOperation`
- `kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataUniversalIdentifier`
- `calendarLayout`
- `calendarFieldMetadataUniversalIdentifier`

As a result **any** Kanban view in an app manifest is rejected by
`validateFlatViewCreation` with `"Kanban view must have a main group by
field"`, and any Calendar view would trip the `view.entity.ts` check
constraint requiring `calendarLayout` + `calendarFieldMetadataId` to be
non-null. Discovered while trying to install
[`twenty-crm-meeting-baas`](https://github.com/Meeting-BaaS/twenty-crm-meeting-baas)
which ships a Kanban view.

## Changes

- **Server converter**: read all five fields from the manifest (with `??
null` fallback).
- **`ViewManifest` type** (`twenty-shared`): add the five fields so SDK
users can set them type-safely.
- **Move `ViewCalendarLayout`** from `twenty-server` to `twenty-shared`
so the manifest type can reference it. Seven import sites updated; the
front-end imports via generated GraphQL types and is unaffected.
- **Unit tests**: extend
`from-view-manifest-to-universal-flat-view.util.spec.ts` with
preservation + null-default cases for both Kanban and Calendar (5 tests
total).
- **Regression coverage**: add a Kanban view
(`post-cards-by-status.view.ts`) to the `rich-app` fixture grouped by
the existing `status` SELECT field. The existing
`applications-install-delete-reinstall` e2e test now exercises the
Kanban path end-to-end — a future regression here would fail CI.

Note: `expected-manifest.ts` and the `views.length` assertion in
`manifest.tests.ts` were updated to reflect the new fixture view.

## Test plan

- [x] `nx test twenty-server --
from-view-manifest-to-universal-flat-view` → 5/5 pass
- [x] `nx typecheck twenty-shared` / `twenty-sdk` / `twenty-server` → no
new errors (one pre-existing unrelated error in
`admin-panel.module-factory.ts`)
- [x] `nx lint twenty-shared` / `twenty-sdk` → clean
- [x] Manual install of the Meeting BaaS app on a dev workspace succeeds
with the Kanban view after this fix
- [ ] CI: SDK e2e `applications-install-delete-reinstall` passes against
the new fixture view
- [ ] CI: integration test `calendar-field-deactivation-deletes-views`
still passes after the enum move

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: claude[bot] <41898282+claude[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-04-22 16:31:00 +02:00
Thomas Trompette b4e924b671 Sync views and navigation items (#18003)
Both objects are necessary to fully enjoy objects within applications

<img width="770" height="311" alt="Capture d’écran 2026-02-17 à 15 19
43"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/48c51fa4-63f4-45b2-a40a-df73f3aa79be"
/>
2026-02-17 16:32:41 +01:00
Abdul Rahman 1839f8e946 Fix: Persist hide empty groups setting on backend (BREAKING: deploy server first) (#16385)
Closes #13754 and [core team issue
#414](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/414)
2025-12-10 19:10:29 +05:30
Marie 7ce22d5c7e breaking (soft) - Migrate viewGroup.fieldMetadataId -> view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataId (2/3) (#16277)
Should be merged once https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/16206 has
been released + command run to prod

In this PR
- Remove usage of viewGroup.fieldMetadataId, both in BE and FE states. 
- But we still need to properly populate it until we fully remove
viewGroup.fieldMetadataId from db and ORM entity (upcoming 3rd PR out of
3). fieldMetadataId was removed from CoreViewGroup type and
CreateViewGroupInput and is determined BE-side based on the associated
view's mainGroupByFieldMetadataId. **I expect this means a downtime on
viewGroup creation, until both FE and BE are deployed and cache is
flushed.** This seems acceptable to me as it only regards viewGroup
creation.
    - this information is replaced by view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataID
- Handle view group creation, update and deletion in the BE as a
side-effect of a view creation, update or deletion. Optimistic effects
are still used
- Add validation at view creation or update regarding
mainGroupByFieldMetadata

Left to do in 3rd PR
- Remove viewGroup.fieldMetadataId from db and ORM entity
- Restore feature allowing to update an existing grouped view's group by
field (already OK on BE side but need to rebuild FE optimistic)
2025-12-05 14:00:03 +00:00
Marie 77409b6eb2 [Requires "warm" cache flush (no immediate downtime before flush)] Migrate viewGroup.fieldMetadataId -> view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataId (1/3) (#16206)
In this PR (1/3)
- introduce view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataId as the new reference
determining which fieldMetadataId is used in a grouped view, in order to
deprecate viewGroup.fieldMetadataId which creates inconsistencies.
view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataId is now filled at every view creation,
though not in use yet.
- Introduce a command to backfill view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataId for
existing views + delete all viewGroup.fieldMetadataId with a
fieldMetadataId that is not view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataId. (It should
concern 37 active workspaces)
- Temporarily disable the option to change a grouped view's
fieldMetadataId as for now it creates inconsistencies. This feature can
be reintroduced when we have done the full migration.

In a next PR
- (2/3) use view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataId instead of
viewGroup.fieldMetadataId. In FE we may keep viewGroup.fieldMetadataId
as a state (TBD). View groups will now be created / deleted as a side
effect of view's mainGroupByFieldMetadataId update.
- (3/3) remove viewGroup.fieldMetadataId

---------

Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
2025-12-02 16:31:07 +01:00
Félix Malfait cff17db6cb Enhance role-check system with stricter checks (#15392)
## Overview

This PR strengthens our permission system by introducing more granular
role-based access control across the platform.

## Changes

### New Permissions Added
- **Applications** - Control who can install and manage applications
- **Layouts** - Control who can customize page layouts and UI structure
- **AI** - Control access to AI features and agents
- **Upload File** - Separate permission for file uploads
- **Download File** - Separate permission for file downloads (frontend
visibility)

### Security Enhancements
- Implemented whitelist-based validation for workspace field updates
- Added explicit permission guards to core entity resolvers
- Enhanced ESLint rule to enforce permission checks on all mutations
- Created `CustomPermissionGuard` and `NoPermissionGuard` for better
code documentation

### Affected Components
- Core entity resolvers: webhooks, files, domains, applications,
layouts, postgres credentials
- Workspace update mutations now use whitelist validation
- Settings UI updated with new permission controls

### Developer Experience
- ESLint now catches missing permission guards during development
- Explicit guard markers make permission requirements clear in code
review
- Comprehensive test coverage for new permission logic

## Testing
-  All TypeScript type checks pass
-  ESLint validation passes
-  New permission guards properly enforced
-  Frontend UI displays new permissions correctly

## Migration Notes
Existing workspaces will need to assign the new permissions to roles as
needed. By default, all new permissions are set to `false` for non-admin
roles.
2025-11-07 15:37:17 +01:00
Paul Rastoin 59fbe35a8c Move view in metadata-modules/ and create atomic folder + module for each view entity (#14990)
# Introduction
Preparing view-filter and view-group introduction in v2 core engine
Moving view from `core-modules` to `metadata-modules`

## What happened

### Created dedicated modules for each view entity:
- ViewFieldModule
- ViewFilterModule
- ViewFilterGroupModule
- ViewGroupModule
- ViewSortModule

### Each module is now completely independent with its own:
- Controller
- Resolver
- Service
- Entity

### Created dedicated abstraction metadata module folder for:
- flat-view-field
- flat-view

### Dependencies 
- Eleminated circular dep on ViewModule to all others ones
- Granular import not importing the whole viewModule anymore everywhere


close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1703
2025-10-09 15:18:15 +02:00