This PR introduces refactors and tradeoffs in the API around the events
of field input.
# Refactored usePersistField
The hook `usePersistField` has been refactored to be used anywhere in
the app, not just inside a FieldContext.
This was meant to solve a bug at the beginning but now it is just used
once in `RecordDetailRelationSection` outside of the context, still this
is better to have this hook like that for future use cases.
We also introduce `usePersistFieldFromFieldInputContext`, for an easier
API inside a FieldContext.
# Introduced a new `FieldInputEventContext`
To remove the drill-down of events, we introduce
`FieldInputEventContext`, this allows to set only once the handlers /
events. In practice it allows to have an easier time maintaining the
events for the many different field inputs, because it matches the
pattern we already use of taking everything from a context
(`FieldContext`).
# Removed drill-down from FieldInput
The heavy drill-down in FieldInput has been completely removed, since
everything can be derived from `FieldContext` and
`FieldInputEventContext`.
Also there was some readonly and other specific props, but they were all
drilled down from FieldContext, so it was easier to just use
FieldContext where needed.
# Refactored events of `MultiItemFieldInputProps`
The component `MultiItemFieldInputProps` has a contrived API, here we
just remove the complex part that was persisting from inside.
We now only give a classic API with `onChange` and `onEscape` the rest
is left to higher levels, where it should be, because this generic
component shouldn't be aware of persisting things.
# Extracted the parsing logic of persisted values
For each input field component, we now have a clear util that was before
bound to the persist call,
# Tradeoff with persist times
The tradeoff before was that persistField was called anywhere, before
exiting the component sometimes, now it is only called by the higher
levels like table or show page, which handles this abstraction.
This could be challenged, however I think that having a lot of different
events, and not just `handleSubmit` and `handleCancel`, convey enough
meaning for the higher levels to decide what to do in each case.
A `skipPersist` argument was added in events in the rare edge cases
where we want to voluntarily skip persisting even with a submit or
escape, but that could be challenged because we could also say that we
should use cancel for that and stick to that convention.
# Handling of the bug in `ActivityRichTextEditor`
Initially this refactor was prioritized for solving this bug, which was
very annoying for the users.
But while fixing it with the new persistField hook I just understood
that the problem is not just for record title cells but for anything
that is open when we click on a rich text editor.
The issue is described here :
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1317
So right now I just let it as is.
# Stories
The stories were checking that a request was sent in some cases where
persist was called before a component exiting, now that persist is only
called by higher-levels I just removed those tests from the stories,
because that should be the responsibility of higher levels.
Also a helper `getFieldInputEventContextProviderWithJestMocks` was
created that exposes a context and jest mock functions for testing this
new API in stories.
# Miscellaneous
Deactivated tui with nx by default, because it can be annoying.
This PR updates the subtitle under the "Endpoint URL" input on the
webhook creation form.
The updated text clearly states that the server sends POST requests with
application/json and recommends setting the correct Content-Type.
This addresses issue #13757.
Closes#13757
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ehconitin <nitinkoche03@gmail.com>
This PR removes the unintended line break in all IMAP section subtitles
so the text reads as a single inline paragraph.
✅ No functional changes
✅ Purely UI/text formatting fix
Closes#13783
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In this PR, we add some validation logic and rules in both FE and BE to
ensure field permissions are handled correctly for relation fields.
- (BE) Only one field permission per fieldMetadata is accepted per
input. This is already guaranteed in the FE. It was added to help
guarantee that, when looking within the field permissions input for a
potential field permission on a relationTargetFieldMetadataId for a
relation field, there can only be 0 or 1.
- (FE) Only field permission with new values are sent to save, to avoid
sending contradictory field permissions for related fields. E.g. let's
say I have an existing field permission restricting read permission on
company's people field. By definition I also have one on person's
company field. If I update this field permission to enable the read
permission by updating company's people field, in the previous logic I
was also going to send for upsert the existing obsolete field permission
on person's company. Thus the server does not know which is the right
value so we should only send the new value.
- (BE) If the server receives two contradictory field permissions on two
related fields, e.g. on company's people with canRead = null and
person's company with canRead = false, it throws an error.
In this PR
- Introduction of readableFields and updatableFields in
objectMetadataItem selector to ease filtering from a developer
experience perspective ( + to help developers think to do it). In
discussion @lucasbordeau @charlesBochet
- Remove non-updatable field from CSV import process (@etiennejouan)
- QA fix / Non-readable fields should not show on show page
- QA fix / It should not be offered to create a kanban view on a
non-readable field
- QA fix / It should not be offered to create view groups on a
non-readable field
- QA fix / Rating field should have a readonly mode
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR removes any V2 naming in state management logic and some minor
utils and hooks.
It has a lot of changes but nearly all of them were made by the rename
functionality of vscode which is deterministic, so it shouldn't
introduce any regression.
QA has been made on this PR on the main features of the app without any
noticeable issue.
Also renamed some other v2 naming related items :
- TextInputV2 => TextInput
- TextInput => SettingsTextInput
- ObjectFilterDropdownFilterSelectMenuItemV2 =>
ObjectFilterDropdownFilterSelectMenuItem
- useInitDraftValueV2 => useInitDraftValue
- useOpenRecordTableCellV2 => useOpenRecordTableCell
This PR implements what's needed to edit field permissions on a role.
Field permissions that aren't useful are kept in the database to avoid
the overhead of adding cleaning logics both in front end and back end.
They just won't be taken into account if object permission doesn't allow
it.
In this PR we also handle the case were there's no object permission
override but where there are only field permission overrides, which can
happen if an object inherits from a "all object can read" but restricts
read only on some fields.
<img width="547" height="642" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/77d81f89-4af9-42b6-97f3-fae3a6ba1eeb"
/>
<img width="590" height="912" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/69fab8ee-7252-401a-bc6f-8a8b7c7f6bc4"
/>
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1152
This PR lowers unit test coverage because the essential unit tests for
this PR have been written and writing more tests would not be a great
tradeoff for this feature which has already taken a lot of efforts.
Health status queries are failing at the moment - regression was
introduced in 01f25519f6
health status ids are not uuids, we use params to fetch them on the
frontend.
But maybe @FelixMalfait and @abdulrahmancodes have more context on this
one?
- Removed caching of IMAP client as it was problematic and didn't really
matter because of our pipeline, also added retry logic to client.
- Some code refactoring and cleanup
- Breaking changes:
- Removed messageChannel.syncCursor
- Uses messageFolder.syncCursor instead
- Removed Date based sync cursor in favor of message UID which is much
more reliable and precise
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1276
We now need to take fields permissions into account when determining if
a cell is editable or not.
a record field (= a cell) is read only if one of the condition is met:
- the object of the record is read-only (can be determined at table
level) by permission setting
- the field of the object is read-only (can be determined at column
level) - either by permission settings or by system (some workflows
fields for intance)
- the record is deleted (can be determined at row level)
we reorganized the code to avoid re-computing known information as much
as possible.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In our Graphql schema, ids are typed as UUID.
Our FE codegen is typing it as 'any', unless we say otherwise. Fixing it
and fixing the impacts in the codebase
Fixes#13250
This PR fixes the breadcrumb display issue where API names were shown
instead of friendly object names when navigating to related objects in
the detail view.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
resolvetwentyhq/core-team-issues#1255
- Introduced a new field isWeekStartMonday in the workspaceMember table.
- Added a function updateCalendarStartDay to update the
isWeekStartMonday value when the user toggles the corresponding field in
the settings.
The logic works for me, but I couldn’t find a way to create the column
locally in the database for the workspaceMember tables. Please let me
know if this approach looks good and how to properly create dynamic
columns that are not directly handled via migration.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4eebada5-6a96-4a88-8e96-98f1501859e3
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
as discussed here
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13292#issuecomment-3092215050
with @prastoin
- [x] introduce optional message param to `copyToClipboard` method in
`useCopyToClipboard` and refactor it across app, as in case if user has
disallowed clipboard permission in BROWSER unprotected clipboard access
breaks without catch.
- [x] Email copied to clipboard
- [x] run lingui extract
This PR removes every legacy state management logic left in the code
base, we only keep our last component state management logic.
Removed :
- Scoped states logic
- Dropdown scope logic
- Scope id naming
- Component state v1
- Component state v2_alpha
# QA
| Component | Comments |
| --- | --- |
| AttachementDropdown | Ok |
| ObjectTasks | Ok |
| ActivityRichTextEditor | Ok |
| App | Ok dialogs work |
| AppRouterProviders | Ok dialogs work |
| RecordBoardScrollToFocusedCardEffect | Ok |
| RecordBoard | Ok |
| RecordBoardCard | OK |
| useSelectAllCards | Ok |
| RecordInlineCell | Ok |
| useInlineCell | Ok |
| RecordDetailRelationRecordsListItem | Ok |
| RecordDetailRelationSectionDropdownToMany | Ok |
| RecordDetailRelationSectionDropdownToOne | Ok |
| useHandleContainerMouseEnter | Ok |
| useResetTableRowSelection | Ok |
| useSelectAllRows | Ok |
| useSetRecordTableData | Ok |
| useRecordTable | Ok |
| useRecordTableMoveFocusedCell | Ok |
| useRecordTableMoveFocusedRow | Ok |
| useMoveHoverToCurrentCell | OK |
| useTriggerActionMenuDropdown | Ok |
| RecordTableBodyDragDropContextProvider | Ok |
| RecordTableHeaderCell | Ok |
| useSetCurrentRowSelected | Ok |
| useRecordTitleCell | Ok |
| SettingsObjectFieldActiveActionDropdown | Ok |
| SettingsObjectFieldInactiveActionDropdown | Ok |
| SettingsObjectFieldItemTableRow | Ok |
| SettingsObjectInactiveMenuDropDown | Ok |
| SettingsRoleEditEffect | Ok |
| SettingsRolesQueryEffect | Ok |
| Dropdown | Ok |
| useSelectableList | Ok |
| useSelectableListHotKeys | Ok |
| useSelectableListListenToEnterHotkeyOnItem | Ok |
| useNavigationSection | Ok |
| useCreateViewFromCurrentState | Ok |
| useDeleteViewFromCurrentState | Ok |
| useUpdateViewFromCurrentState | Ok |
| ViewPickerFavoriteFoldersDropdown | Ok |
| useCreateViewFromCurrentView | Ok |
| ViewBarDetails | Ok |
| WorkflowRunVisualizer | Ok |
| useHandleWorkflowRunDiagramCanvasInit | Ok |
| WorkflowDiagramCanvasBase | Ok |
| WorkflowRunVisualizerEffect | Ok |
| useRemoveStepFilter | Ok |
| useRemoveStepFilterGroup | Ok |
| useUpsertStepFilterSettings | Ok |
| WorkflowFindRecordsFilters | Ok |
| SettingsObjects | Ok |
Webhooks are still documented in core playground to detail Webhooks of
core objects.
We moved webhooks to metadata playground and forgot to keep computation
of WebhookForResponse
This PR adds it back
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13297
See SettingsDataModelFieldDateForm form validation which expects a
settings field to be present with a default display format. This PR adds
the missing initial value.
- Renamed `WorkflowActionAdapter` to `ToolExecutorWorkflowAction`
- Renamed `settingPermission` table to `permissionFlag` and `setting`
column to `flag`
- Decoupled the send email logic from workflows to tools
- Add new `Tools Permission` section in FE
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Implementation is very simple
Established authentication dynamic is intercepted at
getAuthTokensFromLoginToken. If 2FA is required, a pattern similar to
EmailVerification is executed. That is, getAuthTokensFromLoginToken
mutation fails with either of the following errors:
1. TWO_FACTOR_AUTHENTICATION_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED
2. TWO_FACTOR_AUTHENTICATION_PROVISION_REQUIRED
UI knows how to respond accordingly.
2FA provisioning occurs at the 2FA resolver.
2FA verification, currently only OTP, is handled by auth.resolver's
getAuthTokensFromOTP
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Jean-Baptiste Ronssin <65334819+jbronssin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Balaji Krishnamurthy