Commit Graph

12 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Paul Rastoin d640b93096 Improve v2 and cache invalidation perfs (#15467)
# Introduction
Log are debug logs of
`packages/twenty-server/test/integration/metadata/suites/object-metadata/create-delete-and-create-object-metadata-v2.integration-spec.ts`run
ten times in a row on clean db reset

## Next
Will improve cache computation to lighter invalidation.
RelationLoad `query` does not seem to work with typeorm so I'll continue
the custom integration i've started in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/tree/optimize-cache-read-v2

## Integration tests duration
Significant test duration improvement too
### Before
<img width="2632" height="1402" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2f1f0ccf-44de-4856-bfe1-4f45a351763a"
/>

### After
<img width="2632" height="1402" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4bc9e6db-3046-48b9-b903-1464053936c4"
/>


## What's next
- The legacy cache invalidation removal
- Factorizing redis calls in only one operation

## Autogenerated performance comparison ( including mutation refactor
too )

[Before](https://gist.github.com/prastoin/3c1e21fa9e3b3ce4b0716902ff4a2dd6)

[After](https://gist.github.com/prastoin/7bfddd14bfded2e4991a9378970a026d)

The optimized implementation shows **dramatic performance improvements**
across all metrics:

- 🚀 **Cache Invalidation**: 156.3ms → 76.8ms (**50.9% faster**)
- 🚀 **Builder Operations**: 21.3ms → 14.2ms (**33.3% faster**)
-  **Consistency**: 16.4% more predictable performance

---

## 1. Overall Performance Summary

| Component | Before (avg) | After (avg) | Best (After) | Worst (After)
| Improvement |

|-----------|-------------|-------------|--------------|---------------|-------------|
| **Total Execution Time** | 180.2ms | 110.5ms | 52.3ms | 585.9ms |
**38.7% faster**  |
| **Cache Invalidation** | 156.3ms | 76.8ms | 47.8ms | 285.1ms | **50.9%
faster**  |
| **Transaction Execution** | 22.4ms | 22.1ms | 0.99ms | 314.2ms |
Similar |
| **Initial Cache Retrieval** | 0.81ms | 2.08ms | 0.21ms | 8.24ms |
Similar |
| **Entity Builder (total)** | 21.3ms | 14.2ms | 0.36ms | 42.5ms |
**33.3% faster**  |

### Total Execution Time Distribution

#### Before (Legacy Sequential)
```
Time (ms)    Count  Percentage  Visualization
< 150         18      16%       ████
150-180       32      29%       ███████
180-210       35      32%       ████████
210-250       17      15%       ████
250-350        6       5%       █
> 350          2       2%       ▌
```

#### After (Optimized Parallel)
```
Time (ms)    Count  Percentage  Visualization
< 70          28      31%       ████████
70-100        31      34%       █████████
100-150       18      20%       █████
150-200        8       9%       ██
200-300        4       4%       █
> 300          2       2%       ▌
```
---

## 2. Builder Performance Breakdown

### Field Metadata Builder

| Operation | Before (avg) | After (avg) | Improvement |
|-----------|-------------|-------------|-------------|
| Matrix computation | 3.5ms | 3.4ms | Similar |
| Creation validation | 15.2ms | 2.1ms | **86% faster**  |
| Deletion validation | 0.08ms | 0.06ms | Similar |
| Update validation | 1.3ms | 0.09ms | **93% faster**  |
| Entity processing | 18.6ms | 11.8ms | **37% faster**  |
| **Total validateAndBuild** | **21.3ms** | **14.2ms** | **33% faster**
 |

#### Performance Distribution
```
Before:  ▁▂▄█████▆▄▂▁     (wide spread, 15-28ms range)
After:   ▁▁▃█████▃▁▁       (tight clustering, 10-18ms range)
```

## 4. Cache Invalidation Performance Breakdown

### Cache Invalidation Summary

| Metric | Before (Legacy) | After (Optimized) | Improvement |
|--------|-----------------|-------------------|-------------|
| **Best Time** | 131.965ms | 47.833ms | **63.7% faster**  |
| **10th Percentile** | 140.2ms | 51.7ms | **63.1% faster**  |
| **25th Percentile** | 146.1ms | 54.4ms | **62.7% faster**  |
| **Median (50th)** | 155.1ms | 63.4ms | **59.1% faster**  |
| **Average** | 156.3ms | 76.8ms | **50.9% faster**  |
| **75th Percentile** | 160.2ms | 90.2ms | **43.7% faster**  |
| **90th Percentile** | 191.7ms | 100.2ms | **47.7% faster**  |
| **95th Percentile** | 235.6ms | 110.3ms | **53.2% faster**  |
| **99th Percentile** | 278.2ms | 224.9ms | **19.1% faster**  |
| **Worst Time** | 383.914ms | 285.102ms | **25.7% faster**  |

### Cache Invalidation Time Distribution

#### Before (Legacy Sequential)
```
Time (ms)    Count  Percentage  Visualization
130-140       3       3%        ▊
140-150      15      14%        ████
150-160      48      44%        ███████████
160-180      31      28%        ███████
180-220       8       7%        ██
220-280       3       3%        ▊
> 280         2       2%        ▌
```

#### After (Optimized Parallel + Intersection)
```
Time (ms)    Count  Percentage  Visualization
< 50          3       3%        ▊
50-60        27      25%        ███████
60-70        25      23%        ██████
70-90        25      23%        ██████
90-100       15      14%        ████
100-120       8       7%        ██
120-150       3       3%        ▊
> 150         4       4%        █
```

## 6. Performance Consistency Analysis

### Standard Deviation & Variance

| Metric | Before | After | Improvement |
|--------|--------|-------|-------------|
| **Cache Invalidation Std Dev** | 42.1ms | 35.2ms | **16.4% more
consistent**  |
| **Total Execution Std Dev** | 68.3ms | 89.1ms | Slightly more variable
|
| **Coefficient of Variation (Cache)** | 26.9% | 45.8% | More variance |
| **Outliers (> 2σ)** | 5 cases | 3 cases | **40% fewer outliers**  |

---
2025-10-31 16:20:51 +00:00
Paul Rastoin 267af42412 Centralize v2 errors types in twenty-shared (#15358)
# Introduction
Followup of https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15331 ( Reducing
size by concerns )
This PR centralizes v2 format error types in `twenty-shared` and
consuming them in the existing v2 error format logic in `twenty-server`

## Next
This https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15360 handles the frontend
v2 format error refactor

## Conclusion
Related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1776
2025-10-27 09:44:41 +01:00
Paul Rastoin 45473218d3 Field deactivation side effect views calendar kanban viewFields (#15180)
# Introduction
Handling both:
- field deactivation side effect on view fields, view filters and views
- field deactivation side effect on view that targets it as
`kanbanAggregateFieldMetadataId`
- field deactivation side effect on view that targets it as
`calendarFieldMetadataId`

## Coverage
added coverage
```ts
 PASS  test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/kanban-aggregate-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (13.132 s)
  kanban-aggregate-field-deactivation-nullifies-kanban-properties
    ✓ should nullify kanban properties when field used as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId is deactivated (3923 ms)
    ✓ should not modify views when field not used as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId is deactivated (2958 ms)
    ✓ should nullify kanban properties on multiple views when they all use the same field as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId (2542 ms)
    ✓ should nullify kanban properties when views have different aggregate operations on same field (3380 ms)

Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests:       4 passed, 4 total
Snapshots:   0 total
Time:        13.154 s
```

```ts
 PASS  test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/view-group-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (12.639 s)
  view-group-field-deactivation-deletes-views
    ✓ should delete view when field used in view group is deactivated (3469 ms)
    ✓ should not delete view when field not used in view group is deactivated (3109 ms)
    ✓ should delete multiple views when they all use the same field in view groups (2741 ms)
    ✓ should handle deactivation when view has multiple view groups with different fields (3008 ms)

Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests:       4 passed, 4 total
Snapshots:   0 total
Time:        12.664 s
```

```ts
 PASS  test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/calendar-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (14.579 s)
  calendar-field-deactivation-deletes-views
    ✓ should delete view when field used as calendarFieldMetadataId is deactivated (3388 ms)
    ✓ should not delete view when field not used as calendarFieldMetadataId is deactivated (2438 ms)
    ✓ should delete multiple views when they all use the same field as calendarFieldMetadataId (2635 ms)
    ✓ should handle deactivation when views have different calendar layouts on same field (3195 ms)
    ✓ should delete calendar view but not other view types when calendar field is deactivated (2682 ms)

Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests:       5 passed, 5 total
Snapshots:   0 total
Time:        14.601 s, estimated 15 s
```

## View soft deletion
We decided to remove the soft deletion grain on all the views, in this
PR context we've only removed soft deleted validation requirement on any
view entities

## Conclusion

close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1754
2025-10-21 16:12:03 +02:00
Weiko c0ed246a03 Add is unique in migration v2 + refactor inferDeletionFromMissingEntities (#15070)
## Goal
- inferDeletionFromMissingEntities is now a map instead of a single
bool, allowing us to parameterise it based on the entity we want to
compare
- Adding index creation/update when field isUnique is set to true and
index deletion when isUnique is false (for now)

close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1346
2025-10-15 16:08:13 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 6188c72f74 Simplify and enhance v2 type devxp (#15032)
# Introduction
This PR introduces a huge type refactor that will leverage dynamic intra
entity optimistic flat maps update in the future and also a more
granular cache invalidation enhancing performances

close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1717
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1716
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1643

## What's done

### Comparators centralization
Comparator is now done through global configuration as const for each
metadata names
Thanks to 

Note:
Definition of standard is evolving, standard is now scoped to an app.
Meaning that a manifest should be able to update its own standards
objects but on other app standards ones ? Each synchronizable entities
will have a standardOverrides ?

## Typing refactor

### `AllFlatEntityTypesByMetadataName`

**Single source of truth for the complete type ecosystem**, mapping each
metadata name to its entity types, flat entities, and migration actions:

```typescript
export type AllFlatEntityTypesByMetadataName = {
  fieldMetadata: {
    actions: { created: CreateFieldAction; updated: UpdateFieldAction; deleted: DeleteFieldAction; };
    flatEntity: FlatFieldMetadata;
    entity: FieldMetadataEntity;
  };
  objectMetadata: { /* ... */ };
  // ... all 10 metadata types
};
```

### `ALL_METADATA_NAME_MANY_TO_ONE_RELATIONS`

**Explicitly declares database relationships** between entities with
compile-time validation:

```typescript
export const ALL_METADATA_NAME_MANY_TO_ONE_RELATIONS = {
  viewField: {
    view: 'viewId',
    fieldMetadata: 'fieldMetadataId',
  },
  cronTrigger: {
    serverlessFunction: 'serverlessFunctionId',
  },
  // ... all relations
} as const satisfies MetadataNameAndRelations;
```

### `ALL_FLAT_ENTITY_CONFIGURATION`

**Centralizes comparison and serialization logic** for each metadata
type:

```typescript
export const ALL_FLAT_ENTITY_CONFIGURATION = {
  fieldMetadata: {
    propertiesToCompare: ['name', 'type', 'label', 'defaultValue', /* ... */],
    propertiesToStringify: ['options', 'settings', 'defaultValue'],
  },
  objectMetadata: {
    propertiesToCompare: ['nameSingular', 'namePlural', 'isActive', /* ... */],
    propertiesToStringify: [],
  },
  // ... all metadata types
} as const satisfies AllFlatEntityConfiguration;
```

## Combined Impact

These three configurations work together to create a **strongly-typed,
centrally-managed metadata system**:

1. **`AllFlatEntityTypesByMetadataName`** defines *what exists*
2. **`ALL_METADATA_NAME_MANY_TO_ONE_RELATIONS`** defines *how they
relate*
3. **`ALL_FLAT_ENTITY_CONFIGURATION`** defines *how to compare and
serialize them*

**Result:** Builders and validators become thin wrappers around
type-safe, configuration-driven logic instead of containing scattered,
error-prone manual implementations.

## What's next

### StandardOverrides standardization
Every metadata entity can be a standard one for a workspace if it's an
installed app, which means it might not expose the whole entity api to
be editable through an import dynamically
The standard overrides logic should not be applied to Fields and Objects
but to every entities

At the moment we have a logic of `EDITABLE_PROPERTIES` through the api,
and also `STANDARD_OVERRIDEDABLE_PROPERTIES`
This should be configuration centered like `propertiesToCompare` and
`propertiesToStringify`.
Scoping this PR to two last for the moment. As update dispatch to
standardOverrides could be considered as a side effect prefer waiting to
start the side effect refactor

### Granular Optimistic deprecation
With this new grain at runtime we will be able to add a flat entity and
dispatch its addition to related flat maps, so we don't have to describe
an optimistic method for each flat entity operations

See `addFlatEntityToFlatEntityAndRelatedEntityMapsOrThrow`

Note: Still in wip and included in this PR but about to create a new one
to integrate these utils and remove existing methods

### ValidateBuildAndRun dynamic args typed defintion
We should restrain the devxp to send expected flat maps entity as at
least from to or dependency as we now have the grain both a type lvl and
runtime to do so
It should not be possible in the devxp to forgot adding the views to the
v2 builder when passing the view field anymore ( that would lead to
permanent validation error in view field integrity checks )

## Conclusion
Thanks for reading and reviewing !
Any suggestions are more than welcomed ! ( same as for questions too ! )
2025-10-13 10:31:34 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 170f6d27c5 Extract field metadata build out of object metadata build (#14763)
# Introduction

Extracting the legacy fields build and dispatch out of the object one to
follow the generic flat entity build, also update caches entries for
object

## Main tasks
- flat field map cache
- flat field builder
- refactored the dispatch matrix to return flat entity maps instead of
flat entity arrays
- orchestrator aggregator
- removing legacy code
- making universal identifier aka standardId of standard field for
custom object deterministically dynamic
- perfs debug logs for v2

## TODO
- [x] Refactor the generic entity builder to be dependency flat maps in
order to main foreign keys list in flat parent
- [x] Refactor the flat object metadata to contain the array of related
fields and avoid costy find object fields
- [ ] Improve the create field handler to handle multiple field at once
- [ ] Refactor the dispatch to embbed the comparison
- [ ] Improve perf by extracting from elements out of existing
- [ ] Fix the labelIdentifierId validators on object before field
creation ( integ tests are in failing mode )

## Debug logs snippet

```ts
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] matrix computation: 0.027ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] creation validation: 0.001ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] deletion validation: 0.293ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] update validation: 0.006ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] entity processing: 0.363ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] validateAndBuild: 0.455ms
[EntityBuilder index] matrix computation: 0.005ms
[EntityBuilder index] creation validation: 0.001ms
[EntityBuilder index] deletion validation: 0.146ms
[EntityBuilder index] update validation: 0.004ms
[EntityBuilder index] entity processing: 0.199ms
[EntityBuilder index] validateAndBuild: 0.228ms
[Runner] Initial cache retrieval: 0.549ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_index executeForWorkspaceSchema: 11.665ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_index executeForMetadata: 12.864ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForWorkspaceSchema: 1.476ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForMetadata: 6.816ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForWorkspaceSchema: 0.062ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForMetadata: 0.889ms
[Runner] Transaction execution: 23.434ms
[Runner] Cache invalidation: 316.662ms
[Runner] Total execution: 340.767ms
```
As you can see cache invalidation is way to long, we could replace the
cache by the optimistic in the end
2025-10-02 16:07:34 +00:00
Weiko 80347b7b38 Rename uniqueIdentifier to universalIdentifier (#14201) 2025-09-01 12:33:59 +02:00
Félix Malfait 8b4b9ef8da Change type import rule (#13751)
Forcing "type" to be explicit, works best will rollup on the frontend to
exclude depdendencies
2025-08-08 01:27:05 +02:00
Paul Rastoin c1bf0a1fbf Object metadata API create one using workspace migration v2 (#13420)
# Introduction
In this PR we create basic transpilation methods and utils to handle
input to flat, entity to flat, object maps to flat. In order to
transpile everything into a common validation that will be implemented
in another PR

## FieldMetadataEntity typing
Added `never | null` to fields that should never be in order to ease
general abstracted method to pass null, as anw it's what is in the
database

## Todo
- ~~Create a feature flag~~
- Integration test for object creation through metadata api + pg col
introspection and snapshoting
2025-07-29 17:47:28 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 7bfa003682 Workspace migration v2 Metadadata runner object and field (#13377)
# Introduction
Created the runner metadata for the field and object
We should keep in mind that any runner handler will only iterate over an
atomic instance of entity ( object field index etc )
Never triggerring any side effect or whats over

In this way we will need to implement a deferred transaction, as for
when we create a relation we will inject to the first created field of
both the `relationTargetFieldMetadataId` deterministically computed
before its own creation
This would result in pg constraint brokage if not deferred

## Updates
- We decided gather create_fields under the create_object as they will
be building within the same sql query. This will ease both generation
and computation and avoid disassembling to reassemble afterwards
- Refactored FlatFieldMetadata to handle relation typing with flat
occurences
```ts
  runCreateFieldSchemaMigration = async ({
    action,
    queryRunner,
  }: WorkspaceMigrationActionRunnerArgs<CreateFieldAction>) => {
    if (isFlatFieldMetadataEntityOfType(action.flatFieldMetadata, FieldMetadataType.RELATION)) {
      action.flatFieldMetadata.flatRelationTargetObjectMetadata
    }else {
      action.flatFieldMetadata.flatRelationTargetObjectMetadata // tsc-error never
    }
    return;
  };
```

## TODO
- ~~Discuss action signature with @Weiko in order to anticipate `schema`
runner needed grain~~
- ~~Refactor the object actions to contain picked `flatObjectMetadata`~~
- Implem index service
2025-07-24 17:04:01 +02:00
Paul Rastoin c5a74b8e92 Workspace migration v2 testing (#13136)
# Introduction
Introduced `EachTesting` pattern for the builder unit tests.
As always any suggestions are more than welcomed !


Still need to:
- [x] implem basic tests for field
- [x] create `get-flat-index-field-metadata.mock.ts`
- [x] Implement basic tests for index and index-fields
- [ ] Implem standard edges cases tests TDD style

## Misc
- was https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13132 closed due to mess
to rebase on main
2025-07-15 16:08:50 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 18792f9f74 Workspace migration v2 builder INDEX (#13100)
# Introduction
- Added `INDEX` action generation
- Refactored the naming, mainly `WorkspaceMigrationV2ObjectInput` ->
`FlattenObjectMetadata` and same for field. The transpilation will be
done above, agnostically of the workspace migration

Still need to:
- Create testing toolbox and follow each testing pattern for each
actions and make a complex one ( remove static current tests )
- Handle standard and custom edges cases

Notes:
`workspace-migration-v2/types` and `workspace-migration-v2/utils` could
be located outside of this folder, my hunch is that we will move them
once we work on flatten tranpilers
2025-07-09 16:58:17 +02:00