Introduce a read-only view of permissions similar to agent roles tab.
The role selector in the following image feels as if it would lead to a
new page, which is not what we want.
<img width="1281" height="813" alt="Permissions (If easier V1)"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7b272f5a-40ef-43ad-83d8-f9e588b1cd6e"
/>
Therefore, I added a Select component for now and would love some
clarity on what's ideal.
<img width="554" height="651" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/91575208-66b1-4ed1-86cd-f3aa528ad0dc"
/>
Also, the "Add Rule" button changes to enabled when we switch the role
from `Admin` to `Member` and clicking it redirects to
`/settings/roles/:role-id/add-object-permission`. Do we want to disable
the button completely?
One final thing: SettingsAgentRoleTab already re-uses
SettingsRolePermissions. I created MemberPermissionsTab to do the same.
I don't think we need an abstracted shared component here since both
tabs rely on the same shared child anyway. However, if we need a
refactor, I can use some direction on how the code should look.
Creating this PR as draft since I think there might be a couple
suggested changes on this.
Closes [1918](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1918).
- For the first point in the issue, we just show the deactivated entries
along with the deactivated text.
---
- For the second point, we show a banner and control the
enabled/disabled state of save button depending on whether we're
allowing the user to create table with the typed name.
- For example, we do not want to allow the user to create a table with
reserved name, so we disable the save button without showing a banner.
- Similarly, we do not want the user to create a table with a name that
already exists in the database. In this case, we show a banner and we
also disable the save button.
- Finally, we do not want to allow the user to create a table where
singular and plural name are the same. Therefore, we disable the save
button for names like `works`.
---
- For the third point, if we add the delete button, it logically means
that we allow the user to delete a custom object/field even it has not
been deactivated yet, so did that.
- Upon deleting the object/field, if we wait for the metadata to refetch
before we navigate, this is what we see because the path does not exist
any longer after deletion and we're waiting for refetch on the path
until we navigate away.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dbe0569c-db88-4285-851f-22551b1ca81e
- To avoid this page from appearing, I replaced awaiting refetch to not
awaiting refetch and redirecting while the refetch happens in the
background.
- Therefore, when we delete something, there is a slight delay for when
it is actually cleared out from the list, but the Not Found view does
not appear on the screen.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/47f49579-ce51-4d6a-b857-72046247bb4b
- I tried optimistically removing the object/field from the metadata,
but it leads to some issues (crashes the app) and I have not been able
to find a solution for it yet.
- Therefore, instead of getting stuck at perfection and blocking myself,
I stopped getting into the issue further and created this PR by ensuring
that the desired functionality works.
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> Display deactivated objects/fields by default, add delete actions with
confirmation, and unify metadata name computation (auto-suffix reserved
keywords) across front/back with conflict checks in object creation.
>
> - **Frontend (Settings/Data Model)**:
> - **Visibility/UX**: Show `Deactivated` labels for objects/fields;
filters default to include inactive (`showDeactivated`/`showInactive`
true); replace field action dropdown with chevron link.
> - **Delete flows**: Add delete buttons for custom objects/fields with
confirmation modals and background refetch to avoid Not Found flashes.
> - **Creation/Edit validation**: Add name conflict detection banner in
`SettingsDataModelObjectAboutForm` and disable Save on conflicts;
simplify `metadataLabelSchema` to use computed name; form fields
validate on change and sync API names.
> - **Shared (twenty-shared/metadata)**:
> - Add `computeMetadataNameFromLabel` util (slugify+camelCase) and
`RESERVED_METADATA_NAME_KEYWORDS`; auto-append `Custom` to reserved
names; export constants/utilities.
> - **Backend**:
> - Migrate to shared `computeMetadataNameFromLabel`; update validators
to use shared reserved keywords with new messages; allow deletion of
active custom fields/objects (keep standard guards); adjust
services/decorators accordingly.
> - **Tests/Stories**:
> - Update unit/integration snapshots for new reserved-name messages and
behaviors; add missing i18n/router decorators in stories.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
5b126155606f6dbc8f7f91e2192cffb7bd2ebd2c. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
- Refactored workspace member details into a focused Infos-only page.
- Aligned the flow with SettingsProfile, including controlled name
inputs, debounced saves, and stable instance IDs.
- Added a dedicated member-picture upload flow. Introduced the
MemberPictureUploader, connected to the
uploadWorkspaceMemberProfilePicture mutation.
- Backend now includes a workspace-member resolver/module for
profile-picture uploads. The endpoint is permission-guarded, streams
files through FileUploadService, and returns the signed file without
modifying the member entity.
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> Adds a workspace member detail page with picture/name management,
integrates a new avatar upload mutation, and updates list routing;
replaces the old profile picture uploader across profile and onboarding.
>
> - **Frontend**
> - **Settings Members**:
> - Add `pages/settings/members/SettingsWorkspaceMember` with
`MemberInfosTab`, `MemberNameFields`, and `MemberEmailField` for
viewing/editing member info.
> - Update routes in `SettingsRoutes` and add
`SettingsPath.WorkspaceMemberPage`.
> - Update `SettingsWorkspaceMembers` to navigate to member detail on
row click and simplify row actions (remove dropdown menu).
> - **Avatar Upload**:
> - Introduce `WorkspaceMemberPictureUploader` using
`uploadWorkspaceMemberProfilePicture` mutation.
> - Replace `ProfilePictureUploader` in `SettingsProfile` and
`onboarding/CreateProfile`.
> - **GraphQL (client)**:
> - Add `uploadWorkspaceMemberProfilePicture` mutation types/hooks in
`generated(-metadata)/graphql.ts`.
> - **Backend**
> - Add `UserWorkspaceResolver` with
`uploadWorkspaceMemberProfilePicture` mutation guarded by
`WorkspaceAuthGuard` and `SettingsPermissionGuard` (WORKSPACE_MEMBERS),
using `FileUploadService`.
> - Register resolver and `PermissionsModule` in `UserWorkspaceModule`.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
359652f8c94d093a69469969874131e525d3dc6f. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
## Summary
This PR introduces a comprehensive agent evaluation system and refactors
the AI module structure for better organization.
## Key Changes
### 🎯 Agent Evaluation System
- Added **Agent Turn Evaluation** entities, DTOs, and database schema
- New GraphQL mutations: `evaluateAgentTurn` and `runEvaluationInput`
- Added `evaluationInputs` field to Agent entity for storing test inputs
- New `AgentTurnGraderService` for automatic turn evaluation
- Added evaluation UI with new **Evals** and **Logs** tabs in agent
detail pages
### 🏗️ Entity & Module Refactoring
- Renamed `AgentChatMessage` → `AgentMessage` for clarity
- Consolidated chat entities: `AgentMessage`, `AgentTurn`, and
`AgentChatThread`
- Reorganized AI modules under `ai/` subdirectory structure
- Updated imports across codebase to reflect new module paths
### 🤖 New Agents & Roles
- Added **Dashboard Builder Agent** for dashboard creation and
management
- Added **Dashboard Manager Role** with appropriate permissions
- Updated role permissions to be more granular (users vs agents vs API
keys)
### 🔐 Permission System Updates
- Added `HTTP_REQUEST_TOOL` permission flag
- Updated Workflow Manager role permissions (restricted tool access)
- Enhanced permission flag types to differentiate between user/agent/API
key contexts
- Added `isRelevantForAgents`, `isRelevantForApiKeys`,
`isRelevantForUsers` to permission flags
### 📨 Message Role Enhancement
- Added `system` role to `AgentMessageRole` enum (alongside
user/assistant)
- Updated message handling to support system prompts
### 🎨 UI/UX Improvements
- New tabs in agent detail: **Evals** and **Logs**
- Added turn detail page: `/ai/agents/:agentId/turns/:turnId`
- Fixed text overflow in `SettingsListItemCardContent`
- Updated role applicability labels ("Assignable to Workspace Members")
### 🛠️ Technical Improvements
- Fixed Zod schema validation for UUID and Date fields (use string
validators)
- Updated `ToolRegistryService` to properly register HTTP tool with
permission flag
- Enhanced error handling in agent execution services
- Updated database migrations for new entity schema
## Database Migrations
- `1764210000000-add-system-role-to-agent-message.ts`
- `1764220000000-add-evaluation-inputs-to-agent.ts`
- `1764200000000-add-agent-turn-evaluation.ts`
- `1764100000000-refactor-agent-chat-entities.ts`
## Testing
- [ ] Agent evaluation flow tested
- [ ] Dashboard Builder agent tested
- [ ] Permission system validated
- [ ] UI tabs and navigation tested
- [ ] Database migrations run successfully
## Breaking Changes
⚠️ **Entity Rename**: `AgentChatMessage` renamed to `AgentMessage` -
GraphQL queries need updating
## Related Issues
<!-- Link any related issues here -->
## Screenshots
<!-- Add screenshots if applicable -->
Block users from creating NUMERIC, POSITION, and TS_VECTOR fields via
the API as these are system-only types. Users should use NUMBER instead
of NUMERIC.
/closes #16023
# Introduction
Two things:
- Enforcing non nullable workspace custom application Id for any
workspace
- Fixing front non editable data models following
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15911 that associate any custom
entities to an applicationId. The front was putting everything as
readonly when under an app ( we will have to handle the twenty standard
application in the future too )
## Fallback
### Migration
The non nullable migration will fail when released, that's why it's
being swallowed and re-run in an upgrade command post workspace custom
application creation for those that miss one. Allowing the migration to
pass in the end
The typeorm migration still need to exists for any new workspaces
### GetCurrentUser
In order to dynamically display isReadOnly in data model settings we're
fetching the workspaceCustomApplicationId through the `getCurrentUser`
If not fallback this endpoint would throw until we're handling existing
workspaces that do not have a custom workspace application
The fallback should be removed post release
## 🐛 Issues Fixed
### 1. Role Editing Not Working for New Agents
When creating a new agent and then creating a role for it, the role
permissions appeared as non-editable. This was caused by:
- In create mode, `agentId = ''` (empty string from `useParams`)
- Empty string is **falsy** but `isDefined('')` returns **true**
- This caused incorrect behavior in role exclusivity checks and API
calls
### 2. Missing Role Data Loading
The agent form wasn't loading role data needed for permission editing
because it was missing the `SettingsRolesQueryEffect` component.
### 3. Navigation Conflicts
The `useSaveDraftRoleToDB` hook contained navigation logic that caused
conflicts when used from different contexts (role detail page vs agent
form).
### 4. Linting Errors
Unused `useIcons` import in `SettingsAgentRoleTab.tsx`.
---
## 🔧 Changes Made
### Agent Role Tab (`SettingsAgentRoleTab.tsx`)
- ✅ Use `isNonEmptyString(agentId)` to validate agentId (follows
codebase patterns)
- ✅ Improved role exclusivity logic to handle both create and edit
modes:
- **Edit mode**: Role must be assigned exclusively to this agent
- **Create mode**: Role must not be assigned to anyone yet
- ✅ Only call `assignRoleToAgent` when a valid agentId exists
- ✅ Pass `undefined` instead of empty string for `fromAgentId` prop
### Role Hook (`useSaveDraftRoleToDB.ts`)
- ✅ Removed navigation logic from the hook (better separation of
concerns)
- ✅ Removed `useNavigateSettings` and `SettingsPath` dependencies
- ✅ Hook now only handles data persistence, not navigation
### Role Component (`SettingsRole.tsx`)
- ✅ Added navigation after successful role creation in create mode
- ✅ Navigation now handled by the component using the hook
### Agent Form (`SettingsAgentForm.tsx`)
- ✅ Added `SettingsRolesQueryEffect` to ensure role data is loaded
- ✅ Agent form handles its own navigation after save
---
## ✅ Testing Scenarios
All these scenarios now work correctly:
1. ✅ Create new agent → Create role → Edit permissions → Save agent
2. ✅ Edit existing agent → Create role → Edit permissions → Save
3. ✅ Edit existing agent → Try to edit shared role (shows warning
message)
4. ✅ Navigate to object-level permissions from agent form with proper
breadcrumbs
---
## 📝 Technical Details
### Root Cause Analysis
The main issue was that empty string was being treated differently in
different checks:
- `agentId &&` → evaluates to `false` (empty string is falsy)
- `isDefined(agentId)` → returns `true` (empty string is defined)
This inconsistency caused the role to appear as non-editable and
attempted invalid API calls.
### Solution
Used `isNonEmptyString()` from `@sniptt/guards` which properly checks
both that the value is defined AND not empty, following codebase
conventions.
---
## 🎯 Impact
- Fixes critical bug preventing role permission configuration for new
agents
- Improves code quality with better separation of concerns
- Makes navigation logic more predictable and maintainable
- Follows codebase patterns and guidelines
- Users with a single workspace are allowed to update their email across
`core.user` and `workspace_xyz.workspaceMember`.
- The latter happens asynchronously (built it like this for non-blocking
with multiple workspaces), but since we restrict the email update
functionality to a single user, we can also update the email in
workspaceMember synchronously - I left asynchronous there to receive
feedback on whether we should move to synchronous or not.
- Merged main and resolved conflicts to ensure we use the
`SettingsPermissionGuard` and the updated `workspace.service.ts` code.
One edge-case that I was trying to communicate on Discord:
Say that an admin is a member of multiple workspaces. Therefore, they
can allow roles with PROFILE_INFORMATION permission to update their
email.
<p align="center">
<img width="553" height="115" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/80382b1f-a9e3-4dac-b606-c2defeb2c330"
/>
</p>
However, since the admin is part of multiple workspaces, he/she cannot
even update own email - the field stays disabled, leading to some
confusion.
<p align="center">
<img width="545" height="255" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5e6d27db-c9a8-4d5e-9ab6-65c77beae5b4"
/>
</p>
However, the workspace can have another member with admin role or some
other role that has PROFILE_INFORMATION permission flag. That user will
be and should be allowed to update email, so we cannot hide `email` from
dropdown options.
<p align="center">
<img width="585" height="283" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a670d3ac-cf48-4865-a425-b909093d8420"
/>
</p>
The behavior is fine imo, just a little confusing for members with more
than one workspace.
I have also tested the flow by signing up to YC workspace with my org
google account (twenty.com), then changing email to my personal address.
- After changing, I need to login using Google with my personal account
to access YC workspace again.
- If I login using Google with org google account (twenty.com), a new
user account is created.
This behavior is consistent with Notion and Linear.
Finally, as for the verification of email, the user is asked to verify
email while they're logged in, but just in case they logout without
verifying, the next login would force them to verify their email in the
email/password flow.
However, for Social/SSO, they must verify before they logout or else
they'd have to contact support for assistance. I have not looked into
how to show verification screen while logging in via Social/SSO yet, but
if that's something critical for completeness here, I shall revisit it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
## Overview
This PR strengthens our permission system by introducing more granular
role-based access control across the platform.
## Changes
### New Permissions Added
- **Applications** - Control who can install and manage applications
- **Layouts** - Control who can customize page layouts and UI structure
- **AI** - Control access to AI features and agents
- **Upload File** - Separate permission for file uploads
- **Download File** - Separate permission for file downloads (frontend
visibility)
### Security Enhancements
- Implemented whitelist-based validation for workspace field updates
- Added explicit permission guards to core entity resolvers
- Enhanced ESLint rule to enforce permission checks on all mutations
- Created `CustomPermissionGuard` and `NoPermissionGuard` for better
code documentation
### Affected Components
- Core entity resolvers: webhooks, files, domains, applications,
layouts, postgres credentials
- Workspace update mutations now use whitelist validation
- Settings UI updated with new permission controls
### Developer Experience
- ESLint now catches missing permission guards during development
- Explicit guard markers make permission requirements clear in code
review
- Comprehensive test coverage for new permission logic
## Testing
- ✅ All TypeScript type checks pass
- ✅ ESLint validation passes
- ✅ New permission guards properly enforced
- ✅ Frontend UI displays new permissions correctly
## Migration Notes
Existing workspaces will need to assign the new permissions to roles as
needed. By default, all new permissions are set to `false` for non-admin
roles.
**Before**
- any user with workpace_members permission was able to remove a user
from their workspace. This triggered the deletion of workspaceMember +
of userWorkspace, but did not delete the user (even if they had no
workspace left) nor the roleTarget (acts as junction between role and
userWorkspace) which was left with a userWorkspaceId pointing to
nothing. This is because roleTarget points to userWorkspaceId but the
foreign key constraint was not implemented
- any user could delete their own account. This triggered the deletion
of all their workspaceMembers, but not of their userWorkspace nor their
user nor the roleTarget --> we have orphaned userWorkspace, not
technically but product wise - a userWorkspace without a workspaceMember
does not make sense
So the problems are
- we have some roleTargets pointing to non-existing userWorkspaceId
(which caused https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14608 )
- we have userWorkspaces that should not exist and that have no
workspaceMember counterpart
- it is not possible for a user to leave a workspace by themselves, they
can only leave all workspaces at once, except if they are being removed
from the workspace by another user
**Now**
- if a user has multiple workspaces, they are given the possibility to
leave one workspace while remaining in the others (we show two buttons:
Leave workspace and Delete account buttons). if a user has just one
workspace, they only see Delete account
- when a user leaves a workspace, we delete their workspaceMember,
userWorkspace and roleTarget. If they don't belong to any other
workspace we also soft-delete their user
- soft-deleted users get hard deleted after 30 days thanks to a cron
- we have two commands to clean the orphans roleTarget and userWorkspace
(TODO: query db to see how many must be run)
**Next**
- once the commands have been run, we can implement and introduce the
foreign key constraint on roleTarget
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14608
As title
- adds decorators in twenty-sdk
- update twenty-cli load-manifest to it gets @FieldMetadata infos +
testing
- update twenty-server so it CRUD fields properly, using
universalIdentifier
- Fix UI so we can update managed objects records
- move FieldMetadata items from twenty-server to twenty-shared
Here is what the PR does:
- Surface password state in validatePasswordResetToken, returning
hasPassword so the client can tell whether a user is setting or changing
their password.
- Consume that flag throughout the front end (mock data, stories,
GraphQL types) and update the Reset/Set Password modal to swap the
heading/button label and success toast accordingly.
- After a successful password set/reset, immediately update the
logged-in user’s hasPassword flag so the Settings screen reflects the
new state without a reload.
Modal has two states now - reset password modal uses change password
state since it made intuitive sense.
<p align="center">
<img width="404" height="397" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c54cc581-1248-4395-833d-0202758e1947"
/>
</p>
<p align="center">
<img width="403" height="393" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d8a39a95-27e6-4037-86f2-1f74176002ba"
/>
</p>
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
- Allow users to choose the date granularity of the x axis and the group
by of the y axis on a bar chart
- Display those options conditionally
- Store timezones in graphs: each graph has its own timezone, defaults
to the user timezone. There will be a picker in the v2 to choose the
timezone. For now the timezone is not used by the backend, but it will
be used in filters and in group by queries.
- Store first day of the week
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/66a5d156-dd93-4ebe-8c8f-d172f93e25be
Closes [Core Issue
#1772](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1772).
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> Introduces SSO bypass with a new permission flag and workspace-level
provider toggles, enabling permitted users to log in via
Google/Microsoft/Password when SSO-only, with backend enforcement and
frontend UI/hooks/queries.
>
> - **Backend**:
> - **Permission & Enforcement**: Add `PermissionFlagType.SSO_BYPASS`;
update `AuthService` to allow login via non-SSO providers when workspace
bypass is enabled and user has `SSO_BYPASS`.
> - **Workspace Model**: Add `isGoogleAuthBypassEnabled`,
`isMicrosoftAuthBypassEnabled`, `isPasswordAuthBypassEnabled`
(migration, entity, update input, service validation).
> - **Public API**: Extend `PublicWorkspaceDataOutput` with
`authBypassProviders`; resolver computes it; permissions defaults
include `SSO_BYPASS`.
> - **Frontend**:
> - **GraphQL/State**: Generate new types/fields; add
`authBypassProviders` to `GetPublicWorkspaceDataByDomain`; new states
`workspaceAuthBypassProvidersState`, `workspaceBypassModeState`.
> - **Auth UI/Logic**: Add `useWorkspaceBypass`; update sign-in form and
footer to offer "Bypass SSO" and use merged providers when enabled;
remove auto-redirect when single SSO.
> - **Settings**: Add Security section to toggle bypass methods per
provider; conditionally show Change Password via `useCanChangePassword`.
> - **Tests/Mocks**: Update mocks and tests to include bypass
flags/providers.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
8c393b2bad387fb6e8b8f40027f8637dd6e85723. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Fixes - https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/15364
- Removed `activeNonSystemObjectMetadataItems` from the hook as it was
not necessary. Hook use `alphaSortedActiveNonSystemObjectMetadataItems`
now.
- Correctly check for read permissions.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Complete color refactoring
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1779
- Updated all colors to use Radix colors with P3 color space allowing
for brighter colors
- Created our own gray scale interpolated on Radix's scale to have the
same values for grays as the old ones in the app
- Introduced dark and light colors as well as there transparent versions
- Added many new colors from radix that can be used in the tags or in
the graphs
- Updated multiple color utilities to match new behaviors
- Changed the computation of Avatar colors to return only colors from
the theme (before it was random hsl)
These changes allow the user to use new colors in tags or charts, the
colors are brighter and with better contrast. We have a full range of
color variations from 1 to 12 where before we only had 4 adaptative
colors.
All these changes will allow us to develop custom themes for the user
soon, where users can choose their accent colors, background colors and
there contrast.
# Introduction
Please first review this PR initial base
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15358
In a nutshell refactored the frontend fetchers to display v2 errors
format smoothly
Please note that the v2 now finished the whole validation and does fail
fast anymore ( summary is hardcoded for the moment )
```json
[
{
"extensions": {
"code": "BAD_USER_INPUT",
"errors": {
"cronTrigger": [],
"databaseEventTrigger": [],
"fieldMetadata": [
{
"errors": [
{
"code": "INVALID_FIELD_INPUT",
"message": "Default value should be as quoted string",
"value": "",
},
{
"code": "INVALID_FIELD_INPUT",
"message": "Default value "" must be one of the option values",
"value": "",
},
],
"flatEntityMinimalInformation": {
"id": Any<String>,
"name": "testField",
"objectMetadataId": Any<String>,
},
"status": "fail",
"type": "create_field",
},
],
"index": [],
"objectMetadata": [],
"routeTrigger": [],
"serverlessFunction": [],
"view": [],
"viewField": [],
"viewFilter": [],
"viewGroup": [],
},
"message": "Validation failed for 0 object(s) and 0 field(s)",
"summary": {
"invalidCronTrigger": 0,
"invalidDatabaseEventTrigger": 0,
"invalidFieldMetadata": 0,
"invalidIndex": 0,
"invalidObjectMetadata": 0,
"invalidRouteTrigger": 0,
"invalidServerlessFunction": 0,
"invalidView": 0,
"invalidViewField": 0,
"invalidViewFilter": 0,
"invalidViewGroup": 0,
"totalErrors": 0,
},
"userFriendlyMessage": "Validation failed for 0 object(s) and 0 field(s)",
},
"message": "Multiple validation errors occurred while creating fields",
"name": "GraphQLError",
},
]
```
## What's done
- `usePersistView` tool ( CRUD )
- renamed `usePersistViewX` tools accordingly ( no more records or core
)
- Now catching a lot of before unhandled exceptions
- refactored each services to handle their own exception handlers and
return either the response or the error within a discriminated union
record
## Result
### Primary entity error
When performing an metadata operation on a given metadata, if validation
errors occurs we will display each of them in a toast
Here while creating an object metadata.
<img width="700" height="327" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0c33d13c-c66c-4749-af36-b253abd3449b"
/>
### Related entity error
Still while creating an object
<img width="700" height="327" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/52607788-c4e9-470c-ac8c-23437345ee5c"
/>
### Translated
<img width="700" height="327" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a7198c20-ae82-47a6-910c-761de9594672"
/>
## Conclusion
This PR is an extract of https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15331
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1776
## Notes
- Not refactor around triggers services as they're not consumed directly
by any frontend services
Adds intelligent routing system that automatically selects the best
agent for user queries based on conversation context.
### Changes:
- Added `routerModel` column to workspace table for configurable router
LLM selection
- Implemented `RouterService` with conversation history analysis and
agent matching logic
- Created router settings UI in AI Settings page with model dropdown
- Removed agent-specific thread associations - threads are now
agent-agnostic
- Added real-time routing status notification in chat UI with shimmer
effect
- Removed automatic default assistant agent creation
- Renamed GraphQL operations from agent-specific to generic (e.g.,
`agentChatThreads` → `chatThreads`)
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Fixes [Dependabot Alert
85](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/security/dependabot/85) -
prototype pollution in lodash.
Added a shared pick helper (with unit tests) in twenty-shared and
refactored front-end/server code to import { pick } from the shared
barrel instead of lodash.pick.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: martmull <martmull@hotmail.fr>
🎯 Merge Settings Relation and Morph Relation Forms followup
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15062
Here we fixed some little comments that could have be done earlier in
the main PR
🎯 Merge Settings Relation and Morph Relation Forms
In the settings, we unify morph and relation into a single form.
The form now automatically creates
- a `RELATION` field when 1 destination object is selected
- or a `MORPH_RELATION` field when 2+ objects are selected.
Better UI labels (showing object name for single selection, "X Objects"
for multiple), proper field editing controls on destination objects, and
capitalized field labels.
We still make sure the isMorphRelationEnabled feature flag prevents
current users from accessing this feature
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1589
Closes#14726
### Added
- `trashRetentionDays` field to workspace entity (default: 14 days)
- Automated trash cleanup using BullMQ jobs
- Daily cron (00:10 UTC) that enqueues cleanup jobs for all active
workspaces
- Per-workspace limit: 100k records deleted per day
- Calendar-based retention: records deleted on day X are cleaned up X+14
days later (at midnight UTC boundaries)
### Architecture
- **Cron (WorkspaceTrashCleanupCronJob):** Runs daily, enqueues jobs in
parallel for all workspaces
- **Job (WorkspaceTrashCleanupJob):** Processes individual workspace
cleanup
- **Service (WorkspaceTrashCleanupService):** Discovers tables with
`deletedAt`, deletes old records with quota enforcement
- **Command:** `npx nx run twenty-server:command
cron:workspace:cleanup-trash` to register the cron
### Testing
- Unit tests for service with 100% coverage of public API
- Tested quota enforcement, error handling, and edge cases
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
**Fixes #15036**
Changes:
Centered Webhook URL: The webhook URL is now properly centered within
its table cell.
Conditional Scroll Arrows: The small arrows for horizontal scrolling now
only appear when the webhook URL is longer than the width of the cell.
This prevents the arrows from being displayed for shorter URLs.
Files changed:
1.
`packages/twenty-front/src/modules/settings/developers/components/SettingsWebhooksTable.tsx`
The grid-template-columns of the StyledTableRow component was changed
from a fixed-width layout (444px 68px) to a flexible layout (1fr auto).
This allows the first column, which contains the webhook URL, to grow
and shrink dynamically based on the available space, which is crucial
for proper centering and handling of different URL lengths.
2.
`packages/twenty-front/src/modules/settings/developers/components/SettingsDevelopersWebhookTableRow.tsx`
The overflow property of the StyledUrlTableCell component was changed
from hidden to auto. This ensures that the horizontal scrollbar (the
"small arrows") is only displayed when the content of the cell (the
webhook URL) overflows the cell's width.The redundant
StyledApisFieldTableRow component was removed to simplify the code, as
its styles were being overridden by the parent component.
How to Test
1. Log in to the application.
2. Go to Settings > API & Webhooks.
4. Add a new webhook with a short URL (e.g., http://localhost:3000).
5. Expected Behavior: The URL should be centered within the table cell,
and no scroll arrows should be visible.
6. Add another webhook with a long URL.
7. Expected Behavior: The URL should be centered, and horizontal scroll
arrows should be visible, allowing you
to scroll to see the entire URL.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
## Refactor: Prepare frontend record layouts for backend-driven
configuration
This PR simplifies and prepares the frontend record layout system for
eventual migration to backend-driven layouts, aligning the architecture
with the existing PageLayout system used for dashboards.
### Key Changes
**Architecture Improvements:**
- Created unified LayoutRenderingContext that works for both record
pages (with targetRecord) and dashboards (standalone)
- Replaced prop drilling with context-based data flow - cards access
targetRecord and isInRightDrawer via context hooks
- Introduced useTargetRecord() helper hook that provides type-safe
access to the current record
- Created generic CardRenderer component that handles configuration
injection and context guards uniformly
**Configuration System:**
- Converted all tab icons from React components to JSON-serializable
strings (e.g., Icon: IconCheckbox → icon: 'IconCheckbox')
- Added configuration field to cards, matching the widget configuration
pattern on the backend
- Created CardConfiguration types system similar to WidgetConfiguration
on the backend
- Moved widget-specific props (like showDuplicatesSection) into
configuration objects
**Code Organization:**
- Extracted visibility evaluation logic into reusable
evaluateTabVisibility() utility
- Organized layouts into dedicated files (one per object:
base-record-layout.ts, company-record-layout.ts, etc.)
- Renamed components to match their purpose: Notes → NotesCard,
Attachments → FilesCard, etc.
- Consolidated card rendering from registry object to direct
getCardComponent() function
**API Alignment:**
- Made ifNoReadPermissionObject an explicit part of TabVisibilityConfig
(follows if* naming convention)
- Removed redundant targetObjectNameSingular from tab-level (now derived
from visibility config)
- Card API now mirrors Widget API (both use type, configuration,
accessed via context)
## Problem
With Twenty usage growing, we are facing challenges on server side to
respond to the demand. The current bottleneck we are facing is server
CPU.
While investigating CPU performances, we figured out that loading all
relation fields was the biggest issue.
### About graphql query response size
**Example:** on `People Index` Table page:
we query: `person.company` and we query **all non relation fields** on
company relation field.
`{ person { company { id, name, domainName, employees, address ... } }`
However we only need **company.id, company.name and company.domainName**
to be able to render the Company Chip in the company column (RELATION)
in the table.
`{ person { company { id, name, domainName } }`
We initially assumed that the querying all non relation fields was not
an issue because it was not adding additional load on database (which is
also partially true: if a field is containing a huge json this will add
load on postgres as data needs to be transfered)
This assumption is wrong on CPU side:
- when loading one to many relations (company.people), this quickly ads
up and we end up with response of 20kB quite quickly, even without
adding any custom field on person.
- even when loading a many to one relation, if the user is storing big
data in a given field (note.body for instance, or workflowRun.state),
this starts also being an issue.
- Worst case scenario are starting to happen: on a production workspace
with 20 active workflows. Loading workflow table while displaying
workflow runs commands (20 workflows x 60 workflowRuns x
workflowRun.state which is a big JSON) result in a response of... 125MB.
### Why is it an issue?
When yoga (graphql engine) parses a response to send it back in server
response, it's using `JSON.parse `(or stringify depending on the case).
Parsing data is CPU instensive (as you need to validate, transform) and
this is more or less `O(n)`.
This means returning 125MB is very intense on the CPU and will likely
use 100% of the CPU for ~1sec in our production servers.
NodeJs (nodeV8) is single threaded. It's able to process multiple
requests in parallel but to do that, it will cut them in "microTasks"
and process each microTasks (that can belong to different requests) one
after the other. Exactly like a single threaded CPU would allocate some
time to a process and then to the next one, etc.
This means that this big response request will actually block the other
request.
As a result, all requests are slow and our infrastructure is multi
tenant so some customers are impacting others.
This is even a bigger issue when our health checks start to fail and
containers are starting being considered as unhealthy and killed by the
orchestrator
## How to fix this
1. On Front end side, we should only query what we need. In this PR, I'm
forcing the relations to only query: `id`, `labelIdentifier`,
`imageIdentifier`
2. (later) as we are API first, we also need to do something to protect
the servers from this side too. To do that, Graphql APIs can associate a
cost to each graphql field (maybe 1 for a test fixed, 2 for a JSON
field, 10 for relations, etc...) and we can throttle based on that.
## Changes in this PR
It's mainly about refactor the tooling to generate `RecordGqlFields`
(`generateDepthOneGqlFields`). this tooling is used to generate the list
of fields we want to query. Most of the time we want to query a record
with one level of nesting.
1) Refactor to remove duplicate code => `generateDepthOne` become
`generateDepth` and can handle both `depth = 0 | 1`
2) Introduce `generateDepthRecordGqlFieldsFromFields.ts` which is the
base and can give you a list of gqlFields based on FieldMetadataItems
3) Introduce `generateDepthRecordGqlFieldsFromObject` which is a
shortcut for an object
4) Introduce `generateDepthRecordGqlFieldsFromRecords` which is the
intersection between `generateDepthRecordGqlFieldsFromObject` and a
given record (useful for cache tooling)
5) Replace all usages + introduce a hook
`useGenerateDepthRecordGqlFieldsFromObject` to ease usage
Abdullah.
