Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Raphaël Bosi 3675f264f1 Infer record pickers for record-typed logic function workflow inputs (#21494)
## Context

Logic functions can declare workflow inputs typed as records or arrays
of records (e.g. the People Data Labs enrichment functions), but the
workflow builder rendered those as a plain text input with a variable
picker, which is not usable.

## What this does

- Adds an `objectUniversalIdentifier` link on input schema properties,
so a record-typed input is tied to a workspace object.
- The SDK build infers it from a
`TwentyRecord<'objectUniversalIdentifier'>` marker type in the handler
signature, reading the object's universal identifier straight from the
source; explicit input schemas can still set the field directly.
- The workflow builder renders these inputs as a single record picker or
a record multi-select with the variable picker on the right. Selected
records are stored as record ids; `TwentyRecord<UID>` is a branded
`string`, so the handler signature reflects that it receives ids (a
bound variable resolves to whatever the referenced step produced).
- The multi-select collapses overflowing chips into a `+N` badge
(reusing `ExpandableList`) and its variable picker offers both record
objects and fields.
- Updates the People Data Labs enrichment inputs as the reference
implementation.

<img width="802" height="824" alt="CleanShot 2026-06-12 at 16 54 10@2x"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a0896d74-0aab-49bd-a173-14c578a2e533"
/>


<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21494?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
2026-06-19 09:10:01 +02:00
martmull 128d2d394d feat: allow apps to add view fields to existing views (defineViewField) (#21160)
## Summary

Lets a Twenty application add **view fields (columns) to an existing
view it does not own** — including standard views like the People index
view — without redeclaring/owning that view. This mirrors the existing,
working pattern by which an app adds a custom field to a standard object
via `defineField` + `objectUniversalIdentifier`.

The asymmetry being removed was purely in the manifest schema:
`ViewFieldManifest` only existed *nested* inside
`ViewManifest.fields[]`, so adding a view field forced declaring a
`ViewManifest` — which the sync treats as a view the app creates and
owns, and rejects when the UID is a standard view's. Validation,
persistence, the FK aggregator machinery, and uninstall cleanup were
already generic and cross-app-safe, so no engine changes were needed.

### Changes
- **twenty-shared:** new top-level `StandaloneViewFieldManifest`
(`ViewFieldManifest & { viewUniversalIdentifier }`),
`Manifest.viewFields`, and a `SyncableEntity.ViewField` member.
- **twenty-sdk:** `defineViewField` (validates `universalIdentifier` +
`viewUniversalIdentifier` + `fieldMetadataUniversalIdentifier`), CLI
manifest assembly of a top-level `viewFields` list, and `dev:add
viewField` scaffolding.
- **twenty-server:** one top-level loop over `manifest.viewFields` that
reuses the existing `fromViewFieldManifestToUniversalFlatViewField`
converter (already parameterized by `viewUniversalIdentifier`). No
validator/persistence/aggregator changes.

### Notes for maintainers
- Confirm the `Manifest.viewFields` optionality convention — implemented
as a **required** array to mirror `fields`/`views`.
- Two different apps adding a column for the same field to the same view
conflicts on the existing unique `(fieldMetadataId, viewId)` partial
index; the existing `flat-view-field-validator` duplicate check surfaces
this as a structured validation error.
- `dev:add viewField` scaffolding is included (was optional in the
plan).

## Test Plan
- [x] `twenty-shared` typecheck
- [x] `twenty-sdk` 364 unit tests + `buildManifest` assembly test
(rich-app fixture) + typecheck + prettier
- [x] `twenty-server` typecheck + `lint:diff-with-main`
- [x] **Server integration suite**
`successful-manifest-update-view-field.integration-spec.ts` (4/4):
- standalone view field attaches to the standard `allPeople` view
without recreating it (sync succeeds, no
`INVALID_VIEW_DATA`/`ENTITY_ALREADY_EXISTS`)
- uninstall removes the contributed column while the standard view + its
columns remain intact
  - duplicate `(view, field)` rejected with `METADATA_VALIDATION_FAILED`
  - unknown target view rejected
- [x] Sibling `successful-manifest-update-field.integration-spec.ts`
still green (no harness regression)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
2026-06-05 08:06:30 +00:00
Félix Malfait d602f35cbd feat(data-model): custom-indexes management UI and mutations (#20846)
## Summary

Brings indexes management into the per-object Settings tab as a section
under Search (no feature flag, advanced mode only). Admins can create /
delete non-unique indexes with the UI; apps can declare indexes in code
with `defineIndex`. Composite-typed fields are now indexable by picking
a specific sub-column (e.g. `Address > City`).

A few related polish items also land here (invite-user dropdown lands on
the Invite tab; standard warning callout above the new-index form).

## What ships

### UI — custom indexes on per-object Settings
- New section directly under Search, wrapped in
`AdvancedSettingsWrapper`.
- Filter dropdown on the search bar toggles system-index visibility
(shown by default since advanced mode).
- **+ Add Index** button (disabled with tooltip once the per-object cap
is reached) navigates to a dedicated `SettingsObjectNewIndex` page
(matches the field-creation pattern, not a modal):
- Field picker mirrors the webhook event-form layout (rows of dropdowns,
implicit trailing empty row).
- Composite fields surface their sub-properties (`Address > City`,
`Currency > Amount`, …).
  - BTREE / GIN type selector.
- Standard warning Callout: "Use indexes sparingly — each one speeds
reads but slows writes."
- Trash icon on `isCustom: true` rows → confirmation modal →
`deleteOneIndex`.

### Server — `createOneIndex` / `deleteOneIndex` mutations
- Gated by `SettingsPermissionGuard(DATA_MODEL)`.
- `IndexMetadataService` wraps the existing migration runner via
`WorkspaceMigrationValidateBuildAndRunService` so the metadata row and
the SQL index land atomically.
- Validation: rejects empty fields, duplicate `(fieldMetadataId,
subFieldName)` pairs, fields not on the object, requires `subFieldName`
for composite parents, forbids `subFieldName` on scalar/relation,
enforces `MAX_CUSTOM_INDEXES_PER_OBJECT = 10`.
- Delete refuses on `isCustom: false` rows so system indexes can't be
removed via this API.
- Dedicated GraphQL exception handler maps each typed error to the right
transport error class.

### Composite sub-field indexing
- Adds `subFieldName: string | null` column to
`IndexFieldMetadataEntity` (fast instance command).
- The flat-entity flow (`UniversalFlatIndexFieldMetadata`,
`FlatIndexFieldMetadata`, `from-universal-flat-index-to-flat-index`,
runner column resolution) all carry `subFieldName` through.
- For composite parents, the runner uses
`computeCompositeColumnName({...}, property)` for the picked sub-column;
for non-composite parents, behavior is unchanged.
- The `'::'` separator encodes `(fieldMetadataId, subFieldName)` for
dedup on the wire; the frontend uses the same separator inside the
Select component's string value.

### Apps can declare indexes in code (`defineIndex`)
- New `IndexManifest` + `IndexFieldManifest` types in
`twenty-shared/application` wired into the `Manifest` type.
- `defineIndex` SDK helper + `IndexConfig`. CLI manifest builder +
extractor recognize `defineIndex` / `ManifestEntityKey.Indexes`.
- Server: `from-index-manifest-to-universal-flat-index` converter
resolves field IDs, validates composite/scalar `subFieldName` rules, and
delegates to `generateFlatIndexMetadataWithNameOrThrow` for the
deterministic name.
- Orchestrator wires the loop after the field-resolution pass;
per-object cap enforced inline against the manifest.
- Cascade on uninstall is automatic — when an app disappears its indexes
drop with it (universal-flat-entity diff handles it).
- Rich-app fixture ships a real `defineIndex` on `PostCard.status`,
exercising the full manifest → install path in CI.

### Closed for now (open later if needed)
- Apps cannot declare `isUnique` indexes — unique constraints stay with
the field-creation flow.
- Apps cannot use a partial-`indexWhereClause` — the UI surface keeps
the framework's hardcoded allowlist.
- UI cannot create unique or partial indexes either; same reasons.

### Cleanups along the way
- Reused the existing `getCompositeSubFieldLabel` +
`COMPOSITE_FIELD_SUB_FIELD_LABELS` (deleted the duplicates I'd created
early in the PR).
- Moved `MAX_CUSTOM_INDEXES_PER_OBJECT` to `twenty-shared/constants`
(single source for FE + BE).
- Replaced inline `isDefined(x) && x !== ''` with `isNonEmptyString`
(from `@sniptt/guards`).
- Hoisted the per-object fields Map + inlined the cap counter into the
indexes orchestrator loop (drops the install scan from O(indexes ×
totalFields) to O(totalFields + indexes)).
- Per design-feedback: page-based create flow (not a modal), filter
dropdown on the SearchInput (not a separate toggle), webhook-style
picker, field icons.

### Unrelated polish that lands here
- "Invite user" link in the multi-workspace dropdown now lands on the
Invite tab directly (`#invite`) instead of the first tab of the members
page.

## Test plan
- [ ] `npx nx typecheck twenty-server / twenty-front / twenty-sdk /
twenty-shared` — passes
- [ ] `npx nx lint:diff-with-main twenty-server / twenty-front` — clean
- [ ] `npx jest index-metadata.service.spec` — green
- [ ] `npx jest from-index-manifest-to-universal-flat-index` — green
(new converter spec, 8 cases)
- [ ] `npx vitest run
src/sdk/define/indexes/__tests__/define-index.spec.ts` (twenty-sdk) —
green (6 cases)
- [ ] `npx vitest run --config vitest.integration.config.ts -t
"rich-app"` — green (rich-app app-dev integration exercises the new
manifest path with the PostCard.status index)
- [ ] Advanced mode → Settings → any object → Settings tab → Indexes
section is visible under Search
- [ ] Create a single-field BTREE index, confirm SQL index exists
(verify via `pg_indexes`)
- [ ] Create a composite-field index (`Address > City`) and confirm the
column is `addressAddressCity`
- [ ] Create an index spanning two columns; column order matches the
picker order
- [ ] Attempt to create an 11th custom index → button is disabled with
tooltip
- [ ] Delete a custom index → confirmation modal → row disappears, PG
index dropped
- [ ] System indexes have no trash icon and are hidden by default
2026-05-25 17:47:09 +02:00
Weiko 3bda05ea57 [Breaking change] Prepare non-system permission flags (#20847)
# Summary

Replaces the enum-keyed `permissionFlags: PermissionFlag[]` on roles
with `permissionFlagUniversalIdentifiers: string[]`

This unlocks mixing system flags (`SystemPermissionFlag.*`) with
app-defined flags in a role config.

This is a breaking change. Existing app source must switch to the new
field.

# Breaking changes

- `RoleManifest.permissionFlags` removed. Use
`RoleManifest.permissionFlagUniversalIdentifiers: string[]`.
- `RoleConfig.permissionFlags` removed (was `PermissionFlagType[]`). Use
`RoleConfig.permissionFlagUniversalIdentifiers: string[]`.
- `PermissionFlagManifest` type removed from
`twenty-shared/application`.
- `PermissionFlag` re-export removed from `twenty-sdk/define`.
`SystemPermissionFlag` is re-exported in its place.
- Retargeting a permission flag between roles is now classified as
delete + create instead of update

 ### Not in this PR
- definePermissionFlag SDK function and top-level
Manifest.permissionFlags catalog (apps defining their own custom flags).
Until those land, permissionFlagUniversalIdentifiers only accepts
SystemPermissionFlag.* UUIDs; arbitrary UUIDs fail validation.
2026-05-22 21:22:28 +00:00
Félix Malfait 53fdac1417 feat(apps): split AI tool and workflow action triggers in LogicFunction manifest (#20208)
## Summary

Replaces the bolted-on `isTool` + `toolInputSchema` fields on
`LogicFunctionManifest` with two distinct, opt-in triggers that align
with the existing `cron` / `databaseEvent` / `httpRoute` trigger
pattern:

- **`toolTriggerSettings`** — exposes the function as an AI tool (chat /
MCP / function calling). Uses standard JSON Schema (the format LLMs
natively understand).
- **`workflowActionTriggerSettings`** — exposes the function as a step
in the visual workflow builder. Uses Twenty's rich `InputSchema` so the
builder can render proper `FieldMetadataType`-aware editors, variable
pickers, labels, and an optional `outputSchema`.

A function can opt into none, one, or both. Each surface gets the schema
format appropriate for it.

### Why

`isTool: true` previously exposed the function as both an AI tool AND a
workflow node, with the same JSON Schema feeding both — but the workflow
builder really wants Twenty's `InputSchema` (with `CURRENCY`,
`RELATION`, `EMAILS`, etc.) and the AI surface really wants standard
JSON Schema. Today the workflow builder hacks around this by treating
JSON Schema as `InputSchema`, which silently breaks for any
non-primitive field type. Splitting the triggers fixes that and lets
each surface evolve independently.

### Migration

- **Fast** instance command adds the two new nullable columns.
- **Slow** instance command backfills `toolTriggerSettings` +
`workflowActionTriggerSettings` from `isTool=true` rows (preserving
today's both-surfaces behaviour) then drops the legacy columns.

### Stacked

Stacked on top of #20181. Merge that first, then this.

## Test plan

- [ ] CI green (oxlint, typecheck, jest, vitest)
- [ ] Run `--include-slow` upgrade against a workspace with existing
`isTool=true` logic functions; verify both new columns populated and old
columns dropped
- [ ] Verify AI chat sees migrated tool functions (Linear create-issue,
Exa search) and can call them with the JSON Schema
- [ ] Add an AI-tool function from the Settings UI (toggles
`toolTriggerSettings`) and verify it shows up in chat
- [ ] Add a workflow-action function from the Settings UI (toggles
`workflowActionTriggerSettings`) and verify it appears in the workflow
node picker
- [ ] In the workflow builder, edit a `LOGIC_FUNCTION` step and verify
input fields render (no more JSON-Schema-as-InputSchema hack)
- [ ] Try defining a function with no triggers in the SDK and verify
`defineLogicFunction` rejects it

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: martmull <martmull@hotmail.fr>
2026-05-05 14:56:09 +02:00
martmull c804f27846 Add check for manifest uuid version (#20239)
As title

<img width="1059" height="203" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c6840c4e-792b-45da-b450-addd77af0de7"
/>
2026-05-04 16:06:50 +00:00
Charles Bochet a445f4a6fa feat(sdk): add definePageLayoutTab for extending existing page layouts (#20004)
## Summary

Introduces `definePageLayoutTab` so apps can attach a single tab (with
optional widgets) to an **existing** `pageLayout` referenced by
`pageLayoutUniversalIdentifier`. The parent layout can be standard, from
the same app, or from another app — mirroring how `defineField`
references an object via `objectUniversalIdentifier`.

This complements `definePageLayout`: use `definePageLayout` when you own
the entire layout, use `definePageLayoutTab` when you only want to add
to one.

```ts
import { definePageLayoutTab, PageLayoutTabLayoutMode } from 'twenty-sdk/define';

export default definePageLayoutTab({
  universalIdentifier: 'b1b2b3b4-b5b6-4000-8000-000000000001',
  pageLayoutUniversalIdentifier: 'STANDARD-OR-OTHER-APP-PAGE-LAYOUT-UUID',
  title: 'Hello World',
  position: 1000,
  icon: 'IconWorld',
  layoutMode: PageLayoutTabLayoutMode.CANVAS,
  widgets: [/* ... */],
});
```

## Changes

- **twenty-shared**: new top-level `pageLayoutTabs:
PageLayoutTabManifest[]` on `Manifest`, optional
`pageLayoutUniversalIdentifier` on `PageLayoutTabManifest`, new
`SyncableEntity.PageLayoutTab`.
- **twenty-sdk**:
  - new `definePageLayoutTab` + `PageLayoutTabConfig` exports;
- manifest extraction wiring (`TargetFunction.DefinePageLayoutTab`,
`ManifestEntityKey.PageLayoutTabs`);
  - dev-mode label/state for the new entity;
- CLI scaffold (`getPageLayoutTabBaseFile`) + unit tests for `npx
twenty-cli add`.
- **twenty-server**: convert top-level `pageLayoutTabs` (and their
widgets) into universal flat entities in
`computeApplicationManifestAllUniversalFlatEntityMaps`. Cross-app FK
validation on `pageLayoutUniversalIdentifier` is already handled by the
existing `FlatPageLayoutTab` validator.
- **docs**: new `definePageLayoutTab` accordion in `apps/layout.mdx`
with usage example and guidance vs `definePageLayout`.
- **CI / rich-app fixture**: `extra-tab.page-layout-tab.ts` exercises
the new flow with a front-component widget; `expected-manifest.ts` and
`manifest.tests.ts` updated.
2026-04-23 12:00:10 +00:00
Félix Malfait b010599000 fix(server): preserve kanban/calendar fields in view manifest sync (#19946)
## Summary

The `fromViewManifestToUniversalFlatView` converter hardcoded five view
fields to `null` instead of reading them from the manifest:
- `mainGroupByFieldMetadataUniversalIdentifier`
- `kanbanAggregateOperation`
- `kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataUniversalIdentifier`
- `calendarLayout`
- `calendarFieldMetadataUniversalIdentifier`

As a result **any** Kanban view in an app manifest is rejected by
`validateFlatViewCreation` with `"Kanban view must have a main group by
field"`, and any Calendar view would trip the `view.entity.ts` check
constraint requiring `calendarLayout` + `calendarFieldMetadataId` to be
non-null. Discovered while trying to install
[`twenty-crm-meeting-baas`](https://github.com/Meeting-BaaS/twenty-crm-meeting-baas)
which ships a Kanban view.

## Changes

- **Server converter**: read all five fields from the manifest (with `??
null` fallback).
- **`ViewManifest` type** (`twenty-shared`): add the five fields so SDK
users can set them type-safely.
- **Move `ViewCalendarLayout`** from `twenty-server` to `twenty-shared`
so the manifest type can reference it. Seven import sites updated; the
front-end imports via generated GraphQL types and is unaffected.
- **Unit tests**: extend
`from-view-manifest-to-universal-flat-view.util.spec.ts` with
preservation + null-default cases for both Kanban and Calendar (5 tests
total).
- **Regression coverage**: add a Kanban view
(`post-cards-by-status.view.ts`) to the `rich-app` fixture grouped by
the existing `status` SELECT field. The existing
`applications-install-delete-reinstall` e2e test now exercises the
Kanban path end-to-end — a future regression here would fail CI.

Note: `expected-manifest.ts` and the `views.length` assertion in
`manifest.tests.ts` were updated to reflect the new fixture view.

## Test plan

- [x] `nx test twenty-server --
from-view-manifest-to-universal-flat-view` → 5/5 pass
- [x] `nx typecheck twenty-shared` / `twenty-sdk` / `twenty-server` → no
new errors (one pre-existing unrelated error in
`admin-panel.module-factory.ts`)
- [x] `nx lint twenty-shared` / `twenty-sdk` → clean
- [x] Manual install of the Meeting BaaS app on a dev workspace succeeds
with the Kanban view after this fix
- [ ] CI: SDK e2e `applications-install-delete-reinstall` passes against
the new fixture view
- [ ] CI: integration test `calendar-field-deactivation-deletes-views`
still passes after the enum move

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: claude[bot] <41898282+claude[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-04-22 16:31:00 +02:00
Charles Bochet eb1ca1b9ec perf(sdk): split twenty-sdk barrel into per-purpose subpaths to cut logic-function bundle ~700x (#19834)
## Summary

Logic-function bundles produced by the twenty-sdk CLI were ~1.18 MB even
for a one-line handler. Root cause: the SDK shipped as a single bundled
barrel (`twenty-sdk` → `dist/index.mjs`) that co-mingled server-side
definition factories with the front-component runtime, validation (zod),
and React. With no `\"sideEffects\"` declaration on the SDK package,
esbuild had to assume every module-level statement could have side
effects and refused to drop unused code.

This PR restructures the SDK so consumers' bundlers can tree-shake at
the leaf level:

- **Reorganized SDK source.** All server-side definition factories now
  live under `src/sdk/define/` (agents, application, fields,
  logic-functions, objects, page-layouts, roles, skills, views,
  navigation-menu-items, etc.). All front-component runtime
  (components, hooks, host APIs, command primitives) lives under
  `src/sdk/front-component/`. The legacy bare `src/sdk/index.ts` is
  removed; the bare `twenty-sdk` entry no longer exists.

- **Split the build configs by purpose / runtime env.** Replaced
  `vite.config.sdk.ts` with two purpose-specific configs:
  - `vite.config.define.ts` — node target, externals from package
    `dependencies`, emits to `dist/define/**`
  - `vite.config.front-component.ts` — browser/React target, emits to
    `dist/front-component/**`
  Both use `preserveModules: true` so each leaf ships as its own `.mjs`.

- **\`\"sideEffects\": false\`** on `twenty-sdk` so esbuild can drop
  unreferenced re-exports.

- **\`package.json\` exports + \`typesVersions\`** updated: dropped the
bare \`.\` entry, added \`./front-component\`, and pointed \`./define\`
  at the new per-module dist layout.

- **Migrated every internal/example/community app** to the new subpath
  imports (`twenty-sdk/define`, `twenty-sdk/front-component`,
  `twenty-sdk/ui`).

- **Added \`bundle-investigation\` internal app** that reproduces the
  bundle bloat and demonstrates the fix.

- Cleaned up dead \`twenty-sdk/dist/sdk/...\` references in the
  front-component story builder, the call-recording app, and the SDK
  tsconfig.

## Bundle size impact

Measured with esbuild using the same options as the SDK CLI
(\`packages/twenty-apps/internal/bundle-investigation\`):

| Variant | Imports | Before | After |
| ----------------------- |
------------------------------------------------------- | ---------- |
--------- |
| \`01-bare\` | \`defineLogicFunction\` from \`twenty-sdk/define\` |
1177 KB | **1.6 KB** |
| \`02-with-sdk-client\` | + \`CoreApiClient\` from
\`twenty-client-sdk/core\` | 1177 KB | **1.9 KB** |
| \`03-fetch-issues\` | + GitHub GraphQL fetch + JWT signing + 2
mutations | 1181 KB | **5.8 KB** |
| \`05-via-define-subpath\` | same as \`01\`, via the public subpath |
1177 KB | **1.7 KB** |

That's a ~735× reduction on the bare baseline. Knock-on benefits for
Lambda warm + cold starts, S3 upload size, and \`/tmp\` disk usage in
warm containers.

## Test plan

- [x] \`npx nx run twenty-sdk:build\` succeeds
- [x] \`npx nx run twenty-sdk:typecheck\` passes
- [x] \`npx nx run twenty-sdk:test:unit\` passes (31 files / 257 tests)
- [x] \`npx nx run-many -t typecheck
--projects=twenty-front,twenty-server,twenty-front-component-renderer,twenty-sdk,twenty-shared,bundle-investigation\`
passes
- [x] \`node
packages/twenty-apps/internal/bundle-investigation/scripts/build-variants.mjs\`
produces the sizes above
- [ ] CI green

Made with [Cursor](https://cursor.com)
2026-04-18 19:38:34 +02:00
martmull 8702300b07 App feedbacks fix option id required in apps (#19386)
fixes
https://discord.com/channels/1130383047699738754/1488226371032453292
2026-04-07 13:53:16 +00:00
martmull 119014f86d Improve apps (#19256)
- simplify the base application template
- remove --exhaustive option and replace by a --example option like in
next.js https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/cli
- Fix some bugs and logs
- add a post-card app in twenty-apps/examples/
2026-04-03 12:44:03 +00:00