# Introduction
related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1833
In this PR we're starting the sync-metadata and standardIds deprecation
by introducing `twenty-standard` application that will regroup every
standard object such as company and opportunities. But also the
`custom-workspace-application` which is an app created at the same time
as a workspace and that will regroup everything configure within the
workspace ( custom objects fields etc )
## What's done
On both new workspace and seeded workspace creation:
- Creating a custom workspace app
- Creating a twenty standard app
- Refactored the seed core schema and workspace creation to be run
within a transaction in order to handle circular dependency foreignkey
requirements ( which is deferred for app toward workspace )
- Updated workspace entity to have a custom workspace relation (
nullable for the moment until we implem an upgrade command to handle
retro comp )
- Integration testing on user, workspace creation deletion and expected
default apps creation
- ~~Soft deleted user on `deleteUser`~~ Done by marie and rebased on it
## What's next
- Update seeder to propagate the `twenty-standard` workspace
`applicationId` to every standard synchronized entities ( cheap and fast
iteration through the about to be deprecated sync-metadata as an easy
way to synchronize standards metadata entities ).
- Update seeder to propagate the `custom-workspace-application`
workspace `applicationId` to anything custom ( `pets` and `rockets` )
- Prepend `custom-workspace-application` `applicationId` to every
metadata API operations ( create a specific cache etc )
- Upgrade command on all existing workspace to create a custom app and
associate its applicationId to any existing custom entities
- Make `universalIdentifier` and `applicationId` required for any
syncable entity
**Root Cause**
Many-to-one relation filters were being exposed under the relation name
(e.g., `company`) instead of the corresponding foreign-key attribute
(e.g., `companyId`).
**Change**
- Detect many-to-one relation metadata and remap those filter keys to
`<fieldName>Id`.
- Removed some unused code unrelated to this fix.
## Problem
The ESLint rule `graphql-resolvers-should-be-guarded` introduced in
#15392 was failing on main because the guard `SettingsPermissionsGuard`
had inconsistent naming.
## Root Cause
The guard was named `SettingsPermissionsGuard` (with an 's') which was
inconsistent with other permission guards:
- ✅ `CustomPermissionGuard`
- ✅ `NoPermissionGuard`
- ✅ `ImpersonatePermissionGuard`
- ❌ `SettingsPermissionsGuard` (inconsistent!)
The ESLint rule checks if guard names end with `PermissionGuard`, but
`SettingsPermissionsGuard` ends with `sGuard`, so it wasn't recognized
as a permission guard.
## Solution
Renamed the guard to be consistent with the naming convention:
1. ✅ Renamed file: `settings-permissions.guard.ts` →
`settings-permission.guard.ts`
2. ✅ Renamed export: `SettingsPermissionsGuard` →
`SettingsPermissionGuard`
3. ✅ Renamed internal class: `SettingsPermissionsMixin` →
`SettingsPermissionMixin`
4. ✅ Updated all 122 references across 44 files in the codebase
5. ✅ Renamed test file: `settings-permissions.guard.spec.ts` →
`settings-permission.guard.spec.ts`
## Testing
- ✅ `npx nx run twenty-server:lint` passes
- ✅ `npx nx run twenty-server:typecheck` passes
- ✅ No references to the old name remain in the codebase
- ✅ All previously failing resolver files now pass ESLint validation
## Related
Fixes issues introduced in #15392
## Overview
This PR strengthens our permission system by introducing more granular
role-based access control across the platform.
## Changes
### New Permissions Added
- **Applications** - Control who can install and manage applications
- **Layouts** - Control who can customize page layouts and UI structure
- **AI** - Control access to AI features and agents
- **Upload File** - Separate permission for file uploads
- **Download File** - Separate permission for file downloads (frontend
visibility)
### Security Enhancements
- Implemented whitelist-based validation for workspace field updates
- Added explicit permission guards to core entity resolvers
- Enhanced ESLint rule to enforce permission checks on all mutations
- Created `CustomPermissionGuard` and `NoPermissionGuard` for better
code documentation
### Affected Components
- Core entity resolvers: webhooks, files, domains, applications,
layouts, postgres credentials
- Workspace update mutations now use whitelist validation
- Settings UI updated with new permission controls
### Developer Experience
- ESLint now catches missing permission guards during development
- Explicit guard markers make permission requirements clear in code
review
- Comprehensive test coverage for new permission logic
## Testing
- ✅ All TypeScript type checks pass
- ✅ ESLint validation passes
- ✅ New permission guards properly enforced
- ✅ Frontend UI displays new permissions correctly
## Migration Notes
Existing workspaces will need to assign the new permissions to roles as
needed. By default, all new permissions are set to `false` for non-admin
roles.
**Before**
- any user with workpace_members permission was able to remove a user
from their workspace. This triggered the deletion of workspaceMember +
of userWorkspace, but did not delete the user (even if they had no
workspace left) nor the roleTarget (acts as junction between role and
userWorkspace) which was left with a userWorkspaceId pointing to
nothing. This is because roleTarget points to userWorkspaceId but the
foreign key constraint was not implemented
- any user could delete their own account. This triggered the deletion
of all their workspaceMembers, but not of their userWorkspace nor their
user nor the roleTarget --> we have orphaned userWorkspace, not
technically but product wise - a userWorkspace without a workspaceMember
does not make sense
So the problems are
- we have some roleTargets pointing to non-existing userWorkspaceId
(which caused https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14608 )
- we have userWorkspaces that should not exist and that have no
workspaceMember counterpart
- it is not possible for a user to leave a workspace by themselves, they
can only leave all workspaces at once, except if they are being removed
from the workspace by another user
**Now**
- if a user has multiple workspaces, they are given the possibility to
leave one workspace while remaining in the others (we show two buttons:
Leave workspace and Delete account buttons). if a user has just one
workspace, they only see Delete account
- when a user leaves a workspace, we delete their workspaceMember,
userWorkspace and roleTarget. If they don't belong to any other
workspace we also soft-delete their user
- soft-deleted users get hard deleted after 30 days thanks to a cron
- we have two commands to clean the orphans roleTarget and userWorkspace
(TODO: query db to see how many must be run)
**Next**
- once the commands have been run, we can implement and introduce the
foreign key constraint on roleTarget
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14608
As title
- adds decorators in twenty-sdk
- update twenty-cli load-manifest to it gets @FieldMetadata infos +
testing
- update twenty-server so it CRUD fields properly, using
universalIdentifier
- Fix UI so we can update managed objects records
- move FieldMetadata items from twenty-server to twenty-shared
# Introduction
This PR aims to deprecate having to manually handle optimistic side
effect foreign key addition in the whole v2 experience.
This PR implements the strong basis + builder refactor of the optimistic
computation of a given flat entity maps with its related flat entity
maps ( runner needs a small refactor on actions type definition first )
Flat entity maps updates through mutations are now only scoped to the
generic entity builder ( very isolated )
## What's next
- Refactor actions v2 type definition to gain grain over `metadataName`
and action operation ( `create` `delete` `update` ).
from `{type: 'create_view_field'}` to `{metadataName: 'view_field',
type: 'create' }`
- Use new optimistic tool computation tools
- Only invalidate impacted flat maps cache
## New tools
Strictly dynamically typed new flat entity maps tools
- `addFlatEntityToFlatEntityAndRelatedEntityMapsThroughMutationOrThrow`
-
`deleteFlatEntityFromFlatEntityAndRelatedEntityMapsThroughMutationOrThrow`
## Unit test
Adding basic unit testing coverage to introduced tools
## `FlatEntityValidationArgs`
From
```ts
export type FlatEntityValidationArgs<T extends AllMetadataName> = {
flatEntityToValidate: MetadataFlatEntity<T>;
optimisticFlatEntityMaps: MetadataFlatEntityMaps<T>;
mutableDependencyOptimisticFlatEntityMaps: MetadataValidationRelatedFlatEntityMaps<T>;
workspaceId: string;
remainingFlatEntityMapsToValidate: MetadataFlatEntityMaps<T>;
buildOptions: WorkspaceMigrationBuilderOptions;
};
```
To
```ts
export type FlatEntityValidationArgs<T extends AllMetadataName> = {
flatEntityToValidate: MetadataFlatEntity<T>;
optimisticFlatEntityMapsAndRelatedFlatEntityMaps: MetadataFlatEntityAndRelatedFlatEntityMapsForValidation<T>;
workspaceId: string;
remainingFlatEntityMapsToValidate: MetadataFlatEntityMaps<T>;
buildOptions: WorkspaceMigrationBuilderOptions;
};
```
# Introduction
When creating a view with v2 flag activated in production result in race
condition due to request being slow and //.
That's why we're introducing a batch create on view field here
closing https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1836
## In v2
- batch create view field endpoint is available
- frontend will target the new endpoint
## In v1
- batch create view field endpoint is not available
- frontend will stick to old fake batch view field creation loop
## Polish
- use persist view field is quite verbose as contains two data model we
could aim to create an update many view fields in order to standardize
new pattern
## Tests
### makeSureDashboardNamingAvailableCommand
Case 1: no dashboard custom object
Case 2: with dashboard custom object
### SeedDashboardViewCommand
Case 1: no existing view
Case 2: with existing view
Closes [Core Issue
#1772](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1772).
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> Introduces SSO bypass with a new permission flag and workspace-level
provider toggles, enabling permitted users to log in via
Google/Microsoft/Password when SSO-only, with backend enforcement and
frontend UI/hooks/queries.
>
> - **Backend**:
> - **Permission & Enforcement**: Add `PermissionFlagType.SSO_BYPASS`;
update `AuthService` to allow login via non-SSO providers when workspace
bypass is enabled and user has `SSO_BYPASS`.
> - **Workspace Model**: Add `isGoogleAuthBypassEnabled`,
`isMicrosoftAuthBypassEnabled`, `isPasswordAuthBypassEnabled`
(migration, entity, update input, service validation).
> - **Public API**: Extend `PublicWorkspaceDataOutput` with
`authBypassProviders`; resolver computes it; permissions defaults
include `SSO_BYPASS`.
> - **Frontend**:
> - **GraphQL/State**: Generate new types/fields; add
`authBypassProviders` to `GetPublicWorkspaceDataByDomain`; new states
`workspaceAuthBypassProvidersState`, `workspaceBypassModeState`.
> - **Auth UI/Logic**: Add `useWorkspaceBypass`; update sign-in form and
footer to offer "Bypass SSO" and use merged providers when enabled;
remove auto-redirect when single SSO.
> - **Settings**: Add Security section to toggle bypass methods per
provider; conditionally show Change Password via `useCanChangePassword`.
> - **Tests/Mocks**: Update mocks and tests to include bypass
flags/providers.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
8c393b2bad387fb6e8b8f40027f8637dd6e85723. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Pg scan was redundant because historically the workspaceId was
`varchar`, even though below migration won't change that we had a look
to workspaceId col declaration across the codebase
# Introduction
Initially wanted to reactive the test introduced in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15393, that was failing because
of direct data source access removing all views ( even seeded one )
which was making the test fail
While doing so discovered a lot of issue with the rest API:
- Rest api wasn't consuming the v2 at all
- Rest api wasn't prepared to handle v2 exceptions
- Rest api did not handled unknown exceptions ( timeout )
Refactored the cleanup of each test to follow black box pattern and
avoid test leakage
# Introduction
A while ago we migrated view from workspace to metadata
Their standard objects workspace entities declaration remained we can
now remove them
## Deprecating commands before 1.5
The view migration command from workspace to metadata was introduced in
`1.5.0`. Removing the `baseWorkspaceEntity` make this command obsolete.
If tomorrow twenty handles auto upgrade in latest and a user having an
instance in `1.3.0` starts auto-upgrading he won't be able to migrate
his views ( that's why we should not support upgrade before 1.5 anymore
here )
We will have the same use case with FavoritesFolders
# Introduction
Fixing self relation field creation in v2
- When computing related flat field to delete on object metadata
deletion that has self relation fields
- On self relation creation validation name availability not searching
for the relation target field of the current object field if it's the
field being validated
## Coverage
- added CUD integration testing on self relation fields
close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/15153
This PR implements Sentry's AI agent monitoring by:
- Configuring vercelAIIntegration with recordInputs and recordOutputs
options
- Adding sendDefaultPii to Sentry.init() for better debugging
- Creating a shared AI_TELEMETRY_CONFIG constant to DRY up the telemetry
configuration
- Adding experimental_telemetry to all AI SDK calls (generateText,
generateObject, streamText)
All AI operations are now fully monitored in Sentry with complete
input/output recording for debugging and performance analysis.
Note: Currently on Sentry v9.26.0, which is compatible with this
implementation. No breaking changes from the v9-to-v10 migration guide
were found in the codebase.
# Introduction
Refactoring the standard overrides dispatcher to only pass over fields
to has to be dispatched in the standardOverrides entry and let the other
side effects resulting from out of standard overrides mutation trigger
Related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1753
## This allows
- standard field settings, options etc updates and so on
## Remark
- Determine what we should do on object deactivation ( right now in
production we can still access deactivated object relation properties
and so on e.g deactivate opportunities still accessible from a view
field on company ( still have to re-create it as it has been deleted )
=> decided to leave as it is right now, `isActive` could be considered
as uiDeactivated in the end
- We should also add forbidden standard field mutations validation
inside the builder itself ( here we want to early return in the api
input transpiler too as we don't want to spread invalid side effects )
=> or in the end we could just centralize both but it will generate
several errors
## Coverage
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/object-metadata/successful-update-one-standard-object-metadata.integration-spec.ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/successful-update-one-standard-field-metadata.integration-spec.ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/object-metadata/failing-update-one-standard-object-metadata.integration-spec.ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/failing-update-one-standard-field-metadata.integration-spec.ts
Test Suites: 4 passed, 4 total
Tests: 18 passed, 18 total
Snapshots: 16 passed, 16 total
Time: 8.721 s, estimated 10 s
```
## Update post review
Faced a behavior where updating back the company label to its original
value would result in storing this value in the standard overrides
Refactored both field and object transpilation behavior to rather remove
the standard override value instead and let fallback on original value
Yes it's quite duplicated will factorize once we move this inside the
builder
Adds intelligent routing system that automatically selects the best
agent for user queries based on conversation context.
### Changes:
- Added `routerModel` column to workspace table for configurable router
LLM selection
- Implemented `RouterService` with conversation history analysis and
agent matching logic
- Created router settings UI in AI Settings page with model dropdown
- Removed agent-specific thread associations - threads are now
agent-agnostic
- Added real-time routing status notification in chat UI with shimmer
effect
- Removed automatic default assistant agent creation
- Renamed GraphQL operations from agent-specific to generic (e.g.,
`agentChatThreads` → `chatThreads`)
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
## Description
Fixes#15160
- Moved the reserved subdomains to a separate shared constant file:
`packages/twenty-server/src/engine/core-modules/workspace/constants/reserved-subdomains.constant.ts`
- Updated the validation while generating subdomain to check if the
extracted subdomain (from email or display name) is reserved
- When a reserved subdomain is detected, the server will automatically
fall back to a random subdomain
---------
Co-authored-by: Naineel Soyantar <naineelsoyantar@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Introduction
Handling both:
- field deactivation side effect on view fields, view filters and views
- field deactivation side effect on view that targets it as
`kanbanAggregateFieldMetadataId`
- field deactivation side effect on view that targets it as
`calendarFieldMetadataId`
## Coverage
added coverage
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/kanban-aggregate-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (13.132 s)
kanban-aggregate-field-deactivation-nullifies-kanban-properties
✓ should nullify kanban properties when field used as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId is deactivated (3923 ms)
✓ should not modify views when field not used as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId is deactivated (2958 ms)
✓ should nullify kanban properties on multiple views when they all use the same field as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId (2542 ms)
✓ should nullify kanban properties when views have different aggregate operations on same field (3380 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 4 passed, 4 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 13.154 s
```
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/view-group-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (12.639 s)
view-group-field-deactivation-deletes-views
✓ should delete view when field used in view group is deactivated (3469 ms)
✓ should not delete view when field not used in view group is deactivated (3109 ms)
✓ should delete multiple views when they all use the same field in view groups (2741 ms)
✓ should handle deactivation when view has multiple view groups with different fields (3008 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 4 passed, 4 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 12.664 s
```
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/calendar-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (14.579 s)
calendar-field-deactivation-deletes-views
✓ should delete view when field used as calendarFieldMetadataId is deactivated (3388 ms)
✓ should not delete view when field not used as calendarFieldMetadataId is deactivated (2438 ms)
✓ should delete multiple views when they all use the same field as calendarFieldMetadataId (2635 ms)
✓ should handle deactivation when views have different calendar layouts on same field (3195 ms)
✓ should delete calendar view but not other view types when calendar field is deactivated (2682 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 5 passed, 5 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 14.601 s, estimated 15 s
```
## View soft deletion
We decided to remove the soft deletion grain on all the views, in this
PR context we've only removed soft deleted validation requirement on any
view entities
## Conclusion
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1754
Several fixes after discussing with @BOHEUS
- set applicationManifest env key optional
- fix server local serverless function logging (introduces a new env
variable `SERVERLESS_LOGS_ENABLED` defaulting to false)
Implements permission intersection (AND logic) to prevent permission
escalation when agents act on behalf of users.
### Changes:
- **Permission Intersection**: Operations requiring both user AND agent
permissions
- **RoleContext Type**: Unified type supporting single `roleId` or
multiple `roleIds` for intersection
- **CRUD Services**: Updated to accept `roleContext` for granular
permission control
- **Agent Integration**: Chat agents now use user + agent role
intersection for all operations
- **ORM Layer**: Enhanced `getRepository` to support multi-role
permission checks
### Related:
- Part 2 of ["Acting on behalf of user" concept
PR](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15103)
[Closes#1661](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1661)
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
## Summary
**Step 1 of 2:** Implements the "acting on behalf of user" concept for
workflows and agents to prevent permission escalation and maintain
proper audit trails.
## Problem
Previously, workflows and agents would bypass permissions regardless of
who initiated them, allowing users to escalate their privileges by
triggering workflows that performed actions they couldn't do directly.
## Solution
### For Workflows
Introduced `WorkflowExecutionContext` service that determines execution
mode:
- **Manual triggers/test button**: Uses user's roleId for permissions,
user's identity for `createdBy`
- **Automated triggers** (cron, database events, webhooks): Bypasses
permissions, uses workflow identity
### For Agents
**In Chat:**
- Always act on behalf of the user
- Use user's roleId for permission checks
- Use user's identity for `createdBy`
# Step 1 vs Step 2
### ✅ Step 1 (This PR): Acting on Behalf Concept
- Introduced `isActingOnBehalfOfUser` boolean concept
- Single roleId used for permission checks (user's OR system bypass)
- `createdBy` field properly attributes actions to initiator
- Prevents permission escalation in user-initiated flows
### 🔜 Step 2 (Future): Multi-Role Permission Support
- Support role intersection: `{ intersection: ['roleA', 'roleB'] }`
- Support role union: `{ union: ['roleA', 'roleB', 'roleC'] }`
- Enable user+agent collaboration scenarios
- Update `WorkspaceEntityManager` and `WorkspaceDatasource` to handle
multiple roleIds
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
## Context
- All flatEntity should extend SyncableEntity
- SyncableEntity should now have applicationId and application relation
- Fix syncApp deletion, should now properly use migration v2 to delete
syncable entities
# Introduction
### Summary
Implements side effect handling for `ViewGroup` and `ViewFilters` when
field metadata is updated in the v2 architecture. This ensures that
view-related records are properly maintained when enum field options are
modified, deleted, or created.
### Side effects
- **Side Effect System**: Added side effect handling for field metadata
updates that manages related view groups and view filters
- **Enum Field Updates**: When enum field options are modified, the
system now:
- **View Groups**: Creates new groups for added options, updates
existing groups for modified options, and deletes groups for removed
options
- **View Filters**: Updates filter values to reflect option changes and
removes filters that reference deleted options
### Enum runner fix
Update now works for both atomic enum and array enum ( multi select for
instance )
### Compute flat entity maps from to
Standardized this method usage across v2 services
Next step is to require dependencies dynamically
## Conclusion
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1649
## Goal
- inferDeletionFromMissingEntities is now a map instead of a single
bool, allowing us to parameterise it based on the entity we want to
compare
- Adding index creation/update when field isUnique is set to true and
index deletion when isUnique is false (for now)
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1346
# Introduction
Adding view-group to core engine v2
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15010 ( same pattern )
## What's done
- Created flat-view-group
- flat view group runner
- flat view group builder
- create view group service v2 and input transpilers
- refactor the existing view group resolver to fix standard (
BREAKING_CHANGE on graphql api update especially ) REST stays the same
- refactored the front to consume the mutations autogenerated
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1665
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1563.
We now have two inter-group orderBy criteria: one on the aggregate
values, the other on the dimension values.
Ex: I am grouping companies by city and querying the average number of
employees for each group. I can either order the groups by the city
name, or by the average number of employees, or by one then the other.
I could actually also order groups by an aggregated value that I did not
ask for (ex: average ARR), but I cannot order groups by a field value I
did not group records by (ex: country).
[See discord
discussion](https://discord.com/channels/1130383047699738754/1425438213555753050/1425438223097921659)
An example of query variables:
```
{
"groupBy": [
{
"createdAt": {
"granularity": "QUARTER_OF_THE_YEAR"
}
},
{"city": true}
],
"orderBy": [
{
"aggregate": {
"avgEmployees": "DescNullsLast"
}
},
{
"aggregate": {
"percentyEmptyEmployees": "DescNullsLast"
}
},
{
"city": "AscNullsLast"
},
{
"createdAt": {
"orderBy": "AscNullsLast",
"granularity": "QUARTER_OF_THE_YEAR",
}
}
]
}
```
The aggregate orderBy criteria had already been implemented, but I
updated the implementation to add an "aggregate" key to prefix them, in
order to avoid confusion between the two + for the schema generation not
to break (otherwise we would have an issue when generating
OrderByWithGroupByInput if a user has created a field that has the same
name as an aggregate field, such as avgEmployees).
# Introduction
This PR introduces a huge type refactor that will leverage dynamic intra
entity optimistic flat maps update in the future and also a more
granular cache invalidation enhancing performances
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1717
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1716
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1643
## What's done
### Comparators centralization
Comparator is now done through global configuration as const for each
metadata names
Thanks to
Note:
Definition of standard is evolving, standard is now scoped to an app.
Meaning that a manifest should be able to update its own standards
objects but on other app standards ones ? Each synchronizable entities
will have a standardOverrides ?
## Typing refactor
### `AllFlatEntityTypesByMetadataName`
**Single source of truth for the complete type ecosystem**, mapping each
metadata name to its entity types, flat entities, and migration actions:
```typescript
export type AllFlatEntityTypesByMetadataName = {
fieldMetadata: {
actions: { created: CreateFieldAction; updated: UpdateFieldAction; deleted: DeleteFieldAction; };
flatEntity: FlatFieldMetadata;
entity: FieldMetadataEntity;
};
objectMetadata: { /* ... */ };
// ... all 10 metadata types
};
```
### `ALL_METADATA_NAME_MANY_TO_ONE_RELATIONS`
**Explicitly declares database relationships** between entities with
compile-time validation:
```typescript
export const ALL_METADATA_NAME_MANY_TO_ONE_RELATIONS = {
viewField: {
view: 'viewId',
fieldMetadata: 'fieldMetadataId',
},
cronTrigger: {
serverlessFunction: 'serverlessFunctionId',
},
// ... all relations
} as const satisfies MetadataNameAndRelations;
```
### `ALL_FLAT_ENTITY_CONFIGURATION`
**Centralizes comparison and serialization logic** for each metadata
type:
```typescript
export const ALL_FLAT_ENTITY_CONFIGURATION = {
fieldMetadata: {
propertiesToCompare: ['name', 'type', 'label', 'defaultValue', /* ... */],
propertiesToStringify: ['options', 'settings', 'defaultValue'],
},
objectMetadata: {
propertiesToCompare: ['nameSingular', 'namePlural', 'isActive', /* ... */],
propertiesToStringify: [],
},
// ... all metadata types
} as const satisfies AllFlatEntityConfiguration;
```
## Combined Impact
These three configurations work together to create a **strongly-typed,
centrally-managed metadata system**:
1. **`AllFlatEntityTypesByMetadataName`** defines *what exists*
2. **`ALL_METADATA_NAME_MANY_TO_ONE_RELATIONS`** defines *how they
relate*
3. **`ALL_FLAT_ENTITY_CONFIGURATION`** defines *how to compare and
serialize them*
**Result:** Builders and validators become thin wrappers around
type-safe, configuration-driven logic instead of containing scattered,
error-prone manual implementations.
## What's next
### StandardOverrides standardization
Every metadata entity can be a standard one for a workspace if it's an
installed app, which means it might not expose the whole entity api to
be editable through an import dynamically
The standard overrides logic should not be applied to Fields and Objects
but to every entities
At the moment we have a logic of `EDITABLE_PROPERTIES` through the api,
and also `STANDARD_OVERRIDEDABLE_PROPERTIES`
This should be configuration centered like `propertiesToCompare` and
`propertiesToStringify`.
Scoping this PR to two last for the moment. As update dispatch to
standardOverrides could be considered as a side effect prefer waiting to
start the side effect refactor
### Granular Optimistic deprecation
With this new grain at runtime we will be able to add a flat entity and
dispatch its addition to related flat maps, so we don't have to describe
an optimistic method for each flat entity operations
See `addFlatEntityToFlatEntityAndRelatedEntityMapsOrThrow`
Note: Still in wip and included in this PR but about to create a new one
to integrate these utils and remove existing methods
### ValidateBuildAndRun dynamic args typed defintion
We should restrain the devxp to send expected flat maps entity as at
least from to or dependency as we now have the grain both a type lvl and
runtime to do so
It should not be possible in the devxp to forgot adding the views to the
v2 builder when passing the view field anymore ( that would lead to
permanent validation error in view field integrity checks )
## Conclusion
Thanks for reading and reviewing !
Any suggestions are more than welcomed ! ( same as for questions too ! )
Félix Malfait