Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14766
To reproduce
1. create a view with a any field filter and save it. After, remove any
field filter clicking on the X on the chip. No "Update view" shows.
2. now add another regular filter to the view and save it. Now remove
any field filter clicking on the X on the chip and remove the regular
filter you just added. Now "Update view" shows, click it and refresh the
page. Any field filter still shows
There were two problems
1. UpdateViewButtonGroup is in charge of showing "Update View" button.
But is never mounted if shouldExpandViewBar is falsy.
shouldExpandViewBar was not considering
viewAnyFieldFilterDifferentFromCurrentAnyFieldFilter so even if any
field filter had changed, UpdateViewButtonGroup still wasn't going to
show "Update view" button because it wasn't mounted
2. At save time, we added anyFieldFilterValue to the mutation payload if
```
...(view.anyFieldFilterValue && {
anyFieldFilterValue: view.anyFieldFilterValue,
}),
```,
but in JS an empty string evaluates to falsy.
In this PR https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/14785 we deprecated
viewFilterOperand (from camelCase to capital snakeCase values), but we
had not migrated the existing workflow steps values. Hence they cannot
be executed!
Let's fix that by dealing with both operands, new and deprecated, to
mitigate the issue. Then we will add a command to migrate the values.
- add serverlessFunction schema in twenty-cli
- add trigger schema in twenty-cli
- update serverless function code save and get
- sync serverless function
# Calendar View: Add "+" Button to Calendar Day Cards
## Description
This PR implements the "+" button on calendar day cards in the Month
view, allowing users to create new records directly from the calendar.
- The "+" button appears **on hover** only.
- Newly created records include the **day representing the card** in the
payload (UTC, with only the date part).
- Respects **object permissions** and **soft delete filters**.
- Automatically integrates with **active filters** used in Table and
Kanban views.
## Implementation Notes
- `RecordCalendarAddNew` component handles button visibility and record
creation.
- UTC date is passed to the create function to ensure proper timezone
handling.
- No unit tests added yet (need senior guidance).
---
[Screencast from 2025-09-24
20-10-18.webm](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bd117b43-6c1b-4267-874f-b36844733d9e)
### Video ->
## Related Issues
Fixes: https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1552
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/14762
In this PR
- moved logic around any field filter formatting to twenty-shared
- added any field filter to the filters applied to groupBy when viewId
is defined
- added integration test
In the BE we have stored filter operand as IS_EMPTY, IS_NOT_EMPTY, etc.
For some reason in the FE we were manipulating IsEmpty, IsNotEmpty, etc.
(maybe because they were used before in Views before they were moved to
core)
So we were converting the operands in the FE from IS to Is
(convertViewFilterOperandFromCore) to read and manipulate viewFilters,
and then back to BE version to send mutations etc., from Is to IS
(convertViewFilterOperandToCore).
The migration is now over, so we can remove and simplify that code.
(In the 1-5:migrate-views-to-core command we still do the migration from
Is format to IS format.)
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14569
Some extensions, such as SimilarWeb, are incompatible with twenty: they
trigger intempestive "AbortErrors" converted into error snackbar. While
twenty remains usable it is very annoying.
I did not take time to deeply investigate which requests are
problematic. According to ClaudeAI it may be because twenty makes a lot
of queries to the same endpoint /graphql, a pattern that SimilarWeb may
interpret as tracking which they try to intercept.
In this PR, we finish the work started in [this
PR](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13080) to silent harmless
AbortErrors.
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1560
If viewId is defined in a groupBy query, we want to apply all filters of
the view to the query.
This required to move a lot of code from twenty-front to twenty-shared
to convert the filters as stored in the db into graphql filters,
applying the right combinations between filters etc., which was
previously only done in the FE.
This PR does not handle any field filters, it will be done in a later pr
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d6c565eb-9a29-4830-9396-5f979c8caa7b
- Added a new component for manual trigger (mostly duplicated from
previous one). Will remove the old one once all data are migrated
- Updated schema output so the current item of the iterator can be typed
Todo left:
- migrate old triggers
- add an util to search iterator output. Today current item fields will
be displayed as not found
- set new manual triggers for workflow runs
## Context
Now adding serverless code sync within the migration v2 logic itself. To
do that we need to follow the
- Prepare flat input
- Build migration
- Run migration
steps where now the serverless function entity will store in DB and
cache a checksum of its code and the flat input will contain the code
with the checksum. Build will compare checksum and create an update
action containing the code if it has changed and the migration will now
run the corresponding services (instead of calling those in the parent
serverless service exposed in the API) allowing us to keep that logic
functional for other use cases such as import/export, twenty-cli and
twenty upgrades.