Commit Graph

101 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Weiko c0ed246a03 Add is unique in migration v2 + refactor inferDeletionFromMissingEntities (#15070)
## Goal
- inferDeletionFromMissingEntities is now a map instead of a single
bool, allowing us to parameterise it based on the entity we want to
compare
- Adding index creation/update when field isUnique is set to true and
index deletion when isUnique is false (for now)

close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1346
2025-10-15 16:08:13 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 7d747c9876 [REQUIRES_CACHE_FLUSH][GQL_VIEW_GROUP_API_BREAKING_CHANGE] ViewGroup in v2 (#15052)
# Introduction
Adding view-group to core engine v2
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15010 ( same pattern )

## What's done
- Created flat-view-group
- flat view group runner
- flat view group builder
- create view group service v2 and input transpilers
- refactor the existing view group resolver to fix standard (
BREAKING_CHANGE on graphql api update especially ) REST stays the same
- refactored the front to consume the mutations autogenerated

close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1665
2025-10-14 15:55:50 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 651ab184a7 [GQL_VIEW_FILTER_API_BREAKING_CHANGE][WHEN_RELEASED_REQUIRES_CACHE_FLUSH] ViewFilter migration to workspace migration v2 (#15010)
# Introduction
Migrating `viewFilter` to v2 in order to migrate later the field update
side effect on view to v2 too

## What's done
- Created flat-view-filter
- flat view filter runner
- flat view filter builder
- create view filter service v2 and input transpilers
- refactor the existing view filter resolver to fix standard (
BREAKING_CHANGE on graphql api update especially ) REST stays the same
- refactored the front to consume the mutations autogenerated

## New generic tools
### Compare two flat entity
Introducing a new util to compare two flat entity, it's strictly typed
and will be added to the generic builder in a following PR
This will ease flat entity addition as won't required to create a
specific abstraction for comparison
Generic builder will expect specific constant: properties to compare and
properties to stringify

### Transform flat entity for comparison
Forked and refactor the initial existing method for flat entity business
scope and type safety

## Coverage
Migrated existing integration tests to fit new contract API
This PR does not add strong coverage on validation exceptions
Deadlines are too short

close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1666
2025-10-10 15:02:14 +02:00
Abdul Rahman 5adc9fe9b2 feat: mutualize CRUD tools between workflows and AI (#14996)
Closes [#1662](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1662)
2025-10-10 00:55:34 +05:30
Félix Malfait e577c2d746 Update user friendly errors for translations (#15000)
Force msg typing instead of string for user friendly errors
2025-10-09 18:17:32 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 59fbe35a8c Move view in metadata-modules/ and create atomic folder + module for each view entity (#14990)
# Introduction
Preparing view-filter and view-group introduction in v2 core engine
Moving view from `core-modules` to `metadata-modules`

## What happened

### Created dedicated modules for each view entity:
- ViewFieldModule
- ViewFilterModule
- ViewFilterGroupModule
- ViewGroupModule
- ViewSortModule

### Each module is now completely independent with its own:
- Controller
- Resolver
- Service
- Entity

### Created dedicated abstraction metadata module folder for:
- flat-view-field
- flat-view

### Dependencies 
- Eleminated circular dep on ViewModule to all others ones
- Granular import not importing the whole viewModule anymore everywhere


close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1703
2025-10-09 15:18:15 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 4ecc9c622d [WHEN_RELEASED_REQUIRES_CACHE_FLUSH] Object related record logic in v2 (#14937)
# Introduction
Initial motivation here was to migrate the object related records logic
from v1 to v2, please note that now in v2 views aren't records anymore
but core engine entities

## What's done
- Added specific label identifier targeting view field logic
- Handled side effects on viewField creation with lowest position on
object label identifier mutation
- Added viewField relations in field metadate entity + handled
optimistic in builder v2
- Added view relations in object metadata entity + handled optimistic in
builder v2
- Added integration tests covering the side effects and new validation
exceptions
- Sandardized cache computation
- Coverage on object metadata creation side effect on views and view
fields

## Coverage
```ts
 PASS  test/integration/graphql/suites/view/view-field/object-identifier-update-side-effect-on-view-field.integration-spec.ts
  View Field Resolver - Successful object metadata identifier update side effect on view field
    ✓ should create a view field on label identifier object metadata update if it does not exist on view (7 ms)
    ✓ Should not allow deleting a label identifier view field (17 ms)
    ✓ Should not allow destroying a label identifier view field (6 ms)
    ✓ Should not allow updating a label identifier view field visibility to false (8 ms)
    ✓ Should not allow creating a view field with a position lower than the label idenfitier view field (180 ms)
    ✓ Should not allow updated labelIdentifier view field with a position higher than existing other view field (346 ms)
    ✓ Should allow updated labelIdentifier view field with a position higher than existing other view field (434 ms)

Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests:       7 passed, 7 total
Snapshots:   5 passed, 5 total
Time:        4.571 s, estimated 5 s
```

close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1664
2025-10-08 16:23:37 +02:00
Guillim f60817a1e1 Morph many to one picker (#14155)
This PR follows the multiSelect PR merged previously. It will enable
morph relation Many to One to be handled from the table, using a
singleSelect picker

Main point : I decided to change the singleSelect API to take an array
of **objectMetadataName** instead of only one to deal with both our
usecases.

---------

Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
2025-10-07 17:25:11 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 23e21cbeea Label identifier validation v2 (#14867)
# Introduction
Adding a hacky way to validate object against fields before fields
validation ( bi-directional validation process )
If you encounter an identical setup we will add a specific devXp as
cleanup validation but for the moment this seems enough

close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1639
2025-10-07 13:27:21 +02:00
Weiko 0b60aa4249 Add custom routes to migration v2 (#14846)
## Context
Add routes to migration V2
- Resolvers
- Service v2
- Builder
- Validator
- Action runner

Next PR: Add to twenty-cli to sync routes with serverless
2025-10-03 00:20:21 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 170f6d27c5 Extract field metadata build out of object metadata build (#14763)
# Introduction

Extracting the legacy fields build and dispatch out of the object one to
follow the generic flat entity build, also update caches entries for
object

## Main tasks
- flat field map cache
- flat field builder
- refactored the dispatch matrix to return flat entity maps instead of
flat entity arrays
- orchestrator aggregator
- removing legacy code
- making universal identifier aka standardId of standard field for
custom object deterministically dynamic
- perfs debug logs for v2

## TODO
- [x] Refactor the generic entity builder to be dependency flat maps in
order to main foreign keys list in flat parent
- [x] Refactor the flat object metadata to contain the array of related
fields and avoid costy find object fields
- [ ] Improve the create field handler to handle multiple field at once
- [ ] Refactor the dispatch to embbed the comparison
- [ ] Improve perf by extracting from elements out of existing
- [ ] Fix the labelIdentifierId validators on object before field
creation ( integ tests are in failing mode )

## Debug logs snippet

```ts
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] matrix computation: 0.027ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] creation validation: 0.001ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] deletion validation: 0.293ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] update validation: 0.006ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] entity processing: 0.363ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] validateAndBuild: 0.455ms
[EntityBuilder index] matrix computation: 0.005ms
[EntityBuilder index] creation validation: 0.001ms
[EntityBuilder index] deletion validation: 0.146ms
[EntityBuilder index] update validation: 0.004ms
[EntityBuilder index] entity processing: 0.199ms
[EntityBuilder index] validateAndBuild: 0.228ms
[Runner] Initial cache retrieval: 0.549ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_index executeForWorkspaceSchema: 11.665ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_index executeForMetadata: 12.864ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForWorkspaceSchema: 1.476ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForMetadata: 6.816ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForWorkspaceSchema: 0.062ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForMetadata: 0.889ms
[Runner] Transaction execution: 23.434ms
[Runner] Cache invalidation: 316.662ms
[Runner] Total execution: 340.767ms
```
As you can see cache invalidation is way to long, we could replace the
cache by the optimistic in the end
2025-10-02 16:07:34 +00:00
Abdul Rahman 20403664e3 Feat: native model capabilities (#14787) 2025-10-01 18:37:21 +02:00
Marie 3927b36406 [View migration] Clean ViewFilterOperand (#14785)
In the BE we have stored filter operand as IS_EMPTY, IS_NOT_EMPTY, etc. 
For some reason in the FE we were manipulating IsEmpty, IsNotEmpty, etc.
(maybe because they were used before in Views before they were moved to
core)

So we were converting the operands in the FE from IS to Is
(convertViewFilterOperandFromCore) to read and manipulate viewFilters,
and then back to BE version to send mutations etc., from Is to IS
(convertViewFilterOperandToCore).
The migration is now over, so we can remove and simplify that code. 
(In the 1-5:migrate-views-to-core command we still do the migration from
Is format to IS format.)
2025-09-30 17:12:03 +02:00
Weiko 68b21d2942 Add db event trigger and cron trigger to migration v2 (#14772)
## Context
Add DB events triggers and Cron triggers to migration v2 builder/runner
(and adding corresponding services/resolvers)
2025-09-30 11:14:18 +02:00
Marie da3c3d2b9d [GroupBy] Add views filters to groupBy query (#14762)
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1560

If viewId is defined in a groupBy query, we want to apply all filters of
the view to the query.
This required to move a lot of code from twenty-front to twenty-shared
to convert the filters as stored in the db into graphql filters,
applying the right combinations between filters etc., which was
previously only done in the FE.

This PR does not handle any field filters, it will be done in a later pr
2025-09-30 09:58:55 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 4fbdfb6abc Activate v2 default seed (#14660)
## Introduction
After enabling flag by default got following errors:
```ts
Test Suites: 48 failed, 1 skipped, 97 passed, 145 of 146 total
Tests:       499 failed, 1 skipped, 644 passed, 1144 total
Snapshots:   61 failed, 133 passed, 194 total
Time:        363.226 s
Ran all test suites.
```

## From
<img width="2952" height="1510" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7e3b20c6-2552-40a7-90bb-2d7b3002c895"
/>

## To
<img width="3134" height="1510" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4fc9ada4-3c14-4333-a1db-11daf87db8d6"
/>

There's a huge test bundle in the latest shard that we could split up

## Notes
- Set as failing morph relation field rename as for the moment we do not
handle relation field mutation
- fixed the object update and creation validation adding label
identifier field metadata id checks
- and more

Some integrations tests are still on the v1 ( they have before and after
all disabling and re-enabling the flat ) but mainly we now have more
coverage on the v2 than the v1.
Mainly related records, uniqueness have to be migrated the v2 and so
tests too
2025-09-26 16:05:09 +02:00
Weiko 188d66909d Add ServerlessFunction to migration v2 (#14698) 2025-09-25 14:05:01 +02:00
Paul Rastoin fbd3286792 Index v2 side effects (#14567)
# Introduction
Honestly this implem is a mess, discussing a potential side effect
handler with @weiko before the build and run that would handle each side
effect per entity and operation

Handling:
- [ ] unique index is generated when a field is updated with the
`isUnique`
- [x] an index is generated when a relation is created
- [x] search vector index creation on custom object creation
- [x] renaming a field metadata or an object should re-create all
related indexes which are composed by their namings
- [x] delete object should remove any related indexes
- [x] delete field should update related indexes ( if index ends up
empty it should be removed )
- [ ] on object renaming that contains morph fields -> triggers update
field -> trigger index recompute
- [x] on update name renaming should recompute all related indexes

## TODO
- [x] Integration testing
- [ ] Refactor the index maps cache to be storing a
`idsByObjectMetadataId`
- [x] Refactor deterministic name to use order sorting
- [x] Remove flat index from flat object

## What's next

Will handle morph indexes in a new dedicated PR for the moment will
stick to this
Same for the cache improvement and uniqueness
2025-09-23 10:57:11 +02:00
Abdul Rahman 216d72b5d7 AI SDK v5 migration (#14549)
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
2025-09-22 22:13:43 +02:00
Weiko 40240ce514 Add view viewField favorite creation after object creation in migration v2 (#14644)
## Context
We are not exactly sure how we want to handle side effects with
workspace migration v2, in the meantime I'm re-introducing this part in
the caller (object v2 service)
2025-09-22 16:19:38 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 2d8669ae71 Index v2 runner (#14537)
## Introduction
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/14363
In this PR we're creating builder and runner for index metadata
Removing its previous integration within object builder

## Next:
- implem index impact on field and object metadata api
- Add integration testing coverage add integration test on index
- Implement uniqueness toggle in field metadata api
- add integration test on uniqueness

related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1344
2025-09-17 13:02:43 +00:00
Abdul Rahman 8d9617131c Feat: Add reasoning summary and tool details display for AI responses (#14414)
Closes [#1405](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1405)

### Implemented Features
- Reasoning Summary: Collapsible display of AI thinking process with
real-time streaming
- Tool Execution: Detailed tool call rendering with expandable results
and loading states
- Error Handling: Clean error stream event display with proper
formatting


### Demo



https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/76ad29b7-d831-4bc8-a115-ad25f7ace6e2

<img width="504" height="819" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-12 at 3 23 39 AM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/82dc177d-f009-4e8a-8901-ee1a49201984"
/>

---------

Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
2025-09-17 11:30:24 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 579f704baa Plugging + improving the new orchestrator (#14430)
# Introduction
Initially this PR was about introducing integration coverage for view
field v2 tests
But feature itself wasn't finished, so ended up in a TDD style
devlopment

## The new orchestrator
Orchestrator will organize each flat entity diffing inferring either
validation errors or actions sequentially.
A new builder has been introduced when extended requires to define flat
entity validation utils and action generation for `delete` `update`
`create` operations. It's highly typed using generics

## View field integration testing
Introduce coverage on failing basic tests cases for view field
operations, successfull create is also covered. We could still add more
coverage, will be done later in following PRs

## Remaining tasks for upcoming PRs:
- [ ] rename builder methods names to add generate action in their names
- [x] refactor view validation to handle field and view uniqueness index
combination
- [ ] implem strict update validator on view and view field
- [ ] dynamic cache invalidation post run
- [ ] Add coverage to successful and failing view field operations
- [ ] error formatting summary computation
- [ ] extract types out of the workspace entity builder

## Some vision
Currently flat field metadata maps is nested in the flat object metadata
maps, making its build nested too. ( not extending the new generic
builder )
We will refactor this part for both to be stored extra flat such as the
other existing flat entities.
It will require a small refactor to the generic builder that will not
only have impact on the currently built flat entity optimistic cache but
to an other one ( for example when building a create object action it
will also have an impact flat field maps )
2025-09-15 14:32:57 +02:00
Félix Malfait 30a2164980 First Application POC (#14382)
Quick proof of concept for twenty-apps + twenty-cli, with local
development / hot reload

Let's discuss it!



https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c6789936-cd5f-4110-a265-863a6ac1af2d
2025-09-10 15:12:38 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 9e81618773 Refactor morph field name and morph data loader (#14299)
# Introduction
Storing morph relation field names directly in database, using morphId
to aggregate them
Removing dynamic morph field metadata computation in schemas and data
loader

Will add integration tests on morph data loader entry

closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1425 
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1424 
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1423
2025-09-08 17:20:18 +02:00
Charles Bochet 286682c197 DevXP improvements on new views (#14330) 2025-09-05 18:49:20 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 17c646f9d8 Fix views integration tests (#14317)
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/14202
2025-09-05 10:16:40 +00:00
Vinay Arvind Badgujar 5824637d1a fix - newly added object not visible in left menu (#14202)
resolves #14190 

added refreshCoreViews() call after object creation to immediately
update core views state, ensuring new objects appear in the navigation
drawer without requiring a refresh

---------

Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
2025-09-05 10:43:03 +02:00
Marie 40251d34ec [permissions] Deprecate ObjectsPermissionsDeprecated (1/3) (#14306)
We want to update UserWorkspacePermissions from 
```
export type UserWorkspacePermissions = {
  permissionFlags: Record<PermissionFlagType, boolean>;
  objectRecordsPermissions: Record<PermissionsOnAllObjectRecords, boolean>;
  objectPermissions: ObjectsPermissionsDeprecated;
};
```

to
```
export type UserWorkspacePermissions = {
  permissionFlags: Record<PermissionFlagType, boolean>;
  objectsPermissions: ObjectsPermissions;
};
```

`ObjectsPermissionsDeprecated` and `ObjectsPermissions` are actually
very similar, they only have different key names (`canRead` vs
`canReadObjectRecords`)

To avoid brutal breaking changes, we will proceed in multiple steps: 

1. This PR: adapt FE so it does not call objectRecordsPermissions
anymore + add the new objectsPermissions to UserWorkspacePermissions
without calling it yet in the FE
2. Remove objectRecordsPermissions in BE + use objectsPermissions in FE
instead of objectPermissions
3. Remove objectPermissions
2025-09-04 14:03:33 +00:00
Paul Rastoin 6522498df0 Failing morph relation creation v2 integration testing & fixes (#14253)
# Introduction
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1408
2025-09-03 12:14:43 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 6d6ee939cf Morph relation field v2 fixes (#14216)
Fixes, depending on the contextual current operation in order to
retrieve relation target and all morph related fields to be delete:
- DELETE Field,
- DELETE Object, 
- UPDATE Field, that affects all others related fields
2025-09-02 12:17:20 +00:00
Paul Rastoin da288b1998 V2 integ test sequential operations testing (#14228)
Wil need to add a morph relation field in a new test suite
Especially searching for enum collision
2025-09-02 10:15:01 +02:00
Marie 0d5fedfb0a Fix user friendly message for non available object name (#14210)
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13577.

When naming or renaming an object, we are already checking that the name
was available compared to other existing objects.
But we also need to check that the relation fields that will be created
or updated are available as well: we create relation fields on
Attachment, Note, Favorite, Task and TimelineActivites, that bear the
name of the object. Thus, it is not possible to create an object that
has the same name as one of the fields on Attachment, Note etc: name,
createdAt, ... are not valid names.
2025-09-01 16:35:40 +00:00
Paul Rastoin 59d90bedaa Integration testing v2 enum field types fail and success path (#14010)
# Introduction
Migrating and improving performances of field enum integrations tests
success and failing tests cases to be using the new v2 api

## Discovered issue
When deleting an object in v1 it will leave related enums until the
object is re-created
Something not done anymore within the create in v2 but in the delete
operation
We should implem an upgrade command to remove such relicas

## Bugs
- Update/create default value multi select runner wrong sql query -> FIX
- Update default value multi select regression, we should allow option
without an id to be inserted -> FIX
- default value compare dynamic json stringify convertion or not in
compare tools for object and fields
2025-08-28 10:23:04 +00:00
Weiko 533d7fe49a Deprecate legacy core datasource token (#14096) 2025-08-27 20:09:54 +02:00
Abdul Rahman 9098df7ddf Add preconfigured Workflow creation agent (#13855)
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-08-27 14:20:38 +02:00
Antoine Moreaux 91ce3d4e0c fix(ai): MCPCore findRecord tool (#14033)
Fix #13545

---------

Co-authored-by: lhdu <lhdu@bigquant.ai>
Co-authored-by: huxianc <47603705+huxianc@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-08-22 12:05:56 +02:00
Paul Rastoin e99c67d6b5 Fail slow + structured validator error response scoped by object and fields (#13980)
# Introduction
Example of returned response: ( snapshot copy don't mind jest expect any
values )
```json
{
  "extensions": {
    "code": "BAD_USER_INPUT",
    "errors": {
      "fieldMetadata": [
        {
          "errors": [
            {
              "code": "INVALID_FIELD_INPUT",
              "message": "Name is too long",
              "userFriendlyMessage": "Name is too long",
              "value": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
            },
          ],
          "id": Any<String>,
          "name": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
          "objectMetadataId": Any<String>,
          "operation": "create_field",
        },
        {
          "errors": [
            {
              "code": "INVALID_FIELD_INPUT",
              "message": "Name is too long",
              "userFriendlyMessage": "Name is too long",
              "value": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
            },
          ],
          "id": Any<String>,
          "name": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
          "objectMetadataId": Any<String>,
          "operation": "create_field",
        },
        {
          "errors": [
            {
              "code": "INVALID_FIELD_INPUT",
              "message": "Name is too long",
              "userFriendlyMessage": "Name is too long",
              "value": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
            },
          ],
          "id": Any<String>,
          "name": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
          "objectMetadataId": Any<String>,
          "operation": "create_field",
        },
        {
          "errors": [
            {
              "code": "INVALID_FIELD_INPUT",
              "message": "Name is too long",
              "userFriendlyMessage": "Name is too long",
              "value": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
            },
          ],
          "id": Any<String>,
          "name": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
          "objectMetadataId": Any<String>,
          "operation": "create_field",
        },
        {
          "errors": [
            {
              "code": "INVALID_FIELD_INPUT",
              "message": "Name is too long",
              "userFriendlyMessage": "Name is too long",
              "value": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
            },
          ],
          "id": Any<String>,
          "name": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
          "objectMetadataId": Any<String>,
          "operation": "create_field",
        },
      ],
      "objectMetadata": [
        {
          "errors": [
            {
              "code": "INVALID_OBJECT_INPUT",
              "message": "Name is too long",
              "value": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
            },
          ],
          "fields": [],
          "id": Any<String>,
          "namePlural": "listingas",
          "nameSingular": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
          "operation": "create_object",
        },
      ],
    },
    "message": "Validation failed for 1 object(s) and 5 field(s)",
    "summary": {
      "invalidFields": 5,
      "invalidObjects": 1,
      "totalErrors": 6,
    },
    "userFriendlyMessage": "Validation failed for 1 object(s) and 5 field(s)",
  },
  "message": "Multiple validation errors occurred while creating object",
  "name": "GraphQLError",
}
```

## Note
We should put in place integrations tests on REST API too, in order to
ensure we receive the same response error
2025-08-20 17:33:15 +00:00
Raphaël Bosi 30c42345f0 Core views frontend (#13932)
Parallel code path to read and write core views when
IS_CORE_VIEW_ENABLED.

Migrated view key to an enum.

---------

Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
2025-08-20 19:04:58 +02:00
Etienne 6936993557 Unique fields - fixes (#13848)
- Enable update to unique for composite field with defaultValue
different from default defaultValue on subfield not included in unique
constraint
- Enable update to unique for standard field + Disable update to
non-unique for standard index
- Fix typo

Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1360
2025-08-13 08:40:46 +02:00
Guillim 63c8bb9530 morph backend CORE api (#13517)
# Morph Relation needs some work on the core API

Especially on the Morph types

<img width="682" height="394" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-31 at 12 19 40"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8b185ae3-3fe7-4886-97b1-ec143bb1b0f4"
/>


## Focus Areas:
- GraphQL schema generation
- Query parsing and field selection
- Morph relation field support
- Input type definition preparation
2025-08-12 11:47:02 +02:00
Etienne 7ce96049b8 Unique field - add unique property creation/deletion on field (#13539)
Done : 
- add isUnique prop availability on gql update/create fieldMetadata
resolvers
- add unique index creation logic at update & creation
- add unique index deletion logic at update
- update unique index if field name updated
- edge cases : can't have default value and unique fields / standard
default value excluded from index (where clause) / can't have composite
unique fields / can't create unique fields on MORPH


closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1222
2025-08-08 17:42:50 +02:00
Félix Malfait 8b4b9ef8da Change type import rule (#13751)
Forcing "type" to be explicit, works best will rollup on the frontend to
exclude depdendencies
2025-08-08 01:27:05 +02:00
Raphaël Bosi 593b064448 Create resolvers and controllers for core views (#13624)
Created:
- Services
- Resolvers
- Controllers
- Tests for services
- Integration tests for GraphQL and Rest

Updated the Rest API playground

Added new feature flag `IS_CORE_VIEW_ENABLED`

Updated `viewFilter` `operand` and `view` `type` to be enums rather than
strings and generated migration file.

Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1259

---------

Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
2025-08-07 18:45:04 +02:00
Abdul Rahman 01f25519f6 fix: standardize GraphQL schema UUID field types (#13550)
Closes [#1264](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1264)
2025-08-04 11:43:48 +02:00
nitin 4cd2a87833 Enable roles on api keys (#13334) 2025-08-02 23:54:10 +02:00
Abdul Rahman c3a9843fcb AI settings tab (#13496)
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/87f5a556-ff12-4ce0-aaa7-9120c0432151

---------

Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
2025-08-01 16:59:28 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 14537d74b4 FlatFieldMetadataType hashmap arch and enum validation (#13502)
# Introduction
- FlatFieldMetadataType validators hashmap
- Do not fail fast on validation but aggregate errors
- Implemented `enum` validation
- Plugged the new v2 dynamic call in the field metadata service v2

## What's next:
- Implem integration tests to make things run 🙃 
- migrate existing settings valdiation
- Finish the create object metadata service
- Handle update input transpilation and validation

## Open question
Should we implement, not covered validation ?, adding strictness now or
never.
This will be required by the import anw

## Discovered issue with cache
Currently the cache is not accurately typed, `fieldsById` map are not
storing any relations.
Which means the current transpilation tools are hitting undefined at
runtime
In the best of the world we will refactor the cache to be storing
`FlatObjectMetadata` and `FlatFieldMetadata` so we don't even have to
transpile them for validation and so on
But it would require to refactor the loaders that returns the cache to
the front on hit as FieldMetadataEntity, so we might land on a lighter
solution to rather add a new `getExistingFlatCache` that handles the
transpilation itself
About to do that in an other PR to be discussed with Coco
2025-07-31 14:54:39 +02:00
Abdul Rahman da79afa80a AI Agent handoffs (#13472) 2025-07-30 16:56:58 +02:00
Guillim 8ea816b7ef morph relation : renaming an object (#13404)
# Why
If we have a Morph Relation, like :
Opportunity <-> Company & People

Let's say it's a MANY_TO_ONE on Opportunity side

Then we have two joinColumnNames looking like
- ownerPersonId
- ownerCompanyId

Let's say someone renames the obejct Person (assume we can even though
standard obejcts cannot be renames per say at the moment in the API)

We need to update the joinColumnName and create the associated
migrations
2025-07-25 16:40:51 +02:00