Fixes#13333
This PR adds the ability to pin a manual trigger in the navbar. As
suggested, the following changes have been made:
**Changes Made**
- **Schema updates**
- Updated the `workflowSchema.ts` and added `isPinned` to the
`workflowManualTriggerSchema` as an optional boolean.
- **Defaults**
- Updated the `getManualTriggerDefaultSettings.ts` to add `isPinned` to
the `WorkflowManualTriggerSettings`, defaulting to false.
- **UI updates**
- Updated the `ManualTriggerAvailabilityOptions.ts` to improve the
Availability labels as suggested in the figma files.
- Created a new file `ManualTriggerIsPinnedOptions.ts` that contains the
options (label, value and icon) for the `isPinned` select component.
- Updated the `WorkflowEditTriggerManualForm.tsx` to incorporate the
added `isPinned` select component.
- **Action handling**
- Modified `useRunWorkflowRecordActions.tsx` to add `isPinned:
activeWorkflowVersion.trigger?.settings?.isPinned` to the returned
action config.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Raphaël Bosi <71827178+bosiraphael@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: bosiraphael <raphael.bosi@gmail.com>
Workflow, workflow version and workflow runs should not be passed
through props or context. These are set in recoil component states and
that's where all hooks should look for these.
This PR stop propagating workflow with version through all components.
This is first step toward separating the path between display mode and
input mode for inline-cells like we have done for tableCell.
The idea is to have 1 floating or anchored field input shared between
all cells. This should be done for field-list, board and task/note row +
for hover and edit mode.
This PR is only about field-list and hover
This PR prepares the refactor of record field definition and column
definition.
We need to separate the two concepts of FieldInput and FieldContext at
the cell level, and the new RecordField concept that will replace
FieldDefinition at the metadata and state level.
So we create a new ui sub-folder in the already existing record-field
folder, in order to separate those two concepts that are still very
close.
# Introduction
- Implementing the delete one for the new object metadata service v2.
- Handling relation fields and fields in the first place to finally
remove the object
- puting back updatedAt and createdAt in flat metadatas
- duplicate criteria addition for flat object
- removing datasource id from object metadata dto
Closes#13865
`IconEye` has been removed as specified in the issue. There was also a
`PencilIcon` for the `Edit` section, which has been removed. The
alignment issue was caused due to the `See` label being aligned to
`center`, which has now been removed. An optional parameter
`gridColumns` has been added to `StyledObjectFieldTableRow`.
Adding a screenshot for reference:
<img width="1153" height="498" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/12357084-f8d2-45d4-9b58-651488609c07"
/>
- Enable update to unique for composite field with defaultValue
different from default defaultValue on subfield not included in unique
constraint
- Enable update to unique for standard field + Disable update to
non-unique for standard index
- Fix typo
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1360
When the target is not in the direct next step ids of the source (step
or trigger), check if there is a filter between both. If yes, delete the
filter and remove it from source next step ids.
Also refactored the existing.
This PR removes useRecordTable barrel-hook and instead use the pattern
that enforces one hook per function.
This allows to have a easier to maintain React code with small dedicated
hooks.
This PR also improves the usage of those hooks by cleaning some logic
that calls them.
We introduce a new hook : `useRecordIndexIdFromCurrentContextStore` that
factorizes logic that was duplicated to retrieve the `recordTableId`.
Introduced `useHandleColumnsChange`, that saves table columns into view,
this could be discussed but is it isolated with a TODO comment so ok for
now.
Also lowered the coverage because not enough to cover with test here.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR introduces refactors and tradeoffs in the API around the events
of field input.
# Refactored usePersistField
The hook `usePersistField` has been refactored to be used anywhere in
the app, not just inside a FieldContext.
This was meant to solve a bug at the beginning but now it is just used
once in `RecordDetailRelationSection` outside of the context, still this
is better to have this hook like that for future use cases.
We also introduce `usePersistFieldFromFieldInputContext`, for an easier
API inside a FieldContext.
# Introduced a new `FieldInputEventContext`
To remove the drill-down of events, we introduce
`FieldInputEventContext`, this allows to set only once the handlers /
events. In practice it allows to have an easier time maintaining the
events for the many different field inputs, because it matches the
pattern we already use of taking everything from a context
(`FieldContext`).
# Removed drill-down from FieldInput
The heavy drill-down in FieldInput has been completely removed, since
everything can be derived from `FieldContext` and
`FieldInputEventContext`.
Also there was some readonly and other specific props, but they were all
drilled down from FieldContext, so it was easier to just use
FieldContext where needed.
# Refactored events of `MultiItemFieldInputProps`
The component `MultiItemFieldInputProps` has a contrived API, here we
just remove the complex part that was persisting from inside.
We now only give a classic API with `onChange` and `onEscape` the rest
is left to higher levels, where it should be, because this generic
component shouldn't be aware of persisting things.
# Extracted the parsing logic of persisted values
For each input field component, we now have a clear util that was before
bound to the persist call,
# Tradeoff with persist times
The tradeoff before was that persistField was called anywhere, before
exiting the component sometimes, now it is only called by the higher
levels like table or show page, which handles this abstraction.
This could be challenged, however I think that having a lot of different
events, and not just `handleSubmit` and `handleCancel`, convey enough
meaning for the higher levels to decide what to do in each case.
A `skipPersist` argument was added in events in the rare edge cases
where we want to voluntarily skip persisting even with a submit or
escape, but that could be challenged because we could also say that we
should use cancel for that and stick to that convention.
# Handling of the bug in `ActivityRichTextEditor`
Initially this refactor was prioritized for solving this bug, which was
very annoying for the users.
But while fixing it with the new persistField hook I just understood
that the problem is not just for record title cells but for anything
that is open when we click on a rich text editor.
The issue is described here :
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1317
So right now I just let it as is.
# Stories
The stories were checking that a request was sent in some cases where
persist was called before a component exiting, now that persist is only
called by higher-levels I just removed those tests from the stories,
because that should be the responsibility of higher levels.
Also a helper `getFieldInputEventContextProviderWithJestMocks` was
created that exposes a context and jest mock functions for testing this
new API in stories.
# Miscellaneous
Deactivated tui with nx by default, because it can be annoying.
- Move dev-only types to devDependencies
- Move frontend-only deps from root to twenty-front
- Add website-only deps to twenty-website
- Fix react-phone-number-input patch path
CI should validate.
Testing a different approach to fix broken buildPackageJson on server
build
How i have tested:
A. Local contributor setup
- run yarn
- build server
- run yarn workspace focus
- run server on dist
B. self-host
- docker build
Note: I think the dependencies I have added are suboptimized as the
image went from 2GB to 3.5GB. We might need to be more accurate
This PR updates the subtitle under the "Endpoint URL" input on the
webhook creation form.
The updated text clearly states that the server sends POST requests with
application/json and recommends setting the correct Content-Type.
This addresses issue #13757.
Closes#13757
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ehconitin <nitinkoche03@gmail.com>
github-actions[bot]