When inserting a new step between step 1 et step 2, then step 1 should
have the new step as next step id, add stop having step 2.
When deleting a step, we link the parent and next steps together. It may
change in the future
> [!WARNING]
> I refactored a bunch of components into utility functions to make it
possible to display the `WorkflowStepHeader` component for **triggers**
in the `CommandMenuWorkflowRunViewStep` component. Previously, we were
asserting that we were displaying the header in `Output` and `Input`
tabs only for **actions**. Handling triggers too required a bunch of
changes. We can think of making a bigger refactor of this part.
In this PR:
- Only display the Flow for Workflow Runs; removed the Code Editor tab
- Allows users to see the Output of trigger nodes
- Prevent impossible states by manually setting the selected tab when
selecting a node
## Demo
### Success, Running and Not Executed steps
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c6bebd0f-5da2-4ccc-aef2-d9890eafa59a
### Failed step
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e1f4e13a-2f5e-4792-a089-928e4d6b1ac0
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/709
# Introduction
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/591
Same than for `twenty-shared` made in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11083.
## TODO
- [x] Manual migrate twenty-website twenty-ui imports
## What's next:
- Generate barrel and migration script factorization within own package
+ tests
- Refactoring using preconstruct ? TimeBox
- Lint circular dependencies
- Lint import from barrel and forbid them
### Preconstruct
We need custom rollup plugins addition, but preconstruct does not expose
its rollup configuration. It might be possible to handle this using the
babel overrides. But was a big tunnel.
We could give it a try afterwards ! ( allowing cjs interop and stuff
like that )
Stuck to vite lib app
Closed related PRs:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11294
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11203
# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
- create a form filler component
- send the response on submit
- put back a field name. We need it for the step output
- validate a form is well set before activation
TODO:
- we need to refresh to see the form submitted. We need to discuss about
a strategy
- the response is not saved in the step settings. We need a new endpoint
to update workflow run step
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0f34a6cd-ed8c-4d9a-a1d4-51455cc83443
- Do not render a source handle for the leaf nodes
- Upgrade the `@xyflow/react` library
| Before | After |
|--------|--------|
| 
| 
|
## Other options considered
React Flow exposes a hook to get the connections of the current node. I
tried to use this hook – which makes things way simpler – but I couldn't
find a way to make it work in Storybook. I had two options: 1. Set up
React Flow to render the nodes properly, 2. Mock the hook in Storybook.
The first option was hard to achieve as the `<Reactflow />` component
renders a whole flow, and it doesn't play well with the idea of
rendering a single node in a story.
The second option seemed overkill as mocking modules with Storybook is
not straightforward. See
https://storybook.js.org/docs/writing-stories/mocking-data-and-modules/mocking-modules.
I chose to keep the initial version of my code, written before I spot a
function simplifying the code. We can give it a look another time.
# Introduction
Avoid having multiple `isDefined` definition across our pacakges
Also avoid importing `isDefined` from `twenty-ui` which exposes a huge
barrel for a such little util function
## In a nutshell
Removed own `isDefined.ts` definition from `twenty-ui` `twenty-front`
and `twenty-server` to move it to `twenty-shared`.
Updated imports for each packages, and added explicit dependencies to
`twenty-shared` if not already in place
Related PR https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/9941
**This PR implements a new layout for the visualizer, but the dimensions
of the nodes will change soon. I used hard-coded dimensions, like
`40px`, but I'll update them when I work on fixing the nodes' design. I
think we can merge this PR first and then fix the nodes' design.**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/580fa812-ee8e-4452-b6ac-ca55ecb31759
Baptiste Devessier