This PR is the first part of a refactoring aiming to deprecate the
hotkey scopes api in favor of the new focus stack api which is more
robust.
The refactored components in this PR are the dropdowns and the side
panel/command menu.
- Replaced `useScopedHotkeys` by `useHotkeysOnFocusedElement` for all
dropdown components, selectable lists and the command menu
- Introduced `focusId` for all dropdowns and created a common hotkey
scope `DropdownHotkeyScope` for backward compatibility
- Replaced `setHotkeyScopeAndMemorizePreviousScope` occurrences with
`usePushFocusItemToFocusStack` and `goBackToPreviousHotkeyScope` with
`removeFocusItemFromFocusStack`
Note: Test that the shorcuts and arrow key navigation still work
properly when interacting with dropdowns and the command menu.
Bugs that I have spotted during the QA but which are already present on
main:
- Icon picker select with arrow keys doesn’t work inside dropdowns
- Some dropdowns are not selectable with arrow keys (no selectable list)
- Dropdowns in dropdowns don’t reset the hotkey scope correctly when
closing
- The table click outside is not triggered after closing a table cell
and clicking outside of the table
# Introduce focus stack to handle hotkeys
This PR introduces a focus stack to track the order in which the
elements are focused:
- Each focused element has a unique focus id
- When an element is focused, it is pushed on top of the stack
- When an element loses focus, we remove it from the stack
This focus stack is then used to determine which hotkeys are available.
The previous implementation lead to many regressions because of race
conditions, of wrong order of open and close operations and by
overwriting previous states. This implementation should be way more
robust than the previous one.
The new api can be incrementally implemented since it preserves
backwards compatibility by writing to the old hotkey scopes states.
For now, it has been implemented on the modal components.
To test this PR, verify that the shortcuts still work correctly,
especially for the modal components.
This PR fixes many small bugs around the recent hotkey scope refactor.
- Removed unused ActionBar files
- Created components CommandMenuOpenContainer and
KeyboardShortcutMenuOpenContent to avoid mounting listeners when not
needed
- Added DEFAULT_CELL_SCOPE where missing in some field inputs
- Called setHotkeyScopeAndMemorizePreviousScope instead of
setHotkeyScope in new useOpenFieldInputEditMode hook
- Broke down RecordTableBodyUnselectEffect into multiple simpler effect
components that are mounted only when needed to avoid listening for
keyboard and clickoutside event
- Re-implemented recently deleted table cell soft focus component logic
into RecordTableCellDisplayMode
- Created component selector isAtLeastOneTableRowSelectedSelector
- Drill down hotkey scope when opening a dropdown
- Improved debug logs
This PR was originally about fixing advanced filter dropdown auto resize
to avoid breaking the app main container, but the regression is not
limited to advanced filter dropdown, so this PR fixes the regression for
every dropdown in the app.
This PR adds a max dropdown max width to allow resizing dropdowns
horizontally also, which can happen easily for the advanced filter
dropdown.
In this PR we also start removing `fieldMetadataItemUsedInDropdown` in
component `AdvancedFilterDropdownTextInput` because it has no impact
outside of this component which is used only once.
The autoresize behavior determines the right padding-bottom between
mobile and PC.
Mobile :
<img width="604" alt="Capture d’écran 2025-04-07 à 16 03 12"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fbdd8020-1bfc-4e01-8a05-3a9f114cdd40"
/>
PC :
<img width="757" alt="Capture d’écran 2025-04-07 à 16 03 30"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f80a5967-8f60-40bb-ae3c-fa9eb4c65707"
/>
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/725
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/11409
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
This PR fixes hotkey escape on advanced filter dropdown, which wasn't
working.
It adds a parameters to openDropdown, because in this particular case,
the dropdown is not opened from its clickable component but from an
openDropdown, in that case it wasn't possible for openDropdown to know
which hotkey scope to take, because the hotkey scope is generally passed
in the Dropdown component props.
We might want to find a more robust solution, where a dropdown knows its
hotkey scope without having to be mounted.
---------
Co-authored-by: Raphaël Bosi <71827178+bosiraphael@users.noreply.github.com>
# Introduction
Avoid having multiple `isDefined` definition across our pacakges
Also avoid importing `isDefined` from `twenty-ui` which exposes a huge
barrel for a such little util function
## In a nutshell
Removed own `isDefined.ts` definition from `twenty-ui` `twenty-front`
and `twenty-server` to move it to `twenty-shared`.
Updated imports for each packages, and added explicit dependencies to
`twenty-shared` if not already in place
Related PR https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/9941
There is a problem of hotkey scope not being passed to the relation
picker used for single record select fields.
Fixed it where we open a single record select.
# Feature: Email thread members visibility
For this feature we implemented a chip and a dropdown menu that allows
users to check which workspace members can see an email thread, as
depicted on issue (#4199).
## Implementations
- create a new database table (messageThreadMember)
- relations between `messageThreadMembers` and the relevant existing
tables (`MessageThread` and `WorkspaceMembers`)
- added a new column to the `MessageThread table`: `everyone` - to
indicate that all workspace members can see the email thread
- create a new repository for the new table, including new queries
- edit the queries so that the new fields could be fetched from the
frontend
- created a component `MultiChip`, that shows a group of user avatars,
instead of just one
- created a component, `ShareDropdownMenu`, that shows up once the
`EmailThreadMembersChip` is clicked. On this menu you can see which
workspace members can view the email thread.
## Screenshots
Here are some screenshots of the frontend components that were created:
Chip with everyone in the workspace being part of the message thread:
Chip with just one member of the workspace (the owner) being part of the
message thread:
Chip with some members of the workspace being part of the message
thread:
How the chip looks in a message thread:
Dropdown that opens when you click on the chip:
## Testing and Mock data
We also added mock data (TypeORM seeds), focusing on adding mock data
related to message thread members.
## Conclusion
As some of the changes that we needed to do, regarding the change of
visibility of the message thread, were not covered by the existing
documentation, we were told to open a PR and ask for feedback on this
part of the implementation. Right now, our implementation is focused on
displaying who is part of an email thread.
Feel free to let us know which steps we should follow next :)
---------
Co-authored-by: Simão Sanguinho <simao.sanguinho@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
* Migrate record table to scope map
* Update record scope id to record id
* Remove todos and fix edit mode
* Fix perf
* Fix tests
* Fix tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomast@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Raphaël Bosi