## Summary
Introduces a dedicated **metadata** mutation to update **standard
(non-custom)** workspace member settings, moves profile-related UI to
use it, and aligns **workspace member** record permissions with the rest
of the CRM so users cannot escalate visibility via RLS by editing their
own member record.
## Product behaviour
### Profile and appearance (standard fields)
- Users can still update **their own** standard workspace member fields
that the product exposes in **Settings / Profile** (e.g. name, locale,
color scheme, avatar flow) via the new
**`updateWorkspaceMemberSettings`** mutation.
- The mutation returns a **boolean**; the app **merges** the updated
fields into local state so the UI stays in sync without refetching the
full workspace member record.
- **Locale** changes also keep **`userWorkspace`** in sync when a locale
is present in the payload (including from the workspace `updateOne` path
when applicable).
### Custom fields on workspace members
- The dedicated metadata mutation **rejects** any **custom** workspace
member field (and unknown keys). Those updates must go through the
normal **object** `updateOne` pipeline, which is subject to **object-
and field-level** permissions like other records. But since we don't
have object- and field-level permission configuration for system objects
yet, this permission is derived from Workspace member settings
permission.
- **Workspace member** is no longer exempt from ORM permission
validation for updates merely because it is a **system** object. Users
who **do not** have workspace member access (e.g. no **Workspace
members** settings permission and no equivalent broad settings access on
the role) **cannot** use `updateOne` on `workspaceMember` to change
**custom** (or other) fields on their own row—even though that row is
used for RLS predicates.
- This closes a path where someone could widen what they can see by
writing to fields that drive row-level rules.
### Who can change another member
- Updating **another** user’s workspace member still requires
**Workspace members** (or equivalent) settings permission, consistent
with admin tooling.
## Context
The goal is to add a "See records" button in all objects that would
redirect to that view (this will be done in a later PR). See screenshot
below.
<img width="665" height="312" alt="Screenshot 2026-03-10 at 15 54 36"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6e23a75b-cff0-4d93-bce8-b5481b05c6f6"
/>
## Implementation
- If a view does not exist on an object, there is a **temporary**
fallback where the frontend creates the missing view as a custom view
when going over the object index page
- System objects are now surfaced but we don't want their records to be
editable, they will be readonly (mostly, all fields will be non-editable
except for their custom fields).
- We can't create a new record of a system object, some actions are also
hidden.
- The backend now rejects if you are trying to delete the last view of
an object
FIELD widgets displaying ONE_TO_MANY relations now show a "See all"
action button (arrow-up-right icon) that navigates to the record index
with filtered relations.
### Demo
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fd632553-70e3-4757-8f26-80aa8d2ce0d2
### Changes
- **`WidgetAction` type**: Added `'see-all'` to `WidgetActionId`
- **`useWidgetActions` hook**: Returns `'see-all'` action for
ONE_TO_MANY relation fields (position 0, before edit)
- **`WidgetActionFieldSeeAll` component**: Renders the navigation button
with:
- `IconArrowUpRight` icon
- Link computed using same logic as `RecordDetailRelationSection`
- Hover visibility behavior matching existing edit button
- **`WidgetActionRenderer`**: Added case for `'see-all'` action
- **Storybook**: Added `OneToManyRelationFieldWidgetWithSeeAllButton`
story verifying button visibility and well-formed link
### Link computation
Uses the same filter URL pattern as `RecordDetailRelationSection`:
```typescript
const filterQueryParams = {
filter: {
[relationFieldMetadataItem.name]: {
[ViewFilterOperand.IS]: {
selectedRecordIds: [targetRecord.id],
},
},
},
viewId: indexViewId,
};
const filterLinkHref = getAppPath(
AppPath.RecordIndexPage,
{ objectNamePlural: relationObjectMetadataItem.namePlural },
filterQueryParams,
);
```
The "see-all" action is shown regardless of field read-only status since
it's a navigation action, not an edit action.
<!-- START COPILOT ORIGINAL PROMPT -->
<details>
<summary>Original prompt</summary>
>
> ----
>
> *This section details on the original issue you should resolve*
>
> <issue_title>[RPL] Display "See all" widget action for FIELD widget
displaying relations</issue_title>
> <issue_description>The "See all" widget action is the button you can
see in the top right corner in the following screen. We should redirect
the user to the record index showing the filtered relations.
>
> <img width="1334" height="712" alt="Image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c8aca25e-2136-43b3-8896-abd161a5693e"
/>
>
> Example of interaction today in production:
>
>
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3730301c-d04b-4195-b2fb-a51f8efee08a
>
> ## Technical details
>
> See `useWidgetActions` and `WidgetActionRenderer`. Use the
`arrow-up-right` icon.
>
> See how link is computed here:
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/blob/3cf7803ee1ae545add02f0c628a933618ce736d5/packages/twenty-front/src/modules/object-record/record-field-list/record-detail-section/relation/components/RecordDetailRelationSection.tsx#L193-L204.
Reuse the same link.
>
> ## Acceptance criteria
>
> - The action should be displayed in addition to other actions that
might be rendered today
> - The action must only be displayed for ONE_TO_MANY relations
> - Ensure you write at least one story to ensure the button is
correctly displayed; the button should a well formed
link</issue_description>
>
> ## Comments on the Issue (you are @copilot in this section)
>
> <comments>
> </comments>
>
</details>
<!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT SUFFIX -->
- Fixestwentyhq/core-team-issues#2064
<!-- START COPILOT CODING AGENT TIPS -->
---
💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions,
customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context
Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more [Copilot coding agent
tips](https://gh.io/copilot-coding-agent-tips) in the docs.
---------
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Devessier <29370468+Devessier@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Devessier <baptiste@devessier.fr>
Marie