# Calendar View: Add "+" Button to Calendar Day Cards
## Description
This PR implements the "+" button on calendar day cards in the Month
view, allowing users to create new records directly from the calendar.
- The "+" button appears **on hover** only.
- Newly created records include the **day representing the card** in the
payload (UTC, with only the date part).
- Respects **object permissions** and **soft delete filters**.
- Automatically integrates with **active filters** used in Table and
Kanban views.
## Implementation Notes
- `RecordCalendarAddNew` component handles button visibility and record
creation.
- UTC date is passed to the create function to ensure proper timezone
handling.
- No unit tests added yet (need senior guidance).
---
[Screencast from 2025-09-24
20-10-18.webm](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bd117b43-6c1b-4267-874f-b36844733d9e)
### Video ->
## Related Issues
Fixes: https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1552
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/14762
In this PR
- moved logic around any field filter formatting to twenty-shared
- added any field filter to the filters applied to groupBy when viewId
is defined
- added integration test
In the BE we have stored filter operand as IS_EMPTY, IS_NOT_EMPTY, etc.
For some reason in the FE we were manipulating IsEmpty, IsNotEmpty, etc.
(maybe because they were used before in Views before they were moved to
core)
So we were converting the operands in the FE from IS to Is
(convertViewFilterOperandFromCore) to read and manipulate viewFilters,
and then back to BE version to send mutations etc., from Is to IS
(convertViewFilterOperandToCore).
The migration is now over, so we can remove and simplify that code.
(In the 1-5:migrate-views-to-core command we still do the migration from
Is format to IS format.)
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14569
Some extensions, such as SimilarWeb, are incompatible with twenty: they
trigger intempestive "AbortErrors" converted into error snackbar. While
twenty remains usable it is very annoying.
I did not take time to deeply investigate which requests are
problematic. According to ClaudeAI it may be because twenty makes a lot
of queries to the same endpoint /graphql, a pattern that SimilarWeb may
interpret as tracking which they try to intercept.
In this PR, we finish the work started in [this
PR](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13080) to silent harmless
AbortErrors.
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1560
If viewId is defined in a groupBy query, we want to apply all filters of
the view to the query.
This required to move a lot of code from twenty-front to twenty-shared
to convert the filters as stored in the db into graphql filters,
applying the right combinations between filters etc., which was
previously only done in the FE.
This PR does not handle any field filters, it will be done in a later pr
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d6c565eb-9a29-4830-9396-5f979c8caa7b
- Added a new component for manual trigger (mostly duplicated from
previous one). Will remove the old one once all data are migrated
- Updated schema output so the current item of the iterator can be typed
Todo left:
- migrate old triggers
- add an util to search iterator output. Today current item fields will
be displayed as not found
- set new manual triggers for workflow runs
- Added 'Cron will be triggered at UTC time' notice below trigger
interval dropdown
- Positioned correctly between dropdown and expression field to match
design
- Only shows when Custom CRON option is selected
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
This PR should fix optimistic rendering issues on step updates:
- compute a diff for trigger and steps on mutations
- build an util that applies that diff (built a more robust version from
https://github.com/AsyncBanana/micropatch)
- apply diff in cache
This PR essentially refactors some hard-coded values for width and
height in the table.
It also fixes a few differences from the Figma design, on the checkbox
column width and the top bar and view bar left alignment with the table.
The blue color has been set like before the refactor of the focus portal
(`theme.adaptiveColors.blue4`)
Fixes in https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1490 :
- Fix first drag and drop column width that has changed from main (see
Figma)
- Unify all widths, heights, z-index, etc. with constants
- Put same blue as before for focused portal
Also removed `focus-active` class because we now use a portal for the
focus.
# [WIP] Make Local Search Non-Accent-Sensitive
fixes(#14468)
---
**Description:**
This PR adds accent- and case-insensitive search for the
**SettingsWorkspaceMembers** component’s local search. It ensures that
searching for names or emails works correctly even if the user types
letters without accents.
**Implementation:**
- Added a helper util: `removeAccentsAndCase(text: string)`
- This util:
- Normalizes text to NFD form
- Removes diacritics (accents)
- Converts text to lowercase
- Replaced current `.includes(searchFilter)` logic with a normalized
comparison:
---
### Video ->
[Screencast from 2025-09-16
16-42-50.webm](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7035906c-9c5d-414d-81e5-74e53803628a)
---
Opening a draft pr for initial strategy review before extending it to
other components.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14442
Issues were
1. Table headers always used label metadata identifier (or record text)
as first column, while table body followed viewFields positions
2. Label metadata identifier should always be visible and in first
position for the table views to work as expected, while when updating
the label metadata identifier for an object, no changes were brought to
the viewFields
To fix that
1. In the BE:
- a new logic is implemented to i) update label identifier's viewFields
position and visibility when an object's label identifier is updated to
a new field; ii) add validation on the update of a viewField's position
and visibility to make sure the label identifier's viewField always has
the lowest position + is visible
- a command was added to check all existing views and viewfields
3. In the FE: at first I tried to replicate the logic of the headers
(based on the label identifier rather than the positions) on the body,
but it was too complex and error-prone as in multiple places we are
based on the positions. It also feels more right to have only one source
of truth which is the viewField position. @lucasbordeau if that does not
suit you, we can throw an error if the field with the lowest position is
not the label metadata identifier, as you said the table view will be
very buggy / wont work if the label identifier is not in the first
position. but now it should never be the case thanks to the validation
implemented in the BE
This should be migrated to viewFieldService V2 when relevant @Weiko
@prastoin
Antoine Moreaux