Combined two separate `TypeOrmModule.forFeature()` calls into one. Both
registered entities on the default data source, so no behavioral change.
Repositories for WorkspaceEntity and MessageChannelEntity remain
injectable as before.
Cleaner imports, one less redundant call.
## Summary
- **Drop the `objectMetadata.dataSourceId` foreign key and index** via a
1-22 fast instance command — column kept nullable for data preservation
- **Delete `DataSourceService`, `DataSourceModule`, and
`DataSourceException`** — all code now uses `workspace.databaseSchema`
directly
- **Remove `IS_DATASOURCE_MIGRATED` feature flag** from default flags
and all branching logic
- **Simplify workspace/object creation pipelines** —
`WorkspaceManagerService`, `DevSeederService`, and the object creation
action handler no longer route through `DataSourceService`
- **Keep `DataSourceEntity` and the `dataSource` table** for historical
data — entity stripped of all ORM relations
# Introduction
Currently preparing the `UpgradeCommand` refactor, in this way started
by cleaning up the existing avoiding unecessary dependencies to others
services allowing easier readability and concern centralization for
upcoming refactor
The UpgradeCommand was extending up to five classes, overriding
abstracted class and so on. It was also cascade
injecting 3 services
Introducing the `WorkspaceIteratorService` that centralize the commands
set to run over a single workspace logic shared between both atomic
upgrade command call and global upgradeCommand
## Tradeoff
Duplicated `@Option` between both `UpgradeCommandRunner` and
`WorkspaceMigrationRunner`
## Before
```
UpgradeCommand
└─ extends UpgradeCommandRunner
└─ extends ActiveOrSuspendedWorkspacesMigrationCommandRunner
└─ extends WorkspacesMigrationCommandRunner (owns workspace iteration loop + ORM deps)
└─ extends MigrationCommandRunner (dry-run, verbose, error handling)
└─ extends CommandRunner (nest-commander)
```
## Now
```
UpgradeCommand
└─ extends UpgradeCommandRunner
└─ extends CommandRunner (nest-commander)
uses ─► Services (via composition)
```
## Logging management
At the moment all services are logging, in the best of the world only
the runners should be doing so
## Summary
- Migrates 4 entities (`connectedAccount`, `messageChannel`,
`calendarChannel`, `messageFolder`) from per-workspace schemas to the
shared `core` metadata schema
- Introduces a `IS_CONNECTED_ACCOUNT_MIGRATED` feature flag to control
the migration: when enabled, reads come from core metadata and all
writes are dual-written to both workspace and core
- Extracts 12 enums from workspace entity files to `twenty-shared` for
reuse across frontend and backend
- Creates new TypeORM entities, metadata services, GraphQL
resolvers/DTOs, and exception interceptors per entity
- Each entity owns its own data access module
(`ConnectedAccountDataAccessModule`, `MessageChannelDataAccessModule`,
`CalendarChannelDataAccessModule`, `MessageFolderDataAccessModule`) — no
umbrella infrastructure module
- Adds a 1.20 upgrade command that backfills data from workspace schemas
to core (preserving UUIDs) and enables the feature flag
- Replaces direct repository access with data access service calls
across ~50 files in messaging, calendar, and connected-account modules
- Adds `lastSignedInAt` and `oidcTokenClaims` fields to the new
`ConnectedAccountEntity`
- Drops unused `lastSyncHistoryId` field from the migrated connected
account entity
## Test plan
- [x] Lint passes (`npx nx lint:diff-with-main twenty-server`)
- [x] Typecheck passes (`npx nx typecheck twenty-server`)
- [x] All unit tests pass (477 suites, 4267 tests, 0 failures)
- [ ] Manual test: verify messaging sync works with feature flag
disabled (existing behavior)
- [ ] Manual test: run upgrade command on a workspace, verify data
backfilled to core tables
- [ ] Manual test: verify messaging/calendar sync works with feature
flag enabled (dual-write path)
- [ ] Manual test: verify GraphQL metadata resolvers return correct data
when flag enabled
In this PR, we are adding a new command to reset a message channel.
We are also refactoring a bit cursor reset as we had multiple
implementations at different places in the code base
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Introduction
We need to be able to create custom workspace application on all
workspaces, even pending and ongoing etc
Right now the upgrade devx only allows and expect active or suspended
workspace to be passed to runOnWorkspace.
## WorkspacesMigrationRunner
Created an intermediate class `WorkspacesMigrationRunner` that expect an
array `WorkspaceStatus` to be fetched for the current command to be run
on
The `ActiveOrSuspendedCommandRunner` statically passes both `SUSPENDED`
and `ACTIVE`, whereas the create workspace custom application passed all
the enum values
## DataSource
Workspace that are not fully init don't have a `workspace_schema` so
they don't have `dataSource`
Made a not very elegant check to see if current workspace we're about to
create dataSource on has one historically
Which means that dataSource is now optional, it had only one impact on
an existing command and the desired devx will become consuming existing
services that do not expect dataSource ( or at least yet )
In this PR, I'm solving several issues:
1) We were not checking if the currentWorkspaceMember was owning the
message in the thread. It kind of worked before because the case of
shared threads (with shared threads visibility restriction) was not
happening that often. It seems that the bug has always been there
2) Re-implement orphan messages and threads deletion on messageChannel
deletion. We used to brutally look for all orphans, we disabled it last
week because it was too heavy on db. I've re-implemented it more
carefully and "surgically"
3) Gmail sync was not handling folder synced correctly. It was
leveraging labelIds which it shouldn't do (this is a AND AND parameter)
in full sync
4) Added a command to clean orphan message threads manually if needed.
Usually this is done when you remove a messageChannel, or change
blocklist rules but it can be useful to have it to debug
### Overview
This PR introduces significant enhancements to the MessageQueue module
by integrating `@Processor`, `@Process`, and `@InjectMessageQueue`
decorators. These changes streamline the process of defining and
managing queue processors and job handlers, and also allow for
request-scoped handlers, improving compatibility with services that rely
on scoped providers like TwentyORM repositories.
### Key Features
1. **Decorator-based Job Handling**: Use `@Processor` and `@Process`
decorators to define job handlers declaratively.
2. **Request Scope Support**: Job handlers can be scoped per request,
enhancing integration with request-scoped services.
### Usage
#### Defining Processors and Job Handlers
The `@Processor` decorator is used to define a class that processes jobs
for a specific queue. The `@Process` decorator is applied to methods
within this class to define specific job handlers.
##### Example 1: Specific Job Handlers
```typescript
import { Processor, Process, InjectMessageQueue } from 'src/engine/integrations/message-queue';
@Processor('taskQueue')
export class TaskProcessor {
@Process('taskA')
async handleTaskA(job: { id: string, data: any }) {
console.log(`Handling task A with data:`, job.data);
// Logic for task A
}
@Process('taskB')
async handleTaskB(job: { id: string, data: any }) {
console.log(`Handling task B with data:`, job.data);
// Logic for task B
}
}
```
In the example above, `TaskProcessor` is responsible for processing jobs
in the `taskQueue`. The `handleTaskA` method will only be called for
jobs with the name `taskA`, while `handleTaskB` will be called for
`taskB` jobs.
##### Example 2: General Job Handler
```typescript
import { Processor, Process, InjectMessageQueue } from 'src/engine/integrations/message-queue';
@Processor('generalQueue')
export class GeneralProcessor {
@Process()
async handleAnyJob(job: { id: string, name: string, data: any }) {
console.log(`Handling job ${job.name} with data:`, job.data);
// Logic for any job
}
}
```
In this example, `GeneralProcessor` handles all jobs in the
`generalQueue`, regardless of the job name. The `handleAnyJob` method
will be invoked for every job added to the `generalQueue`.
#### Adding Jobs to a Queue
You can use the `@InjectMessageQueue` decorator to inject a queue into a
service and add jobs to it.
##### Example:
```typescript
import { Injectable } from '@nestjs/common';
import { InjectMessageQueue, MessageQueue } from 'src/engine/integrations/message-queue';
@Injectable()
export class TaskService {
constructor(
@InjectMessageQueue('taskQueue') private readonly taskQueue: MessageQueue,
) {}
async addTaskA(data: any) {
await this.taskQueue.add('taskA', data);
}
async addTaskB(data: any) {
await this.taskQueue.add('taskB', data);
}
}
```
In this example, `TaskService` adds jobs to the `taskQueue`. The
`addTaskA` and `addTaskB` methods add jobs named `taskA` and `taskB`,
respectively, to the queue.
#### Using Scoped Job Handlers
To utilize request-scoped job handlers, specify the scope in the
`@Processor` decorator. This is particularly useful for services that
use scoped repositories like those in TwentyORM.
##### Example:
```typescript
import { Processor, Process, InjectMessageQueue, Scope } from 'src/engine/integrations/message-queue';
@Processor({ name: 'scopedQueue', scope: Scope.REQUEST })
export class ScopedTaskProcessor {
@Process('scopedTask')
async handleScopedTask(job: { id: string, data: any }) {
console.log(`Handling scoped task with data:`, job.data);
// Logic for scoped task, which might use request-scoped services
}
}
```
Here, the `ScopedTaskProcessor` is associated with `scopedQueue` and
operates with request scope. This setup is essential when the job
handler relies on services that need to be instantiated per request,
such as scoped repositories.
### Migration Notes
- **Decorators**: Refactor job handlers to use `@Processor` and
`@Process` decorators.
- **Request Scope**: Utilize the scope option in `@Processor` if your
job handlers depend on request-scoped services.
Fix#5628
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
In this PR, I'm refactoring the messaging module into smaller pieces
that have **ONE** responsibility: import messages, clean messages,
handle message participant creation, instead of having ~30 modules (1
per service, jobs, cron, ...). This is mandatory to start introducing
drivers (gmails, office365, ...) IMO. It is too difficult to enforce
common interfaces as we have too many interfaces (30 modules...). All
modules should not be exposed
Right now, we have services that are almost functions:
do-that-and-this.service.ts / do-that-and-this.module.ts
I believe we should have something more organized at a high level and it
does not matter that much if we have a bit of code duplicates.
Note that the proposal is not fully implemented in the current PR that
has only focused on messaging folder (biggest part)
Here is the high level proposal:
- connected-account: token-refresher
- blocklist
- messaging: message-importer, message-cleaner, message-participants,
... (right now I'm keeping a big messaging-common but this will
disappear see below)
- calendar: calendar-importer, calendar-cleaner, ...
Consequences:
1) It's OK to re-implement several times some things. Example:
- error handling in connected-account, messaging, and calendar instead
of trying to unify. They are actually different error handling. The only
things that might be in common is the GmailError => CommonError parsing
and I'm not even sure it makes a lot of sense as these 3 apis might have
different format actually
- auto-creation. Calendar and Messaging could actually have different
rules
2) **We should not have circular dependencies:**
- I believe this was the reason why we had so many modules, to be able
to cherry pick the one we wanted to avoid circular deps. This is not the
right approach IMO, we need architect the whole messaging by defining
high level blocks that won't have circular dependencies by design. If we
encounter one, we should rethink and break the block in a way that makes
sense.
- ex: connected-account.resolver is not in the same module as
token-refresher. ==> connected-account.resolver => message-importer (as
we trigger full sync job when we connect an account) => token-refresher
(as we refresh token on message import).
connected-account.resolver and token-refresher both in connected-account
folder but should be in different modules. Otherwise it's a circular
dependency. It does not mean that we should create 1 module per service
as it was done before
In a nutshell: The code needs to be thought in term of reponsibilities
and in a way that enforce high level interfaces (and avoid circular
dependencies)
Bonus: As you can see, this code is also removing a lot of code because
of the removal of many .module.ts (also because I'm removing the sync
scripts v2 feature flag end removing old code)
Bonus: I have prefixed services name with Messaging to improve dev xp.
GmailErrorHandler could be different between MessagingGmailErrorHandler
and CalendarGmailErrorHandler for instance
Anish Paudel