### Solution
> After discussion with charles & weiko, we chose the long term
solution.
>
> Fix FE to request checkUserExists resolver with lowercased emails
> Add a decorator on User (and AppToken for invitation), to lowercase
email at user (appToken) creation. ⚠️ It works for TypeOrm .save method
only (there is no user email update in codebase, but in future it
could..)
> Add email lowercasing logic in external auth controller
> Fix FE to request sendInvitations resolver with lowercased emails
> Add migration command to lowercase all existing user emails and
invitation emails
> For other BE resolvers, we let them permissive. For example, if you
made a request on CheckUserExists resolver with uppercased email, you
will not found any user. We will not transform input before checking for
existence.
[link to comment
](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/12130#discussion_r2098062093)
### Test 🚧
- sign-in and up from main subdomain and workspace sub domain > Google
Auth (lowercased email) ✔️ | Microsoft Auth (uppercased email ✔️ &
lowercased email) | LoginPassword (uppercased email ✔️& lowercased
email✔️)
- invite flow with uppercased and lowercased ✔️
- migration command + sign-in ( former uppercased microsoft email ✔️) /
sign-up ( former uppercased invited email ✔️)
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/private-issues/issues/278, closes
https://github.com/twentyhq/private-issues/issues/275, closes
https://github.com/twentyhq/private-issues/issues/279
# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
The global record filter refactor will derive everything at runtime from
objectMetadataItemsState, thus removing the need for a filter definition
concept.
Here we don't yet remove available filter definition usage but we
replace the available filter definitions states, we now derive the same
value from objectMetadataItemsState.
This will allow us to progressively remove the usage of the concept of
filter definition, at the end it will then be easy to just remove from
the codebase because nothing will use it anymore.
Etienne