## Summary
Alternative to #20717. Same goal (clean up the filter dispatcher API
after #20670) but smaller and follows the codebase's "pass data, not
behavior" style.
The dispatcher takes a `fieldMetadataItems: FieldShared[]` array
directly instead of a `findFieldMetadataItemById: (id) => FieldShared |
undefined` callback. The util builds the id lookup internally — once per
call, used for both source-field and relation-target-field lookups. No
new types, no separate hydration step.
## What changes
**`twenty-shared`**
- `computeRecordGqlOperationFilter` /
`turnRecordFilterIntoRecordGqlOperationFilter` /
`turnRecordFilterGroupsIntoGqlOperationFilter`: replace
`findFieldMetadataItemById` param with `fieldMetadataItems` /
`fieldMetadataItemById` (internal Map).
- Remove the exported `FindFieldMetadataItemById` type.
- `turnAnyFieldFilterIntoRecordGqlFilter`: rename its internal
`fieldById` Map for consistency.
- Tests updated to pass arrays.
**Frontend (15 call sites)**
- Switch from `fieldMetadataItemByIdMapSelector` to
`flattenedFieldMetadataItemsSelector`.
- Pass `fieldMetadataItems: flattenedFieldMetadataItems` to the
dispatcher.
- `useFindManyRecordsSelectedInContextStore` keeps the Map selector
because it still does a per-filter lookup for the soft-delete check.
**Server (5 call sites)**
- Pass
`Object.values(flatFieldMetadataMaps.byUniversalIdentifier).filter(isDefined)`.
## Why this over #20717#20717 moves resolution into a separate hydration step + introduces a
`HydratedRecordFilter` type. The bug that #20717 originally surfaced was
Sentry catching 4 critical runtime errors during review
(`fieldMetadataItemByIdMap` declared but not passed). The added type and
the explicit hydration boundary are extra surface area for not much
benefit — the existing API was a callback wrapping a Map at every call
site, and the natural simplification is to just pass the Map (or its
array) directly.
Net diff: **196 insertions, 203 deletions** (~7 lines net removed). 32
files.
## Test plan
- [x] Shared filter unit tests pass (461 tests)
- [x] Frontend filter/context-store tests pass (13 tests)
- [x] Frontend typecheck passes
- [x] Server typecheck passes
- [x] Lint passes (frontend + server)
- [ ] Integration tests on #20670 still pass — workflow find-records +
chart-data with relation-traversal filter still work end-to-end through
the new array param
## Summary
Two relation-traversal bugs surfaced post-merge of #20533, both rooted
in the same architectural smell: the GraphQL filter dispatcher took a
flat `fields: FieldShared[]` array and silently dropped any filter whose
`relationTargetFieldMetadataId` wasn't in that array. Callers had to
remember to pre-augment the list with relation targets — and 16+ call
sites did not all know this.
This PR fixes both bugs and removes the smell.
### Bug 1 — Save as new view loses the relation target
`useCreateViewFromCurrentView` built the create-filter input without
`relationTargetFieldMetadataId`. The saved view's filter persisted
without the traversal — on reload the chip showed "Company contains
'air'" instead of "Company → Name contains 'air'". Discarded at save
time, not at read time.
Fix: include `relationTargetFieldMetadataId` in the create input.
(Commit 1.)
### Bug 2 — Workflow Search Records drops one-hop traversals
`FindRecordsWorkflowAction` built its fields list from
`flatObjectMetadata.fieldIds` only (source object's fields). The shared
dispatcher then couldn't resolve the relation target field on the
related object and silently dropped the filter — a configured "People
where Company → Name Contains 'Airbnb'" came through as `{ and: [] }`.
This was the same shape as bugs already fixed in 5 other call sites
(chart filters, view filters, record table, etc.). The pattern was:
caller forgets to augment fields → dispatcher silently drops the filter.
Fix (commit 2): change the dispatcher to take a
`findFieldMetadataItemById: (id) => FieldShared | undefined` resolver
callback. Both source-field and relation-target-field lookups go through
the same resolver, so callers no longer need to know about the
augmentation requirement. Frontend callers pass a workspace-wide
resolver built from `flattenedFieldMetadataItemsSelector`; server
callers wrap `findFlatEntityByIdInFlatEntityMaps` on
`flatFieldMetadataMaps`. In both cases relation-target lookups just
work, because the resolver can see fields on related objects.
## Why this matters
Before: "if you call the dispatcher, pre-augment your fields list with
relation targets, or filters get silently dropped." An invariant only
enforceable by code review, broken often enough to ship two user-visible
bugs in one week.
After: the dispatcher resolves field ids itself. There's no list to
forget to augment. The failure mode (filter silently dropped) becomes
structurally impossible at the dispatcher boundary.
Net diff: 240 insertions, 319 deletions. Removed
`augmentFieldsWithRelationTargets` (frontend) and the workflow
whack-a-mole code (server).
## Test plan
- [ ] Save view: create an advanced filter using a one-hop relation
traversal, click "Save as new view", reload, confirm the chip still
reads "Source → Target operator value"
- [ ] Workflow: configure a Search Records action with a
relation-traversal filter, run the workflow, confirm the filter is
actually applied
- [ ] Dashboard chart: configure a chart with a relation-traversal
filter, confirm the chart data respects it
- [ ] Record table, group-by, calendar, total count, footer aggregates:
all continue to work with both plain and relation-traversal filters
**Stacked on #20527**
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/48995655-401a-4c35-8094-e88da8408bdd
## Summary
Surfaces the one-hop relation traversal added in #20527 through the
existing **composite sub-field dropdown pattern**. Clicking a
MANY_TO_ONE relation field in the "+ Filter" picker now opens the same
second-level dropdown that composite fields (FULL_NAME, ADDRESS,
CURRENCY, etc.) already use — populated with the target object's
filterable fields. Picking one (e.g. `Company → Name`) builds a filter
that serializes to the nested GraphQL filter the backend now accepts: `{
company: { name: { ilike: "%X%" } } }`.
No new components. The whole feature reuses
`AdvancedFilterSubFieldSelectMenu` + the existing
`subFieldNameUsedInDropdownComponentState` + the existing `MenuItem
hasSubMenu` indicator. Only the conditions that gate the sub-menu (and
the sub-menu's content for relations) were broadened.
## What landed
| File | Change |
|---|---|
| `ObjectFilterDropdownFilterSelectMenuItem` | Sub-menu chevron now
shows on MANY_TO_ONE relations (`isManyToOneRelationField` util). |
| `AdvancedFilterFieldSelectMenu` | Relation clicks open the sub-menu
alongside composite clicks. |
| `AdvancedFilterSubFieldSelectMenu` | New branch: when the sub-menu
type is `'RELATION'`, render the target object's filterable fields via
`useFilterableFieldMetadataItems(targetObjectMetadataId)`. Composite
logic untouched. |
| `objectFilterDropdownSubMenuFieldType` state | Widened to accept a
`'RELATION'` sentinel. Role-permissions sub-field menu narrows it back
out (it doesn't traverse relations). |
| `useSelectFieldUsedInAdvancedFilterDropdown` | New optional
`targetFieldMetadataItem` arg. When present, the stored RecordFilter's
`type` is the target field's type so the operand picker and value input
render the target's operands (`'TEXT'` operators when filtering
`company.name`, etc.). |
| `turnRecordFilterIntoGqlOperationFilter` (shared) | When the filter
targets a `RELATION` field with a `subFieldName`, synthesize a
field-metadata for the target, recurse to build the inner filter, then
wrap it under the relation field's name → `{ relationName: {
targetFieldName: { ...operator } } }`. |
`RecordFilter.subFieldName` stays narrowly typed as
`CompositeFieldSubFieldName` so the wide downstream consumers
(`shouldShowFilterTextInput`, composite handlers in the serializer,
etc.) don't change. The relation target field's name is stored through a
narrowly-scoped cast at the dropdown's storage point — the serializer
checks `filter.type === 'RELATION'` before interpreting it as a target
field name, so the cast can't be mis-read by composite-only code paths.
## Test plan
- [ ] Open a table view on People, click "+ Filter", click "Company" →
sub-menu opens with Company's filterable fields
- [ ] Pick "Name" → operand picker shows TEXT operators (Contains,
Equals, …)
- [ ] Type "Airbnb" → filter applies, table shows people whose company
name contains "Airbnb"
- [ ] Verify network tab: the GraphQL filter variable is `{ company: {
name: { ilike: "%Airbnb%" } } }`
- [ ] Same flow with a composite target field (e.g. `Company →
annualRecurringRevenue → amountMicros`) — should work end-to-end
(backend supports composite-within-relation; #20527 has an integration
test covering this)
- [ ] Composite fields (FULL_NAME, ADDRESS) still open their normal
sub-menu and filter correctly — no regression
- [ ] Role-permissions field-select sub-field menu is unaffected (it
bails out early on the RELATION sentinel)
## Out of scope
- ONE_TO_MANY traversal (no backend support yet)
- Aggregates (`people.count > 5`)
- Persisting relation-traversal filters into a saved view (ViewFilter
has no `relationPath` column yet; that's a separate slice)
- REST API DSL changes
- AI Tools
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Description
- Introduces a new engine command execution model that replaces the
previous approach of mapping `EngineComponentKey` to React components.
Instead, engine commands are now mounted headlessly via
`HeadlessEngineCommandMountRoot`, with their execution context populated
synchronously before mounting.
- Creates new headless command components
- Moves error handling from the SDK layer to the host app by wrapping
all mounted commands with a new `CommandMenuItemErrorBoundary`
The new flow works as follows:
- When a command menu item with an `engineComponentKey` is clicked,
`useCommandMenuItemFrontComponentCommands` calls
`useMountEngineCommand`, which synchronously reads the current context
store (object metadata, selected records, filters, view ID, etc.) and
writes a `MountedEngineCommandContext` into
`mountedEngineCommandsState`.
- The command is then mounted into `mountedEngineCommandsState`, which
triggers `HeadlessEngineCommandMountRoot` to render the corresponding
headless component from `ENGINE_COMPONENT_KEY_HEADLESS_COMPONENT_MAP`,
wrapped in `CommandMenuItemErrorBoundary`,
`ContextStoreComponentInstanceContext.Provider`, and
`EngineCommandComponentInstanceContext.Provider`.
- Each command component reads its execution context and delegates to
one of the 4 execution patterns: `HeadlessEngineCommandWrapperEffect`
(simple actions), `HeadlessConfirmationModalEngineCommandEffect`
(destructive actions needing confirmation),
`HeadlessNavigateEngineCommand` (GO_TO_* commands), or
`HeadlessOpenSidePanelPageEngineCommand` (SEARCH_RECORDS, ASK_AI,
VIEW_PREVIOUS_AI_CHATS).
- After execution, the command self-unmounts via
`useUnmountEngineCommand`, which removes the entry from
`mountedEngineCommandsState` and stops rendering the component.
## Summary
- **Delete 10 unused files**: 7 hooks (`useWorkflowRunUnsafe`,
`useGetViewById`, `useCreateViewFieldGroup`, `useDeleteViewFieldGroup`,
`useUpdateViewFieldGroup`, `useCreateManyViewFieldGroups`,
`useMoveViewColumns` + test), 1 component (`SettingsSummaryCard`), 1
utility (`createEventContext`)
- **Rename `objectMetadataItemsState` → `objectMetadataItemsSelector`**
across ~85 files to accurately reflect it is a derived selector (via
`createAtomSelector`), not a base Jotai atom
## Details
### Dead code removed
| Type | Name | Reason |
|------|------|--------|
| Hook | `useWorkflowRunUnsafe` | Never imported — duplicate of
`useWorkflowRun` without schema validation |
| Hook | `useGetViewById` | Never imported — `useViewById` is used
instead |
| Hook | `useCreateViewFieldGroup` | Never imported — CRUD done via
`usePerformViewFieldGroupAPIPersist` |
| Hook | `useDeleteViewFieldGroup` | Same as above |
| Hook | `useUpdateViewFieldGroup` | Same as above |
| Hook | `useCreateManyViewFieldGroups` | Same as above |
| Hook | `useMoveViewColumns` | Only imported by its own test — no
production usage |
| Component | `SettingsSummaryCard` | Never imported anywhere |
| Utility | `createEventContext` | Never imported anywhere |
### Rename
`objectMetadataItemsState` is created via `createAtomSelector` (it
derives from `objectMetadataItemsWithFieldsSelector`), so naming it
`*State` is misleading. Renamed to `objectMetadataItemsSelector` for
consistency with sibling selectors like
`objectMetadataItemsByNamePluralMapSelector`.
In the BE we have stored filter operand as IS_EMPTY, IS_NOT_EMPTY, etc.
For some reason in the FE we were manipulating IsEmpty, IsNotEmpty, etc.
(maybe because they were used before in Views before they were moved to
core)
So we were converting the operands in the FE from IS to Is
(convertViewFilterOperandFromCore) to read and manipulate viewFilters,
and then back to BE version to send mutations etc., from Is to IS
(convertViewFilterOperandToCore).
The migration is now over, so we can remove and simplify that code.
(In the 1-5:migrate-views-to-core command we still do the migration from
Is format to IS format.)
Issue: https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13913
Motivation/Problem:
Bulk delete and query paths were composing filters differently, causing
mismatches. In some cases this led to invalid or empty GraphQL filters
(e.g. {"and":[{}]}), breaking delete operations.
Fix:
Unify filter composition (combinedFilter) across queries and bulk
delete, ensuring consistent handling of base filters + soft-deleted
clause. Also adjusted record filter grouping logic to avoid dropping
filters when no groups exist.
Result:
Filtered queries and bulk deletes now behave consistently and reliably
without producing broken filters.
---------
Co-authored-by: root <root@DESKTOP-E2VOJGE>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR fixes a bug that appeared because of a race condition with
context store when navigating between settings page and show page.
The bug was caused because record title cell used on record show page
was trying to retrieve the object metadata item before the context store
was initialized.
I created a new hook that supports an undefined state for one render
loop, since in that case components can be rendered before the context
store is initialized.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13649
This PR removes any V2 naming in state management logic and some minor
utils and hooks.
It has a lot of changes but nearly all of them were made by the rename
functionality of vscode which is deterministic, so it shouldn't
introduce any regression.
QA has been made on this PR on the main features of the app without any
noticeable issue.
Also renamed some other v2 naming related items :
- TextInputV2 => TextInput
- TextInput => SettingsTextInput
- ObjectFilterDropdownFilterSelectMenuItemV2 =>
ObjectFilterDropdownFilterSelectMenuItem
- useInitDraftValueV2 => useInitDraftValue
- useOpenRecordTableCellV2 => useOpenRecordTableCell
This PR adds any field filter request generation utils with its unit
test.
It also calls this new util in the relevant requests for table and
board.
This PR also adds a new corresponding state in context store so that the
filter is handled in command menu and actions.
We also add this new filter to the aggregate queries.
The RecordShowPage story was also fixed.
Fixes#11038
# Fix useFindManyRecords withSoftDeleterFilter
The error came from a faulty implementation of the `withSoftDeleted`
parameter inside `useFindManyRecords` and from the fact that
`withSoftDeleted: true` was added to access deleted records actions.
However, this parameter was always set in
`useFindManyRecordsSelectedInContextStore` instead of considering
whether the filter was active or not.
```
const withSoftDeleterFilter = {
or: [{ deletedAt: { is: 'NULL' } }, { deletedAt: { is: 'NOT_NULL' } }],
};
```
The final filter was incorrectly doing an `or` operation between the
base filter and `withSoftDeleterFilter` when it should have been an
`and`:
```
filter: {
...filter,
...(withSoftDeleted ? withSoftDeleterFilter : {}),
}
```
The correct implementation should be:
```
filter:
filter || withSoftDeleted
? {
and: [
...(filter ? [filter] : []),
...(withSoftDeleted ? [withSoftDeleterFilter] : []),
],
}
: undefined,
```
# Fix useFindManyRecordsSelectedInContextStore
- Check if the soft deleted filter is active before using the
`withSoftDeleterFilter` parameter
In this huge (sorry!) PR:
- introducing objectMetadataItem in contextStore instead of
objectMetadataId which is more convenient
- splitting some big hooks into smaller parts to avoid re-renders
- removing Effects to avoid re-renders (especially onViewChange)
- making the view prefetch separate from favorites to avoid re-renders
- making the view prefetch load a state and add selectors on top of it
to avoir re-renders
As a result, the performance is WAY better (I suspect the favorite
implementation to trigger a lot of re-renders unfortunately).
However, we are still facing a random app freeze on view creation. I
could not investigate the root cause. As this seems to be already there
in the precedent release, we can move forward but this seems a urgent
follow up to me ==> EDIT: I've found the root cause after a few ours of
deep dive... an infinite loop in RecordTableNoRecordGroupBodyEffect...
prastoin edit: close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/10253
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
The optimistic effect for record creations and updates wasn't working
properly for `and filters` without explicit `and`.
The problem was located inside `isRecordMatchingFilter` which didn't
consider implicit `and filters` as `and filters`. This caused queries to
be updated by the optimistic effect even if they didn't match the root
query filter.
I also removed `fetchPolicy: 'cache-and-network'` from a query. This was
a temporary fix for this issue.
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
There are two follow ups to this PR:
- Bug: sometimes when opening Cmd+K from a deleted record, we are facing
a global error
- On Index page, actions in top right are displaying label and not short
name
- Implement multiple actions once refactoring on delete is complete
---------
Co-authored-by: bosiraphael <raphael.bosi@gmail.com>
Closes#8737
- Refactored actions by creating hooks to add the possibility to
register actions programatically.
- Small fixes from #8610 review
- Fixed shortcuts display inside the command menu
- Removed `actionMenuEntriesComponentState` and introduced
`actionMenuEntriesComponentSelector`
Charles Bochet