Solves issue #5917.
This PR is now ready for the first review!
Filters do not fully work yet, there's a problem applying multiple
filters like the following:
```
{
and: [
{
[correspondingField.name]: {
gte: start.toISOString(),
} as DateFilter,
},
{
[correspondingField.name]: {
lte: end.toISOString(),
} as DateFilter,
},
],
}
```
I'll do my best to dig into it tonight!
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
## Setup
This PR can be tested only if some feature flags have specific values:
- `IsWorkflowEnabled` equals `true`
- `IsQueryRunnerTwentyORMEnabled` equals `false`
These feature flags weren't committed to don't break other branches.
## What this PR brings
- Display buttons to activate and deactivate a workflow version and a
button to discard the current draft version. I also scaffolded a "Test"
button, which doesn't do anything for now.
- Wired the activate, deactivate and discard draft buttons to the
backend.
- Made it possible to "edit" active and deactivated versions by
automatically creating a new draft version when the user tries to edit
the version.
- Hide the "Discard Draft", button if the current version is not a draft
or is the first version ever created.
- On the backend, don't consider discarded drafts when checking if a new
draft version can be created.
- On the backend, disallow deleting the first created workflow version.
Otherwise, we will end up with a blank canvas in the front end, and it
will be impossible to recover from it.
- On the backend, disallow running deactivation steps if the workflow
version is not currently active. Previously, we were throwing, which is
unnecessary as it's a valid case.
## Spotted bugs that we must dive into
### Duplicate workflow versions in Apollo cache
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7cfffd06-11e0-417a-8da0-f9a5f43b84e2
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR was created by [GitStart](https://gitstart.com/) to address the
requirements from this ticket:
[TWNTY-6260](https://clients.gitstart.com/twenty/5449/tickets/TWNTY-6260).
This ticket was imported from:
[TWNTY-6260](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6260)
---
### Description
This is the second PR on TWNTY-6260 which handles data migration of
Phone field to Phones field.\
\
How to Test?\
Follow the below steps:
- On the main branch,
- go to
`packages/twenty-server/src/database/typeorm-seeds/workspace/people.ts`
and change any person's phone number to a string with characters for
example: "test invalid phone", and then reset the DB.
- reset database using `npx nx database:reset twenty-server`
- This is to make sure that invalid numbers will be handled properly. We
should use the invalid value itself to avoid removing data and see how
the behavior is on the front end. should be the same as in the main, the
display shows the invalid value, but the input is empty when you click,
and then you can update.
- Checkout to `TWNTY-6260-phone-migration` branch
- Rebuild typescript using `npx nx build twenty-server`
- Run command `yarn command:prod upgrade-0.32` to do migration
- Run both backend and frontend to see the migrated field
### Demo
- **Loom Video:**\
<https://www.loom.com/share/4b9bcb423cee447d8ad09852a83b27da?sid=ed74ecaa-0339-4575-acdc-a863e95e94fd>
### Refs
#6260
---------
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Marie Stoppa <marie.stoppa@essec.edu>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
This PR refactors the view module to implement utils that avoid having
to create hooks to inject the scope id in the states, like
`useViewStates`, each componentState will know its unique related
InstanceContext (which holds the instanceId), and thus will be able to
retrieve it itself.
We keep the naming componentState as it reflects the fact that those
states are tied to instances of a component (or its children).
We introduce the instance word where it is needed, in place of scopeId
for example, to precise the fact that we handle instances of component
state, one for each instance of a component.
For example, the currentViewId is a state that is tied to an instance of
the ViewBar, but as we can switch between views, we want currentViewId
to be a componentState tied to an instance of the ViewBar component.
This PR also refactors view filter and sort states to fix this issue :
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6837 and other problems
involving resetting those states between page navigation.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6837
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In this PR:
1. Refactor guards to avoid duplicated queries: WorkspaceAuthGuard and
UserAuthGuard only check for existence of workspace and user in the
request without querying the database
### Description
- This is the first PR on Phones field;
- We are introducing new field type(Phones)
- We are Forbidding creation of Phone field
- We Added support for filtering and sorting on Phones field
- We are using the same display mode as used on the Links field type
(chips), check the Domain field of the Company object
- We are also using the same logic of the link when editing the field
**How to Test**
1. Checkout to TWNTY-6260 branch
2. Reset database using "npx nx database:reset twenty-server" command
3. Add custom field of type Phones in settings/data-model
**Loom Video:**\
<https://www.loom.com/share/3c981260be254dcf851256d020a20ab0?sid=58507361-3a3b-452c-9de8-b5b1abda70ac>
### Refs
#6260
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6942
Other improvements :
- Fetch activities (note and task) title only when loading timeline, so
we don't always have a clickable title.
- Fixed IconButton width regression.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
@Bonapara
Addressing issue #6783.
I tried to achieve the exact behavior you were looking for, but I
couldn't get the dropdown to render correctly in that specific column.
I'd love some help to make sure it's working as expected! 😊
Most of the logic is shared with the `useHandleOpportunity` and
`useAddNewCard` hooks, which could be refactored to reduce code debt.
Also, please go harsh with the review because I know there's a lot of
code cleaning required.
I also agree with Charles's point in [this
comment](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6783#issuecomment-2323299840).
Thanks :)
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bccdb3f1-3946-4e22-b9a4-b7496ef134c9
Issue #4345
used `useUpdateRelationFromManyFieldInput` hook from `FieldInput` to
`updateRelation`.
Creating a seperate hook didnt made sense when it basically does the
same thing.
However renaming the hook to something generic would make sense so that
its not tied to `FieldInput` according to naming convention
followup issue to tackle - #6890https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/452372ea-2699-45fd-9edf-ded36abdbca2
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
In this PR:
- revert de-optimization of icons bundle for storybook. This was forcing
the browser to load ~3k files while running stories
- adding lazy loading on Settings route to improve developer experience
(some files will be loaded later)
- fix FE tests: unit, modules stories, pages stories
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Fetch more on the record table was causing a strange bug where it was
auto scrolling to the bottom of the newly loaded chunk of rows.
This was confusing because we lost our previous position in the record
table.
With this fix the table doesn't scroll when more rows are loaded.
The fetch more row has been moved in the same tbody as the rest of the
rows.
We now only hide it when there is no more record to fetch.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
The code removed in the PR was flagged as unused by the JetBrains
inspector.
I did a QA on the dev environment but other checks are highly
recommended.
There is one commit by scope to make the review easier.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
### Description
1.
- We are introducing new field type(Emails)
- We are Forbiding creation of Email field
- We Added support for filtering and sorting on Emails field
- We are using the same display mode as used on the Links field type
(chips), check the Domain field of the Company object
- We are also using the same logic of the link when editing the field
\
How To Test\
Follow the below steps for testing locally:\
1. Checkout to TWENTY-6261\
2. Reset database using "npx nx database:reset twenty-server" command\
3. Run both the backend and frontend app\
4. Go to Settings/Data model and choose one of the standard objects like
people\
5. Click on Add Field button and choose Emails as the field type
\
### Refs
#6261\
\
### Demo
\
<https://www.loom.com/share/22979acac8134ed390fef93cc56fe07c?sid=adafba94-840d-4f01-872c-dc9ec256d987>
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Closes#4629
Refactored `RecordBoardColumnNewOpportunityButton` and
`RecordBoardColumnNewButton` to use the same logic in dropdown.
I kept those hooks inside `record-board-column` where these buttons are.
Let me know if it should be placed somewhere else.
Also Added navigation state preservation when clicked on `edit from
settings`
Thanks :)
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
We had a regression on the record table as our inView hook was not able
to find the right div to compute its margin. This is because we are
identify this div by a hacky css selector as we don't have a direct
control on it (it's provided by our scrolling library)
ad-elias