## Summary
Enhanced the search resolver integration tests to comprehensively
validate bidirectional accent-insensitive search functionality. Users
can now search with or without accents and find all relevant records
regardless of how the data was originally stored.
## Changes Made
### Test Data Enhancements
- Added 2 new person IDs: `TEST_PERSON_6_ID`, `TEST_PERSON_7_ID`
- Expanded corpus from 5 to 13 records:
- 7 persons
- 2 companies
- 4 pets
- Refactored test data into single arrays with content-driven variable
naming for better maintainability
### Test Coverage Improvements
- Added 6 comprehensive bidirectional tests covering French, Spanish,
and German characters
- Validated multiple fields:
- `firstName`, `lastName`, `jobTitle`, `email`, `company name`, `pet
name`
- Cross-object search testing across Person, Company, and Pet
- Updated all ranking values to account for the enlarged test corpus (5
→ 13 records)
## Test Cases Added/Updated
- [x] should find both **"José"** and **"Jose"** when searching for
`"jose"` (bidirectional accent-insensitive)
- [x] should find both **"García"** and **"Garcia"** when searching for
`"garcia"` (bidirectional accent-insensitive)
- [x] should find both accented and non-accented **"Café"** / **"Cafe"**
records when searching for `"cafe"` (bidirectional accent-insensitive)
- [x] should find both accented and non-accented **"Naïve"** /
**"Naive"** records when searching for `"naive"` (bidirectional
accent-insensitive)
- [x] should find both **"Müller"** and **"Muller"** when searching for
`"muller"` (bidirectional accent-insensitive)
- [x] should find both **"François"** and **"Francois"** when searching
for `"francois"` (bidirectional accent-insensitive)
# Fix cursor-based pagination with lexicographic ordering for composite
fields
## Bug
The existing cursor-based pagination implementation had a bug when
handling composite fields.
When paginating through results sorted by composite fields (like
`fullName` with sub-properties `firstName` and`lastName`), the WHERE
conditions generated for cursor positioning were incorrect, leading to
records being skipped.
The previous implementation was generating wrong WHERE conditions:
For example, when paginating with a cursor like `{ firstName: 'John',
lastName: 'Doe' }`, it would generate:
```sql
WHERE firstName > 'John' AND lastName > 'Doe'
```
This is incorrect because it would miss records like `{ firstName:
'John', lastName: 'Smith' }` which should be included in forward
pagination.
## Fix
Create a new util to use proper lexicographic order when sorting a
composite field.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Abdullah.