# Implement Morph Frontend Settings
Possiblity to create a morh relation from the Settings !
## Overview
Morph object system with new frontend settings UI for configuring morph
relations.
## What Changed
- **New Components**: `SettingsDataModelFieldMorphRelationForm`,
`SettingsMorphRelationMultiSelect`
- **Form System**: React Hook Form + Zod validation for morph relation
configuration
- **Preview System**: Live preview of field configurations with
validation
- **State Management**: Enhanced component state handling for complex
form interactions
## Technical Details
- **Architecture**: Restructured field input/display components for
better maintainability
- **Types**: Added comprehensive TypeScript types for morph relations
(`isFieldMorphRelation`, etc.)
- **Validation**: Dynamic validation rules based on field types and
relation patterns
- **Performance**: Optimized rendering with proper state management
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Issue: https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13913
Motivation/Problem:
Bulk delete and query paths were composing filters differently, causing
mismatches. In some cases this led to invalid or empty GraphQL filters
(e.g. {"and":[{}]}), breaking delete operations.
Fix:
Unify filter composition (combinedFilter) across queries and bulk
delete, ensuring consistent handling of base filters + soft-deleted
clause. Also adjusted record filter grouping logic to avoid dropping
filters when no groups exist.
Result:
Filtered queries and bulk deletes now behave consistently and reliably
without producing broken filters.
---------
Co-authored-by: root <root@DESKTOP-E2VOJGE>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR prepares and simplify option dropdown for using record fields.
I had a problem while trying to use currentRecordFields directly with
ordering so I stayed with the actual column definition system.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR adds a new RecordField abstraction to mimick the behavior of
RecordFilter, RecordSort and other similar concepts that allow to have
something that is not related directly to views.
It is closely following the same pattern with an Effect component to
initialize it from views and CRUD hooks to modify it.
Although for this concept we save to view fields automatically for every
modification.
This PR does not implement saving to view fields, it is just a parallel
code path that is meant to be built to see if everything behaves the
same then we'll remove the old code path at the end by saving record
fields instead of the many states for columns, fields definitions, etc.
Workflow, workflow version and workflow runs should not be passed
through props or context. These are set in recoil component states and
that's where all hooks should look for these.
This PR stop propagating workflow with version through all components.
This is first step toward separating the path between display mode and
input mode for inline-cells like we have done for tableCell.
The idea is to have 1 floating or anchored field input shared between
all cells. This should be done for field-list, board and task/note row +
for hover and edit mode.
This PR is only about field-list and hover
This PR prepares the refactor of record field definition and column
definition.
We need to separate the two concepts of FieldInput and FieldContext at
the cell level, and the new RecordField concept that will replace
FieldDefinition at the metadata and state level.
So we create a new ui sub-folder in the already existing record-field
folder, in order to separate those two concepts that are still very
close.
# Introduction
- Implementing the delete one for the new object metadata service v2.
- Handling relation fields and fields in the first place to finally
remove the object
- puting back updatedAt and createdAt in flat metadatas
- duplicate criteria addition for flat object
- removing datasource id from object metadata dto
This PR removes useRecordTable barrel-hook and instead use the pattern
that enforces one hook per function.
This allows to have a easier to maintain React code with small dedicated
hooks.
This PR also improves the usage of those hooks by cleaning some logic
that calls them.
We introduce a new hook : `useRecordIndexIdFromCurrentContextStore` that
factorizes logic that was duplicated to retrieve the `recordTableId`.
Introduced `useHandleColumnsChange`, that saves table columns into view,
this could be discussed but is it isolated with a TODO comment so ok for
now.
Also lowered the coverage because not enough to cover with test here.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR introduces refactors and tradeoffs in the API around the events
of field input.
# Refactored usePersistField
The hook `usePersistField` has been refactored to be used anywhere in
the app, not just inside a FieldContext.
This was meant to solve a bug at the beginning but now it is just used
once in `RecordDetailRelationSection` outside of the context, still this
is better to have this hook like that for future use cases.
We also introduce `usePersistFieldFromFieldInputContext`, for an easier
API inside a FieldContext.
# Introduced a new `FieldInputEventContext`
To remove the drill-down of events, we introduce
`FieldInputEventContext`, this allows to set only once the handlers /
events. In practice it allows to have an easier time maintaining the
events for the many different field inputs, because it matches the
pattern we already use of taking everything from a context
(`FieldContext`).
# Removed drill-down from FieldInput
The heavy drill-down in FieldInput has been completely removed, since
everything can be derived from `FieldContext` and
`FieldInputEventContext`.
Also there was some readonly and other specific props, but they were all
drilled down from FieldContext, so it was easier to just use
FieldContext where needed.
# Refactored events of `MultiItemFieldInputProps`
The component `MultiItemFieldInputProps` has a contrived API, here we
just remove the complex part that was persisting from inside.
We now only give a classic API with `onChange` and `onEscape` the rest
is left to higher levels, where it should be, because this generic
component shouldn't be aware of persisting things.
# Extracted the parsing logic of persisted values
For each input field component, we now have a clear util that was before
bound to the persist call,
# Tradeoff with persist times
The tradeoff before was that persistField was called anywhere, before
exiting the component sometimes, now it is only called by the higher
levels like table or show page, which handles this abstraction.
This could be challenged, however I think that having a lot of different
events, and not just `handleSubmit` and `handleCancel`, convey enough
meaning for the higher levels to decide what to do in each case.
A `skipPersist` argument was added in events in the rare edge cases
where we want to voluntarily skip persisting even with a submit or
escape, but that could be challenged because we could also say that we
should use cancel for that and stick to that convention.
# Handling of the bug in `ActivityRichTextEditor`
Initially this refactor was prioritized for solving this bug, which was
very annoying for the users.
But while fixing it with the new persistField hook I just understood
that the problem is not just for record title cells but for anything
that is open when we click on a rich text editor.
The issue is described here :
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1317
So right now I just let it as is.
# Stories
The stories were checking that a request was sent in some cases where
persist was called before a component exiting, now that persist is only
called by higher-levels I just removed those tests from the stories,
because that should be the responsibility of higher levels.
Also a helper `getFieldInputEventContextProviderWithJestMocks` was
created that exposes a context and jest mock functions for testing this
new API in stories.
# Miscellaneous
Deactivated tui with nx by default, because it can be annoying.
In this PR
- Introduction of readableFields and updatableFields in
objectMetadataItem selector to ease filtering from a developer
experience perspective ( + to help developers think to do it). In
discussion @lucasbordeau @charlesBochet
- Remove non-updatable field from CSV import process (@etiennejouan)
- QA fix / Non-readable fields should not show on show page
- QA fix / It should not be offered to create a kanban view on a
non-readable field
- QA fix / It should not be offered to create view groups on a
non-readable field
- QA fix / Rating field should have a readonly mode
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR fixes a bug that appeared because of a race condition with
context store when navigating between settings page and show page.
The bug was caused because record title cell used on record show page
was trying to retrieve the object metadata item before the context store
was initialized.
I created a new hook that supports an undefined state for one render
loop, since in that case components can be rendered before the context
store is initialized.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13649
This PR removes any V2 naming in state management logic and some minor
utils and hooks.
It has a lot of changes but nearly all of them were made by the rename
functionality of vscode which is deterministic, so it shouldn't
introduce any regression.
QA has been made on this PR on the main features of the app without any
noticeable issue.
Also renamed some other v2 naming related items :
- TextInputV2 => TextInput
- TextInput => SettingsTextInput
- ObjectFilterDropdownFilterSelectMenuItemV2 =>
ObjectFilterDropdownFilterSelectMenuItem
- useInitDraftValueV2 => useInitDraftValue
- useOpenRecordTableCellV2 => useOpenRecordTableCell
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1276
We now need to take fields permissions into account when determining if
a cell is editable or not.
a record field (= a cell) is read only if one of the condition is met:
- the object of the record is read-only (can be determined at table
level) by permission setting
- the field of the object is read-only (can be determined at column
level) - either by permission settings or by system (some workflows
fields for intance)
- the record is deleted (can be determined at row level)
we reorganized the code to avoid re-computing known information as much
as possible.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In our Graphql schema, ids are typed as UUID.
Our FE codegen is typing it as 'any', unless we say otherwise. Fixing it
and fixing the impacts in the codebase
Fixes#13250
This PR fixes the breadcrumb display issue where API names were shown
instead of friendly object names when navigating to related objects in
the detail view.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
as discussed here
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13292#issuecomment-3092215050
with @prastoin
- [x] introduce optional message param to `copyToClipboard` method in
`useCopyToClipboard` and refactor it across app, as in case if user has
disallowed clipboard permission in BROWSER unprotected clipboard access
breaks without catch.
- [x] Email copied to clipboard
- [x] run lingui extract
Guillim