Commit Graph

22 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Marie 8d78032357 Implement groupBy resolver (with orderBy, without viewId) (#14690)
Closes
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/248?issue=twentyhq%7Ccore-team-issues%7C1543

In this PR
- Implementation of groupBy resolver, without pagination, without viewId
parameter
- introduction of new GqlInputTypeDefinitionKind `OrderByWithGroupBy`
which differs from `OrderBy` as it should use aggregations as order by
conditions (e.g.: OrderByWithGroupBy should use avgEmployees and not
employees which does not make sense)
- Minor refacto of all orderBy expressions to use orderBy signature with
`OrderByCondition` which is usable for both groupBy queries and
non-groupBy queries. groupBy queries differ because their orderBy
conditions are based on aggregatedFields (such as avgEmployees) for
which we can't use the same orderBy signature
<img width="728" height="216" alt="Capture d’écran 2025-09-24 à 15 07
14"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa5c0875-cf38-4d4b-be70-f4d64da77a41"
/>

- Minor refacto to add table name in aggregates expressions
`(AVG("employees") -> AVG("company"."employees")` to keep having the
table names in the orderBy expression as we already had. Since we use
common utils for orderBy and aggregates on findMany this change also
impacts findMany queries with aggregates. It also impacts field
permission check where we extract the name of the selected fields to
check permission on, so I also updated that (see
`extractColumnNamesFromAggregateExpression`)
2025-09-24 16:00:55 +00:00
Guillim 63c8bb9530 morph backend CORE api (#13517)
# Morph Relation needs some work on the core API

Especially on the Morph types

<img width="682" height="394" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-31 at 12 19 40"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8b185ae3-3fe7-4886-97b1-ec143bb1b0f4"
/>


## Focus Areas:
- GraphQL schema generation
- Query parsing and field selection
- Morph relation field support
- Input type definition preparation
2025-08-12 11:47:02 +02:00
Charles Bochet b14063fe06 Re-add prettier (#13812)
Re add prettier in eslint.configs
2025-08-11 14:10:04 +02:00
Félix Malfait 464a480043 Continue ESLINT9 Migration (#13795)
Might already fix #13793
2025-08-10 23:25:58 +02:00
Félix Malfait 8b4b9ef8da Change type import rule (#13751)
Forcing "type" to be explicit, works best will rollup on the frontend to
exclude depdendencies
2025-08-08 01:27:05 +02:00
Guillim 1ea451c8be Morph Relations : deleteOneField (#13349)
This PR adapts teh deleteOneField to make sure morph relations can be
deleted, either
- from a relation type, 
- or from a morph relation type (which is the most obvious case).

This PR covers 
- the deletion of fieldMetadata 
- and the migrationof workspace schemas, by using the already existing
definition of relation migrations

This PR implements a new test suite: "Delete Object metadata with morph
relation" and completes the other test suites for FieldMetadata and
ObjectMetadata creation/deletion.

Last, we added a nitpick from @paul I forgot on a previous PR on
process-nested-realtion-v2

Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1197
2025-07-24 12:40:14 +00:00
Marie ae6adb3a63 [permissions] Add read field permission check layer (part 1) (#13376)
In this PR, behind a feature flag, we add a permission layer check based
on the read permission.
It is done by computing a map of an object's fields, where keys are the
column names and values the fieldMetadata id, making them comparable to
the restricted fields ids list stored in the permission cache.

For mutations (create, update, delete, destroy), we need to check the
read permission on the returned field, as they may differ from the
updated field. The write field permission will be tackled in a different
PR.
2025-07-23 15:25:34 +00:00
Guillim 37d7996a04 morph fix (#13311)
Short fix for the morph case. 

Was missing the logic for the joinColumnName: we need to add the
"ObjcectMetadataName" on top the the "FieldMetadataName" for morph
relation like it was designed on fieldmetadata service.

On the typescirpt side: the "as FieldMetadataRelationSettings" is not
ideal but I inherit from the a as FieldMetadataInterface type that does
not know the as FieldMetadataType from its parent. If you have a better
simple idea, let me know.


Note : I think we could refactor a bit this part later on.
2025-07-21 16:29:23 +00:00
Paul Rastoin 1dee9bc800 Remove field metadata interface references (#13305)
# Introduction
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13264
> After this PR merge will create a new one removing the type and
replacing it to FieldMetadataEntity.

This is it !
2025-07-21 13:57:14 +02:00
Weiko 2deac9448e Add db event emitter in twenty orm (#13167)
## Context
Add an eventEmitter instance to twenty datasources so we can emit DB
events.
Add input and output formatting to twenty orm (formatData, formatResult)
Those 2 elements simplified existing logic when we interact with the
ORM, input will be formatted by the ORM so we can directly use
field-like structure instead of column-like. The output will be
formatted, for builder queries it will be in `result.generatedMaps`
where `result.raw` preserves the previous column-like structure.

Important change: We now have an authContext that we can pass when we
get a repository, this will be used for the different events emitted in
the ORM. We also removed the caching for repositories as it was not
scaling well and not necessary imho

Note: An upcoming PR should handle the onDelete: cascade behavior where
we send DESTROY events in cascade when there is an onDelete: CASCADE on
the FK.

---------

Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
2025-07-17 18:07:28 +02:00
Marie fca39d317f Restrict queried columns to graphql-requested fields (#13246)
Fixes
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/255?issue=twentyhq%7Ccore-team-issues%7C1214.

Until then, in the endpoints of our dynamic schema, we were querying all
columns and then formatting the result by removing the non-requested
fields (fields not mentioned in the graphql Query) from the result.
This is not compatible with field-level permissions that we are about to
introduce because users would see their request denied if they have
restricted rights on any of the fields of the objects they are querying,
even if they did not query it in the first place.
To prepare for this change, we are restricting the list of queried
columns to those made necessary by the graphql query.

I only made the changes in the dynamic schema for now. We will
potentially need to do updates to other part of the app that use
createQueryBuilder directly or not (for instance, when calling
repository methods such as .findOne()), but they mostly regard system
objects that are not subject to permissions or are executed by entities
that bypass permission such as jobs creating People and Companies from
their email sync.
No changes have been brought to existingRecords related logic in the
dynamic schema because @Weiko is currently working on it, so I may need
to adapt the new logic after he is done.

No feature flag have been added so far as this should not change
anything at the moment.
2025-07-17 14:59:41 +02:00
Charles Bochet d5c974054d Improve performance on metadata computation (#12785)
In this PR:

## Improve recompute metadata cache performance. We are aiming for
~100ms

Deleting relationMetadata table and FKs pointing on it
Fetching indexMetadata and indexFieldMetadata in a separate query as
typeorm is suboptimizing

## Remove caching lock

As recomputing the metadata cache is lighter, we try to stop preventing
multiple concurrent computations. This also simplifies interfaces

## Introduce self recovery mecanisms to recompute cache automatically if
corrupted

Aka getFreshObjectMetadataMaps

## custom object resolver performance improvement:  1sec to 200ms

Double check queries and indexes used while creating a custom object
Remove the queries to db to use the cached objectMetadataMap

## reduce objectMetadataMaps to 500kb
<img width="222" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2370dc80-49b6-4b63-8d5e-30c5ebdaa062"
/>

We used to stored 3 fieldMetadataMaps (byId, byName, byJoinColumnName).
While this is great for devXP, this is not great for performances.
Using the same mecanisme as for objectMetadataMap: we only keep byIdMap
and introduce two otherMaps to idByName, idByJoinColumnName to make the
bridge

## Add dataloader on IndexMetadata (aka indexMetadataList in the API)

## Improve field resolver performances too

## Deprecate ClientConfig
2025-06-23 21:06:17 +02:00
Marie e1a7fa3e5d [permissions] Override workspaceDatasource.createQueryBuilder (#12415)
In the frame of https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/924

- Rename dataSource -> workspaceDataSource when relevant to ease
understandability
- override workspaceDataSource.createQueryBuilder, because we don't want
developers to use it directly since it does not run permission checks at
this level. Indeed, we cannot do so because 1) datasources are shared
between roles so we would need to re-think its implementation to make
that possible, while for now we never call
workspaceDatasource.createQueryBuilder in our codebase 2)
workspaceEntityManager.createQueryBuilder, that we have overriden with
permission checks, then performs a call to
workspaceDataSource.createQueryBuilder so that would make two permission
checks.
2025-06-02 16:37:23 +00:00
Marie 9706f0df13 [permissions] Remove raw queries and restrict its usage (#12360)
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/748

In the frame of the work on permissions we

- remove all raw queries possible to use repositories instead
- forbid usage workspaceDataSource.executeRawQueries()
- restrict usage of workspaceDataSource.query() to force developers to
pass on shouldBypassPermissionChecks to use it.

---------

Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-06-02 10:53:51 +02:00
Paul Rastoin a8423e8503 [QRQC_2] No explicit any in twenty-server (#12068)
# Introduction

Added a no-explicit-any rule to the twenty-server, not applicable to
tests and integration tests folder

Related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/975
Discussed with Charles

## In case of conflicts
Until this is approved I won't rebased and handle conflict, just need to
drop two latest commits and re run the scripts etc

## Legacy
We decided not to handle the existing lint error occurrences and
programmatically ignored them through a disable next line rule comment

## Open question
We might wanna activate the
[no-explicit-any](https://typescript-eslint.io/rules/no-explicit-any/)
`ignoreRestArgs` for our use case ?
```
    ignoreRestArgs?: boolean;
```

---------

Co-authored-by: etiennejouan <jouan.etienne@gmail.com>
2025-05-15 16:26:38 +02:00
Charles Bochet 45d4845b26 Remove old relations (#11993)
This is a first PR to remove old relation logic

Next steps:
- remove relationMetadata from cache
- remove relationMetadata table content and structure
- refactor relationDefinition to leverage field.settings instead
2025-05-13 11:28:22 +02:00
Marie 4257f30f12 Permission checks on twentyORM global manager (#11477)
In this PR we are handling permissions when using
twentyORMGlobalManager,
and handling permissions for rest api and api key
2025-04-23 17:57:48 +02:00
Jérémy M cc29c25176 feat: new relation sync-metadata, twenty-orm, create/update (#10217)
Fix
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/330#issue-2827026606
and
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/327#issue-2827001814

What this PR does when `isNewRelationEnabled` is set to `true`:
- [x] Drop the creation of the  foreign key as a `FieldMetadata`
- [x] Stop creating `RelationMetadata`
- [x] Properly fill `FieldMetadata` of type `RELATION` during the sync
command
- [x] Use new relation settings in TwentyORM
- [x] Properly create `FieldMetadata` relations when we create a new
object
- [x] Handle `database:reset` with new relations

---------

Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-04-22 19:01:39 +02:00
Marie 162c6bcaa3 [permissions] Implement object-records permissions in query builders (#11458)
In this PR we are

- (if permissionsV2 is enabled) executing permission checks at query
builder level. To do so we want to override the query builders methods
that are performing db calls (.execute(), .getMany(), ... etc.) For now
I have just overriden some of the query builders methods for the poc. To
do so I created custom query builder classes that extend typeorm's query
builder (selectQueryBuilder and updateQueryBuilder, for now and later I
will tackle softDeleteQueryBuilder, etc.).
- adding a notion of roles permissions version and roles permissions
object to datasources. We will now use one datasource per roleId and
rolePermissionVersion. Both rolesPermissionsVersion and rolesPermissions
objects are stored in redis and recomputed at role update or if queried
and found empty. Unlike for metadata version we don't need to store a
version in the db that stands for the source of truth. We also don't
need to destroy and recreate the datasource if the rolesPermissions
version changes, but only to update the value for rolesPermissions and
rolesPermissionsVersions on the existing datasource.

What this PR misses
- computing of roles permissions should take into account
objectPermissions table (for now it only looks at what's on the roles
table)
- pursue extension of query builder classes and overriding of their db
calling-methods
- what should the behaviour be for calls from twentyOrmGlobalManager
that don't have a roleId?
2025-04-11 17:34:02 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 9ad8287dbc [REFACTOR] twenty-shared multi barrel and CJS/ESM build with preconstruct (#11083)
# Introduction

In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)

For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682

close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590

## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )

## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617

## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960

## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level

## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
2025-03-22 19:16:06 +01:00
Jérémy M a1eea40cf7 feat: populate relation join column (#10212)
Fix
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/241#issue-2793030259
2025-02-25 11:24:05 +01:00
Jérémy M 07197d1e6d feat: new relation in graphql-query-runner (#9883)
Fix https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/300

Within GraphQLQueryRunner the new relation format will be used when the
feature flag `IsNewRelationEnabled` is set to true.
2025-01-29 17:04:39 +01:00