This PR refactors all the dropdown content wrapping mechanism across the
entire app.
It refactors the internals of the `Dropdown` component and introduces a
new generic `DropdownContent` component that is a generic wrapper used
for each dropdown.
## Why this PR ?
Because we’ve been experiencing continuous regressions for months on the
dropdown content width, with weird scrolling behaviors in some and not
in others, and every time a solution was found for a particular set of
dropdowns, it broke another set of dropdowns, which wasn’t noticed
because doing the QA of all dropdowns of the app is very difficult for
fixing an apparently small bug.
## Don’t we already have a `DropdownMenu` component ?
Indeed, this new `DropdownContent` is almost like `DropdownMenu` and
took inspiration from it but `DropdownContent` acts as a generic content
container that sets the width of the whole dropdown, whether we have a
menu or not.
## Why don’t we put it directly in Dropdown internals ?
Because the Dropdown component is using a complex logic with floating-ui
middleware to compute its position and size, and for this logic to work
correctly, it cannot be responsible for the “wanted” width of its
content, because the children components, which the dropdown is not
aware of, can request different widths after the dropdown has been
mounted.
A good example with multiple use cases inside the same dropdown can be
found in `AdvancedFilterDropdownFilterInput`
Thus, it is the responsibility of the content of the dropdown to
determine the width it wants to have.
## What is the difference with DropdownMenuItemsContainer ?
We can have multiple `DropdownMenuItemsContainer` in a dropdown,
alongside other components like `DropdownMenuSeparator` or
`DropdownMenuHeader`, and each of those components behaves differently
regarding to its width, paddings, etc. Therefore it is logical that the
`DropdownMenuItemsContainer` cannot be responsible for the whole
dropdown content width, and trying to do so has been the cause of many
regressions for months.
Now `DropdownMenuItemsContainer` is taking a width of `auto` by default,
which is the best to adapt to a parent which has a defined width.
## How do I set the width of my dropdown now ?
By passing a pixel width to the props `widthInPixels` of
`DropdownContent`, which only accepts numbers to avoid any confusion
with `auto` , `100%` or `160px` and other specific width variables.
The `dropdownWidth` props has been removed from `<Dropdown>` to avoid
any confusion.
Also the `DropdownMenuItemsContainer` is now using `auto` as its default
width to fill the available space inside `DropdownContent` .
It is highly recommended to use the enum `GenericDropdownContentWidt` to
define your width.
## Where to use this new `DropdownContent` component ?
There are two main use cases.
If the dropdown content is defined directly inline in the Dropdown
props, then it is recommended to use it here too.
On the other hand if the dropdown content is abstracted in another
component, it’s recommended to use this new component alongside the
others components like `DropdownMenuItemsContainer`.
A good rule of thumb is to place `DropdownContent` where
`DropdownMenuItemsContainer`, `DropdownMenuSearchInput`, etc. are
placed.
## What if I have a custom width ?
Just define a constant like `ICON_PICKER_DROPDOWN_CONTENT_WIDTH` and use
it with the props `widthInPixels` .
Otherwise there’s a `GenericDropdownContentWidth` enum. The default
value being `GenericDropdownContentWidth.Medium` (or 200px), which most
dropdowns use.
## QA
Component | Comment
-- | --
AttachmentDropdown | Fixed overflowing (thanks to DropdownContent)
RecordIndexActionMenuDropdown |
CommandMenuActionMenuDropdown |
SupportDropdown | Fixed overflowing (thanks to DropdownContent)
MessageThreadSubscribersDropdownButton | Removed because unused
FavoriteFolderNavigationDrawerItemDropdown | Set width at Narrow
FavoriteFolderPicker |
ViewPickerOptionDropdown |
PageFavoriteFolderDropdown | Removed because unused
AdvancedFilterAddFilterRuleSelect |
AdvancedFilterAddFilterRuleSelect |
AdvancedFilterFieldSelectMenu |
AdvancedFilterRecordFilterGroupOptionsDropdown |
AdvancedFilterRecordFilterOperanceSelect | Set width at Narrow
AdvancedFilterLogicalOperatorDropdown | Set width at Narrow
AdvancedFilterRecordFilterOptionsDropdown |
AdvancedFilterRootRecordFilterGroup | Fixed broken horizontal scrolling
behavior
AdvancedFilterSubFieldSelectMenu |
AdvancedFilterDropdownFilterInput |
ObjectFilterDropdownBooleanSelect |
ObjectFilterDropdownCountrySelect | Fixed broken menu items container
ObjectFilterDropdownCurrencySelect | Set width to Large
ObjectFilterDropdownFilterInput |
ObjectFilterDropdownOperandDropdown | Fixed width that was not fixed
ObjectFilterDropdownFilterInput | Fixed width that wasn’t the same for
EditableFilterChip
ObjectFilterDropdownOperandSelect | Refactored
ObjectOptionsDropdownRecordGroupFieldsContent | Added missing separator
ObjectOptionDropdownFieldsContent |
ObjectOptionsDropdownHiddenFieldsContent |
ObjectOptionsDropdownLayoutContent |
ObjectOptionsDropdownLayoutOpenInContent |
ObjectOptionsDropdownMenuContent |
ObjectOptionsDropdownRecordGroupFieldsContent |
ObjectOptionsDropdownRecordGroupsContent |
ObjectOptionsDropdownRecordGroupSortContent |
ObjectOptionsDropdownHiddenRecordGroupsContent | Removed unnecessary
DropdownMenuItemsContainer
RecordBoardColumnHeaderAggregateDropdown | Fixed overflowing (thanks to
DropdownContent)
RecordBoardColumnHeaderAggregateDropdownFieldsContent | Fixed
overflowing (thanks to DropdownContent)
RecordBoardColumnHeaderAggregateDropdownMenuContent | Fixed overflowing
(thanks to DropdownContent)
RecordBoardColumnHeaderAggregateDropdownOptionsContent | Fixed
overflowing (thanks to DropdownContent)
MultiItemFieldInput | Fixed overflowing (thanks to DropdownContent)
MultiItemFieldMenuItem |
MultipleRecordPicker | Fixed overflowing (thanks to DropdownContent)
SingleRecordPicker |
RecordTableColumnAggregateDropdownSubmenuContent |
RecordTableColumnAggregateFooterMenuContent |
RecordTableColumnHeadDropdownMenu | Fixed overflowing (thanks to
DropdownContent)
RecordTableHeaderPlusButtonContent |
MultipleSelectDropdown | Broken width fixed
ObjectSortDropdownButton |
RecordDetailRelationRecordsListItem |
ConfigVariableDatabaseInput |
ConfigVariableOptionsDropdownContent |
SettingsObjectFieldActiveActionDropdown | Fixed overflowing (thanks to
DropdownContent)
SettingsObjectFieldDisabledActionDropdown | Set width at Narrow
SettingsObjectSummaryCard | Removed because unused
SettingsDataModelFieldSelectFormOptionRow |
SettingsDataModelNewFieldBreadcrumbDropdown |
SettingsObjectInactiveMenuDropDown |
SettingsRoleAssignementWorkspaceMemberPickerDropdown |
SettingsRolePermissionObjectLevelObjectPickerDropdownContent |
SettingsSecurityApprovedAccessDomainRowDropdownMenu | Couldn’t test
SettingsSecuritySSORowDropdownMenu | Couldn’t test
SettingsAccountsRowDropdownMenu | Fixed overflowing (thanks to
DropdownContent)
SettingsIntegrationDatabaseConnectionSummaryCard | Couldn’t test
SettingsServerlessFunctionTablEnvironmentVariableTableRow | Deactivated
scope
MatchColumnSelectFieldSelectDropdownContent | Removed now unnecessary
width on DropdownMenuItemsContainer
MatchColumnSelectSubFieldSelectDropdownContent |
SubMatchingSelectInput |
CurrencyPickerDropdownSelect |
IconPicker | Fixed overflowing (thanks to DropdownContent)
PhoneCountryPickerDropdownSelect |
Select | Refactored to drilldown wanted width of content, in this case
it’s intended
ExpandedListDropdown |
ShowPageAddButton | Removed because unused
MultiWorkspaceDropdownDefaultComponent |
MultiWorkspaceDropdownThemesComponent |
MultiWorkspaceDropdownWorkspacesListComponent |
AdvancedFilterDropdownButton |
EditableFilterChip |
EditableFilterDropdownButton |
UpdateViewButtonGroup |
ViewBarFilterDropdown |
ViewBarFilterDropdownFieldSelectMenu |
ViewPickerContentCreateMode |
ViewPickerContentEditMode |
ViewPickerListContent |
WorkflowEditTriggerDatabaseEventForm |
WorkflowVariablesDropdownFieldItems |
WorkflowVariablesDropdownObjectItems |
WorkflowVariablesDropdownWorkflowStepItems |
CommandMenuContextChipGroups |
RecordBoardColumnDropdownMenu |
MultiSelectInput |
SelectInput |
CustomSlashMenu |
DropdownMenu | Removed and replaced by DropdownContent
OverlayContainer and around |
<!-- notionvc: 1e23bdb8-2dda-4f8d-a64d-ecc829a768a2 -->
## Miscellaneous
Side notes :
- The `Select` component is now wrapping the `DropdownContent` because
it computes a dynamic width.
- The advanced filter dropdown has been fixed, it was broken when
resizing the window horizontally, we couldn’t scroll. This specific edge
case was taken into account when refactoring the whole dropdown content
system
- As discussed with Nitin, data-select-disable will probably be removed
entirely, so I let it as is, because right now it is not used by the
refactored d&d selection.
- Duplicate separators under DropdownMenuHeader have been removed.
Fixes : https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12327
Fixes : https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/951
1. Removing tokenPair internal variable of ApolloFactory. We will relay
on cookieStorage
2. setting the cookie explicitely instead of only relaying on recoil
cookieEffect which is too late
# Introduction
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/591
Same than for `twenty-shared` made in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11083.
## TODO
- [x] Manual migrate twenty-website twenty-ui imports
## What's next:
- Generate barrel and migration script factorization within own package
+ tests
- Refactoring using preconstruct ? TimeBox
- Lint circular dependencies
- Lint import from barrel and forbid them
### Preconstruct
We need custom rollup plugins addition, but preconstruct does not expose
its rollup configuration. It might be possible to handle this using the
babel overrides. But was a big tunnel.
We could give it a try afterwards ! ( allowing cjs interop and stuff
like that )
Stuck to vite lib app
Closed related PRs:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11294
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11203
# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/271
This PR
- Removes the feature flag IS_COMMAND_MENU_V2_ENABLED
- Removes all old Right drawer components
- Removes the Action menu bar
- Removes unused Copilot page
This PR follows #10700, it is the same refactor but for the workflows
pages.
- Duplicates the right drawer workflow pages for the command menu and
replace the states used in these pages by component states
- We store the component instance id upon navigation to restore the
states when we navigate back to a page
There are still states which are not component states inside the
workflow diagram and workflow command menu pages, we should convert them
in a futur refactor.
`closeCommandMenu` was called programmatically in multiple places for
the workflow, I refactored that to only rely on the click outside
listener. This introduced a wiggling bug on the workflow canvas when we
change node selection. This should be fixed in another PR by updating
the canvas animation to take the animation values of the command menu
instead. I'm thinking we could use [motion
values](https://motion.dev/docs/react-motion-value) for this as I told
you @Devessier
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/491
This PR:
- Duplicates the right drawer pages for the command menu and replace all
the states used in these pages by component states (The right drawer
pages will be deleted when we deprecate the command menu v1)
- Wraps those pages into a component instance provider
- We store the component instance id upon navigation to restore the
states when we navigate back to a page
The only pages which are not updated for now are the pages related to
the workflow objects, this will be done in another PR.
In another PR, to improve the navigation experience I will replace the
icons and titles of the chips by the label identifier and the avatar if
the page is a record page.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a76d3345-01f3-4db9-8a55-331cca8b87e0
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
# Introduction
closes#10196
Initially fixing the `Account Owner` record field value should not be
clickable and redirects on current page bug.
This has been fixed computing whereas the current filed is a workspace
member dynamically rendering a stale Chip components instead of an
interactive one
## Refactor
Refactored the `AvatarChip` `to` props logic to be scoped to lower level
scope `Chip`.
Now we have `LinkChip` `Chip`, `LinkAvatarChip` and `AvatarChip` all
exported from twenty-ui.
The caller has to determine which one to call from the design system
## New rule regarding chip links
As discussed with @charlesBochet and @FelixMalfait
A chip link will now ***always*** have `to` defined. ( and optionally an
`onClick` ).
`ChipLinks` cannot be used as buttons anymore
## Factorization
Deleted the `RecordIndexRecordChip.tsx` file ( aka
`RecordIdentifierChip` component ) that was duplicating some logic,
refactored the `RecordChip` in order to handle what was covered by
`RecordIdentifierChip`
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are more than welcomed ! Took few opinionated
decision/refactor regarding nested long ternaries rendering `ReactNode`
elements
## Misc
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8ef11fb2-7ba6-4e96-bd59-b0be5a425156
---------
Co-authored-by: Mohammed Razak <mohammedrazak2001@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
# Introduction
Avoid having multiple `isDefined` definition across our pacakges
Also avoid importing `isDefined` from `twenty-ui` which exposes a huge
barrel for a such little util function
## In a nutshell
Removed own `isDefined.ts` definition from `twenty-ui` `twenty-front`
and `twenty-server` to move it to `twenty-shared`.
Updated imports for each packages, and added explicit dependencies to
`twenty-shared` if not already in place
Related PR https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/9941
Implementing the Outlook icon for CreatedBy, only for emails.
Not in this PR original scope : The similar feature for calendar created
records. Since it was straightforward, I added it to the scope of this
PR.
Fix https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/252
## Context
Following this https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/4199
This has not been fully implemented, after 5months of dead code I'm
removing the feature for the time being until we re-prioritise the
feature (unlikely during these next 6 months) to keep the codebase a bit
cleaner (no need to maintain dead features)
Feel free to reopen / revert this PR once feature is ready
## Test
locally after importing emails
The DX is not great when you need to do a lot of database
resets/command.
Should we disable Typescript validation to speed things up? With this
and caching database:reset takes 1min instead of 2 on my machine.
See also: https://github.com/typeorm/typeorm/issues/4136
And #9291 / #9293
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
This PR was created by [GitStart](https://gitstart.com/) to address the
requirements from this ticket:
[TWNTY-7536](https://clients.gitstart.com/twenty/5449/tickets/TWNTY-7536).
---
### Description
Migrate all menu items components to twenty ui and update imports.
```typescript
MenuItem
MenuItemAvata
MenuItemCommand
MenuItemCommandHotKeys
MenuItemDraggable
MenuItemMultiSelect
MenuItemMultiSelectAvatar
MenuItemMultiSelectTag
MenuItemNavigate
MenuItemSelect
MenuItemSelectAvatar
MenuItemSelectColor
MenuItemSelectTag
MenuItemSuggestion
MenuItemToggle
```
\
Also migrate all other dependent components and utilities like
`Checkbox` & `Toggle`\
\
Fixestwentyhq/private-issues#82
---------
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <140154534+gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Fix all the broken CIs :p
This includes an ongoing effort to simplify test maintenance by having 1
unique source of truth about metadata and data mocks (that will later be
generated from a unique source of seeds: dev = demo = test)
Regressions:
- Unit line coverage: 60 > 55
- Storybook Pages branch coverage: 40 > 35
We will need to write tests to increase those coverage
- RelationFieldDisplay perf: 0.2ms to 0.22ms > We might have a
regression here
- Removed perf story about RawJSON > We will need to re-add it
- Remove raw queries and replace them by using `twentyORM`
- Refactor into services and utils
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Feature: Email thread members visibility
For this feature we implemented a chip and a dropdown menu that allows
users to check which workspace members can see an email thread, as
depicted on issue (#4199).
## Implementations
- create a new database table (messageThreadMember)
- relations between `messageThreadMembers` and the relevant existing
tables (`MessageThread` and `WorkspaceMembers`)
- added a new column to the `MessageThread table`: `everyone` - to
indicate that all workspace members can see the email thread
- create a new repository for the new table, including new queries
- edit the queries so that the new fields could be fetched from the
frontend
- created a component `MultiChip`, that shows a group of user avatars,
instead of just one
- created a component, `ShareDropdownMenu`, that shows up once the
`EmailThreadMembersChip` is clicked. On this menu you can see which
workspace members can view the email thread.
## Screenshots
Here are some screenshots of the frontend components that were created:
Chip with everyone in the workspace being part of the message thread:
Chip with just one member of the workspace (the owner) being part of the
message thread:
Chip with some members of the workspace being part of the message
thread:
How the chip looks in a message thread:
Dropdown that opens when you click on the chip:
## Testing and Mock data
We also added mock data (TypeORM seeds), focusing on adding mock data
related to message thread members.
## Conclusion
As some of the changes that we needed to do, regarding the change of
visibility of the message thread, were not covered by the existing
documentation, we were told to open a PR and ask for feedback on this
part of the implementation. Right now, our implementation is focused on
displaying who is part of an email thread.
Feel free to let us know which steps we should follow next :)
---------
Co-authored-by: Simão Sanguinho <simao.sanguinho@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Closes#5924.
Adding the "many" side of relations in the table view, and fixing some
issues (glitch in Multi record select, cache update after update).
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
neo773