Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Raphaël Bosi 167d684a29 Run the people-data-labs spec suite in CI (#23743)
The PDL app's unit vitest config only matched `src/**/*.test.ts`, but
the app's test files were named `*.spec.ts`, so CI ran a single file and
368 tests never executed.

Renamed the 88 spec files to `*.test.ts`, the convention every other
public app and the `create-twenty-app` scaffold already use, which
leaves `vitest.unit.config.ts` byte-identical to the other apps.
`capitalize-name` had both a spec and a test file covering the same
function, so the more thorough one was kept.

Turning the suite on surfaced one real failure: `collectUuids` in the
select-option test scooped up the `path` strings added to
`PDL_LOGIC_FUNCTION_CONSTANTS` and asserted they were v4 UUIDs. It now
stops at any object with a `universalIdentifier` and collects only that
value.

`yarn test:unit` is green at 88 files / 368 tests, with `yarn typecheck`
and `yarn lint` clean.
2026-08-04 12:01:40 +00:00
Raphaël Bosi 0ff9e77fd3 Hide app record-selection commands when all records are selected (#23561)
PDL enrichment and call-recorder's call summary are `RECORD_SELECTION`
commands backed by headless front components, which only receive record
ids in selection mode. Under select all the context store switches to
exclusion mode, so they received an empty `recordIds` array and still
reported success while enriching nothing.

They now declare `conditionalAvailabilityExpression: !isSelectAll`, so
they disappear from the command menu and quick actions while select all
is active. Both app versions are bumped since the server rejects
redeploying an equal version.

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/23561?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
2026-07-30 12:30:10 +00:00
Paul Rastoin 2ef7b7824e Upgrade call-recorder, people-data-labs, last-contact and partners apps to twenty-sdk 2.23.0-alpha.1 (#23098)
## What

Upgrades the two breaking-change-prone apps to `twenty-sdk` /
`twenty-client-sdk` `2.23.0-alpha.1`, and adds the server-side hook that
lets the 2.23 upgrade install them:

- **people-data-labs**
- **partners**

Follows up on #22882 (System side effect relations), which re-derived
the system relation field universal identifiers name-free and shipped
`getSystemRelationFieldUniversalIdentifier` in the SDK.

## How

- **people-data-labs**: bump the SDK to `2.23.0-alpha.1`. The enriched
views temporarily hardcoded the new system relation identifiers with a
TODO because the SDK still embedded the old values; now that the
name-free identifiers ship in `2.23`, derive them from
`STANDARD_OBJECT_UNIVERSAL_IDENTIFIERS.{company,person}.fields.{noteTargets,taskTargets,attachments,timelineActivities}.universalIdentifier`
(identical to the previously pinned values, verified). Engine already
pinned `twenty >=2.23.0`; app stays `1.0.7` (manifest unchanged).
- **partners**: bump the SDK to `2.23.0-alpha.1`. The partner role
references
`opportunity.fields.{taskTargets,noteTargets,attachments,timelineActivities}`
universal identifiers, which the SDK now resolves to the `2.23`
name-free values. Pin `engines.twenty >=2.23.0` and bump the app to
`1.3.1`.
- **server**: add an opt-in `skipWorkspaceCompatibilityCheck` to the
install/upgrade path. The `upgrade-people-data-labs-application` 2.23
command runs mid-upgrade, before the workspace is marked as having
completed 2.23, so the workspace-compatibility check would otherwise
reject installing `1.0.7` (`engines >=2.23.0`). The server is already on
2.23, so the command passes the flag to install `1.0.7` and close the
desync window. Version-progression (downgrade/same-version) checks still
run.
- **call-recorder** and **last-contact** are intentionally left
unchanged (reverted): they don't define custom objects and don't
reference the system relation identifiers, so they aren't
breaking-change-prone and need no SDK bump.

## Breaking change constraints

- **people-data-labs** and **partners** reference system relation
identifiers that only exist on a `2.23` server, so both pin
`engines.twenty >=2.23.0`. Their `dockerhub-latest` integration leg is
red by design until a >=2.23 server image is published (same accepted
state as #22882); the `local` leg is green.

## Validation

- Regenerated the app lockfiles against the published `2.23.0-alpha.1`.
- `people-data-labs` typechecks cleanly against the real `2.23` SDK
types.
- CI: people-data-labs and partners green on `local`, red on
`dockerhub-latest` by design; server/SDK/all other checks green.
- Rebased onto latest `main`.
2026-07-21 15:40:14 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 1be5a0e54a System side effect relations (#22882)
Closes twentyhq/core-team-issues#2667

## What

Default relations to the standard relation objects
(`timelineActivities`, `attachments`, `noteTargets`, `taskTargets`) are
now fully owned by the **metadata side-effect engine**. Neither the API
transpilers nor the SDK manifest builder provision them anymore: any
object creation, rename or deletion — regardless of the caller — goes
through the same engine handlers.

## Why

- Provisioning was duplicated across the API path and the SDK manifest
builder, with diverging behavior.
- Universal identifiers of relation fields were derived from object
**names**, so renaming an object mutated them and forced lossy
delete+create cycles on manifest sync.

## How

### Engine-owned lifecycle (side-effect handlers)

- `objectSystemRelationsOnCreate`: provisions the 8 forward/reverse
relation fields (+ join column indexes) when an object is created.
- `objectSystemRelationsOnUpdate`: renames the reverse morph fields
(`target<ObjectName>`) when their host object is renamed — a lossless
`fieldMetadata.update`.
- `objectSystemSideEffectsOnDelete`: cascades deletion of engine-owned
fields/indexes when the object is deleted.
- The API transpilers and the SDK `buildManifest` no longer inject these
fields; `isSystemSideEffect: true` marks engine-owned entities, guarded
by a granular property allowlist (only `isActive` is user-editable) and
excluded from manifest deletion inference.

### Name-free deterministic universal identifiers

New `getSystemRelationFieldUniversalIdentifier({
applicationUniversalIdentifier, objectUniversalIdentifier,
relationTargetObjectUniversalIdentifier })` in `twenty-shared`, exported
from `twenty-sdk/define`. The identifier is keyed on the two **object**
identifiers instead of field names (direction encoded by argument
order), so object renames never mutate relation field identifiers. It
cannot collide with the name-based `getFieldUniversalIdentifier`
derivation (field names cannot contain `:`).

### twenty-standard re-owned

All 48 forward/reverse system relation field declarations in
`STANDARD_OBJECTS` now pin the derived name-free identifiers (computed
inline via the shared util) and carry `isSystemSideEffect: true`, with
labels/icons declared explicitly (translated via `msg`).
`twenty-standard` is projected as if the engine had generated these
fields itself.

### 2.23 upgrade commands

- `reconcile-system-relation-field-universal-identifier`: structurally
matches existing default relation fields per workspace and backfills the
derived universal identifiers, `isSystemSideEffect` flags, and standard
labels/icons.
- `upgrade-people-data-labs-application`: upgrades installed PDL apps to
`1.0.7` right after the backfill to close the desync window (its views
reference the re-derived identifiers).

### Misc

- `people-data-labs` `1.0.7`: views temporarily pin the new derived
identifiers (TODO: import from the next released `twenty-sdk`).
- `UpgradeStatusModule` split out of `UpgradeModule` so the application
module cluster can consume upgrade status/migration services without
importing the versioned command bundles (fixes a require cycle that
crashed boot).
- Docs: `system-fields.mdx` documents the system relation fields and
their resolver; `sync-and-recovery.mdx` plan example no longer shows
auto-injected relations.

## Known red CI

`people-data-labs (dockerhub-latest)` fails by design until the 2.23
server image is published: the app pins the new identifiers which only
exist on a 2.23 server. The `local` leg (server built from this branch)
is green.

## System fields are no longer manifest-authorable (accepted regression)

The manifest converter no longer derives `isSystem` /
`isSystemSideEffect` from field names. Reserved-system-named manifest
fields (`id`, `createdAt`, `updatedAt`, `deletedAt`, `createdBy`,
`updatedBy`, `position`, `searchVector`) are now skipped at conversion
time when they carry the exact derived universal identifier (keeps
manifests built with older SDKs installable), and rejected with
`INVALID_INPUT` when they pin any other identifier. System fields are
therefore fully engine-canonical: nothing a manifest carries can produce
a system-flagged entity anymore.

**Accepted regression**: a manifest can no longer influence system field
properties at all. Previously a (legacy) re-declaration could shape them
at creation — which actually produced broken system fields, e.g. a
nullable, non-unique `id` — and could still toggle the allowlisted
`isActive` / `universalSettings` afterwards. We consider this acceptable
for now: per-app granularity over system fields will be reintroduced
later through the **override framework**, which will also settle update
semantics by forbidding direct updates over `isSystemSideEffect: true`
entities and expressing divergence as overrides.

`isSystemSideEffect`-only entities (the default relation fields
provisioned by this PR) still have no engine-level update guard (see
Follow-up below); that part is unchanged and also lands with the
overrides refactor.

## Follow-up

`isSystemSideEffect` field update/delete guards intentionally live at
the API layer (`sanitize-raw-update-field-input.ts`,
`from-delete-field-input-...util.ts`) rather than in the engine-level
`FlatFieldMetadataValidatorService`. Moving them into the validator
requires threading operation-origin (direct field mutation vs engine
cascade) through the migration matrix, otherwise legitimate object
rename/delete cascades (which carry `isSystemBuild=false`) would be
rejected. Tracked in twentyhq/core-team-issues#2671.

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22882?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
2026-07-20 18:53:24 +02:00
martmull 435073e9c5 Display featured applications in marketplace (#22635)
## After
<img width="1060" height="589" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/74dfadcf-8698-4404-81c6-b309cc4cbf79"
/>
<img width="732" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0e1a3644-04bc-4208-aa77-3842d9db9cc8"
/>
<img width="797" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0456ecce-607a-4705-8a89-c77029bfb6ac"
/>

- Remove IS_MARKETPLACE_SETTING_TAB_VISIBLE feature flag
- add vetted toggle in admin app tab
- added people data labs, last contact and call recorder to default
vetted applications

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22635?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->

---------

Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
2026-07-07 17:05:54 +02:00
Raphaël Bosi 1d3f6176b2 Use record pickers for People Data Labs enrichment workflow inputs (#22596)
Follow-up to #21494, which added record-typed logic function workflow
inputs but deferred the People Data Labs migration until the SDK
release.

twenty-sdk 2.16.0 (published) now includes the `record`/`records` input
schema support, so this types the enrichment inputs accordingly:
`records` on enrich-people/enrich-companies and `recordId` on
enrich-person/enrich-company render as record pickers bound to
Person/Company.

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22596?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
2026-07-07 10:41:40 +02:00
martmull 1bf0d06e18 Add author to twenty apps (#22226)
as title

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22226?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
2026-06-26 15:11:37 +00:00
martmull 1cf1c33899 Add command menu items to people data labs (#22180)
- Adds command menu items to enrich people and companies
- Improve readme

## After

<img width="1039" height="584" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9c6c3967-e905-4bf2-a3ef-307ae5bdca92"
/>


<img width="2560" height="332" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4ab4ffb8-fe52-4612-99c7-282d0ffa2c94"
/>
<img width="2560" height="478" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d496e21b-de18-4c52-acc7-6106afca0bb7"
/>
<img width="2560" height="452" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/caea4de3-5bee-4de7-a347-c5d8540fd179"
/>
<img width="2560" height="335" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/92bd17e3-f4b6-4fcb-84ae-d8ebc7ccce1e"
/>


<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22180?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
2026-06-25 15:12:30 +00:00
martmull c71663946e chore(apps): move public apps to packages/twenty-apps/public and generalize CI workflow (#22096)
## What

Introduces a `packages/twenty-apps/public/` folder and moves the
publicly publishable apps into it, then generalizes the apps CI workflow
to cover both folders.

### Moves
The following apps were moved from `packages/twenty-apps/internal/` to
`packages/twenty-apps/public/` (via `git mv`, history preserved):
- `people-data-labs`
- `twenty-discord`
- `twenty-exa`
- `twenty-fireflies`
- `twenty-last-contact`
- `twenty-linear`
- `twenty-meeting-bot`
- `twenty-slack`

These remain in `internal/`: `self-hosting`, `twenty-for-twenty`,
`twenty-partners`.

### Workflow
- Renamed `.github/workflows/ci-internal-apps.yaml` →
`.github/workflows/ci-twenty-apps.yaml`.
- The discover job now scans **both** `packages/twenty-apps/internal`
and `packages/twenty-apps/public`:
  - the "no nested `.github`" guard checks both folders,
  - `changed-files` watches both globs,
- the matrix builder iterates over both roots (guarded with `existsSync`
so a missing folder is a no-op).
- Each matrix entry still carries its own `path`, so the `ci` job works
unchanged regardless of which folder an app lives in.

## Notes
- The apps are standalone packages (own `yarn.lock`, not part of the
root Nx workspaces), so no root `package.json` / `nx.json` / `tsconfig`
changes were needed.
- The companion publish workflow lives in `twentyhq/twenty-infra`
(`publish-internal-apps.yaml` → `publish-public-apps.yaml`) and is
updated in a paired PR.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---
_Generated by [Claude
Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01Fmu3DWf1yTTkVW49eSkXwh)_

<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22096?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
2026-06-24 17:24:16 +02:00