Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Marie 7ce22d5c7e breaking (soft) - Migrate viewGroup.fieldMetadataId -> view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataId (2/3) (#16277)
Should be merged once https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/16206 has
been released + command run to prod

In this PR
- Remove usage of viewGroup.fieldMetadataId, both in BE and FE states. 
- But we still need to properly populate it until we fully remove
viewGroup.fieldMetadataId from db and ORM entity (upcoming 3rd PR out of
3). fieldMetadataId was removed from CoreViewGroup type and
CreateViewGroupInput and is determined BE-side based on the associated
view's mainGroupByFieldMetadataId. **I expect this means a downtime on
viewGroup creation, until both FE and BE are deployed and cache is
flushed.** This seems acceptable to me as it only regards viewGroup
creation.
    - this information is replaced by view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataID
- Handle view group creation, update and deletion in the BE as a
side-effect of a view creation, update or deletion. Optimistic effects
are still used
- Add validation at view creation or update regarding
mainGroupByFieldMetadata

Left to do in 3rd PR
- Remove viewGroup.fieldMetadataId from db and ORM entity
- Restore feature allowing to update an existing grouped view's group by
field (already OK on BE side but need to rebuild FE optimistic)
2025-12-05 14:00:03 +00:00
Paul Rastoin 5016c25daa Remove viewGroup v1 implem (#16178)
# Introduction
Removing v1 implementation of view groups and both view group and view
field relicas front fetchers

Related https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1911
2025-11-28 16:36:28 +01:00
Paul Rastoin 8dd43be9a2 Create many view groups (#15591)
# Introduction
Same as https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15576 but for view
groups creation

When creating a kanban view with v2 flag activated in production result
in race condition due to request being slow and //.
That's why we're introducing a batch create on view group here
closing https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1847

## In v2
- batch create view group endpoint is available
- frontend will target the new endpoint

## In v1
- batch create view group endpoint is not available
- frontend will stick to old fake batch view group creation loop


## Gallery
### v2
<img width="1796" height="486" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/932cfe9f-85f1-41cc-a1c4-72a4b5d5a256"
/>

### v1
<img width="1852" height="966" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8aa9df11-cdea-4b12-ae60-118cdf5e257b"
/>
2025-11-04 15:17:55 +01:00
Paul Rastoin 503a5029da Refactor twenty-front metadata api services for v2 (#15360)
# Introduction
Please first review this PR initial base
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15358
In a nutshell refactored the frontend fetchers to display v2 errors
format smoothly
Please note that the v2 now finished the whole validation and does fail
fast anymore ( summary is hardcoded for the moment )
```json
[
  {
    "extensions": {
      "code": "BAD_USER_INPUT",
      "errors": {
        "cronTrigger": [],
        "databaseEventTrigger": [],
        "fieldMetadata": [
          {
            "errors": [
              {
                "code": "INVALID_FIELD_INPUT",
                "message": "Default value should be as quoted string",
                "value": "",
              },
              {
                "code": "INVALID_FIELD_INPUT",
                "message": "Default value "" must be one of the option values",
                "value": "",
              },
            ],
            "flatEntityMinimalInformation": {
              "id": Any<String>,
              "name": "testField",
              "objectMetadataId": Any<String>,
            },
            "status": "fail",
            "type": "create_field",
          },
        ],
        "index": [],
        "objectMetadata": [],
        "routeTrigger": [],
        "serverlessFunction": [],
        "view": [],
        "viewField": [],
        "viewFilter": [],
        "viewGroup": [],
      },
      "message": "Validation failed for 0 object(s) and 0 field(s)",
      "summary": {
        "invalidCronTrigger": 0,
        "invalidDatabaseEventTrigger": 0,
        "invalidFieldMetadata": 0,
        "invalidIndex": 0,
        "invalidObjectMetadata": 0,
        "invalidRouteTrigger": 0,
        "invalidServerlessFunction": 0,
        "invalidView": 0,
        "invalidViewField": 0,
        "invalidViewFilter": 0,
        "invalidViewGroup": 0,
        "totalErrors": 0,
      },
      "userFriendlyMessage": "Validation failed for 0 object(s) and 0 field(s)",
    },
    "message": "Multiple validation errors occurred while creating fields",
    "name": "GraphQLError",
  },
]
```

## What's done
- `usePersistView` tool ( CRUD )
- renamed `usePersistViewX` tools accordingly ( no more records or core
)
- Now catching a lot of before unhandled exceptions
- refactored each services to handle their own exception handlers and
return either the response or the error within a discriminated union
record

## Result
### Primary entity error 
When performing an metadata operation on a given metadata, if validation
errors occurs we will display each of them in a toast
Here while creating an object metadata.
<img width="700" height="327" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0c33d13c-c66c-4749-af36-b253abd3449b"
/>

### Related entity error
Still while creating an object
<img width="700" height="327" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/52607788-c4e9-470c-ac8c-23437345ee5c"
/>

### Translated
<img width="700" height="327" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a7198c20-ae82-47a6-910c-761de9594672"
/>


## Conclusion
This PR is an extract of https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15331
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1776
## Notes
- Not refactor around triggers services as they're not consumed directly
by any frontend services
2025-10-28 10:50:41 +01:00