Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1560
If viewId is defined in a groupBy query, we want to apply all filters of
the view to the query.
This required to move a lot of code from twenty-front to twenty-shared
to convert the filters as stored in the db into graphql filters,
applying the right combinations between filters etc., which was
previously only done in the FE.
This PR does not handle any field filters, it will be done in a later pr
Closes
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/248?issue=twentyhq%7Ccore-team-issues%7C1543
In this PR
- Implementation of groupBy resolver, without pagination, without viewId
parameter
- introduction of new GqlInputTypeDefinitionKind `OrderByWithGroupBy`
which differs from `OrderBy` as it should use aggregations as order by
conditions (e.g.: OrderByWithGroupBy should use avgEmployees and not
employees which does not make sense)
- Minor refacto of all orderBy expressions to use orderBy signature with
`OrderByCondition` which is usable for both groupBy queries and
non-groupBy queries. groupBy queries differ because their orderBy
conditions are based on aggregatedFields (such as avgEmployees) for
which we can't use the same orderBy signature
<img width="728" height="216" alt="Capture d’écran 2025-09-24 à 15 07
14"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/aa5c0875-cf38-4d4b-be70-f4d64da77a41"
/>
- Minor refacto to add table name in aggregates expressions
`(AVG("employees") -> AVG("company"."employees")` to keep having the
table names in the orderBy expression as we already had. Since we use
common utils for orderBy and aggregates on findMany this change also
impacts findMany queries with aggregates. It also impacts field
permission check where we extract the name of the selected fields to
check permission on, so I also updated that (see
`extractColumnNamesFromAggregateExpression`)
Fixes:
- relation one to many cannot be set (we have deprecated limit: keyword
in graphql at it was not use, we should only use first or last)
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14556
Tested :
- workspace needs to flush cache after activating feature flag
- workspace does not need to flush cache if ff false and coming from
previous version (before gql schema gen updates)
## ✨ Add accent-insensitive search functionality
### 🎯 Overview
Implements accent-insensitive search across all searchable fields in
Twenty CRM.
Users can now search for "jose" to find "José", "muller" to find
"Müller", "cafe" to find "café", etc.
### 🔍 Problem
Twenty's search functionality was accent-sensitive, requiring users to
type exact accented characters to find records.
This created a poor user experience, especially for international names
and content.
### 💡 Solution
Added PostgreSQL `unaccent` extension with a custom immutable wrapper
function to enable accent-insensitive full-text search across all
searchable field types.
### 📋 Changes Made
**Modified Files:**
- `packages/twenty-server/scripts/setup-db.ts`
-
`packages/twenty-server/src/engine/api/graphql/graphql-query-runner/utils/compute-where-condition-parts.ts`
-
`packages/twenty-server/src/engine/workspace-manager/workspace-sync-metadata/utils/get-ts-vector-column-expression.util.ts`
### 🗄️ Database Setup (`setup-db.ts`)
```sql
-- Added unaccent extension
CREATE EXTENSION IF NOT EXISTS "unaccent";
-- Created immutable wrapper function
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION unaccent_immutable(text) RETURNS text AS $$
SELECT public.unaccent($1)
$$ LANGUAGE sql IMMUTABLE;
```
### 🔍 Search Vector Generation
(`get-ts-vector-column-expression.util.ts`)
Applied `public.unaccent_immutable()` to all searchable field types:
- TEXT fields (job titles, names, etc.)
- FULL_NAME fields (first/last names)
- EMAILS fields (both email address and domain)
- ADDRESS fields
- LINKS fields
- RICH_TEXT and RICH_TEXT_V2 fields
### 🔎 Query Processing (`compute-where-condition-parts.ts`)
Enhanced search queries to use `public.unaccent_immutable()` for both:
- Full-text search (`@@` operator with `to_tsquery`)
- Pattern matching (`ILIKE` operator)
### 🧠 Technical Rationale: Why the Wrapper Function?
**The Challenge:**
PostgreSQL's built-in `unaccent()` is marked as **STABLE**, but
`GENERATED ALWAYS AS` expressions (used for search vector columns)
require **IMMUTABLE** functions.
**The Solution:**
Created an IMMUTABLE wrapper function that calls the underlying
`unaccent()` function:
- ✅ Satisfies PostgreSQL's immutability requirements for generated
columns
- ✅ Maintains the exact same functionality as the original `unaccent()`
- ✅ Uses fully qualified `public.unaccent_immutable()` to ensure
function resolution from workspace schemas
**Alternative Approaches Considered:**
- ❌ Modifying `search_path`: would affect workspace isolation
- ❌ Computing unaccent at query time: would hurt performance
- ❌ Using triggers: would complicate data consistency
### 🎯 Impact
For **Person** records, accent-insensitive search now works on:
- Name (first/last name): `"jose garcia"` finds `"José García"`
- Email: `"jose@cafe.com"` finds `"josé@café.com"`
- Job Title: `"manager"` finds `"Managér"` or `"Gerente de Café"`
Applies to all searchable standard objects:
- Companies, People, Opportunities, Notes, Tasks, etc.
- Any custom fields of searchable types (TEXT, EMAILS, etc.)
### ✅ Testing
- Database reset completes successfully
- Workspace seeding works without errors
- Search vectors generate with unaccent functionality
- All searchable field types properly handle accented characters
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
We decided to send 4xx errors to sentry from the FE, except for
ForbiddenErrors.
In some cases, we also need not to send to sentry some 4xx errors, like
user input error, because the error stemming from the user input is
unpredictable (ex: duplicate entry for a record with unicity
constraints) and thus acceptable.
Let's add a isExpected extension on UserInputErrors to introduce a
specific behaviour for them (do not send to sentry).
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1417
- The pre-hook creates a page-layout and links it to the dashboard
- Added `position`, `createdBy`, `attachments`, `searchVector`,
`favorites` to the dashboard entity
- Updated the view seed
- Updated the page layout services to work within a transaction
## Context
Views and some other objects "leak" in the core API, this should be
fixed but in the meantime they fail if they use dataloaders because it's
not provided in the core config
```
[
TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'objectMetadataLoader')
]
```
in view.resolver using dataloaders to compute the name field
How to test: query views from /graphql instead of /metadata
Note: we could have a dedicated dataloader service for each gql server in the future
This Pr continues the extensibility journey
- adds a `core.databaseEventTrigger` table
- add a oneToMany relation between `core.serverlessFunction` and
`core.databaseEventTrigger`
- add a job `CallDatabaseEventTriggerJobsJob` triggered by
`EntityEventsToDbListener` triggering `serverlessFunction` based on the
`core.databaseEventTrigger.settings.eventName`
- add a new `trigger-queue` to carry this job
- renamed `DatabaseEventTriggerListener` into
`WorkflowDatabaseEventTriggerListener`
Parallel code path to read and write core views when
IS_CORE_VIEW_ENABLED.
Migrated view key to an enum.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
# Morph Relation needs some work on the core API
Especially on the Morph types
<img width="682" height="394" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-31 at 12 19 40"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8b185ae3-3fe7-4886-97b1-ec143bb1b0f4"
/>
## Focus Areas:
- GraphQL schema generation
- Query parsing and field selection
- Morph relation field support
- Input type definition preparation
In this PR we adapt field permission to two things
1. Connect: the recent insertion of the connect feature introduces the
possibility to have "connect" objects in typeORM's expressionMap's
valueSet, where we previously only had column names (if i followed
correctly). For instance for a person object that a N - 1 relationship
to company, person will have both companyId and company as possible
valueSet keys for the upsert. We need to reflect that in our
`getColumnNameToFieldMetadataIdMap` util that returns a map containing
every possible value we could encounter in valueSet. In an attempt to
tie this to the schema generation where this is introduced, I created
the shallow util extractGraphQLRelationFieldNames (probably ill-named -
im willing to update the name if @etiennejouan has a better idea?) to
remind us that these two are linked.
2. CreateMany: When calling query builders methods directly on custom
object (like we do in graphql-create-many-resolver), we need to be
careful to call them with a selection of readable fields. We had a
debate on whether we should compute this selection containing all
readable fields by default under the hood when no selected fields are
indicated. I am still not 100% convinced as I think it should remain the
caller's responsibility, but this case reminds us that it could easily
be forgotten by developers - although it is all the more the case as we
don't have seeds yet that help us realize that ([PR on the
way](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13646)).
This PR aims to improve performances as we are making A LOT of queries
after having added events emission to the ORM layer. While investigating
issues, I've come across multiple problems I will describe below
## Add index on workspace.activationStatus as we are querying it a lot
As per title
## Add logs on core datasource destroy
It seems that we have postgres connection pool destruction in
production. I cannot reproduce locally but I suspect the Query Timeouts
to be the root cause. I'm fixing most of the Query Timeouts cause in
this PR but I'm adding the logs so we have more information in case in
keeps happening in production.
## GraphQL query runner createMany
It was using a for loop on each record. This is as issue has we will
emit an event separately for each record => we should always try to
batch events.
Replacing by a save on all records. Note that this is not perfect as we
should avoid using save (bad performances), and use insert + updateMany
instead. As I have follow up discussions regarding permissions, I
haven't replaced it by insert and updateMany yet. Using save instead of
a for loop makes the problem less worrying.
## Introduce updateMany in ORM @Weiko @ijreilly FYI
.save(manyRecords) is bad as it's querying the data for no good reason
(and doing a select for each record...).
We already have .insert(), i'm introducing .updateMany()
I think our ORM layer should be simplified a lot but I'm not starting
the refacto yet
## Fixing ORM @Weiko @ijreilly FYI
- Fixing events emission in delete function
- Fixing events emission in insert function
- make sure everything is batched
## Events performance @Weiko @ijreilly FYI
Do not emit timelineActivity db events as this does not seem useful and
is quite heavy
## Messaging and Calendar performance @bosiraphael FYI
Rework many functions to make sure they are batched. This does not touch
the driver layer and I have heavily tested it. (multiple account, with
multiple channels, common thread, common messages, etc...)
## Workflow Trigger relation Fetch performance @martmull FYI
Improved performance by batching
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1262
In this PR we add the update permission check layer by
- for the graphql api: extracting columns to update from the
expressionMap
- for rest api: .save() is used so we need to add the permission layer
to .save directly. We also take advantage of this PR to filter out
non-readable fields from save response (other save returns the whole
entity) - this was planned in
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1216
The current solution does not work with rest api depth 2 queries, but
this seem to already not work on main (for timeout reasons though, so
different). I offer to create a ticket to fix it altogether later.
Weiko