Commit Graph

35 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Guillim 63c8bb9530 morph backend CORE api (#13517)
# Morph Relation needs some work on the core API

Especially on the Morph types

<img width="682" height="394" alt="Screenshot 2025-07-31 at 12 19 40"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8b185ae3-3fe7-4886-97b1-ec143bb1b0f4"
/>


## Focus Areas:
- GraphQL schema generation
- Query parsing and field selection
- Morph relation field support
- Input type definition preparation
2025-08-12 11:47:02 +02:00
Félix Malfait 8b4b9ef8da Change type import rule (#13751)
Forcing "type" to be explicit, works best will rollup on the frontend to
exclude depdendencies
2025-08-08 01:27:05 +02:00
Etienne 58d25ebd83 CreateMany optim - .save -> .updateMany + position (#13704)
fixes : https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1312

---------

Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
2025-08-07 00:52:28 +02:00
Marie 9957057d1f [permissions] Adapt field permissions to connect + createMany (#13655)
In this PR we adapt field permission to two things

1. Connect: the recent insertion of the connect feature introduces the
possibility to have "connect" objects in typeORM's expressionMap's
valueSet, where we previously only had column names (if i followed
correctly). For instance for a person object that a N - 1 relationship
to company, person will have both companyId and company as possible
valueSet keys for the upsert. We need to reflect that in our
`getColumnNameToFieldMetadataIdMap` util that returns a map containing
every possible value we could encounter in valueSet. In an attempt to
tie this to the schema generation where this is introduced, I created
the shallow util extractGraphQLRelationFieldNames (probably ill-named -
im willing to update the name if @etiennejouan has a better idea?) to
remind us that these two are linked.

2. CreateMany: When calling query builders methods directly on custom
object (like we do in graphql-create-many-resolver), we need to be
careful to call them with a selection of readable fields. We had a
debate on whether we should compute this selection containing all
readable fields by default under the hood when no selected fields are
indicated. I am still not 100% convinced as I think it should remain the
caller's responsibility, but this case reminds us that it could easily
be forgotten by developers - although it is all the more the case as we
don't have seeds yet that help us realize that ([PR on the
way](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13646)).
2025-08-06 08:31:52 +00:00
Etienne 3c485ccb37 Upsert in CreateMany - fixes (#13598)
fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13553
and https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1300
2025-08-04 19:06:40 +02:00
Charles Bochet dc3c194f3e Improve messaging sync performances (#13549)
This PR aims to improve performances as we are making A LOT of queries
after having added events emission to the ORM layer. While investigating
issues, I've come across multiple problems I will describe below

## Add index on workspace.activationStatus as we are querying it a lot

As per title

## Add logs on core datasource destroy

It seems that we have postgres connection pool destruction in
production. I cannot reproduce locally but I suspect the Query Timeouts
to be the root cause. I'm fixing most of the Query Timeouts cause in
this PR but I'm adding the logs so we have more information in case in
keeps happening in production.

## GraphQL query runner createMany

It was using a for loop on each record. This is as issue has we will
emit an event separately for each record => we should always try to
batch events.
Replacing by a save on all records. Note that this is not perfect as we
should avoid using save (bad performances), and use insert + updateMany
instead. As I have follow up discussions regarding permissions, I
haven't replaced it by insert and updateMany yet. Using save instead of
a for loop makes the problem less worrying.

## Introduce updateMany in ORM @Weiko @ijreilly FYI

.save(manyRecords) is bad as it's querying the data for no good reason
(and doing a select for each record...).
We already have .insert(), i'm introducing .updateMany()

I think our ORM layer should be simplified a lot but I'm not starting
the refacto yet

## Fixing ORM @Weiko @ijreilly  FYI
- Fixing events emission in delete function
- Fixing events emission in insert function
- make sure everything is batched

## Events performance @Weiko @ijreilly FYI

Do not emit timelineActivity db events as this does not seem useful and
is quite heavy

## Messaging and Calendar performance @bosiraphael FYI

Rework many functions to make sure they are batched. This does not touch
the driver layer and I have heavily tested it. (multiple account, with
multiple channels, common thread, common messages, etc...)

## Workflow Trigger relation Fetch performance @martmull FYI

Improved performance by batching
2025-08-03 23:56:44 +02:00
nitin 4cd2a87833 Enable roles on api keys (#13334) 2025-08-02 23:54:10 +02:00
Etienne 13bed8e4d2 fix createMany resolver when updating softdeleted record (#13425)
Context: updateOne/Many works on soft deleted records but the update of
the upsertMany throws error

fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13195
2025-07-25 14:35:04 +02:00
Etienne 88a6913217 Connect/Disconnect - Add Disconnect logic + Migration to query builders (insert/update) (#13271)
Context : 
Large PR with 600+ test files. Enable connect and disconnect logic in
createMany (upsert true) / updateOne / updateMany resolvers

- Add disconnect logic
- Gather disconnect and connect logic -> called relation nested queries
- Move logic to query builder (insert and update one) with a preparation
step in .set/.values and an execution step in .execute
- Add integration tests

Test : 
- Test API call on updateMany, updateOne, createMany (upsert:true) with
connect/disconnect
2025-07-24 17:04:38 +02:00
Marie ae6adb3a63 [permissions] Add read field permission check layer (part 1) (#13376)
In this PR, behind a feature flag, we add a permission layer check based
on the read permission.
It is done by computing a map of an object's fields, where keys are the
column names and values the fieldMetadata id, making them comparable to
the restricted fields ids list stored in the permission cache.

For mutations (create, update, delete, destroy), we need to check the
read permission on the returned field, as they may differ from the
updated field. The write field permission will be tackled in a different
PR.
2025-07-23 15:25:34 +00:00
Weiko 2deac9448e Add db event emitter in twenty orm (#13167)
## Context
Add an eventEmitter instance to twenty datasources so we can emit DB
events.
Add input and output formatting to twenty orm (formatData, formatResult)
Those 2 elements simplified existing logic when we interact with the
ORM, input will be formatted by the ORM so we can directly use
field-like structure instead of column-like. The output will be
formatted, for builder queries it will be in `result.generatedMaps`
where `result.raw` preserves the previous column-like structure.

Important change: We now have an authContext that we can pass when we
get a repository, this will be used for the different events emitted in
the ORM. We also removed the caching for repositories as it was not
scaling well and not necessary imho

Note: An upcoming PR should handle the onDelete: cascade behavior where
we send DESTROY events in cascade when there is an onDelete: CASCADE on
the FK.

---------

Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
2025-07-17 18:07:28 +02:00
Marie fca39d317f Restrict queried columns to graphql-requested fields (#13246)
Fixes
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/255?issue=twentyhq%7Ccore-team-issues%7C1214.

Until then, in the endpoints of our dynamic schema, we were querying all
columns and then formatting the result by removing the non-requested
fields (fields not mentioned in the graphql Query) from the result.
This is not compatible with field-level permissions that we are about to
introduce because users would see their request denied if they have
restricted rights on any of the fields of the objects they are querying,
even if they did not query it in the first place.
To prepare for this change, we are restricting the list of queried
columns to those made necessary by the graphql query.

I only made the changes in the dynamic schema for now. We will
potentially need to do updates to other part of the app that use
createQueryBuilder directly or not (for instance, when calling
repository methods such as .findOne()), but they mostly regard system
objects that are not subject to permissions or are executed by entities
that bypass permission such as jobs creating People and Companies from
their email sync.
No changes have been brought to existingRecords related logic in the
dynamic schema because @Weiko is currently working on it, so I may need
to adapt the new logic after he is done.

No feature flag have been added so far as this should not change
anything at the moment.
2025-07-17 14:59:41 +02:00
Charles Bochet d5c974054d Improve performance on metadata computation (#12785)
In this PR:

## Improve recompute metadata cache performance. We are aiming for
~100ms

Deleting relationMetadata table and FKs pointing on it
Fetching indexMetadata and indexFieldMetadata in a separate query as
typeorm is suboptimizing

## Remove caching lock

As recomputing the metadata cache is lighter, we try to stop preventing
multiple concurrent computations. This also simplifies interfaces

## Introduce self recovery mecanisms to recompute cache automatically if
corrupted

Aka getFreshObjectMetadataMaps

## custom object resolver performance improvement:  1sec to 200ms

Double check queries and indexes used while creating a custom object
Remove the queries to db to use the cached objectMetadataMap

## reduce objectMetadataMaps to 500kb
<img width="222" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2370dc80-49b6-4b63-8d5e-30c5ebdaa062"
/>

We used to stored 3 fieldMetadataMaps (byId, byName, byJoinColumnName).
While this is great for devXP, this is not great for performances.
Using the same mecanisme as for objectMetadataMap: we only keep byIdMap
and introduce two otherMaps to idByName, idByJoinColumnName to make the
bridge

## Add dataloader on IndexMetadata (aka indexMetadataList in the API)

## Improve field resolver performances too

## Deprecate ClientConfig
2025-06-23 21:06:17 +02:00
Etienne facd2fe26f Import - fix import with multiple unique constraints (#12784)
Test : 
- For company for example, in import, update of domainName works (Export
companies, import them updating domainName.primaryLink)
2025-06-23 15:10:41 +00:00
Marie e1a7fa3e5d [permissions] Override workspaceDatasource.createQueryBuilder (#12415)
In the frame of https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/924

- Rename dataSource -> workspaceDataSource when relevant to ease
understandability
- override workspaceDataSource.createQueryBuilder, because we don't want
developers to use it directly since it does not run permission checks at
this level. Indeed, we cannot do so because 1) datasources are shared
between roles so we would need to re-think its implementation to make
that possible, while for now we never call
workspaceDatasource.createQueryBuilder in our codebase 2)
workspaceEntityManager.createQueryBuilder, that we have overriden with
permission checks, then performs a call to
workspaceDataSource.createQueryBuilder so that would make two permission
checks.
2025-06-02 16:37:23 +00:00
martmull 196d8c97a4 Add relations in database event trigger output data (#11820)
## Done
- add relations in dropdown variables
- add relations in worklfow run inputs
- use objectMetadataMaps in workflow folder

## To do
- does not work with rest api calls, will be fixed after
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11349 is merged
- waiting for crud action relation fields
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/509
2025-05-27 20:46:15 +02:00
Etienne ddab513c0b patch messages in thread (#12191)
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12190
2025-05-23 10:24:13 +00:00
martmull 8e2d0139ed Emit proper event on createOrUpdate csv import operation (#12163)
- use proper event emitter when upserting records with csv import
- After:


https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8303da38-2e35-4f4c-bb13-8a7a222971b7
2025-05-21 11:59:50 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 442f8dbe3c [QRQC_2] No implicitAny in twenty-server (#12075)
# Introduction
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/12068
Related with https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/975

We're enabling `noImplicitAny` handled few use case manually, added a
`ts-expect-error` to the others, we should plan to handle them in the
future
2025-05-15 18:23:22 +02:00
Paul Rastoin a8423e8503 [QRQC_2] No explicit any in twenty-server (#12068)
# Introduction

Added a no-explicit-any rule to the twenty-server, not applicable to
tests and integration tests folder

Related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/975
Discussed with Charles

## In case of conflicts
Until this is approved I won't rebased and handle conflict, just need to
drop two latest commits and re run the scripts etc

## Legacy
We decided not to handle the existing lint error occurrences and
programmatically ignored them through a disable next line rule comment

## Open question
We might wanna activate the
[no-explicit-any](https://typescript-eslint.io/rules/no-explicit-any/)
`ignoreRestArgs` for our use case ?
```
    ignoreRestArgs?: boolean;
```

---------

Co-authored-by: etiennejouan <jouan.etienne@gmail.com>
2025-05-15 16:26:38 +02:00
Marie f782f4dcd8 Fix CSV import upsert (#12048)
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/11864 and
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/908

We should not send `createManyXXX` mutations with FE-forged ids in the
payload if we want to do an upsert, because that 1) prevents records
from being merged 2) triggers optimistic rendering while we can't know
before-hand which records will actually be created and which records
will only be updated

Also noticed createdBy was being overriden even for records we are
updating and not creating, which did not seem right, so fixed that too
2025-05-15 14:44:31 +02:00
Charles Bochet 45d4845b26 Remove old relations (#11993)
This is a first PR to remove old relation logic

Next steps:
- remove relationMetadata from cache
- remove relationMetadata table content and structure
- refactor relationDefinition to leverage field.settings instead
2025-05-13 11:28:22 +02:00
Marie 4257f30f12 Permission checks on twentyORM global manager (#11477)
In this PR we are handling permissions when using
twentyORMGlobalManager,
and handling permissions for rest api and api key
2025-04-23 17:57:48 +02:00
Jérémy M cc29c25176 feat: new relation sync-metadata, twenty-orm, create/update (#10217)
Fix
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/330#issue-2827026606
and
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/327#issue-2827001814

What this PR does when `isNewRelationEnabled` is set to `true`:
- [x] Drop the creation of the  foreign key as a `FieldMetadata`
- [x] Stop creating `RelationMetadata`
- [x] Properly fill `FieldMetadata` of type `RELATION` during the sync
command
- [x] Use new relation settings in TwentyORM
- [x] Properly create `FieldMetadata` relations when we create a new
object
- [x] Handle `database:reset` with new relations

---------

Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
2025-04-22 19:01:39 +02:00
Marie 162c6bcaa3 [permissions] Implement object-records permissions in query builders (#11458)
In this PR we are

- (if permissionsV2 is enabled) executing permission checks at query
builder level. To do so we want to override the query builders methods
that are performing db calls (.execute(), .getMany(), ... etc.) For now
I have just overriden some of the query builders methods for the poc. To
do so I created custom query builder classes that extend typeorm's query
builder (selectQueryBuilder and updateQueryBuilder, for now and later I
will tackle softDeleteQueryBuilder, etc.).
- adding a notion of roles permissions version and roles permissions
object to datasources. We will now use one datasource per roleId and
rolePermissionVersion. Both rolesPermissionsVersion and rolesPermissions
objects are stored in redis and recomputed at role update or if queried
and found empty. Unlike for metadata version we don't need to store a
version in the db that stands for the source of truth. We also don't
need to destroy and recreate the datasource if the rolesPermissions
version changes, but only to update the value for rolesPermissions and
rolesPermissionsVersions on the existing datasource.

What this PR misses
- computing of roles permissions should take into account
objectPermissions table (for now it only looks at what's on the roles
table)
- pursue extension of query builder classes and overriding of their db
calling-methods
- what should the behaviour be for calls from twentyOrmGlobalManager
that don't have a roleId?
2025-04-11 17:34:02 +02:00
Félix Malfait aa5da92555 Improve upsert for spreadsheet import (#11283)
Refactor query runner to improve the import method for upserts, we now
take into account any unique field and prevent any conflict upfront.
Previously, we would only update if an `id` was passed.



https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8087b864-ba42-4b6e-abf2-b9ea66e6c467


This is only a first step, there are other things to fix on the frontend
for this to work.
2025-04-01 15:27:08 +02:00
Weiko 0234c8d707 Fix featureFlag N+1 queries (#10261)
## Context
Regression was introduced 3 weeks ago when we added relations v2.
Because the relation logic is recursive during the life of a request, we
were querying the featureFlags many times.

We are now always using the featureFlag map and it's now available in
the base resolver so we don't need to query it everywhere, preferably
passing it as a parameter instead.

Note: We should introduce a cache for featureFlags in the future, this
is something easy to control and invalidate when needed.
2025-02-18 14:43:42 +01:00
Jérémy M 07197d1e6d feat: new relation in graphql-query-runner (#9883)
Fix https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/300

Within GraphQLQueryRunner the new relation format will be used when the
feature flag `IsNewRelationEnabled` is set to true.
2025-01-29 17:04:39 +01:00
Weiko 1c04b2b0b7 [Flexible-schema] Refactor gql query runner to emit api event before processing to gql types (#8596)
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/8300

## Context
API events were created too late and were already formatted as Gql
responses (including nesting with edges/node/type + formatting that
should not exist in an event payload). This PR moves the emit logic to
the resolver where we actually do the DB query
Note: Also added RESTORED events
2024-11-21 18:11:28 +01:00
Marie a799370483 Aggregated queries #1 (#8345)
First step of https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6868

Adds min.., max.. queries for DATETIME fields
adds min.., max.., avg.., sum.. queries for NUMBER fields 

(count distinct operation and composite fields such as CURRENCY handling
will be dealt with in a future PR)

<img width="1422" alt="Capture d’écran 2024-11-06 à 15 48 46"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4bcdece0-ad3e-4536-9720-fe4044a36719">

---------

Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
2024-11-14 18:05:05 +01:00
Félix Malfait b792d2a4d3 Add unique indexes and indexes for composite types (#7162)
Add support for indexes on composite fields and unicity constraint on
indexes

This pull request includes several changes across multiple files to
improve error handling, enforce unique constraints, and update database
migrations. The most important changes include updating error messages
for snack bars, adding a new command to enforce unique constraints, and
updating database migrations to include new fields and constraints.

### Error Handling Improvements:
*
[`packages/twenty-front/src/modules/error-handler/components/PromiseRejectionEffect.tsx`](diffhunk://#diff-e7dc05ced8e4730430f5c7fcd0c75b3aa723da438c26e0bef8130b614427dd9aL23-R23):
Updated error messages in `enqueueSnackBar` to use `error.message`
directly.
*
[`packages/twenty-front/src/modules/object-metadata/hooks/useFindManyObjectMetadataItems.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-74c126d6bc7a5ed6b63be994d298df6669058034bfbc367b11045f9f31a3abe6L44-R46):
Simplified error messages in `enqueueSnackBar`.
*
[`packages/twenty-front/src/modules/object-record/hooks/useFindDuplicateRecords.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-af23a1d99639a66c251f87473e63e2b7bceaa4ee4f70fedfa0fcffe5c7d79181L56-R58):
Simplified error messages in `enqueueSnackBar`.
*
[`packages/twenty-front/src/modules/object-record/hooks/useHandleFindManyRecordsError.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-da04296cbe280202a1eaf6b1244a30490d4f400411bee139651172c59719088eL22-R24):
Simplified error messages in `enqueueSnackBar`.

### New Command for Unique Constraints:
*
[`packages/twenty-server/src/database/commands/upgrade-version/0-31/0-31-enforce-unique-constraints.command.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-8337096c8c80dd2619a5ba691ae5145101f8ae0368a75192a050047e8c6ab7cbR1-R159):
Added a new command to enforce unique constraints on company domain
names and person emails.
*
[`packages/twenty-server/src/database/commands/upgrade-version/0-31/0-31-upgrade-version.command.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-20215e9981a53c7566e9cbff96715685125878f5bcb84fe461a7440f2e68f6fcR13-R14):
Integrated the new `EnforceUniqueConstraintsCommand` into the upgrade
process.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-20215e9981a53c7566e9cbff96715685125878f5bcb84fe461a7440f2e68f6fcR13-R14)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-20215e9981a53c7566e9cbff96715685125878f5bcb84fe461a7440f2e68f6fcR31)
[[3]](diffhunk://#diff-20215e9981a53c7566e9cbff96715685125878f5bcb84fe461a7440f2e68f6fcR64-R68)
*
[`packages/twenty-server/src/database/commands/upgrade-version/0-31/0-31-upgrade-version.module.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-da52814efc674c25ed55645f8ee2561013641a407f88423e705dd6c77b405527R7):
Registered the new `EnforceUniqueConstraintsCommand` in the module.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-da52814efc674c25ed55645f8ee2561013641a407f88423e705dd6c77b405527R7)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-da52814efc674c25ed55645f8ee2561013641a407f88423e705dd6c77b405527R24)

### Database Migrations:
*
[`packages/twenty-server/src/database/typeorm/metadata/migrations/1726757368824-migrationDebt.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-c450aeae7bc0ef4416a0ade2dc613ca3f688629f35d2a32f90a09c3f494febdcR1-R53):
Added a migration to update the `relationMetadata_ondeleteaction_enum`
and set default values.
*
[`packages/twenty-server/src/database/typeorm/metadata/migrations/1726757368825-addIsUniqueToIndexMetadata.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-8f1e14bd7f6835ec2c3bb39bcc51e3c318a3008d576a981e682f4c985e746fbfR1-R19):
Added a migration to include the `isUnique` field in `indexMetadata`.
*
[`packages/twenty-server/src/database/typeorm/metadata/migrations/1726762935841-addCompostiveColumnToIndexFieldMetadata.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-7c96b7276c7722d41ff31de23b2de4d6e09adfdc74815356ba63bc96a2669440R1-R19):
Added a migration to include the `compositeColumn` field in
`indexFieldMetadata`.
*
[`packages/twenty-server/src/database/typeorm/metadata/migrations/1726766871572-addWhereToIndexMetadata.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-26651295a975eb50e672dce0e4e274e861f66feb1b68105eee5a04df32796190R1-R14):
Added a migration to include the `indexWhereClause` field in
`indexMetadata`.

### GraphQL Exception Handling:
*
[`packages/twenty-server/src/engine/api/graphql/workspace-query-runner/utils/workspace-query-runner-graphql-api-exception-handler.util.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-58445eb362dc89e31107777d39b592d7842d2ab09a223012ccd055da325270a8R1-R4):
Enhanced exception handling for `QueryFailedError` to provide more
specific error messages for unique constraint violations.
[[1]](diffhunk://#diff-58445eb362dc89e31107777d39b592d7842d2ab09a223012ccd055da325270a8R1-R4)
[[2]](diffhunk://#diff-58445eb362dc89e31107777d39b592d7842d2ab09a223012ccd055da325270a8R23-R59)
*
[`packages/twenty-server/src/engine/api/graphql/workspace-resolver-builder/factories/create-many-resolver.factory.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-233d58ab2333586dd45e46e33d4f07e04a4b8adde4a11a48e25d86985e5a7943L58-R58):
Updated the `workspaceQueryRunnerGraphqlApiExceptionHandler` call to
include context.
*
[`packages/twenty-server/src/engine/api/graphql/workspace-resolver-builder/factories/create-one-resolver.factory.ts`](diffhunk://#diff-68b803f0762c407f5d2d1f5f8d389655a60654a2dd2394a81318655dcd44dc43L58-R58):
Updated the `workspaceQueryRunnerGraphqlApiExceptionHandler` call to
include context.

---------

Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
2024-10-13 10:21:03 +02:00
Weiko d5bd320b8d Add DestroyMany to graphql query runner (#7507)
## Context
destroyMany was not implemented, this PR adds it
2024-10-08 17:40:48 +02:00
Weiko 511150a2d3 Refactor graphql query runner and add mutation resolvers (#7418)
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/6859

This PR adds all the remaining resolvers for
- updateOne/updateMany
- createOne/createMany
- deleteOne/deleteMany
- destroyOne
- restoreMany

Also
- refactored the graphql-query-runner to be able to add other resolvers
without too much boilerplate.
- add missing events that were not sent anymore as well as webhooks
- make resolver injectable so they can inject other services as well
- use objectMetadataMap from cache instead of computing it multiple time
- various fixes (mutation not correctly parsing JSON, relationHelper
fetching data with empty ids set, ...)

Next steps: 
- Wrapping query builder to handle DB events properly
- Move webhook emitters to db event listener
- Add pagination where it's missing (findDuplicates, nested relations,
etc...)
2024-10-04 11:58:33 +02:00
Weiko 02618b3e6a Fix graphql query createMany resolver with nested relations (#7061)
Looks like insert() does not return foreign keys. We could eventually
call findMany after but it seems that's what save() is doing so I'm
replacing insert with save.
```typescript
/**
 * Flag to determine whether the entity that is being persisted
 * should be reloaded during the persistence operation.
 *
 * It will work only on databases which does not support RETURNING / OUTPUT statement.
 * Enabled by default.
 */
reload?: boolean;
```

Note: save() also does an upsert by default with no way to configure
that so if we want to keep that behaviour we will need to add a check
before
```typescript
if (args.upsert) {
    const existingRecords = await repository.findBy({
      id: Any(args.data.map((record) => record.id)),
    });
    ...
```

---------

Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
2024-09-18 18:45:52 +02:00
Weiko 37d85a716a [flexible-schema] Add createOne/createMany with upsert to graphql query runner (#7041)
## Context
This PR introduces createOne/createMany through the new graphql query
runner.
Trying to use twentyOrm wrapper as much as possible, in this case here
the args are already converted from "metadata-like" structure (including
composite fields) as graphql input to typeorm / raw columns (I had to
introduce a little fix there).

Keep in mind that I'm not using the new graphql query runner parsing
classes here, especially the selected-fields part, because typeorm
already returns all the record columns in the InsertResult object
(including default values such as id, createdAt, ...). That also means
relation objects will be returned as NULL in the gql response but we
don't handle nested creation for the moment so it should be fine.

Note: also removing the feature flag from findOne/findMany
2024-09-16 12:20:04 +02:00