61c72942acd57ff96d247997eb012e052a5dcdc8
4 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Paul Rastoin
|
0c545bcdeb |
[BREAKING-CHANGE] Centralize system View viewField side effect (#23081)
# Introduction Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/2669 Part of the `isSystemSideEffect` engine-ownership effort. Until now, a custom object's default **INDEX** table view (`All {objectLabelPlural}`) and its view fields were built imperatively in `ObjectMetadataService` with random `v4()` identifiers, while `twenty-standard` authored its own copies with hardcoded literals. The two never converged, an object rename could drift the view, and nothing marked these rows as engine-owned. This PR makes the metadata side-effect engine the **single owner** of the INDEX view and its view fields, on name-free deterministic identifiers, for custom and standard objects alike. ## Core design - **Name-free deterministic identity.** The INDEX view identifier derives from `object identifier + ViewKey.INDEX` (`getSystemViewUniversalIdentifier`); each view-field identifier derives from `view identifier + field identifier` (`getViewFieldUniversalIdentifier`). An object rename (with a pinned object identifier) keeps the same view, losslessly. - **`isSystemSideEffect: true` is provenance.** Every INDEX view / view field the engine emits is flagged system-owned, so manifest deletion inference never drops it. The flag follows the view: a view field inherits its parent view's flag. - **The engine is the sole owner of the INDEX view.** It always emits it; a caller providing one with the same derived identifier is a genuine conflict surfaced by the engine's reserved-identifier collision, not silently deferred. ## Changes ### Shared (`twenty-shared`) - `getIndexViewUniversalIdentifier` → `getSystemViewUniversalIdentifier`, now taking a `viewKey` (generalizes to any singleton engine-owned view). - Standard field identifiers extracted into a new `STANDARD_OBJECT_FIELDS` constant, so both an object's `fields` and its INDEX view read the same field identifiers. - `buildStandardObjectIndexView` derives the standard INDEX view + view-field identifiers from `STANDARD_OBJECT_FIELDS`, replacing the hardcoded literals in `standard-object.constant.ts`. ### Metadata side-effect engine (custom objects) - **`objectSystemFieldsAndIndexViewOnCreate`** (replaces `objectSystemFieldsOnCreate`): on object creation, provisions the 7 reserved system fields **and** the INDEX view with one view field per displayable system field, all `isSystemSideEffect: true`. - **`fieldIndexViewFieldOnCreate`** (new): on field creation, provisions the field's INDEX view field. Object created in the same batch → visible, positioned before the system view fields; pre-existing object → hidden, appended (preserving the historical `createOneField` behavior). Both branches resolve the INDEX view by its derived identifier (single map access, never a scan). - **`fieldSystemViewFieldsOnDelete`** (new): on field deletion, cascade-deletes every engine-owned view field displaying it. - **`objectSystemSideEffectsOnDelete`** (extended): now also cascade-deletes the object's engine-owned views and their view fields (in addition to system fields, indexes, searchFieldMetadata). Every lookup walks a foreign-key aggregator down from the deleted object, so the work is proportional to what the object owns, never to workspace size. - Object-create and field-create positions are derived from the same caller-input field list, so the INDEX view layout is contiguous with no handler-ordering dependency. - `view` / `viewField` added to the side-effect companion metadata names for `fieldMetadata` and `objectMetadata`. ### Reserved-identifier invariant A caller can never define an entity whose identifier collides with one a system side effect produces: caller inputs are forced `isSystemSideEffect: false` at every entry point (API and app-manifest transpilers), and the engine raises `RESERVED_SYSTEM_UNIVERSAL_IDENTIFIER`, aborting the operation, when a system emission lands on a caller-claimed identifier. Covered by a new engine-level test. ### Caller-side provisioning removed The imperative INDEX view + view-field provisioning is removed from `ObjectMetadataService.createOneObject`. The record-page `FIELDS_WIDGET` view is intentionally left caller-side and deferred to the follow-up (see below). ### `twenty-standard` convergence Standard INDEX views and their view fields converge on the same derived-identifier + `isSystemSideEffect: true` scheme as the engine. `twenty-standard` syncs through the from/to migration path (which never runs the side-effect engine), so it authors this INDEX surface itself, matching what the engine produces for custom objects. ## Rollout Two `2.26.0` workspace commands, running after the `2.25` messageCampaign commands: - `upgrade:2-26:reconcile-index-view-universal-identifier` re-owns the INDEX views of the **twenty-standard and workspace-custom applications** and all their view fields to the derived identifiers with `isSystemSideEffect: true`, in a single per-workspace transaction. Each view field identifier is keyed on the application of the **displayed field** (an app or user column on a standard INDEX view converges too). Soft-deleted views and view fields are skipped: one can coexist with an active successor on the same derivation inputs and both would derive the same identifier. Children reference the view by primary key, so the re-own is lossless. - `upgrade:2-26:demote-and-backfill-application-index-view` handles **manifest-installed applications**, which never had their INDEX view auto-provisioned: every caller-authored INDEX view of another application is demoted to `key: null` (a plain additional view under its manifest identifier), then every application object gets the engine-owned INDEX view and its full view-field layout backfilled through the migration pipeline's legacy path (no side-effect expansion), views committed before view fields across applications since a view field belongs to the application owning its field. Idempotent and retry-safe: engine-owned INDEX views are neither demoted nor re-backfilled, and view creation and view-field creation are gated independently, so a retry after a partial failure still backfills the missing view fields of an already-committed view. Both support `--dry-run` and invalidate the full flat-maps closure (parents aggregate the re-owned identifiers, children resolve them as universal foreign keys, and page-layout widget universal configurations resolve view PKs at cache-build time). The `2.25` `upgrade:2-25:add-message-campaign-name-field` command is adapted to resolve the campaign INDEX view by its INDEX key on the object instead of by universal identifier: it now runs before the reconcile, on workspaces still holding legacy identifiers. ## ⚠️ Breaking change This PR **mutates 187 previously hardcoded universal identifiers** — the standard objects' INDEX views and their view fields (the literals removed from `standard-object.constant.ts`), now derived. - **Handled by the `2.26` commands above** for all existing workspaces. - **The INDEX key is now engine-reserved.** The flat view validator rejects caller-created INDEX views (API and manifest inputs are forced `isSystemSideEffect: false`) and enforces a single non-deleted INDEX view per object; `view.key` is no longer a comparable/updatable property, so no writer can promote or demote a view after creation. `ViewManifest.key` is deprecated and ignored (manifest views are always additional views, so old apps keep syncing and demoted views are not promoted back); the REST/GraphQL create path now rejects `key: INDEX`. In-repo example apps (`hello-world`, `document-generator`) no longer declare it. - **12 declared-but-never-seeded standard INDEX view field identifiers deleted** (the former `preservedViewFields` on `timelineActivity`, `workflowRun` and `workspaceMember`): after the reconcile, no workspace row references them. - **`computeFlatViewFieldsToCreate` now derives view field identifiers** instead of drawing `v4()` ones, which also changes what the committed `1-23` record-page backfill produces going forward (deliberate, documented in-code). - **Record-page views and view fields are not affected** (identifiers unchanged). - **In-repo apps: `twenty-last-contact` updated.** It was the only app declaring explicit INDEX view fields (10 columns across `allPeople` / `allCompanies` / `allOpportunities`) through manifest `viewFields`. Those target identifiers are now engine-owned and derived, so the manifest inputs no longer resolve and install failed with `View not found`. The app now declares only its fields; the engine's `fieldIndexViewFieldOnCreate` provisions the matching INDEX view field automatically. No other app under `packages/twenty-apps` references any of the 187 mutated identifiers, and apps that target standard views point at record-page views (e.g. `real-estate` → `opportunityRecordPageFields`) or their own objects (`twenty-partners`), all unchanged. ### Loss of granularity for app maintainers The engine now owns the INDEX view field of every field a caller adds to an object, so app maintainers lose direct control over those columns. Previously an app could target the engine-owned INDEX view with an explicit manifest `viewField` and set its `position` and `isVisible`. Now `fieldIndexViewFieldOnCreate` appends a **hidden** view field in caller-input order on field creation, so: - Columns an app previously showed at a **dedicated position** and **visible** (e.g. `twenty-last-contact`'s last-contact columns) become **hidden** and **appended in input order** after install. - There is currently **no manifest way to override** the engine-provisioned INDEX view field's position, visibility, or size. This is a deliberate regression accepted for the sake of single-ownership, and app maintainers should expect their INDEX columns to move/hide after upgrading. A follow-up override API will let maintainers reclaim per-field control over the engine-provisioned INDEX view field. ## Testing - Unit specs for each handler: object create (system fields + INDEX view/view fields, override, position offset), field create (same-batch vs existing-object, non-displayable noop, no-INDEX-view noop), field delete, object delete (fields/indexes/searchFieldMetadata/views/view fields cascade, reverse-relation view field on another object). - Engine-level test for the reserved-identifier collision. - `twenty-standard` guard test that its INDEX views/view fields stay on the derived scheme and stay system-owned. - Integration test: full engine provisioning of the INDEX view/view fields on object creation, same view id preserved across an object rename, and cascade delete on object deletion. ## Follow-up The full record-page stack (record-page view, its view fields, view field groups, page layout / tab / widget) is still built imperatively and moves into the engine in https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/2721. |
||
|
nitin
|
79f3a5243a |
Add callAppRoute to RestApiClient (#22863)
Adds a `callAppRoute` method to `RestApiClient` in `twenty-client-sdk/rest`. It calls one of the app's own HTTP routes using the injected `TWENTY_FUNCTIONS_URL`, resolved internally the same way the client already resolves `TWENTY_API_URL`, so app code no longer reads env vars or knows how function routes are hosted. Both app runtimes already go through `RestApiClient` for route calls (logic functions and front components), so both get this in one place; front components keep the existing 401 token-refresh flow. Pairs with #22825, which makes the injected `TWENTY_FUNCTIONS_URL` callable in every topology (app custom domain -> workspace isolated functions domain -> `SERVER_URL/s`). Once this ships in an SDK release, Call Recorder's own-route plumbing (logic-function and front-component utils) drops its URL resolution and calls `client.callAppRoute(path, body)`. --------- Co-authored-by: martmull <martmull@hotmail.fr> Co-authored-by: cubic-dev-ai[bot] <191113872+cubic-dev-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
martmull
|
23cae2040a |
Improve application asset management (#22564)
App manifests could point the logo and screenshots at either external
URLs or public folder paths, and that was handled inconsistently across
install, sync and the marketplace.
This makes assets always bundled files:
- Manifests now use `logo` and `galleryImages` (a `string[]` of public
folder paths) instead of `logoUrl` and `screenshots`. The old fields
still work but are deprecated. Gallery order comes from the array index.
Normalization (deprecated-field migration, and warning about + ignoring
external URLs) happens in `defineApplication`, so the warnings surface
at define time.
- Logo is stored as a File record (`logoFileId`).
- The registration gallery is configured via a `settings` jsonb column
on `applicationRegistration` (`{ galleryImages: string[] }`) — populated
from the manifest, read by the marketplace detail (falling back to the
legacy `screenshots` column, then the manifest). No dedicated gallery
table.
- The marketplace detail DTO and front now use `galleryImages`.
Verified against a local Postgres: the fast instance commands run with
no pending-migration diff, the schema is correct, and the server boots.
Typecheck, lint, codegen and the application unit tests pass.
Not included yet: rehosting assets into storage for npm catalog and
tarball registrations, versioned cache busting on the serving route, and
a backfill for existing installs.
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22564?utm_source=github"
rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">``<img alt="Review
in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg">``</a>
|
||
|
martmull
|
07a921f8ca |
Add Document Generator SDK app + step-by-step tutorial (#22522)
## What & why
This adds a **guided tutorial** that teaches the Twenty SDK by building
one real, useful app end to end — plus the finished app itself, ready
for the marketplace.
The app, **Document Generator**, turns reusable templates into
personalized documents using CRM data: write a template once with
`{{placeholders}}`, then generate a filled-in document for any Person or
Company from the command menu, an AI agent, or a workflow.
## Two parts
**1. The app — `packages/twenty-apps/public/document-generator`**
Each capability maps to one tutorial chapter:
- **Data:** `documentTemplate` + `document` objects, fields, and a
bidirectional relation
- **Logic:** a single `generate-document` handler exposed as an **AI
tool**, a **workflow action**, and an **HTTP POST route**; plus a public
**HTML view route**
- **UI:** two views + sidebar navigation, a **command-menu item** (on
Person selection) that opens a **React front component**
- **AI:** an agent + skill; a default application role; marketplace
metadata + logo
- **Tests:** unit tests for the template renderer + an install
integration test
**2. The tutorial —
`packages/twenty-docs/.../apps/tutorials/document-generator/`**
A six-chapter series under **Developers › Apps › Tutorial** (Overview →
Data model → Generating documents → HTTP routes → Building the UI → AI
agent → Publishing). Minimal prose, paste-ready code, inline links to
the matching reference pages, and real screenshots. Registers a new
"Tutorial" nav group and regenerates `docs.json` + the navigation
template.
## Verification
Validated against a running Twenty instance (`twenty-app-dev` on
`:2020`):
- `twenty dev --once` installs cleanly (28 metadata objects created)
- Generated a real document from a Person — placeholders resolved (name,
job title, `company.name`, email), zero missing tokens
- Command menu → front component → generate flow works in the UI
- Public HTML view route renders the document
- App gates green: `yarn lint` (0/0), `yarn typecheck`, `yarn test:unit`
(7/7)
All screenshots in the tutorial are captured from this run.
## Notes
- Left out per-app CI workflows (`.github/workflows`) to keep scope
tight — happy to add them if wanted.
https://claude.ai/code/session_012FoC76zPbPmpgtN7MXMPwy
---
_Generated by [Claude
Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_012FoC76zPbPmpgtN7MXMPwy)_
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22522?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
|
