TODO:
- [ ] It should not be possible to add tasks, notes, files, etc.
Fix for https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/7172
Note for reviewer:
- With these changes, `deletedAt` is now always included in
`recordGqlFields`.
--- Edit from Charles --
In this PR:
1) As mentionned by @pau-not-paul, we are adding deletedAt to our
recordGqlFields for board and table
2) I'm removing cellReadOnly logic, it is now fully computed using
useIsFieldValueReadonly like it's done in other places, there is no need
to maintain two read only systems
3) refactoring useIsFieldValueReadonly to take all the business logics
into one place together. It's now a function of the 5 factors (isRemote,
isDeleted, objectName, fieldName, etc...). Later it's likely to get back
to a function of Pick<FieldMetadata>, Pick<ObjectMetadata>,
record.isDeleted but we are not there yet
Note: as all cells are listening to the record (for isDeleted), updating
a field will trigger a re-rendering of the row which is not an issue
right now. It will be if we introduce bulk edition. In this case we
would need to use a selector on fields on top of record store
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
We were not handling relations in the search resolver, which started
being an issue as we query those relations in the combinedSearch queries
(introduced here https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/8564); they
were nullified in the response payload. The response was overwriting
findManyRecords results in the cache as it contained the exact same
fields.
So we now
1. Handle relations in the search resolver
2. Stop querying relations in search queries (no use)
Something changed, which affected the Favorite folder picker checkbox
styles -- fixed it!
Cleaned up code in `CurrentWorkspaceMemberFavoritesFolders` - removed
redundant filtering since favorites are already filtered in
`usePrefetchedFavoritesData`.
Regarding issue #8569 - I am not sure what to do in this case. Since
Folders data is gated by a feature flag, we can't use it in
`CurrentWorkspaceMemberFavoritesFolders` to ensure the favorite section
renders with empty folders. Currently, the section only appears when at
least one favorite exists - may be leave this section open at all times
or fix this bug after removal of the feature flag?
---------
Co-authored-by: Nitin Koche <nitinkoche@Nitins-MacBook-Pro.local>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Fixes: #8552
1. Summary
It seems table cell content is missing `white-space: nowrap`, so it
breaks the content into multiple lines when there are spaces or such.
2. Solution
Set `white-space: nowrap` for the table cell container so it always
takes a single line regardless of the length of the content.
3. Recording
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a42a2e80-d1fc-43b1-bf87-d52bf0367a88
Here we add the option for Text inputs to be wrapped, and to select on
how many lines text should be displayed.
Fix#7552
---------
Co-authored-by: guillim <guillaume@twenty.com>
This PR is preparing states to we'll be able to handle view groups
correctly with table data.
RowIds are now stores in 2 component states, one storing ids by view
group and another storing all the rowIds.
We're doing that because some other state like focus, or select must not
be scoped by view group id.
# Description
Closes#8169
Extract Add New button from entitiesToSelect and add it as a separate
element .
There doesn't seem to be a point in having Add New as part of a list, it
seems better off in its own component, apart from list items
## Rationale
There already is #8353 addressing the same issue, but it seems it
doesn't really remove the duplicate "Add New" in the list, leaving a
duplicate "Add New" in `SingleEntitySelect`
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
- Create a new component state `contextStoreFiltersComponentState` and
refactor `contextStoreTargetedRecordsRuleComponentState`
- Refactor `computeContextStoreFilters` to use filters when no records
are selected
This PR was created by [GitStart](https://gitstart.com/) to address the
requirements from this ticket:
[TWNTY-7536](https://clients.gitstart.com/twenty/5449/tickets/TWNTY-7536).
---
### Description
Migrate all menu items components to twenty ui and update imports.
```typescript
MenuItem
MenuItemAvata
MenuItemCommand
MenuItemCommandHotKeys
MenuItemDraggable
MenuItemMultiSelect
MenuItemMultiSelectAvatar
MenuItemMultiSelectTag
MenuItemNavigate
MenuItemSelect
MenuItemSelectAvatar
MenuItemSelectColor
MenuItemSelectTag
MenuItemSuggestion
MenuItemToggle
```
\
Also migrate all other dependent components and utilities like
`Checkbox` & `Toggle`\
\
Fixestwentyhq/private-issues#82
---------
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <140154534+gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Simplifying the logic around multi-object pickers and search by getting
rid of the behaviour that keeped selected elements even when they did
not match the search filter (eg keeping selected record "Brian Chesky"
in dropdown even when search input is "Qonto"). This allows us to
simplify the fetch queries around the search to only do one query.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/8233
Typing a search input was triggering a re-render of the whole
RecordBoardCard, resetting the search input to its initial value, an
empty string, making it impossible to actually type anything.
useRelationPicker had (legacy?) useless dependencies to recoil states
that caused the rerenders.
On the kanban page, the record creation was changed a few weeks ago to
enable creation on top / bottom of the columns.
However, this introduced a glitch (missing background opacity). While
fixing it, I have refactored the component structure to:
- separate "New" button from the Empty record card
We have previously fixed the unselection of table records on click
outside. However, the ref was mispositioned as it selected the full
height table. In the case of low record numbers, we also want the
unselection to happen on table body click
[This PR](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/8210) introduced a
regression, causing noteId or taskId (respectively for noteTarget or
taskTarget creation) to be overwritten with an undefined value in the
input for noteTarget or taskTarget creation.
This is because in ActivityTargetInlineCellEditMode, in addition to the
noteId and taskId we are declaring, we are looking into the object
(noteTarget or taskTarget)'s fields and prefilling the record-to-create
with a value, potentially undefined, for all of the object fields.
So when looping over noteTarget's fields, we would find the `note`
relation field, and eventually add `note: undefined` to the
record-to-create input, in addition to the non-empty and valid existing
`noteId`.
Then in sanitizeRecordInput, from the note added right above, we add an
empty noteId to the input from node, overwriting the "good" noteId.
There are several ways to fix this, I chose to update prefillRecord not
to add an empty "note" object that makes no sense in addition to the
"noteId" we already have at this stage.
It is also possible to update `sanitizeRecordInput` not to overwrite a
value from a relation (noteId from note relation) if there is already a
value in the input.
pau-not-paul