Commit Graph

19 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Paul Rastoin 579f704baa Plugging + improving the new orchestrator (#14430)
# Introduction
Initially this PR was about introducing integration coverage for view
field v2 tests
But feature itself wasn't finished, so ended up in a TDD style
devlopment

## The new orchestrator
Orchestrator will organize each flat entity diffing inferring either
validation errors or actions sequentially.
A new builder has been introduced when extended requires to define flat
entity validation utils and action generation for `delete` `update`
`create` operations. It's highly typed using generics

## View field integration testing
Introduce coverage on failing basic tests cases for view field
operations, successfull create is also covered. We could still add more
coverage, will be done later in following PRs

## Remaining tasks for upcoming PRs:
- [ ] rename builder methods names to add generate action in their names
- [x] refactor view validation to handle field and view uniqueness index
combination
- [ ] implem strict update validator on view and view field
- [ ] dynamic cache invalidation post run
- [ ] Add coverage to successful and failing view field operations
- [ ] error formatting summary computation
- [ ] extract types out of the workspace entity builder

## Some vision
Currently flat field metadata maps is nested in the flat object metadata
maps, making its build nested too. ( not extending the new generic
builder )
We will refactor this part for both to be stored extra flat such as the
other existing flat entities.
It will require a small refactor to the generic builder that will not
only have impact on the currently built flat entity optimistic cache but
to an other one ( for example when building a create object action it
will also have an impact flat field maps )
2025-09-15 14:32:57 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 6522498df0 Failing morph relation creation v2 integration testing & fixes (#14253)
# Introduction
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1408
2025-09-03 12:14:43 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 6d6ee939cf Morph relation field v2 fixes (#14216)
Fixes, depending on the contextual current operation in order to
retrieve relation target and all morph related fields to be delete:
- DELETE Field,
- DELETE Object, 
- UPDATE Field, that affects all others related fields
2025-09-02 12:17:20 +00:00
Paul Rastoin 7df9094939 RelationFieldMetadataType to MorphOrRelationFieldMetadataType and so on (#14160) 2025-08-29 15:25:12 +00:00
Paul Rastoin b364acf5bb Morph relation validation v2 (#14141)
## Introduction
Binding morph relation validation to relation validation code flow
Please note that ALL create field will go through basic atomic
validation, which involve name availability and so on

close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1407
2025-08-28 16:05:58 +00:00
Félix Malfait e264d7f32b fix: Enable Lingui recommended rules and fix all translation violations (#14133)
- Enable lingui/no-single-variables-to-translate and all other
recommended Lingui rules
- Fix single variable translation patterns (t`${variable}` → variable)
- Fix expression-in-message violations by extracting variables
- Fix t-call-in-function violations by moving translations inside
functions
- Update ESLint configs to use linguiPlugin.configs['flat/recommended']
- Clean up unused imports and improve translation patterns
2025-08-28 15:12:38 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 59d90bedaa Integration testing v2 enum field types fail and success path (#14010)
# Introduction
Migrating and improving performances of field enum integrations tests
success and failing tests cases to be using the new v2 api

## Discovered issue
When deleting an object in v1 it will leave related enums until the
object is re-created
Something not done anymore within the create in v2 but in the delete
operation
We should implem an upgrade command to remove such relicas

## Bugs
- Update/create default value multi select runner wrong sql query -> FIX
- Update default value multi select regression, we should allow option
without an id to be inserted -> FIX
- default value compare dynamic json stringify convertion or not in
compare tools for object and fields
2025-08-28 10:23:04 +00:00
Paul Rastoin e99c67d6b5 Fail slow + structured validator error response scoped by object and fields (#13980)
# Introduction
Example of returned response: ( snapshot copy don't mind jest expect any
values )
```json
{
  "extensions": {
    "code": "BAD_USER_INPUT",
    "errors": {
      "fieldMetadata": [
        {
          "errors": [
            {
              "code": "INVALID_FIELD_INPUT",
              "message": "Name is too long",
              "userFriendlyMessage": "Name is too long",
              "value": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
            },
          ],
          "id": Any<String>,
          "name": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
          "objectMetadataId": Any<String>,
          "operation": "create_field",
        },
        {
          "errors": [
            {
              "code": "INVALID_FIELD_INPUT",
              "message": "Name is too long",
              "userFriendlyMessage": "Name is too long",
              "value": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
            },
          ],
          "id": Any<String>,
          "name": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
          "objectMetadataId": Any<String>,
          "operation": "create_field",
        },
        {
          "errors": [
            {
              "code": "INVALID_FIELD_INPUT",
              "message": "Name is too long",
              "userFriendlyMessage": "Name is too long",
              "value": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
            },
          ],
          "id": Any<String>,
          "name": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
          "objectMetadataId": Any<String>,
          "operation": "create_field",
        },
        {
          "errors": [
            {
              "code": "INVALID_FIELD_INPUT",
              "message": "Name is too long",
              "userFriendlyMessage": "Name is too long",
              "value": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
            },
          ],
          "id": Any<String>,
          "name": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
          "objectMetadataId": Any<String>,
          "operation": "create_field",
        },
        {
          "errors": [
            {
              "code": "INVALID_FIELD_INPUT",
              "message": "Name is too long",
              "userFriendlyMessage": "Name is too long",
              "value": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
            },
          ],
          "id": Any<String>,
          "name": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
          "objectMetadataId": Any<String>,
          "operation": "create_field",
        },
      ],
      "objectMetadata": [
        {
          "errors": [
            {
              "code": "INVALID_OBJECT_INPUT",
              "message": "Name is too long",
              "value": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
            },
          ],
          "fields": [],
          "id": Any<String>,
          "namePlural": "listingas",
          "nameSingular": "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa",
          "operation": "create_object",
        },
      ],
    },
    "message": "Validation failed for 1 object(s) and 5 field(s)",
    "summary": {
      "invalidFields": 5,
      "invalidObjects": 1,
      "totalErrors": 6,
    },
    "userFriendlyMessage": "Validation failed for 1 object(s) and 5 field(s)",
  },
  "message": "Multiple validation errors occurred while creating object",
  "name": "GraphQLError",
}
```

## Note
We should put in place integrations tests on REST API too, in order to
ensure we receive the same response error
2025-08-20 17:33:15 +00:00
Paul Rastoin 9eaede6e1e Fix default relation standard field deletion (#13975)
Authorize relation standard field deletion if targetObjectMetadata is
not present in existingFlatObjectMetadataMaps
2025-08-19 16:12:04 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 6629092645 Refactor builder to embed Object validation create/delete/update (#13934)
# Introduction
Moving validation directly in the builder that has the perfect
granularity to do it.
When importing we won't have to infer and dispatch on the operation
nature ( update delete create ) and validate accordingly

## Objects
Only migrated object validation for the moment even though create object
involves a validate flat field metadata creation call too

## TODO
- improve `otherFlatObjectMetadataMapsToValidate` naming too vague

## Next
- handle fields validation within fields actions build
- Unit test coverage validation issue on builder and validate
- integration test plugging with new feature flag

## Manual tested
- Update
- Delete
- Create TODO
2025-08-18 11:16:16 +02:00
Paul Rastoin ad77d2f462 ObjectMetadataServiceV2.updateOne (#13891)
# Introduction
Last service to get migrated, `updateOne` object metadata service v2
2025-08-14 09:37:52 +00:00
Paul Rastoin de0468d104 ObjectMetadataServiceV2.createOne (#13849)
# Introduction

Introducing v2 object metadata service create one handler v2, not
overkilling the flatObjectMetadata validation for the moment that will
require sequential validation for the import in order to handle
relations and morph relations
2025-08-12 16:49:35 +02:00
Paul Rastoin d4b5ed93a3 FieldMetadataServiceV2.updateOne (#13784)
# Introduction
Implementing the `updateOne` service handler following workspace
migration v2 style
2025-08-12 10:05:53 +00:00
Paul Rastoin 28e5186f23 FieldMetadataServiceV2.deleteOneField (#13744)
# Introduction
- Migrated the `deleteOneField` handler to new workspace migration v2
style
- Refactored the build to expect `flatObjectMetadataMaps` that he
instantly translate at the be beginning
Commented `ObjectMetadataServiceV2` as it's still not implemented
neither used
2025-08-08 15:11:47 +02:00
Félix Malfait 8b4b9ef8da Change type import rule (#13751)
Forcing "type" to be explicit, works best will rollup on the frontend to
exclude depdendencies
2025-08-08 01:27:05 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 83a560c936 Refactor FieldMetadataService and validation to consume FlatObjectMetadataMaps (#13719)
# Introduction
Following recent `FlatObjectMetadataMaps` manipulation, transpilers
utils introduction in https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13620
Refactored the field metadata service and validator to iterate over
`FlatObjectMetadataMaps` instead of `FlatObjectMetadata[]`.

The object metadata service v2 is shadow coding
2025-08-07 17:19:07 +02:00
Paul Rastoin d8ec2e3959 Field metadata v2 relation (#13562)
# Introduction
- deferrable constraint on foreignKey definition
- fix relation creation input transpilation to flat field metadata
- fix validation to allow contextual validation on not already created
field metadata ( usefull for relation, and will be necessary for the
import )
2025-08-04 09:30:13 +00:00
Paul Rastoin 14537d74b4 FlatFieldMetadataType hashmap arch and enum validation (#13502)
# Introduction
- FlatFieldMetadataType validators hashmap
- Do not fail fast on validation but aggregate errors
- Implemented `enum` validation
- Plugged the new v2 dynamic call in the field metadata service v2

## What's next:
- Implem integration tests to make things run 🙃 
- migrate existing settings valdiation
- Finish the create object metadata service
- Handle update input transpilation and validation

## Open question
Should we implement, not covered validation ?, adding strictness now or
never.
This will be required by the import anw

## Discovered issue with cache
Currently the cache is not accurately typed, `fieldsById` map are not
storing any relations.
Which means the current transpilation tools are hitting undefined at
runtime
In the best of the world we will refactor the cache to be storing
`FlatObjectMetadata` and `FlatFieldMetadata` so we don't even have to
transpile them for validation and so on
But it would require to refactor the loaders that returns the cache to
the front on hit as FieldMetadataEntity, so we might land on a lighter
solution to rather add a new `getExistingFlatCache` that handles the
transpilation itself
About to do that in an other PR to be discussed with Coco
2025-07-31 14:54:39 +02:00
Paul Rastoin 29a4f4d685 CreateFieldInput transpilation to FlatFieldMetadata, FlatFieldMetadata validation (#13493)
# Introduction
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13420

What has been done:
- `CreateFieldInput` transpilation to `FlatFieldMetadata`
- `FlatFieldMetadata` validator service
- A lof of transpilation utils from `input` to `flatObject` or
`flatField`
- Created dedicated v2 api metadata services
- Introducing `inferDeletionFromMissingObjectFieldIndex` in the builder,
to avoid diffing every object and field of the current workspace we
allow only generating create/update migration operations, usefull when
passing by the api metadata


## We still need to in another PR:
- Implement a strong unit test coverage and critical functions and
services
- Finalize flat field metadata validation exception for `options`
`defaultValue` `settings` and `relations`
- Finalize `flatObjectMetadata` validation and v2 service refactor
- Plug the new service when feature flag is enabled
2025-07-30 15:08:11 +02:00