# Introduction
Initial motivation here was to migrate the object related records logic
from v1 to v2, please note that now in v2 views aren't records anymore
but core engine entities
## What's done
- Added specific label identifier targeting view field logic
- Handled side effects on viewField creation with lowest position on
object label identifier mutation
- Added viewField relations in field metadate entity + handled
optimistic in builder v2
- Added view relations in object metadata entity + handled optimistic in
builder v2
- Added integration tests covering the side effects and new validation
exceptions
- Sandardized cache computation
- Coverage on object metadata creation side effect on views and view
fields
## Coverage
```ts
PASS test/integration/graphql/suites/view/view-field/object-identifier-update-side-effect-on-view-field.integration-spec.ts
View Field Resolver - Successful object metadata identifier update side effect on view field
✓ should create a view field on label identifier object metadata update if it does not exist on view (7 ms)
✓ Should not allow deleting a label identifier view field (17 ms)
✓ Should not allow destroying a label identifier view field (6 ms)
✓ Should not allow updating a label identifier view field visibility to false (8 ms)
✓ Should not allow creating a view field with a position lower than the label idenfitier view field (180 ms)
✓ Should not allow updated labelIdentifier view field with a position higher than existing other view field (346 ms)
✓ Should allow updated labelIdentifier view field with a position higher than existing other view field (434 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 7 passed, 7 total
Snapshots: 5 passed, 5 total
Time: 4.571 s, estimated 5 s
```
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1664
# Introduction
Adding a hacky way to validate object against fields before fields
validation ( bi-directional validation process )
If you encounter an identical setup we will add a specific devXp as
cleanup validation but for the moment this seems enough
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1639
When starting the app on a fresh database reset the cache would be
filled with empty flat field metadata maps
Because the reset command hack through the repository directly in order
to create views and stuff
implemented an iso flush as the one existing initially
added it to a workspace deletion tambien
```
{
byId: {],
universalIdById: {}
}
```
## Context
We are experiencing bad performance on Twenty. One of the root cause
hypothesis is that computing `currentUser.currentWorkspace.views` is CPU
consuming. Without views, the GetCurrentUser response is ~1000 lines.
With its ~10000 lines.
As graphql is going through all fields recursively this can be quite
heavy on CPU. We had a similar issues on ObjectMetadataItems 2 years ago
and came with storing the response in redis.
Note: I thought there was also a cache in RAM but this is not the case,
so to invalidate the cache we can just empty redis.
## How
- Extract getting all views from GetCurrentUser and update frontend to
perform both queries
- Add views to cached graphql operations
- invalidate the cache manually on view or related core entities update
/ create / delete / destroy
## Tests
I have tested a lot on v1
# Introduction
Extracting the legacy fields build and dispatch out of the object one to
follow the generic flat entity build, also update caches entries for
object
## Main tasks
- flat field map cache
- flat field builder
- refactored the dispatch matrix to return flat entity maps instead of
flat entity arrays
- orchestrator aggregator
- removing legacy code
- making universal identifier aka standardId of standard field for
custom object deterministically dynamic
- perfs debug logs for v2
## TODO
- [x] Refactor the generic entity builder to be dependency flat maps in
order to main foreign keys list in flat parent
- [x] Refactor the flat object metadata to contain the array of related
fields and avoid costy find object fields
- [ ] Improve the create field handler to handle multiple field at once
- [ ] Refactor the dispatch to embbed the comparison
- [ ] Improve perf by extracting from elements out of existing
- [ ] Fix the labelIdentifierId validators on object before field
creation ( integ tests are in failing mode )
## Debug logs snippet
```ts
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] matrix computation: 0.027ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] creation validation: 0.001ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] deletion validation: 0.293ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] update validation: 0.006ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] entity processing: 0.363ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] validateAndBuild: 0.455ms
[EntityBuilder index] matrix computation: 0.005ms
[EntityBuilder index] creation validation: 0.001ms
[EntityBuilder index] deletion validation: 0.146ms
[EntityBuilder index] update validation: 0.004ms
[EntityBuilder index] entity processing: 0.199ms
[EntityBuilder index] validateAndBuild: 0.228ms
[Runner] Initial cache retrieval: 0.549ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_index executeForWorkspaceSchema: 11.665ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_index executeForMetadata: 12.864ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForWorkspaceSchema: 1.476ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForMetadata: 6.816ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForWorkspaceSchema: 0.062ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForMetadata: 0.889ms
[Runner] Transaction execution: 23.434ms
[Runner] Cache invalidation: 316.662ms
[Runner] Total execution: 340.767ms
```
As you can see cache invalidation is way to long, we could replace the
cache by the optimistic in the end
## Introduction
After enabling flag by default got following errors:
```ts
Test Suites: 48 failed, 1 skipped, 97 passed, 145 of 146 total
Tests: 499 failed, 1 skipped, 644 passed, 1144 total
Snapshots: 61 failed, 133 passed, 194 total
Time: 363.226 s
Ran all test suites.
```
## From
<img width="2952" height="1510" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7e3b20c6-2552-40a7-90bb-2d7b3002c895"
/>
## To
<img width="3134" height="1510" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4fc9ada4-3c14-4333-a1db-11daf87db8d6"
/>
There's a huge test bundle in the latest shard that we could split up
## Notes
- Set as failing morph relation field rename as for the moment we do not
handle relation field mutation
- fixed the object update and creation validation adding label
identifier field metadata id checks
- and more
Some integrations tests are still on the v1 ( they have before and after
all disabling and re-enabling the flat ) but mainly we now have more
coverage on the v2 than the v1.
Mainly related records, uniqueness have to be migrated the v2 and so
tests too
Workspace cleaning jobs slow down the db each hours when running. We
suspect the object metadata deleting query with all cascade/depending
entities (field, index, ..) to be the cause.
## Context
-
packages/twenty-server/src/engine/metadata-modules/object-metadata/utils/build-default-relation-flat-field-metadatas-for-custom-object.util.ts
Fixing targetFlatFieldMetadata not being accurate for default relation
during object creation (was not used yet)
-
packages/twenty-server/src/engine/twenty-orm/workspace-schema-manager/services/workspace-schema-foreign-key-manager.service.ts
Simplifying API + Removing unused methods and the ones that were
querying pg schema as we want to avoid those as much as possible
-
packages/twenty-server/src/engine/workspace-manager/workspace-migration-v2/workspace-migration-runner-v2/action-handlers/field/services/create-field-action-handler.service.ts
Adding FK creation when Join column is created
# Introduction
Honestly this implem is a mess, discussing a potential side effect
handler with @weiko before the build and run that would handle each side
effect per entity and operation
Handling:
- [ ] unique index is generated when a field is updated with the
`isUnique`
- [x] an index is generated when a relation is created
- [x] search vector index creation on custom object creation
- [x] renaming a field metadata or an object should re-create all
related indexes which are composed by their namings
- [x] delete object should remove any related indexes
- [x] delete field should update related indexes ( if index ends up
empty it should be removed )
- [ ] on object renaming that contains morph fields -> triggers update
field -> trigger index recompute
- [x] on update name renaming should recompute all related indexes
## TODO
- [x] Integration testing
- [ ] Refactor the index maps cache to be storing a
`idsByObjectMetadataId`
- [x] Refactor deterministic name to use order sorting
- [x] Remove flat index from flat object
## What's next
Will handle morph indexes in a new dedicated PR for the moment will
stick to this
Same for the cache improvement and uniqueness
## Context
We are not exactly sure how we want to handle side effects with
workspace migration v2, in the meantime I'm re-introducing this part in
the caller (object v2 service)
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14442
Issues were
1. Table headers always used label metadata identifier (or record text)
as first column, while table body followed viewFields positions
2. Label metadata identifier should always be visible and in first
position for the table views to work as expected, while when updating
the label metadata identifier for an object, no changes were brought to
the viewFields
To fix that
1. In the BE:
- a new logic is implemented to i) update label identifier's viewFields
position and visibility when an object's label identifier is updated to
a new field; ii) add validation on the update of a viewField's position
and visibility to make sure the label identifier's viewField always has
the lowest position + is visible
- a command was added to check all existing views and viewfields
3. In the FE: at first I tried to replicate the logic of the headers
(based on the label identifier rather than the positions) on the body,
but it was too complex and error-prone as in multiple places we are
based on the positions. It also feels more right to have only one source
of truth which is the viewField position. @lucasbordeau if that does not
suit you, we can throw an error if the field with the lowest position is
not the label metadata identifier, as you said the table view will be
very buggy / wont work if the label identifier is not in the first
position. but now it should never be the case thanks to the validation
implemented in the BE
This should be migrated to viewFieldService V2 when relevant @Weiko
@prastoin
# Introduction
Initially this PR was about introducing integration coverage for view
field v2 tests
But feature itself wasn't finished, so ended up in a TDD style
devlopment
## The new orchestrator
Orchestrator will organize each flat entity diffing inferring either
validation errors or actions sequentially.
A new builder has been introduced when extended requires to define flat
entity validation utils and action generation for `delete` `update`
`create` operations. It's highly typed using generics
## View field integration testing
Introduce coverage on failing basic tests cases for view field
operations, successfull create is also covered. We could still add more
coverage, will be done later in following PRs
## Remaining tasks for upcoming PRs:
- [ ] rename builder methods names to add generate action in their names
- [x] refactor view validation to handle field and view uniqueness index
combination
- [ ] implem strict update validator on view and view field
- [ ] dynamic cache invalidation post run
- [ ] Add coverage to successful and failing view field operations
- [ ] error formatting summary computation
- [ ] extract types out of the workspace entity builder
## Some vision
Currently flat field metadata maps is nested in the flat object metadata
maps, making its build nested too. ( not extending the new generic
builder )
We will refactor this part for both to be stored extra flat such as the
other existing flat entities.
It will require a small refactor to the generic builder that will not
only have impact on the currently built flat entity optimistic cache but
to an other one ( for example when building a create object action it
will also have an impact flat field maps )
resolves#14190
added refreshCoreViews() call after object creation to immediately
update core views state, ensuring new objects appear in the navigation
drawer without requiring a refresh
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1316
As discussed with @Bonapara, the behaviour is the following:
1 if there is a read restriction on a field that is or becomes the label
identifier, this restriction is actually overriden to allow any user who
has read rights on the object to also be able to read the values on the
label identifier field. This restriction is overriden in the values
stored in the cache but not in the db.
2 in the UI it is not possible to add a field permission to restrict
read rights on the field that is the label identifier. It is still
possible to update the label identifier for it to be a field that
previously had a restrictive field permission on a role though, but then
1. has our back.
Enable unique constraint creation on name standard field.
Null values are handled in front with 'Untitled'.
Need to migrate fieldMetadata default value on all custom objects ?
Tested :
- Toggle on/off uniqueness on standard name field of standard/custom
object
- Create new custom text field and toggle on/off uniqueness
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13577.
When naming or renaming an object, we are already checking that the name
was available compared to other existing objects.
But we also need to check that the relation fields that will be created
or updated are available as well: we create relation fields on
Attachment, Note, Favorite, Task and TimelineActivites, that bear the
name of the object. Thus, it is not possible to create an object that
has the same name as one of the fields on Attachment, Note etc: name,
createdAt, ... are not valid names.
# Introduction
When udpating a flat object metadata name we need to search for RELATION
field that has a MORPH RELATION target flat field metadata with
MANY_TO_ONE relationType as its settings are binded to the updated flat
object metadata name
In the best of the world we would remove this complexity to be computed
at runtime only and deprecate implemented logic here
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1412
# Introduction
From `morphRelationCreationPayload` to `flatFieldMetadatas`
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1406
## Unit testing
I'm not a fan of covering things this way, where we could have some
strong integration testing tests in the first place
But I wanted to freeze the optimistic path computation, also covered the
exception because it was cheap, doesn't mean I won't cover them through
integration tests later anw
## Context
To simplify the way we inject our default datasource, I've recently
removed the token injection that was confusion since we only had once
configured on the module level. Now I'm removing TypeORM service which
allows us to instantiate a new Datasource with the same parameters as
the default one, it was redundant and confusing.
# Introduction
Migrating and improving performances of field enum integrations tests
success and failing tests cases to be using the new v2 api
## Discovered issue
When deleting an object in v1 it will leave related enums until the
object is re-created
Something not done anymore within the create in v2 but in the delete
operation
We should implem an upgrade command to remove such relicas
## Bugs
- Update/create default value multi select runner wrong sql query -> FIX
- Update default value multi select regression, we should allow option
without an id to be inserted -> FIX
- default value compare dynamic json stringify convertion or not in
compare tools for object and fields
## Context
View tables were missing some FK, we are also introducing delete cascade
on those tables when needed to leverage pg cascade deletion instead of
having to implement it.
Also renaming those classes with Entity suffix to follow repo
guidelines.
## Context
This PR introduces view actions for the migration v2. We should be able
to create, update and delete views through the migration runner
independently from object actions (this is not 100% true in this PR
though as I'm still passing the object metadata to build the view)
Note: Once favorite are moved out of the workspace schema, we will have
favorite actions as well, in the meantime I have to inject some code at
the end of the createOne method from the object metadata service
…s, and resources
- Removed unused `ObjectMetadataStandardIdToIdMap`.
- Updated Vite config with additional allowed hosts.
- Improved MCP service to handle `ping` method and lists for tools,
prompts, and resources.
- Refactored utility function `isFieldMetadataEntityOfType` for improved
type handling.
- Expanded MCP metadata service to include tools, prompts, and resources
support.
## Context
This refactoring improves scalability in the workspace migration runner
in terms of actions. Instead of relying on a switch case and multiple
changes and services + duplicate things between metadata and workspace
schema, we now have a unique module for all kind of actions and a
registry pattern to register them and run them dynamically.
Example on how to add a new "create_role" action with the future design:
```typescript
// packages/twenty-server/src/engine/workspace-manager/workspace-migration-v2/workspace-migration-runner-v2/action-handlers/role/services/create-role-action-handler.service.ts
export class CreateRoleActionHandlerService extends WorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandler(
'create_role',
) {
constructor(
private readonly workspaceSchemaManagerService: WorkspaceSchemaManagerService,
private readonly roleRepository: Repository<Role>,
) {}
async executeForMetadata(
context: WorkspaceMigrationActionRunnerArgs<CreateRoleAction>,
): Promise<void> {
this.roleRepository.save({...}); // technically could use the queryRunner from context param directly instead of injecting the repository
}
async executeForWorkspaceSchema(
context: WorkspaceMigrationActionRunnerArgs<CreateRoleAction>,
): Promise<void> {
// this.workspaceSchemaManagerService.tableManager... -> Nothing to do in the workspace schema in the role case
}
}
```
```typescript
// packages/twenty-server/src/engine/workspace-manager/workspace-migration-v2/workspace-migration-runner-v2/action-handlers/workspace-schema-migration-runner-action-handlers.module.ts
@Module({
imports: [WorkspaceSchemaManagerModule, +TypeOrmModule.forFeature([Role]),
providers: [
...
+RoleCreateActionService
],
})
export class WorkspaceSchemaMigrationRunnerActionHandlersModule {}
```
```typescript
export type WorkspaceMigrationAction=
| WorkspaceMigrationObjectAction
...
+| WorkspaceMigrationRoleAction;
export type CreateRoleAction = {
type = 'create_role',
role: RoleEntity
};
export type WorkspaceMigrationRoleAction = CreateRoleAction;
```
## Context
- Adding ts-vector generatedType/asExpression as TS_VECTOR settings
- Using those settings to setup properly tsVector searchVector column
through the new migration runner
- Fix enum creation/suppression
Note: regarding the new tsVector, we should implement a command to
update existing fields
TODO:
- TS_VECTOR search vector column update (note: should be properly
updated whenever the object labelIdentifier is updated or a new TEXT
field is added to the object to follow the current logic)
- relation type fields and columns are not implemented yet
- index migrations
# Introduction
Moving validation directly in the builder that has the perfect
granularity to do it.
When importing we won't have to infer and dispatch on the operation
nature ( update delete create ) and validate accordingly
## Objects
Only migrated object validation for the moment even though create object
involves a validate flat field metadata creation call too
## TODO
- improve `otherFlatObjectMetadataMapsToValidate` naming too vague
## Next
- handle fields validation within fields actions build
- Unit test coverage validation issue on builder and validate
- integration test plugging with new feature flag
## Manual tested
- Update
- Delete
- Create TODO
# Introduction
- Implementing the delete one for the new object metadata service v2.
- Handling relation fields and fields in the first place to finally
remove the object
- puting back updatedAt and createdAt in flat metadatas
- duplicate criteria addition for flat object
- removing datasource id from object metadata dto
- Enable update to unique for composite field with defaultValue
different from default defaultValue on subfield not included in unique
constraint
- Enable update to unique for standard field + Disable update to
non-unique for standard index
- Fix typo
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1360
# Introduction
Introducing v2 object metadata service create one handler v2, not
overkilling the flatObjectMetadata validation for the moment that will
require sequential validation for the import in order to handle
relations and morph relations
# Introduction
- Migrated the `deleteOneField` handler to new workspace migration v2
style
- Refactored the build to expect `flatObjectMetadataMaps` that he
instantly translate at the be beginning
Commented `ObjectMetadataServiceV2` as it's still not implemented
neither used
# Introduction
Following recent `FlatObjectMetadataMaps` manipulation, transpilers
utils introduction in https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13620
Refactored the field metadata service and validator to iterate over
`FlatObjectMetadataMaps` instead of `FlatObjectMetadata[]`.
The object metadata service v2 is shadow coding
In this PR
1. Fix delete and soft-delete repository methods for repositories where
permission checks are NOT bypassed: they need to have a selection of
columns to return by default. To match what we did for insert I set it
to `'*'` by default. But I feel this may be bug prone as developers will
not necessarily think to fill the right values in. Maybe we should
change the api to use selectable fields by default. @charlesBochet
2. Add field permission seeds and enable field permission feature flag
in dev
Paul Rastoin