Should be merged once https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/16206 has
been released + command run to prod
In this PR
- Remove usage of viewGroup.fieldMetadataId, both in BE and FE states.
- But we still need to properly populate it until we fully remove
viewGroup.fieldMetadataId from db and ORM entity (upcoming 3rd PR out of
3). fieldMetadataId was removed from CoreViewGroup type and
CreateViewGroupInput and is determined BE-side based on the associated
view's mainGroupByFieldMetadataId. **I expect this means a downtime on
viewGroup creation, until both FE and BE are deployed and cache is
flushed.** This seems acceptable to me as it only regards viewGroup
creation.
- this information is replaced by view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataID
- Handle view group creation, update and deletion in the BE as a
side-effect of a view creation, update or deletion. Optimistic effects
are still used
- Add validation at view creation or update regarding
mainGroupByFieldMetadata
Left to do in 3rd PR
- Remove viewGroup.fieldMetadataId from db and ORM entity
- Restore feature allowing to update an existing grouped view's group by
field (already OK on BE side but need to rebuild FE optimistic)
In this PR (1/3)
- introduce view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataId as the new reference
determining which fieldMetadataId is used in a grouped view, in order to
deprecate viewGroup.fieldMetadataId which creates inconsistencies.
view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataId is now filled at every view creation,
though not in use yet.
- Introduce a command to backfill view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataId for
existing views + delete all viewGroup.fieldMetadataId with a
fieldMetadataId that is not view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataId. (It should
concern 37 active workspaces)
- Temporarily disable the option to change a grouped view's
fieldMetadataId as for now it creates inconsistencies. This feature can
be reintroduced when we have done the full migration.
In a next PR
- (2/3) use view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataId instead of
viewGroup.fieldMetadataId. In FE we may keep viewGroup.fieldMetadataId
as a state (TBD). View groups will now be created / deleted as a side
effect of view's mainGroupByFieldMetadataId update.
- (3/3) remove viewGroup.fieldMetadataId
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1629
To do before requesting review :
- filter update
Migration to come in an other PR
Strat :
1/ Null transformation
- [x] Transform NULL equivalent value to NULL in field validation in
common api - pre-query - with feature flag
- [ ] Same logic in ORM (Not done, complex to handle feature flag here)
- [x] Transform NULL value to equivalent in data formatting in ORM -
post-query
2/ Migration (in other PR) for fieldMetadata not nullable with default
defaultValue (empty string, ...)
- [ ] Remove NOT NULL db constraint
- [ ] Update record value to NULL
- [ ] Update field metadata : isNullable:true
- [ ] Update uniqueIndex whereClause (also for standard uniqueIndex)
- [ ] Activate feature flag
3/ Update metadata creation
- [x] No more default default value
- [x] Update standard field nullability
- [x] Remove index default whereClause for standard field
4/ Update filter
- [x] When filtering on NULL or empty string, be sure all records are
returned (the one with NULL + the one with "")
5/ Test
- [ ] Strat. to do
# Introduction
Cleaner and fewer scope version of
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15745 ( removed sync-metadata
hack through, too ambitious migration and upgrade )
Please note that this PR won't have any interaction with the existing
sync-metadata
Which mean that the sync metadata does not update the standard entities
applicationId and universalIdentifier, and it won't we will deprecate it
on favor of a workspace migration aka twenty-standard app installation
## API Metadata
Any operation going through the api metadata nows automatically scope
the related entity to the workspace custom application instance. (
optionally passing an applicationId to allow current hacky implem of app
sync service )
We need to either ignore the tests or remove the cli status check from
the blocking status badges for a PR to be merged
## New workspace
Already handled in previous
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15625, when a workspace is
created it gets created a twenty standard and custom workspace instance
All his views and permissions will be prefilled to the its twenty
standard app instance with a specific universalIdentifier
## New universalIdentifier
At the contrary as before with standardIds, universalIdentifier are
unique for a given workspace
This means that createdAt field of both object company and opportunity
will have a unique universalIdentifier whereas they share the same
standardId
## FlatApplication
Introduced the flatApplication and cache. Will migrate existing
`MetadataName` to be `SyncableMetadataName` in a following PR
## What's next
Next we will describe a twenty standard app configuration as json that
will be used to generate a workspace migration that will be run instead
of the sync metadata, in a nutshell we aim to deprecated the sync
metadata
So we can standardize any entity to have a non nullable applicationId
and universalIdentifier
## Upgrade command
Introduced an upgrade command that will create a custom workspace
instance for any workspace that do not have one in order to align with
the new behavior when creating a new workspace
As title
- adds decorators in twenty-sdk
- update twenty-cli load-manifest to it gets @FieldMetadata infos +
testing
- update twenty-server so it CRUD fields properly, using
universalIdentifier
- Fix UI so we can update managed objects records
- move FieldMetadata items from twenty-server to twenty-shared
# Introduction
Handling both:
- field deactivation side effect on view fields, view filters and views
- field deactivation side effect on view that targets it as
`kanbanAggregateFieldMetadataId`
- field deactivation side effect on view that targets it as
`calendarFieldMetadataId`
## Coverage
added coverage
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/kanban-aggregate-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (13.132 s)
kanban-aggregate-field-deactivation-nullifies-kanban-properties
✓ should nullify kanban properties when field used as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId is deactivated (3923 ms)
✓ should not modify views when field not used as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId is deactivated (2958 ms)
✓ should nullify kanban properties on multiple views when they all use the same field as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId (2542 ms)
✓ should nullify kanban properties when views have different aggregate operations on same field (3380 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 4 passed, 4 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 13.154 s
```
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/view-group-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (12.639 s)
view-group-field-deactivation-deletes-views
✓ should delete view when field used in view group is deactivated (3469 ms)
✓ should not delete view when field not used in view group is deactivated (3109 ms)
✓ should delete multiple views when they all use the same field in view groups (2741 ms)
✓ should handle deactivation when view has multiple view groups with different fields (3008 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 4 passed, 4 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 12.664 s
```
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/calendar-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (14.579 s)
calendar-field-deactivation-deletes-views
✓ should delete view when field used as calendarFieldMetadataId is deactivated (3388 ms)
✓ should not delete view when field not used as calendarFieldMetadataId is deactivated (2438 ms)
✓ should delete multiple views when they all use the same field as calendarFieldMetadataId (2635 ms)
✓ should handle deactivation when views have different calendar layouts on same field (3195 ms)
✓ should delete calendar view but not other view types when calendar field is deactivated (2682 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 5 passed, 5 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 14.601 s, estimated 15 s
```
## View soft deletion
We decided to remove the soft deletion grain on all the views, in this
PR context we've only removed soft deleted validation requirement on any
view entities
## Conclusion
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1754
## Context
- All flatEntity should extend SyncableEntity
- SyncableEntity should now have applicationId and application relation
- Fix syncApp deletion, should now properly use migration v2 to delete
syncable entities
# Introduction
### Summary
Implements side effect handling for `ViewGroup` and `ViewFilters` when
field metadata is updated in the v2 architecture. This ensures that
view-related records are properly maintained when enum field options are
modified, deleted, or created.
### Side effects
- **Side Effect System**: Added side effect handling for field metadata
updates that manages related view groups and view filters
- **Enum Field Updates**: When enum field options are modified, the
system now:
- **View Groups**: Creates new groups for added options, updates
existing groups for modified options, and deletes groups for removed
options
- **View Filters**: Updates filter values to reflect option changes and
removes filters that reference deleted options
### Enum runner fix
Update now works for both atomic enum and array enum ( multi select for
instance )
### Compute flat entity maps from to
Standardized this method usage across v2 services
Next step is to require dependencies dynamically
## Conclusion
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1649
# Introduction
Initial motivation here was to migrate the object related records logic
from v1 to v2, please note that now in v2 views aren't records anymore
but core engine entities
## What's done
- Added specific label identifier targeting view field logic
- Handled side effects on viewField creation with lowest position on
object label identifier mutation
- Added viewField relations in field metadate entity + handled
optimistic in builder v2
- Added view relations in object metadata entity + handled optimistic in
builder v2
- Added integration tests covering the side effects and new validation
exceptions
- Sandardized cache computation
- Coverage on object metadata creation side effect on views and view
fields
## Coverage
```ts
PASS test/integration/graphql/suites/view/view-field/object-identifier-update-side-effect-on-view-field.integration-spec.ts
View Field Resolver - Successful object metadata identifier update side effect on view field
✓ should create a view field on label identifier object metadata update if it does not exist on view (7 ms)
✓ Should not allow deleting a label identifier view field (17 ms)
✓ Should not allow destroying a label identifier view field (6 ms)
✓ Should not allow updating a label identifier view field visibility to false (8 ms)
✓ Should not allow creating a view field with a position lower than the label idenfitier view field (180 ms)
✓ Should not allow updated labelIdentifier view field with a position higher than existing other view field (346 ms)
✓ Should allow updated labelIdentifier view field with a position higher than existing other view field (434 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 7 passed, 7 total
Snapshots: 5 passed, 5 total
Time: 4.571 s, estimated 5 s
```
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1664
# Introduction
Extracting the legacy fields build and dispatch out of the object one to
follow the generic flat entity build, also update caches entries for
object
## Main tasks
- flat field map cache
- flat field builder
- refactored the dispatch matrix to return flat entity maps instead of
flat entity arrays
- orchestrator aggregator
- removing legacy code
- making universal identifier aka standardId of standard field for
custom object deterministically dynamic
- perfs debug logs for v2
## TODO
- [x] Refactor the generic entity builder to be dependency flat maps in
order to main foreign keys list in flat parent
- [x] Refactor the flat object metadata to contain the array of related
fields and avoid costy find object fields
- [ ] Improve the create field handler to handle multiple field at once
- [ ] Refactor the dispatch to embbed the comparison
- [ ] Improve perf by extracting from elements out of existing
- [ ] Fix the labelIdentifierId validators on object before field
creation ( integ tests are in failing mode )
## Debug logs snippet
```ts
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] matrix computation: 0.027ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] creation validation: 0.001ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] deletion validation: 0.293ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] update validation: 0.006ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] entity processing: 0.363ms
[EntityBuilder fieldMetadata] validateAndBuild: 0.455ms
[EntityBuilder index] matrix computation: 0.005ms
[EntityBuilder index] creation validation: 0.001ms
[EntityBuilder index] deletion validation: 0.146ms
[EntityBuilder index] update validation: 0.004ms
[EntityBuilder index] entity processing: 0.199ms
[EntityBuilder index] validateAndBuild: 0.228ms
[Runner] Initial cache retrieval: 0.549ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_index executeForWorkspaceSchema: 11.665ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_index executeForMetadata: 12.864ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForWorkspaceSchema: 1.476ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForMetadata: 6.816ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForWorkspaceSchema: 0.062ms
[BaseWorkspaceMigrationRunnerActionHandlerService] delete_field executeForMetadata: 0.889ms
[Runner] Transaction execution: 23.434ms
[Runner] Cache invalidation: 316.662ms
[Runner] Total execution: 340.767ms
```
As you can see cache invalidation is way to long, we could replace the
cache by the optimistic in the end
# Introduction
- Implementing the delete one for the new object metadata service v2.
- Handling relation fields and fields in the first place to finally
remove the object
- puting back updatedAt and createdAt in flat metadatas
- duplicate criteria addition for flat object
- removing datasource id from object metadata dto
# Introduction
- Migrated the `deleteOneField` handler to new workspace migration v2
style
- Refactored the build to expect `flatObjectMetadataMaps` that he
instantly translate at the be beginning
Commented `ObjectMetadataServiceV2` as it's still not implemented
neither used
# Introduction
- FlatFieldMetadataType validators hashmap
- Do not fail fast on validation but aggregate errors
- Implemented `enum` validation
- Plugged the new v2 dynamic call in the field metadata service v2
## What's next:
- Implem integration tests to make things run 🙃
- migrate existing settings valdiation
- Finish the create object metadata service
- Handle update input transpilation and validation
## Open question
Should we implement, not covered validation ?, adding strictness now or
never.
This will be required by the import anw
## Discovered issue with cache
Currently the cache is not accurately typed, `fieldsById` map are not
storing any relations.
Which means the current transpilation tools are hitting undefined at
runtime
In the best of the world we will refactor the cache to be storing
`FlatObjectMetadata` and `FlatFieldMetadata` so we don't even have to
transpile them for validation and so on
But it would require to refactor the loaders that returns the cache to
the front on hit as FieldMetadataEntity, so we might land on a lighter
solution to rather add a new `getExistingFlatCache` that handles the
transpilation itself
About to do that in an other PR to be discussed with Coco
# Introduction
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13420
What has been done:
- `CreateFieldInput` transpilation to `FlatFieldMetadata`
- `FlatFieldMetadata` validator service
- A lof of transpilation utils from `input` to `flatObject` or
`flatField`
- Created dedicated v2 api metadata services
- Introducing `inferDeletionFromMissingObjectFieldIndex` in the builder,
to avoid diffing every object and field of the current workspace we
allow only generating create/update migration operations, usefull when
passing by the api metadata
## We still need to in another PR:
- Implement a strong unit test coverage and critical functions and
services
- Finalize flat field metadata validation exception for `options`
`defaultValue` `settings` and `relations`
- Finalize `flatObjectMetadata` validation and v2 service refactor
- Plug the new service when feature flag is enabled
Marie