# Introduction
At the moment when updating any record cache occurence, we will build a
fragment that will expect all of the object metadata item fields to be
provided.
Which result in the following traces: ( in the video companies aren't
fetch with companyId and other missing fields )
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/56eab7c1-8f01-45ff-8f5d-78737b788b92
By definition as we're using graphql we might not request every record's
fields each time we wanna consume them.
In this way we will now dynamically compute or expect depending on the
CRUD operation specific fields to be written in the cache, and not all
of them
Tested all optimistic and failure management use cases
## Covering cache
Added coverage only for the `deleteOne` and `deleteMany` hooks, it cover
only the record record cache and not its relations hydratation ( for the
moment )
## Why not closing #9927
Unless I'm mistaken everything done here have fixed the same logs/traces
issue for updates and deletion but not creation.
Which means we still need to investigate the mass upload from import and
prefillRecord behavior
In a nutshell: went over each `updateRecordFromCache` calls, still need
to do all `createRecordInCache` calls
related to #9927
## Conlusion
Sorry for the big PR should have ejected into a specific one for the
`MinimalRecord` refactor
Will also continue covering others hooks later in my week as for the
`deleteOne`
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
- Do not render a source handle for the leaf nodes
- Upgrade the `@xyflow/react` library
| Before | After |
|--------|--------|
| 
| 
|
## Other options considered
React Flow exposes a hook to get the connections of the current node. I
tried to use this hook – which makes things way simpler – but I couldn't
find a way to make it work in Storybook. I had two options: 1. Set up
React Flow to render the nodes properly, 2. Mock the hook in Storybook.
The first option was hard to achieve as the `<Reactflow />` component
renders a whole flow, and it doesn't play well with the idea of
rendering a single node in a story.
The second option seemed overkill as mocking modules with Storybook is
not straightforward. See
https://storybook.js.org/docs/writing-stories/mocking-data-and-modules/mocking-modules.
I chose to keep the initial version of my code, written before I spot a
function simplifying the code. We can give it a look another time.
# Introduction
Avoid having multiple `isDefined` definition across our pacakges
Also avoid importing `isDefined` from `twenty-ui` which exposes a huge
barrel for a such little util function
## In a nutshell
Removed own `isDefined.ts` definition from `twenty-ui` `twenty-front`
and `twenty-server` to move it to `twenty-shared`.
Updated imports for each packages, and added explicit dependencies to
`twenty-shared` if not already in place
Related PR https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/9941
- remove delete serverless function when archiving workflow version
- update copy serverless function to reset serverless function to old
version
- remove createNewWorkflowVersion and use createDraftFromWorkflowVersion
- fix step update issue and optimistic rendering when generate draft
from active version
Paul Rastoin