# Introduction
Creating dedicated folders and module for both `page-layout-tab` and
`page-layout-widget`
The addition diff with deletion is due to the module being added
## Summary
This PR enforces that all custom exceptions must provide a
`userFriendlyMessage`, ensuring end users always see readable error
messages.
## Changes
### Core Changes
- **`CustomException` simplified**: Removed the `ForceFriendlyMessage`
generic parameter - `userFriendlyMessage` is now always required
- **Type safety**: The constructor now requires `{ userFriendlyMessage:
MessageDescriptor }` (no longer optional)
### Updated Files
- **74+ exception classes** updated to provide default user-friendly
messages using Lingui `msg` macro
- Each exception class has a sensible fallback message (e.g., `msg\`An
authentication error occurred.\``)
- Exception classes that had code-specific message maps retain their
behavior
## Benefits
- **Compile-time enforcement**: Forgetting to add a user-friendly
message now causes a TypeScript error
- **Better UX**: End users always see a localized, human-readable error
message
- **Simpler API**: No more boolean generic parameter to think about
## Testing
- `npx nx run twenty-server:typecheck` passes
- `npx nx run twenty-server:lint` passes
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> Enforces `userFriendlyMessage` on `CustomException` and updates all
exception classes to supply localized default messages, with
filters/tests adjusted accordingly.
>
> - **Core**:
> - Enforce required `userFriendlyMessage` in `CustomException` (remove
optional generic; constructor now requires `{ userFriendlyMessage:
MessageDescriptor }`).
> - **Exceptions**:
> - Update ~70+ exception classes to set default localized messages via
Lingui `msg` maps and pass them in constructors (e.g., `AuthException`,
`ObjectMetadataException`, `FieldMetadataException`, etc.).
> - Add fallback messages where needed (e.g., `INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR` or
domain-specific defaults).
> - **HTTP/GraphQL Filters**:
> - Ensure fallbacks create `UnknownException` with `msg` for
user-friendly text in REST/GraphQL exception filters.
> - **Tests**:
> - Adjust unit tests to pass `userFriendlyMessage` to exceptions.
> - Update Jest snapshots to include `extensions.userFriendlyMessage` or
message objects where applicable.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
221004fdfc0d97b7d152a258b347bf571e70f10e. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
# Introduction
In this pullrequest have been migrated to the flat standard entities:
Role, Agent and RoleTargets.
## What happens
- Removed createStandardMorph tool util in favor of dynamic typing of
`createMorphOrRelationStandardField`
- Implemented a command to remove standard agents and their role that
has been removed in https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/16513 also
added a default role target to data manipulator role to the only
remaining agent
- Implemented an agent deleteMany service handler
Changes:
- as we store date in redis as serialized, let's make all flatEntity
dates as string. This requires changing FlatEntity types and making sure
that entity are converted to flatEntity and flatEntity to dtos
First PR to implement application tokens
- add new application role in twenty-server
- move duplicated constants and types to twenty-shared
- will add role configuration utils into twenty-sdk in another PR
# Introduction
Refactored the api `validateBuildAndRunWorkspaceMigration` to be require
less configuration but to infer required args dynamically depending on
provided metadata maps to compare
## `inferDeletionFromMissingEntities`
Is not dynamically computed avoiding any miss configuration issue and
any missleading devxp
## Maps computation
Making only one call to redis to build both dependency and to be
compared entity maps. It does not matter to avoid passing a about to
compared flat entity maps to could also be a depedency, it's handled
directly in the builder setup optimistic cache logic
Please note that the flat maps used for the service input transpilation
might differ from the one that we will dynamically compute and inject in
the builder. Leading to do 2 redis calls but also race condition prone
validation error
We prefer that this occurs at the builder rather than at the runner
level as the pg instance is not cache and reflect the real state of a
given workspace
In a nutshell, there's a possible race condition between cache
invalidation and computation in both service input transpilers and
builder but we're totally ok with that
Should be merged once https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/16206 has
been released + command run to prod
In this PR
- Remove usage of viewGroup.fieldMetadataId, both in BE and FE states.
- But we still need to properly populate it until we fully remove
viewGroup.fieldMetadataId from db and ORM entity (upcoming 3rd PR out of
3). fieldMetadataId was removed from CoreViewGroup type and
CreateViewGroupInput and is determined BE-side based on the associated
view's mainGroupByFieldMetadataId. **I expect this means a downtime on
viewGroup creation, until both FE and BE are deployed and cache is
flushed.** This seems acceptable to me as it only regards viewGroup
creation.
- this information is replaced by view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataID
- Handle view group creation, update and deletion in the BE as a
side-effect of a view creation, update or deletion. Optimistic effects
are still used
- Add validation at view creation or update regarding
mainGroupByFieldMetadata
Left to do in 3rd PR
- Remove viewGroup.fieldMetadataId from db and ORM entity
- Restore feature allowing to update an existing grouped view's group by
field (already OK on BE side but need to rebuild FE optimistic)
# Introduction
Migrating `pageLayoutTab` to the v2 engine
- Types and constants
- Builder and validate
- Runner
Introduced a new `StrictSyncableEntity` that enforces that
`universalIdentifier` and `applicationId` are defined
As these entities are brand new we could enforce this rule already
This still requires a migration command to associate the existing
entities to custom workspace application instance and define
universalIdentifier
Handled retro-comp of the migration through a migration as upgrade
command fallback
---------
Co-authored-by: bosiraphael <raphael.bosi@gmail.com>
## Description
When switching a view's visibility from WORKSPACE to UNLISTED, the code
in `view-v2.service.ts` correctly sets `createdByUserWorkspaceId` to the
current user (to prevent the view from disappearing). However, this
property was not included in `FLAT_VIEW_EDITABLE_PROPERTIES`, which
meant:
1. The comparison logic didn't detect the change
2. No update action was created for the property
3. The value was never persisted to the database
4. The view disappeared because it became UNLISTED with no owner
This fix adds `createdByUserWorkspaceId` to the editable properties so
the change is properly detected and persisted.
Might fix https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/15955
# Introduction
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1980
In this PR we migrate the agent from v1 to v2.
## New FlatRoleTargetByAgentIdMaps
Derivated the `flatRoleTargetMaps` to be building a
`flatRoleTargetByAgentIdMaps` to ease retrieving a roleId to associate
to an agent
## Coverage
Added strong coverage on both failing and successful CRU agents
operations
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
In this PR (1/3)
- introduce view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataId as the new reference
determining which fieldMetadataId is used in a grouped view, in order to
deprecate viewGroup.fieldMetadataId which creates inconsistencies.
view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataId is now filled at every view creation,
though not in use yet.
- Introduce a command to backfill view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataId for
existing views + delete all viewGroup.fieldMetadataId with a
fieldMetadataId that is not view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataId. (It should
concern 37 active workspaces)
- Temporarily disable the option to change a grouped view's
fieldMetadataId as for now it creates inconsistencies. This feature can
be reintroduced when we have done the full migration.
In a next PR
- (2/3) use view.mainGroupByFieldMetadataId instead of
viewGroup.fieldMetadataId. In FE we may keep viewGroup.fieldMetadataId
as a state (TBD). View groups will now be created / deleted as a side
effect of view's mainGroupByFieldMetadataId update.
- (3/3) remove viewGroup.fieldMetadataId
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
## Context
We've recently introduced a new workspace cache service which now acts
as a cache access and local storage for all workspace related data,
deprecating the individual specific services.
- Better performance through multiple caching/fetching strategies
- Consistent data access patterns across the codebase
- Reduced redis queries through MGET/MSET/PIPELINE with multiple cache
keys
# Introduction
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1930
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1929
Migrating role and roleTarget entities to the v2 core engine, allowing
v2 caching leverage and allow migrating agent to v2 that needs role
target in prior
After agent we should be able to pass twenty standard app totally though
workspace migration
## Role target assignation
Please note that role target have 3 creation entrypoints:
- Agent
- User workspace
- ApiKey
Refactored all 3 of them to pass through a new role-target.service.ts
that consumes the v2 under the hood.
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
# Introduction
Related https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/15846
The root cause is that universalIdentifier is still optional in database
and fallbacked when extracted out of database to standardId. But all
`BaseWorkspaceEntity` and `CustomWorkspaceEntity` share the same
standardId for their default standard fields `createdAt` `deletedAt`
resulting in such compare result in dispatcher
```ts
{
"initialDispatcher": {
"createdFlatEntityMaps": {
"byId": {},
"idByUniversalIdentifier": {},
"universalIdentifiersByApplicationId": {}
},
"deletedFlatEntityMaps": {
"byId": {},
"idByUniversalIdentifier": {},
"universalIdentifiersByApplicationId": {}
},
"updatedFlatEntityMaps": {
"byId": {
"55e1568c-eb87-4b8a-9f1b-19bbf6042f3e": {
"updates": [
{
"from": "Deletion date",
"to": "Date when the record was deleted",
"property": "description"
},
{
"from": "IconCalendarClock",
"to": "IconCalendarMinus",
"property": "icon"
},
{
"from": false,
"to": true,
"property": "isLabelSyncedWithName"
},
{
"from": null,
"to": {
"displayFormat": "RELATIVE"
},
"property": "settings"
}
]
}
}
}
},
"fromFlatEntity": {
"universalIdentifier": "20202020-b9a7-48d8-8387-b9a3090a50ec",
"applicationId": null,
"id": "9c97c8bf-1f64-463c-915c-f68f41d3cd60",
"standardId": "20202020-b9a7-48d8-8387-b9a3090a50ec",
"objectMetadataId": "e9565126-8351-457b-b003-3ea4c6d253bc",
"type": "DATE_TIME",
"name": "deletedAt",
"label": "Deleted at",
"defaultValue": null,
"description": "Deletion date",
"icon": "IconCalendarClock",
"standardOverrides": null,
"options": null,
"settings": null,
"isCustom": false,
"isActive": true,
"isSystem": false,
"isUIReadOnly": true,
"isNullable": true,
"isUnique": false,
"workspaceId": "20202020-1c25-4d02-bf25-6aeccf7ea419",
"isLabelSyncedWithName": false,
"relationTargetFieldMetadataId": null,
"relationTargetObjectMetadataId": null,
"morphId": null,
"createdAt": "2025-11-20T17:28:45.474Z",
"updatedAt": "2025-11-20T17:28:45.474Z",
"kanbanAggregateOperationViewIds": [],
"calendarViewIds": [],
"viewGroupIds": [],
"viewFieldIds": [],
"viewFilterIds": []
},
"toFlatEntity": {
"universalIdentifier": "20202020-b9a7-48d8-8387-b9a3090a50ec",
"applicationId": null,
"id": "55e1568c-eb87-4b8a-9f1b-19bbf6042f3e",
"standardId": "20202020-b9a7-48d8-8387-b9a3090a50ec",
"objectMetadataId": "37263f48-6858-4d28-a6e1-5f7321e49c24",
"type": "DATE_TIME",
"name": "deletedAt",
"label": "Deleted at",
"defaultValue": null,
"description": "Date when the record was deleted",
"icon": "IconCalendarMinus",
"standardOverrides": null,
"options": null,
"settings": {
"displayFormat": "RELATIVE"
},
"isCustom": false,
"isActive": true,
"isSystem": false,
"isUIReadOnly": true,
"isNullable": true,
"isUnique": false,
"workspaceId": "20202020-1c25-4d02-bf25-6aeccf7ea419",
"isLabelSyncedWithName": true,
"relationTargetFieldMetadataId": null,
"relationTargetObjectMetadataId": null,
"morphId": null,
"createdAt": "2025-11-20T17:28:44.267Z",
"updatedAt": "2025-11-21T17:17:55.057Z",
"kanbanAggregateOperationViewIds": [],
"calendarViewIds": [],
"viewGroupIds": [],
"viewFieldIds": [],
"viewFilterIds": []
}
}
```
## Impact
- This might be corrupting label and description of an other standard
field of an other object
- Race condition on latest universalIdentifier assigned in cache making
the update sometime accurate sometimes not
## Fix
Will be fixed by the in coming work on applicationId and
universalIdentifier as required in database + upgrade command that will
handle retro-comp. ( won't handle description corruption though, should
be anecdotical )
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15911 ( handling this only for
new workspace, retro comp upgrade command will be coming just after )
## PR scope
- Introduce TDD integration tests as failing
- Added unit test to critical methods that might have been involved in
the root cause ( still worth it to keep )
---------
Co-authored-by: guillim <guigloo@msn.com>
# Introduction
This PR aims to deprecate having to manually handle optimistic side
effect foreign key addition in the whole v2 experience.
This PR implements the strong basis + builder refactor of the optimistic
computation of a given flat entity maps with its related flat entity
maps ( runner needs a small refactor on actions type definition first )
Flat entity maps updates through mutations are now only scoped to the
generic entity builder ( very isolated )
## What's next
- Refactor actions v2 type definition to gain grain over `metadataName`
and action operation ( `create` `delete` `update` ).
from `{type: 'create_view_field'}` to `{metadataName: 'view_field',
type: 'create' }`
- Use new optimistic tool computation tools
- Only invalidate impacted flat maps cache
## New tools
Strictly dynamically typed new flat entity maps tools
- `addFlatEntityToFlatEntityAndRelatedEntityMapsThroughMutationOrThrow`
-
`deleteFlatEntityFromFlatEntityAndRelatedEntityMapsThroughMutationOrThrow`
## Unit test
Adding basic unit testing coverage to introduced tools
## `FlatEntityValidationArgs`
From
```ts
export type FlatEntityValidationArgs<T extends AllMetadataName> = {
flatEntityToValidate: MetadataFlatEntity<T>;
optimisticFlatEntityMaps: MetadataFlatEntityMaps<T>;
mutableDependencyOptimisticFlatEntityMaps: MetadataValidationRelatedFlatEntityMaps<T>;
workspaceId: string;
remainingFlatEntityMapsToValidate: MetadataFlatEntityMaps<T>;
buildOptions: WorkspaceMigrationBuilderOptions;
};
```
To
```ts
export type FlatEntityValidationArgs<T extends AllMetadataName> = {
flatEntityToValidate: MetadataFlatEntity<T>;
optimisticFlatEntityMapsAndRelatedFlatEntityMaps: MetadataFlatEntityAndRelatedFlatEntityMapsForValidation<T>;
workspaceId: string;
remainingFlatEntityMapsToValidate: MetadataFlatEntityMaps<T>;
buildOptions: WorkspaceMigrationBuilderOptions;
};
```
# Introduction
Refactoring the standard overrides dispatcher to only pass over fields
to has to be dispatched in the standardOverrides entry and let the other
side effects resulting from out of standard overrides mutation trigger
Related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1753
## This allows
- standard field settings, options etc updates and so on
## Remark
- Determine what we should do on object deactivation ( right now in
production we can still access deactivated object relation properties
and so on e.g deactivate opportunities still accessible from a view
field on company ( still have to re-create it as it has been deleted )
=> decided to leave as it is right now, `isActive` could be considered
as uiDeactivated in the end
- We should also add forbidden standard field mutations validation
inside the builder itself ( here we want to early return in the api
input transpiler too as we don't want to spread invalid side effects )
=> or in the end we could just centralize both but it will generate
several errors
## Coverage
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/object-metadata/successful-update-one-standard-object-metadata.integration-spec.ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/successful-update-one-standard-field-metadata.integration-spec.ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/object-metadata/failing-update-one-standard-object-metadata.integration-spec.ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/failing-update-one-standard-field-metadata.integration-spec.ts
Test Suites: 4 passed, 4 total
Tests: 18 passed, 18 total
Snapshots: 16 passed, 16 total
Time: 8.721 s, estimated 10 s
```
## Update post review
Faced a behavior where updating back the company label to its original
value would result in storing this value in the standard overrides
Refactored both field and object transpilation behavior to rather remove
the standard override value instead and let fallback on original value
Yes it's quite duplicated will factorize once we move this inside the
builder
# Introduction
Handling both:
- field deactivation side effect on view fields, view filters and views
- field deactivation side effect on view that targets it as
`kanbanAggregateFieldMetadataId`
- field deactivation side effect on view that targets it as
`calendarFieldMetadataId`
## Coverage
added coverage
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/kanban-aggregate-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (13.132 s)
kanban-aggregate-field-deactivation-nullifies-kanban-properties
✓ should nullify kanban properties when field used as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId is deactivated (3923 ms)
✓ should not modify views when field not used as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId is deactivated (2958 ms)
✓ should nullify kanban properties on multiple views when they all use the same field as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId (2542 ms)
✓ should nullify kanban properties when views have different aggregate operations on same field (3380 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 4 passed, 4 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 13.154 s
```
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/view-group-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (12.639 s)
view-group-field-deactivation-deletes-views
✓ should delete view when field used in view group is deactivated (3469 ms)
✓ should not delete view when field not used in view group is deactivated (3109 ms)
✓ should delete multiple views when they all use the same field in view groups (2741 ms)
✓ should handle deactivation when view has multiple view groups with different fields (3008 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 4 passed, 4 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 12.664 s
```
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/calendar-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (14.579 s)
calendar-field-deactivation-deletes-views
✓ should delete view when field used as calendarFieldMetadataId is deactivated (3388 ms)
✓ should not delete view when field not used as calendarFieldMetadataId is deactivated (2438 ms)
✓ should delete multiple views when they all use the same field as calendarFieldMetadataId (2635 ms)
✓ should handle deactivation when views have different calendar layouts on same field (3195 ms)
✓ should delete calendar view but not other view types when calendar field is deactivated (2682 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 5 passed, 5 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 14.601 s, estimated 15 s
```
## View soft deletion
We decided to remove the soft deletion grain on all the views, in this
PR context we've only removed soft deleted validation requirement on any
view entities
## Conclusion
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1754
## Context
- All flatEntity should extend SyncableEntity
- SyncableEntity should now have applicationId and application relation
- Fix syncApp deletion, should now properly use migration v2 to delete
syncable entities
# Introduction
### Summary
Implements side effect handling for `ViewGroup` and `ViewFilters` when
field metadata is updated in the v2 architecture. This ensures that
view-related records are properly maintained when enum field options are
modified, deleted, or created.
### Side effects
- **Side Effect System**: Added side effect handling for field metadata
updates that manages related view groups and view filters
- **Enum Field Updates**: When enum field options are modified, the
system now:
- **View Groups**: Creates new groups for added options, updates
existing groups for modified options, and deletes groups for removed
options
- **View Filters**: Updates filter values to reflect option changes and
removes filters that reference deleted options
### Enum runner fix
Update now works for both atomic enum and array enum ( multi select for
instance )
### Compute flat entity maps from to
Standardized this method usage across v2 services
Next step is to require dependencies dynamically
## Conclusion
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1649
## Goal
- inferDeletionFromMissingEntities is now a map instead of a single
bool, allowing us to parameterise it based on the entity we want to
compare
- Adding index creation/update when field isUnique is set to true and
index deletion when isUnique is false (for now)
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1346
# Introduction
Adding view-group to core engine v2
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15010 ( same pattern )
## What's done
- Created flat-view-group
- flat view group runner
- flat view group builder
- create view group service v2 and input transpilers
- refactor the existing view group resolver to fix standard (
BREAKING_CHANGE on graphql api update especially ) REST stays the same
- refactored the front to consume the mutations autogenerated
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1665
# Introduction
This PR introduces a huge type refactor that will leverage dynamic intra
entity optimistic flat maps update in the future and also a more
granular cache invalidation enhancing performances
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1717
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1716
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1643
## What's done
### Comparators centralization
Comparator is now done through global configuration as const for each
metadata names
Thanks to
Note:
Definition of standard is evolving, standard is now scoped to an app.
Meaning that a manifest should be able to update its own standards
objects but on other app standards ones ? Each synchronizable entities
will have a standardOverrides ?
## Typing refactor
### `AllFlatEntityTypesByMetadataName`
**Single source of truth for the complete type ecosystem**, mapping each
metadata name to its entity types, flat entities, and migration actions:
```typescript
export type AllFlatEntityTypesByMetadataName = {
fieldMetadata: {
actions: { created: CreateFieldAction; updated: UpdateFieldAction; deleted: DeleteFieldAction; };
flatEntity: FlatFieldMetadata;
entity: FieldMetadataEntity;
};
objectMetadata: { /* ... */ };
// ... all 10 metadata types
};
```
### `ALL_METADATA_NAME_MANY_TO_ONE_RELATIONS`
**Explicitly declares database relationships** between entities with
compile-time validation:
```typescript
export const ALL_METADATA_NAME_MANY_TO_ONE_RELATIONS = {
viewField: {
view: 'viewId',
fieldMetadata: 'fieldMetadataId',
},
cronTrigger: {
serverlessFunction: 'serverlessFunctionId',
},
// ... all relations
} as const satisfies MetadataNameAndRelations;
```
### `ALL_FLAT_ENTITY_CONFIGURATION`
**Centralizes comparison and serialization logic** for each metadata
type:
```typescript
export const ALL_FLAT_ENTITY_CONFIGURATION = {
fieldMetadata: {
propertiesToCompare: ['name', 'type', 'label', 'defaultValue', /* ... */],
propertiesToStringify: ['options', 'settings', 'defaultValue'],
},
objectMetadata: {
propertiesToCompare: ['nameSingular', 'namePlural', 'isActive', /* ... */],
propertiesToStringify: [],
},
// ... all metadata types
} as const satisfies AllFlatEntityConfiguration;
```
## Combined Impact
These three configurations work together to create a **strongly-typed,
centrally-managed metadata system**:
1. **`AllFlatEntityTypesByMetadataName`** defines *what exists*
2. **`ALL_METADATA_NAME_MANY_TO_ONE_RELATIONS`** defines *how they
relate*
3. **`ALL_FLAT_ENTITY_CONFIGURATION`** defines *how to compare and
serialize them*
**Result:** Builders and validators become thin wrappers around
type-safe, configuration-driven logic instead of containing scattered,
error-prone manual implementations.
## What's next
### StandardOverrides standardization
Every metadata entity can be a standard one for a workspace if it's an
installed app, which means it might not expose the whole entity api to
be editable through an import dynamically
The standard overrides logic should not be applied to Fields and Objects
but to every entities
At the moment we have a logic of `EDITABLE_PROPERTIES` through the api,
and also `STANDARD_OVERRIDEDABLE_PROPERTIES`
This should be configuration centered like `propertiesToCompare` and
`propertiesToStringify`.
Scoping this PR to two last for the moment. As update dispatch to
standardOverrides could be considered as a side effect prefer waiting to
start the side effect refactor
### Granular Optimistic deprecation
With this new grain at runtime we will be able to add a flat entity and
dispatch its addition to related flat maps, so we don't have to describe
an optimistic method for each flat entity operations
See `addFlatEntityToFlatEntityAndRelatedEntityMapsOrThrow`
Note: Still in wip and included in this PR but about to create a new one
to integrate these utils and remove existing methods
### ValidateBuildAndRun dynamic args typed defintion
We should restrain the devxp to send expected flat maps entity as at
least from to or dependency as we now have the grain both a type lvl and
runtime to do so
It should not be possible in the devxp to forgot adding the views to the
v2 builder when passing the view field anymore ( that would lead to
permanent validation error in view field integrity checks )
## Conclusion
Thanks for reading and reviewing !
Any suggestions are more than welcomed ! ( same as for questions too ! )
Paul Rastoin