# What
Fully deprecate old relations because we have one bug tied to it and it
make the codebase complex
# How I've made this PR:
1. remove metadata datasource (we only keep 'core') => this was causing
extra complexity in the refactor + flaky reset
2. merge dev and demo datasets => as I needed to update the tests which
is very painful, I don't want to do it twice
3. remove all code tied to RELATION_METADATA /
relation-metadata.resolver, or anything tied to the old relation system
4. Remove ONE_TO_ONE and MANY_TO_MANY that are not supported
5. fix impacts on the different areas : see functional testing below
# Functional testing
## Functional testing from the front-end:
1. Database Reset ✅
2. Sign In ✅
3. Workspace sign-up ✅
5. Browsing table / kanban / show ✅
6. Assigning a record in a one to many / in a many to one ✅
7. Deleting a record involved in a relation ✅ => broken but not tied to
this PR
8. "Add new" from relation picker ✅ => broken but not tied to this PR
9. Creating a Task / Note, Updating a Task / Note relations, Deleting a
Task / Note (from table, show page, right drawer) ✅ => broken but not
tied to this PR
10. creating a relation from settings (custom / standard x oneToMany /
manyToOne) ✅
11. updating a relation from settings should not be possible ✅
12. deleting a relation from settings (custom / standard x oneToMany /
manyToOne) ✅
13. Make sure timeline activity still work (relation were involved
there), espacially with Task / Note => to be double checked ✅ => Cannot
convert undefined or null to object
14. Workspace deletion / User deletion ✅
15. CSV Import should keep working ✅
16. Permissions: I have tested without permissions V2 as it's still hard
to test v2 work and it's not in prod yet ✅
17. Workflows global test ✅
## From the API:
1. Review open-api documentation (REST) ✅
2. Make sure REST Api are still able to fetch relations ==> won't do, we
have a coupling Get/Update/Create there, this requires refactoring
3. Make sure REST Api is still able to update / remove relation => won't
do same
## Automated tests
1. lint + typescript ✅
2. front unit tests: ✅
3. server unit tests 2 ✅
4. front stories: ✅
5. server integration: ✅
6. chromatic check : expected 0
7. e2e check : expected no more that current failures
## Remove // Todos
1. All are captured by functional tests above, nothing additional to do
## (Un)related regressions
1. Table loading state is not working anymore, we see the empty state
before table content
2. Filtering by Creator Tim Ap return empty results
3. Not possible to add Tasks / Notes / Files from show page
# Result
## New seeds that can be easily extended
<img width="1920" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d290d130-2a5f-44e6-b419-7e42a89eec4b"
/>
## -5k lines of code
## No more 'metadata' dataSource (we only have 'core)
## No more relationMetadata (I haven't drop the table yet it's not
referenced in the code anymore)
## We are ready to fix the 6 months lag between current API results and
our mocked tests
## No more bug on relation creation / deletion
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
# Introduction
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/591
Same than for `twenty-shared` made in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11083.
## TODO
- [x] Manual migrate twenty-website twenty-ui imports
## What's next:
- Generate barrel and migration script factorization within own package
+ tests
- Refactoring using preconstruct ? TimeBox
- Lint circular dependencies
- Lint import from barrel and forbid them
### Preconstruct
We need custom rollup plugins addition, but preconstruct does not expose
its rollup configuration. It might be possible to handle this using the
babel overrides. But was a big tunnel.
We could give it a try afterwards ! ( allowing cjs interop and stuff
like that )
Stuck to vite lib app
Closed related PRs:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11294
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11203
## Description:
This pull request includes the following changes:
1. **Dependency Update**:
- Added `@xyflow/react` as a dependency.
- Replaced imports from `reactflow` with `@xyflow/react` in multiple
components.
2. **Dependency Removal**:
- Removed `reactflow` dependency and its related code from the project.
3. **Type Definitions Update**:
- Updated type definitions for nodes and edges to align with the new
library.
4. **Code Refactoring**:
- Minor refactoring for improved code clarity and consistency in the
following components:
- `SettingsDataModelOverview`
- `SettingsDataModelOverviewEffect`
- `SettingsDataModelOverviewField`
- `SettingsDataModelOverviewObject`
5. **Dependency Files Update**:
- Updated `package.json` and `yarn.lock` to reflect the changes in
dependencies.
## Additional Notes:
- These changes ensure that the project is now using the `@xyflow/react`
library instead of `reactflow`.
- The refactoring improves code readability and maintains consistency
across the components.
- Please review the changes and provide any feedback or suggestions.
## Testing:
- The changes have been tested locally and verified to work as expected.
## Checklist:
- [x] Added `@xyflow/react` as a dependency.
- [x] Replaced `reactflow` imports with `@xyflow/react`.
- [x] Removed `reactflow` dependency.
- [x] Updated type definitions for nodes and edges.
- [x] Refactored components for improved clarity and consistency.
- [x] Updated `package.json` and `yarn.lock`.
- [x] Tested the changes locally.
## Related Issue
Fixes#6662
In this PR:
1. Refactor guards to avoid duplicated queries: WorkspaceAuthGuard and
UserAuthGuard only check for existence of workspace and user in the
request without querying the database
Current state:
<img width="704" alt="Bildschirmfoto 2024-05-11 um 17 57 33"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/48770548/c979f6fd-083e-40d3-8dbb-c572229e0da3">
I have some things im not really happy with right now:
* If I have different connections it would be weird to display a one_one
or many_one connection differently
* The edges overlay always at one hand at the source/target (also being
a problem with the 3 dots vs 1 dot)
* I would have to do 4 versions of the 3 dot marker variant as an svg
with exactly the same width as the edges wich is not as easy as it seems
:)
* The initial layout is not really great - I know dagre or elkjs could
solve this but maybe there is a better solution ...
If someone has a good idea for one or more of the problems im happy to
integrate them ;)
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Félix Malfait