# Introduction
Handling both:
- field deactivation side effect on view fields, view filters and views
- field deactivation side effect on view that targets it as
`kanbanAggregateFieldMetadataId`
- field deactivation side effect on view that targets it as
`calendarFieldMetadataId`
## Coverage
added coverage
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/kanban-aggregate-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (13.132 s)
kanban-aggregate-field-deactivation-nullifies-kanban-properties
✓ should nullify kanban properties when field used as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId is deactivated (3923 ms)
✓ should not modify views when field not used as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId is deactivated (2958 ms)
✓ should nullify kanban properties on multiple views when they all use the same field as kanbanAggregateOperationFieldMetadataId (2542 ms)
✓ should nullify kanban properties when views have different aggregate operations on same field (3380 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 4 passed, 4 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 13.154 s
```
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/view-group-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (12.639 s)
view-group-field-deactivation-deletes-views
✓ should delete view when field used in view group is deactivated (3469 ms)
✓ should not delete view when field not used in view group is deactivated (3109 ms)
✓ should delete multiple views when they all use the same field in view groups (2741 ms)
✓ should handle deactivation when view has multiple view groups with different fields (3008 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 4 passed, 4 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 12.664 s
```
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/calendar-field-deactivation-deletes-views.integration-spec.ts (14.579 s)
calendar-field-deactivation-deletes-views
✓ should delete view when field used as calendarFieldMetadataId is deactivated (3388 ms)
✓ should not delete view when field not used as calendarFieldMetadataId is deactivated (2438 ms)
✓ should delete multiple views when they all use the same field as calendarFieldMetadataId (2635 ms)
✓ should handle deactivation when views have different calendar layouts on same field (3195 ms)
✓ should delete calendar view but not other view types when calendar field is deactivated (2682 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 5 passed, 5 total
Snapshots: 0 total
Time: 14.601 s, estimated 15 s
```
## View soft deletion
We decided to remove the soft deletion grain on all the views, in this
PR context we've only removed soft deleted validation requirement on any
view entities
## Conclusion
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1754
## Context
- All flatEntity should extend SyncableEntity
- SyncableEntity should now have applicationId and application relation
- Fix syncApp deletion, should now properly use migration v2 to delete
syncable entities
# Introduction
### Summary
Implements side effect handling for `ViewGroup` and `ViewFilters` when
field metadata is updated in the v2 architecture. This ensures that
view-related records are properly maintained when enum field options are
modified, deleted, or created.
### Side effects
- **Side Effect System**: Added side effect handling for field metadata
updates that manages related view groups and view filters
- **Enum Field Updates**: When enum field options are modified, the
system now:
- **View Groups**: Creates new groups for added options, updates
existing groups for modified options, and deletes groups for removed
options
- **View Filters**: Updates filter values to reflect option changes and
removes filters that reference deleted options
### Enum runner fix
Update now works for both atomic enum and array enum ( multi select for
instance )
### Compute flat entity maps from to
Standardized this method usage across v2 services
Next step is to require dependencies dynamically
## Conclusion
closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1649
# Introduction
Initial motivation here was to migrate the object related records logic
from v1 to v2, please note that now in v2 views aren't records anymore
but core engine entities
## What's done
- Added specific label identifier targeting view field logic
- Handled side effects on viewField creation with lowest position on
object label identifier mutation
- Added viewField relations in field metadate entity + handled
optimistic in builder v2
- Added view relations in object metadata entity + handled optimistic in
builder v2
- Added integration tests covering the side effects and new validation
exceptions
- Sandardized cache computation
- Coverage on object metadata creation side effect on views and view
fields
## Coverage
```ts
PASS test/integration/graphql/suites/view/view-field/object-identifier-update-side-effect-on-view-field.integration-spec.ts
View Field Resolver - Successful object metadata identifier update side effect on view field
✓ should create a view field on label identifier object metadata update if it does not exist on view (7 ms)
✓ Should not allow deleting a label identifier view field (17 ms)
✓ Should not allow destroying a label identifier view field (6 ms)
✓ Should not allow updating a label identifier view field visibility to false (8 ms)
✓ Should not allow creating a view field with a position lower than the label idenfitier view field (180 ms)
✓ Should not allow updated labelIdentifier view field with a position higher than existing other view field (346 ms)
✓ Should allow updated labelIdentifier view field with a position higher than existing other view field (434 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 7 passed, 7 total
Snapshots: 5 passed, 5 total
Time: 4.571 s, estimated 5 s
```
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1664
This Pr begins the extensibility journey
- adds a `core.cronTrigger` table
- add a oneToMany relation between core.serverlessFunction and
`core.cronTrigger` (one serverlessFunction can be triggered by multiple
cronTriggers)
- add a job to trigger a serverless function
- adds a cron to trigger serverlessFunction (via the trigger job) based
on the core.cronTrigger.setting.pattern
- adds a command to register the cron
- add the command in `cron-register-all.command.ts`
# Introduction
In this PR we create basic transpilation methods and utils to handle
input to flat, entity to flat, object maps to flat. In order to
transpile everything into a common validation that will be implemented
in another PR
## FieldMetadataEntity typing
Added `never | null` to fields that should never be in order to ease
general abstracted method to pass null, as anw it's what is in the
database
## Todo
- ~~Create a feature flag~~
- Integration test for object creation through metadata api + pg col
introspection and snapshoting
# Introduction
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13264, this PR
introduces several `fieldMetadataEntity` typing enhancement suggestions.
Mainly any nullable field metadata entity properties are now either
nullable or defined.
Or never if field is dynamically required or not depending on the field
metadata type
This enhance DevX
## Standards
- field enum ( `MULTI_SELECT`, `SELECT`, `RATING` ) will never have
`options` set to `NULL` in db
- field `RELATION` or `MORH_RELATION` won't ever have its relation
fields set to `NULL` in db
- field of any type `settings`, even if possibly defined, can still be
`NULL` in db
- field of any type `defaultValue`, even if possibly defined, can still
be `NULL` in db
It coud be interesting to guard these standards by adding dedicated pg
constraints on each field
## TypesScript type tests
added coverage for each `settings`, `defaultValue`, and `options`
depending on the current `fieldMetadata`
Honestly I don' know if this typescript assertions test file is not
overkill, but regarding metadata staticness it might be very interesting
to have this guard
## Possible improvements
- We could type as `unknown` instead of "all" on `FieldMetadataType`
inferrance
- We still need to deprecate remaining duplicated entities such as
`Index/Field/MetadataInterface` etc not a huge refactor neither urgent
# Introduction
Following `FieldMetadataInterface` deprecation in
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13264
As for the previous PR will rename and remove all the file in a
secondary PR to avoid conflicts and over loading this one
## Improvements
Removed optional properties from the `objectMetadataEntity` model and
added utils to retrieve test data
## Notes
By touching to `ObjectMetadataDTO` I would have expected a twenty-front
codegenerated types mutation, but it does not seem to be granular enough
to null/undefined coercion
# Introduction
From the moment replaced the FieldMetadataInterface definition to:
```ts
import { FieldMetadataType } from 'twenty-shared/types';
import { FieldMetadataEntity } from 'src/engine/metadata-modules/field-metadata/field-metadata.entity';
export type FieldMetadataInterface<
T extends FieldMetadataType = FieldMetadataType,
> = FieldMetadataEntity<T>;
```
After this PR merge will create a new one removing the type and
replacing it to `FieldMetadataEntity`.
Did not renamed it here to avoid conflicts on naming + type issues fixs
within the same PR
## Field metadata entity RELATION or MORPH
Relations fields cannot be null for those field metadata entity instance
anymore, but are never for the others see
`packages/twenty-server/src/engine/metadata-modules/field-metadata/types/field-metadata-entity-test.type.ts`
( introduced TypeScript tests )
## Concerns
- TS_VECTOR is the most at risk with the `generatedType` and
`asExpression` removal from interface
## What's next
- `FielMetadataInterface` removal and rename ( see introduction )
- Depcrecating `ObjectMetadataInterface`
- Refactor `FieldMetadataEntity` optional fiels to be nullable only
- TO DIG `never` occurences on settings, defaultValue etc
- Some interfaces will be replaced by the `FlatFieldMetadata` when
deprecating the current sync and comparators tools
# extracting domain emails
Added new test cases covering weird but valid email formats (plus
addressing, subdomains, international domains, etc.) to identify
potential failures in the current implementation.
Two tests with quoted local parts containing @ symbols or quotes are
marked as skipped since they're expected to fail with the current simple
string splitting approach. They are too exotic IMO, we should throw
errors.
## Next
We will monitor errors related to this and update accordingly later on.
### Note
technically, quotes are possible in RFC see
[here](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4816424/are-single-quotes-legal-in-the-name-part-of-an-email-address)
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Introduction
Big diff a lot of tests and snapshots ( real diff < 500+ )
close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12117
close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12133
## What has been done here
Implemented a strong integration coverage on both fieldmetadata`SELECT`
`UPDATE` and `CREATE`.
Implemented server side validation for the options `value` `label` `id`
and collision issue with also `position`
We could improve:
- Position validation
- DefaultValue validation
## Update
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/update-one-field-metadata-select.integration-spec.ts (41.054 s)
Field metadata select update tests group
✓ Update should succeed with provided option id (2565 ms)
✓ Update should succeed with valid default value (1469 ms)
✓ Update should succeed with various options id (1257 ms)
✓ Update should succeed without option id (1286 ms)
✓ Update should trim option values (1366 ms)
✓ Update should succeed with default value and no options (1122 ms)
✓ Update should fail with unknown default value and no options (1075 ms)
✓ Update should fail with only white spaces id (1195 ms)
✓ Update should fail with empty string id (1058 ms)
✓ Update should fail with null id (1066 ms)
✓ Update should fail with not a string id (1098 ms)
✓ Update should fail with too long id (1373 ms)
✓ Update should fail with only white spaces label (1034 ms)
✓ Update should fail with empty string label (1057 ms)
✓ Update should fail with null label (1100 ms)
✓ Update should fail with not a string label (1144 ms)
✓ Update should fail with too long label (1273 ms)
✓ Update should fail with only white spaces value (1385 ms)
✓ Update should fail with empty string value (1035 ms)
✓ Update should fail with null value (1068 ms)
✓ Update should fail with not a string value (1021 ms)
✓ Update should fail with too long value (1134 ms)
✓ Update should fail with invalid option id (1137 ms)
✓ Update should fail with empty options (1238 ms)
✓ Update should fail with invalid option value format (1104 ms)
✓ Update should fail with comma in option label (1004 ms)
✓ Update should fail with duplicated option values (1015 ms)
✓ Update should fail with duplicated option ids (1079 ms)
✓ Update should fail with duplicated option positions (1266 ms)
✓ Update should fail with duplicated trimmed option values (1220 ms)
✓ Update should fail with undefined option label (1029 ms)
✓ Update should fail with an invalid default value (1142 ms)
✓ Update should fail with an unknown default value (1081 ms)
✓ Update should fail with undefined option value (1086 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 34 passed, 34 total
Snapshots: 28 passed, 28 total
Time: 41.079 s
```
## Create
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/create-one-field-metadata-select.integration-spec.ts (38.292 s)
Field metadata select creation tests group
✓ Create should succeed with provided option id (2096 ms)
✓ Create should succeed with valid default value (1316 ms)
✓ Create should succeed with various options id (1113 ms)
✓ Create should succeed without option id (1378 ms)
✓ Create should trim option values (1296 ms)
✓ Create should fail with only white spaces id (1000 ms)
✓ Create should fail with empty string id (1325 ms)
✓ Create should fail with null id (1060 ms)
✓ Create should fail with not a string id (1142 ms)
✓ Create should fail with too long id (1321 ms)
✓ Create should fail with only white spaces label (999 ms)
✓ Create should fail with empty string label (1163 ms)
✓ Create should fail with null label (1198 ms)
✓ Create should fail with not a string label (1678 ms)
✓ Create should fail with too long label (1527 ms)
✓ Create should fail with only white spaces value (1200 ms)
✓ Create should fail with empty string value (1102 ms)
✓ Create should fail with null value (1037 ms)
✓ Create should fail with not a string value (1462 ms)
✓ Create should fail with too long value (896 ms)
✓ Create should fail with invalid option id (997 ms)
✓ Create should fail with empty options (1058 ms)
✓ Create should fail with invalid option value format (1190 ms)
✓ Create should fail with comma in option label (1142 ms)
✓ Create should fail with duplicated option values (872 ms)
✓ Create should fail with duplicated option ids (860 ms)
✓ Create should fail with duplicated option positions (1002 ms)
✓ Create should fail with duplicated trimmed option values (1336 ms)
✓ Create should fail with undefined option label (754 ms)
✓ Create should fail with an invalid default value (696 ms)
✓ Create should fail with an unknown default value (678 ms)
✓ Create should fail with undefined option value (699 ms)
✓ Create should fail with null options (720 ms)
✓ Create should fail with undefined options (686 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 34 passed, 34 total
Snapshots: 29 passed, 29 total
Time: 38.314 s
```
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed ! Please let me know
## Discussion about validation governance
### Front
Front side will be dealing with zod validations schema that he will
handle and maintain by himself
### Back validation instances
- Validation hold through DTO declarations ( run by yoga through the
resolvers )
- Server programmatic validation and exceptions handling ( run through
the services )
For this refactor/fix we decided to stick to the current implementation
only touching the `Server programmatic validation and exceptions
handling` we will handle validation centralization when we will onboard
the `nestjs-query` deprecation/integration refactor.
### Vision
In the best of the world we could think of an intermediary model that
will handle and take responsibility of the validation decorators that
would be run programmatically through the service, Yoga would still
consume it ? then we would need to have enough grain in the service to
know the input has already validated
## Notes
Introduced zod back side in order to handle very atomic and primitive
validation
## Summary
Add support for multi-workspace feature and adjust configurations and
states accordingly.
- Introduced new state isMultiWorkspaceEnabledState.
- Updated ClientConfigProviderEffect component to handle
multi-workspace.
- Modified GraphQL schema and queries to include multi-workspace related
configurations.
- Adjusted server environment variables and their respective
documentation to support multi-workspace toggle.
- Updated server-side logic to handle new multi-workspace configurations
and conditions.
Paul Rastoin