## Add Morph Relation Field Display Support for Tables (one to many &
many to one)
**Features:**
- Display morph relation fields (one-to-many, many-to-one) in table
cells
- Multi-field record retrieval for improved performance
- Enhanced table cell rendering with morph relation support
**Components Added:**
- `MorphRelationManyToOneFieldDisplay` - Shows many-to-one morph
relations
- `MorphRelationOneToManyFieldDisplay` - Shows one-to-many morph
relations
TODO :
handle notes and tasks case if we choose these kind of objects as
targets/source for a morph relation
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This PR introduces the usage of record fields in the manipulation of
table columns and board fields.
Since all of the actual system relies on states like tableColumns,
recordIndexFieldDefinitions and the likes, it was required to implement
temporary utils that modifies those states in parallel of the new
generic currentRecordFields, to keep a working product.
With this PR though, currentRecordFields becomes the single source of
truth that gets saved to DB, and the remaining work is just to make the
switch with this new state on all components that are plugged to
tableColumns and the like.
This will be done in another PR.
This PR prepares the refactor of record field definition and column
definition.
We need to separate the two concepts of FieldInput and FieldContext at
the cell level, and the new RecordField concept that will replace
FieldDefinition at the metadata and state level.
So we create a new ui sub-folder in the already existing record-field
folder, in order to separate those two concepts that are still very
close.
In this PR
- Introduction of readableFields and updatableFields in
objectMetadataItem selector to ease filtering from a developer
experience perspective ( + to help developers think to do it). In
discussion @lucasbordeau @charlesBochet
- Remove non-updatable field from CSV import process (@etiennejouan)
- QA fix / Non-readable fields should not show on show page
- QA fix / It should not be offered to create a kanban view on a
non-readable field
- QA fix / It should not be offered to create view groups on a
non-readable field
- QA fix / Rating field should have a readonly mode
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
In our Graphql schema, ids are typed as UUID.
Our FE codegen is typing it as 'any', unless we say otherwise. Fixing it
and fixing the impacts in the codebase
Moves system-level operations (auth, billing, admin) to use the
/metadata endpoint instead of /graphql.
This cleans up the endpoint separation so /graphql is purely for core
objects (Company, People, etc.) and /metadata handles all system
operations.
Part of prep work for webhook/API key core migration.
Workflow views and versions are seed being opened by default into record
page. Issue is that:
- new views are set by default to side panel. Updated by copying the
current opensIn value to the new view
- users can still select side panel into their options. Disabling the
button.
<img width="650" alt="Capture d’écran 2025-06-19 à 16 15 34"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0ddc3284-0fed-404f-9c1d-225c65549fd1"
/>
# What
Fully deprecate old relations because we have one bug tied to it and it
make the codebase complex
# How I've made this PR:
1. remove metadata datasource (we only keep 'core') => this was causing
extra complexity in the refactor + flaky reset
2. merge dev and demo datasets => as I needed to update the tests which
is very painful, I don't want to do it twice
3. remove all code tied to RELATION_METADATA /
relation-metadata.resolver, or anything tied to the old relation system
4. Remove ONE_TO_ONE and MANY_TO_MANY that are not supported
5. fix impacts on the different areas : see functional testing below
# Functional testing
## Functional testing from the front-end:
1. Database Reset ✅
2. Sign In ✅
3. Workspace sign-up ✅
5. Browsing table / kanban / show ✅
6. Assigning a record in a one to many / in a many to one ✅
7. Deleting a record involved in a relation ✅ => broken but not tied to
this PR
8. "Add new" from relation picker ✅ => broken but not tied to this PR
9. Creating a Task / Note, Updating a Task / Note relations, Deleting a
Task / Note (from table, show page, right drawer) ✅ => broken but not
tied to this PR
10. creating a relation from settings (custom / standard x oneToMany /
manyToOne) ✅
11. updating a relation from settings should not be possible ✅
12. deleting a relation from settings (custom / standard x oneToMany /
manyToOne) ✅
13. Make sure timeline activity still work (relation were involved
there), espacially with Task / Note => to be double checked ✅ => Cannot
convert undefined or null to object
14. Workspace deletion / User deletion ✅
15. CSV Import should keep working ✅
16. Permissions: I have tested without permissions V2 as it's still hard
to test v2 work and it's not in prod yet ✅
17. Workflows global test ✅
## From the API:
1. Review open-api documentation (REST) ✅
2. Make sure REST Api are still able to fetch relations ==> won't do, we
have a coupling Get/Update/Create there, this requires refactoring
3. Make sure REST Api is still able to update / remove relation => won't
do same
## Automated tests
1. lint + typescript ✅
2. front unit tests: ✅
3. server unit tests 2 ✅
4. front stories: ✅
5. server integration: ✅
6. chromatic check : expected 0
7. e2e check : expected no more that current failures
## Remove // Todos
1. All are captured by functional tests above, nothing additional to do
## (Un)related regressions
1. Table loading state is not working anymore, we see the empty state
before table content
2. Filtering by Creator Tim Ap return empty results
3. Not possible to add Tasks / Notes / Files from show page
# Result
## New seeds that can be easily extended
<img width="1920" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d290d130-2a5f-44e6-b419-7e42a89eec4b"
/>
## -5k lines of code
## No more 'metadata' dataSource (we only have 'core)
## No more relationMetadata (I haven't drop the table yet it's not
referenced in the code anymore)
## We are ready to fix the 6 months lag between current API results and
our mocked tests
## No more bug on relation creation / deletion
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
This pull request introduces changes to improve handling of nullable
values in link-related data structures and simplifies field value
generation logic. Key updates include adjustments to type definitions,
utility functions, and component logic to support `null` values for
links, along with the removal of the `generateDefaultFieldValue`
function in favor of `generateEmptyFieldValue`.
There will be a few more follow-up Pull Requests.
---
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/11844
# Introduction
In this PR we've migrated `twenty-shared` from a `vite` app
[libary-mode](https://vite.dev/guide/build#library-mode) to a
[preconstruct](https://preconstruct.tools/) "atomic" application ( in
the future would like to introduce preconstruct to handle of all our
atomic dependencies such as `twenty-emails` `twenty-ui` etc it will be
integrated at the monorepo's root directly, would be to invasive in the
first, starting incremental via `twenty-shared`)
For more information regarding the motivations please refer to nor:
- https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/587
-
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/281#issuecomment-2630949682
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/589
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/590
## How to test
In order to ease the review this PR will ship all the codegen at the
very end, the actual meaning full diff is `+2,411 −114`
In order to migrate existing dependent packages to `twenty-shared` multi
barrel new arch you need to run in local:
```sh
yarn tsx packages/twenty-shared/scripts/migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport.ts && \
npx nx run-many -t lint --fix -p twenty-front twenty-ui twenty-server twenty-emails twenty-shared twenty-zapier
```
Note that `migrateFromSingleToMultiBarrelImport` is idempotent, it's atm
included in the PR but should not be merged. ( such as codegen will be
added before merging this script will be removed )
## Misc
- related opened issue preconstruct
https://github.com/preconstruct/preconstruct/issues/617
## Closed related PR
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/11028
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10993
- https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10960
## Upcoming enhancement: ( in others dedicated PRs )
- 1/ refactor generate barrel to export atomic module instead of `*`
- 2/ generate barrel own package with several files and tests
- 3/ Migration twenty-ui the same way
- 4/ Use `preconstruct` at monorepo global level
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
## Introduction
Added coverage on the `useDeleteOneRecord` hooks, especially its
optimistic behavior feature.
Introduced a new testing tool `InMemoryTestingCacheInstance` that has
builtin very basic expectors in order to avoid future duplication when
covering others record hooks `update, create, destroy` etc etc
## Notes
Added few comments in this PR regarding some builtin functions I've
created around companies and people mocked object model and that I think
could be cool to spread and centralize within a dedicated "class
template"
Also put in light that unless I'm mistaken some tests are running on
`RecordNode` and not `RecordObject`
Took few directions on my own that as I always I would suggestion nor
remarks on them !
Let me know
## Misc
- Should we refactor `useDeleteOneRecord` tests to follow `eachTesting`
pattern ? => I feel like this is inappropriate as this hooks is already
high level, the only plus value would be less tests code despite
readability IMO
# Introduction
In this PR https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10493 introduced a
regression on optimistic cache for record creation, by expecting a
`position` `fieldMetadataItem` on every `ObjectMetadataItem` which is a
wrong assertion
Some `Tasks` and `ApiKeys` do not have one
## Fix
Dynamically compute optimistic record input position depending on
current `ObjectMetadataItem`
## Refactor
Refactored a failing test following [jest
each](https://jestjs.io/docs/api#describeeachtablename-fn-timeout)
pattern to avoid error prone duplicated env tests. Created a "standard'
and applied it to an other test also using `it.each`.
## Introduction
This refactor results from this
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/10493 review
Introduced a new abstraction to the extinsting
`generateDepthOneRecordGqlFields` that was accepting an optional record
in arg in order to map generated `recordGqlFields` to the keys in the
record
1/ Created a dedicated util method
`generateDepthOneRecordGqlFieldsFromRecord` to do so
2/ Updated each previous `generateDepthOneRecordGqlFields` passing a
record to call new `generateDepthOneRecordGqlFieldsFromRecord`
## Context
We are experiencing a lot of re-rendering / flash on MultiRecordSelect /
SingleRecordSelect / RelationPicker.
This PR is a first step to refactor this components
## Scope
Only move files to uniformize and prepare for the upcoming refactoring
## Vision
- SingleRecordPicker
- MultipleRecordPicker
- sharing RecordPicker tooling (RecordPickerComponentInstanceContext,
searchState)
Used in other areas:
- RelationPicker (which is actually only a subcomponent of
RelationToOneFieldInput)
- RelationFromManyFieldInput
- WorkflowRelationFieldInput
- etc.
+ remove all effects
+ migrate to the latest APIs
+ make a pass on re-renders to remove them completely (we likely need to
use a bit more familyStates here)
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/410
- Added `openRecordIn` column in the `view` entity, which is set to
`SIDE_PANEL` by default
- Created a new option inside the view option dropdown to be able to set
`openRecordIn`
- Updated all record show page openings to reflect the setting behavior
- For `workflow`, `workflowVersion` and `workflowRun` (what I call
workflow objects), we want the default view `openRecordIn` to be set to
`RECORD_PAGE`. When seeding the views for the new workspaces, we set
`openRecordIn` to `RECORD_PAGE` for workflow objects. Since the workflow
objects views `openRecordIn` will be set to the default value
`SIDE_PANEL` for the existing workspaces when the sync metadata runs, I
created a script to run in the 0.43 update to update this value.
- Updated `closeCommandMenu` because of problems introduced by the
animate presence wrapper around the command menu. We now reset the
states at the end of the animation.
Note: We want to be able to open all workflow objects pages in the side
panel, but this requires some refactoring of the workflow module. For
now @Bonapara wanted to allow the possibility to change the
`openRecordIn` setting to `SIDE_PANEL` even for the workflows even if
it's buggy and not ready for the moment. Since this is an experimental
feature, it shouldn't cause too many problems.
# Introduction
While importing records encountering missing expected fields when
writting a fragment from apollo cache
## Updates
### 1/ `createdBy` Default value
When inserting in cache in create single or many we will now make
optimistic behavior on the createdBy value
### 2/ `createRecordInCache` dynamically create `recordGrqlFields`
When creating an entry in cache, we will now dynamically generate fields
to be written in the fragment instead of expecting all of them. As by
nature record could be partial
### 3/ Strictly typed `RecordGqlFields`
# Conclusion
closes#9927
# Introduction
At the moment when updating any record cache occurence, we will build a
fragment that will expect all of the object metadata item fields to be
provided.
Which result in the following traces: ( in the video companies aren't
fetch with companyId and other missing fields )
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/56eab7c1-8f01-45ff-8f5d-78737b788b92
By definition as we're using graphql we might not request every record's
fields each time we wanna consume them.
In this way we will now dynamically compute or expect depending on the
CRUD operation specific fields to be written in the cache, and not all
of them
Tested all optimistic and failure management use cases
## Covering cache
Added coverage only for the `deleteOne` and `deleteMany` hooks, it cover
only the record record cache and not its relations hydratation ( for the
moment )
## Why not closing #9927
Unless I'm mistaken everything done here have fixed the same logs/traces
issue for updates and deletion but not creation.
Which means we still need to investigate the mass upload from import and
prefillRecord behavior
In a nutshell: went over each `updateRecordFromCache` calls, still need
to do all `createRecordInCache` calls
related to #9927
## Conlusion
Sorry for the big PR should have ejected into a specific one for the
`MinimalRecord` refactor
Will also continue covering others hooks later in my week as for the
`deleteOne`
As always any suggestions are welcomed !
# Introduction
When we create a new `view` from record table that has relation such as
opportunities.
Encountered invariant conditions:
## Unknown fiel `__typename`
`Should never occur, encountered unknown fields __typename in
objectMetadaItem viewGroup`,
### Fixed by ignoring unknown internal fields
## Provided both relation `view` and `viewId`
`Should never provide relation mutation through anything else than the
fieldId e.g companyId and not company, encountered: view`
### Fixed by sending only `viewId` to `createManyRecords` in
`usePersistViewGroupRecords.ts`
# Introduction
Avoid having multiple `isDefined` definition across our pacakges
Also avoid importing `isDefined` from `twenty-ui` which exposes a huge
barrel for a such little util function
## In a nutshell
Removed own `isDefined.ts` definition from `twenty-ui` `twenty-front`
and `twenty-server` to move it to `twenty-shared`.
Updated imports for each packages, and added explicit dependencies to
`twenty-shared` if not already in place
Related PR https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/9941
Implementing the Outlook icon for CreatedBy, only for emails.
Not in this PR original scope : The similar feature for calendar created
records. Since it was straightforward, I added it to the scope of this
PR.
Fix https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/252
# Introduction
This PR is highly related to previous optimistic cache refactor:
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/9881
Here we've added some logic within the
`triggerUpdateRelationsOptimisticEffect` which will now run if given
recordInput `deletedAt` field is defined.
If deletion, we will iterate over all the fields searching for
`RELATION` for which deletion might implies necessity to detach the
relation
## Known troubleshooting ( also on main )
We might have to refactor the `prefillRecord` to spread and
overrides`inputValue` over defaultOne as inputValue could be a partial
one for more info please a look to
# Conclusion
Any suggestions are welcomed !
fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/9580
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Introduction
It seems like optimistic caching isn't working as expected for any
record relation mutation, CREATE UPDATE DELETE.
It should not have an impact on the destroy
We included a new `computeOptimisticRecordInput` that will calculate if
a relation is added or detach.
Updated the `triggerCreateRecordsOptimisticEffect` signature we should
have a look to each of its call to determine if it should be checking
cache or not
Related to #9580
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Introduction
By initially fixing this Fixes#9381, discovered other behavior that
have been fix.
Overall we encountered a bug that corrupts a workspace and make the
browser + api crash
This issue https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/25
suggests a refactor that has final save button instead of auto-save
## `labelIdentifierFieldMetadataId` form default value
The default value resulted in being undefined, resulting in react hook
form `labelIdentifierFieldMetadataId` is required field error.
### Fix
Setting default value fallback to `null` as field is `nullable`
## `SettingsDataModelObjectSettingsFormCard` never triggers form
Unless I'm mistaken in production touching any fields within
`SettingsDataModelObjectSettingsFormCard` would never trigger form
submission until you also modify `SettingsDataModelObjectAboutForm`
fields
### Fix
Provide and apply `onblur` that triggers the form on both
`SettingsDataModelObjectSettingsFormCard` inputs
## Wrong default `labelIdentifierFieldMetadataItem` on first page render
When landing on the page for the first time, if a custom
`labelIdentifierFieldMetadataItem` has been set it won't be computed
within the `PreviewCard`.
Occurs when `labelIdentifierFieldMetadataId` form default value is
undefined, due to `any` injection.
### Fix
In the `getLabelIdentifierFieldMetadataItem` check the
`labelIdentifierFieldMetadataIdFormValue` definition, if undefined
fallback to current `objectMetadata` identifier
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Guillim