3cf04bea28fd2aa40b9f9f4875afe3afd41235c4
1264 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
3cf04bea28 |
Support sender variable on workflow send-email action (#22512)
## Context Draft-email workflow steps already accept a workspace member variable as the sender: the step input's `connectedAccountId` can hold a workflow variable that resolves to a workspace member id, which the action then maps to that member's first connected account. Send-email steps were gated out of this and only accepted a static connected account pick. This enables the same dynamic sender resolution on send-email, e.g. sending from the assignee/owner of the record that triggered the workflow. ## What changed - Removed the draft-only gate in `EmailWorkflowActionBase.postprocessInput` so send-email resolves a workspace member id to a connected account the same way draft-email does - Exposed the variable picker and hint on the Account field for both email actions in the workflow step editor - Updated the send-email action spec to cover sender resolution (mirrors the draft-email spec) and replaced the `SendEmailHasNoVariablePicker` story with a variable-sender story for `SEND_EMAIL` <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22512?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
1270054d35 |
feat(ai): dashboard & view building (#22411)
## Why
Building a dashboard through AI chat used to cost ~9 sequential LLM
round-trips
(~160K input tokens for a single request): the agent had to resolve
object/field UUIDs and assemble views through many granular tool calls,
each
step replaying the full cached context.
## What changed
### 1. Reference objects & fields by name (fewer round-trips)
The agent no longer needs to resolve UUIDs before acting.
- `get_object_metadata`: filter by `objectName` (singular/plural) and a
new
`includeFields` flag returning each object's fields (`{id, name, type,
label}`)
inline — object + field IDs in one call.
- `get_field_metadata`: accepts `objectName` as an alternative to
`objectMetadataId`.
- All three dashboard write tools (`create_complete_dashboard`,
`add_dashboard_widget`, `update_dashboard_widget`): accept `objectName`
and
`*FieldName` variants (`aggregateFieldName`,
`primaryAxisGroupByFieldName`,
`secondaryAxisGroupByFieldName`, `groupByFieldName`, ratio `fieldName`),
resolved to UUIDs server-side by `resolveWidgetFieldNamesToIds`. UUID
variants
still win when both are given.
### 2. `upsert_complete_view` — one atomic call to build/reconfigure a
view
- New `upsert_complete_view` tool + `ViewService.upsertCompleteView`:
create or
update a view together with its fields, filters, and sorts.
- Children are **declarative**: a provided array replaces all existing
entries of
that kind, `[]` clears them, omitting leaves them untouched. Fields are
referenced by name or UUID; no child-row IDs needed.
- Runs as a **single workspace migration** (`view` + `viewField` +
`viewFilter` +
`viewSort` in one `validateBuildAndRunWorkspaceMigration` matrice)
instead of
chained per-entity service calls. New
`buildCompleteViewChildrenFlatOperations`
util assembles the child create/delete operations.
- Granular tools (`create_view_filter`, `update_view_sort`, …) are
retained for
surgical single-entry edits.
### 3. Chart filters on dashboard widgets (end-to-end)
- Added `chartFilterSchema` (`recordFilters` + optional
`recordFilterGroups` for
AND/OR logic) to the four chart configs, with field-by-name or -UUID
references
and documented operands/value formats.
- **Relative dates supported** — e.g. `PAST_7_DAY`, `THIS_1_MONTH`,
`NEXT_3_WEEK`,
plus open-ended `IS_IN_PAST` / `IS_IN_FUTURE` / `IS_TODAY`. Filters
route
through the same read pipeline (`computeRecordGqlOperationFilter`) as
view
filters, so they resolve and apply correctly.
- `resolveChartFilterFieldNamesToIds` resolves filter `fieldName` → id
against the
widget object.
### 4. Re-enable AI-assisted dashboards
- Removed the "coming soon" gating (`isActive: false` on the dashboard
skill and
the "not available yet" copy in the MCP server + chat prompts) and
registered
`DashboardToolProvider`.
- Rewrote the dashboard skill prompt: confirmation gate (present a plan,
wait for
confirmation), completion guard (once confirmed, emit the create tool
in-turn —
no "now let me…" preambles), default-and-proceed (pick sensible defaults
for
missing fields instead of stalling), and an intent gate so informational
dashboard questions are answered directly without loading skills.
### 5. Frontend: clearer advanced-filter labels
- `useRecordFilterField` now derives the filter label from field
metadata and
appends the relation target field (e.g. `Company → Name`), so
relation/target
filters — including those set by the AI — display correctly instead of
showing
a stale/blank stored label.
## Fixes
- **`get_object_metadata({ objectName })` crash.**
`ObjectMetadataService.findManyWithinWorkspace`
spread an array-form (`OR`) `where` into a plain object, producing
`{ "0": {...}, "1": {...}, workspaceId }` → `Property "0" was not found
in
"ObjectMetadataEntity"`. Now injects `workspaceId` into each OR clause,
so name
lookups work.
- **Invalid SELECT/MULTI_SELECT filter options silently produced broken
charts/views.**
Chart-configuration validation and the migration-layer
`FlatViewFilterValidator`
now reject filters that reference options that don't exist, with a clear
`Allowed values: …` message at creation time (shared
`getInvalidSelectFilterOptionValues` util + tests).
- **Non-atomic view assembly.** The previous multi-call view build could
leave a
half-built view on failure; `upsert_complete_view` now runs as a single
transaction (one validation pass, one cache recompute, rollback on
error).
- **Blank RECORD_TABLE widgets from UNLISTED views.** Guidance + the
upsert
ownership check steer widget-backing views to `WORKSPACE` visibility; an
UNLISTED view created without an owner renders a blank widget.
- **Extra discovery round-trip removed.** Deleted the skill→tool bundle
mechanism
(`SKILL_TOOL_BUNDLES`, `getBundledToolNamesForSkills`, and the
`load_skills`
schema-loading path) that forced a second `learn_tools` call.
- **Type-safety of widget resolution.** Reworked the widget resolver to
build a
properly typed `WidgetWithMetadataIds` (dedicated input/output types)
instead of
returning an untyped, cast-heavy object.
## Notes
- Backend changes are in `twenty-server`; one small `twenty-front`
change to the
advanced-filter label hook. No entity/schema changes, so no migration.
- Tests added: `getInvalidSelectFilterOptionValues`,
`resolveWidgetFieldNamesToIds`
(incl. filter/relative-date resolution), `update_dashboard_widget`, and
expanded
view-tools factory specs.
- Design decisions: dedicated composite tool over code-interpreter
orchestration
(atomicity + validation + consistency with `create_complete_dashboard` /
`create_complete_workflow`); name-or-UUID but no child-row IDs on
`upsert_complete_view`; name→id resolution kept as stateless utils, not
services.
## Test plan
- [ ] `npx nx run twenty-server:typecheck`
- [ ] `npx nx lint:diff-with-main twenty-server` and `twenty-front`
- [ ] `npx nx test twenty-server` (view tools factory,
`getInvalidSelectFilterOptionValues`,
`resolveWidgetFieldNamesToIds`, `update_dashboard_widget`)
- [ ] AI chat: "Create a dashboard with a chart of deal value by
pipeline stage
and a table of the top 10 open opportunities" → plans, waits for
confirmation, then builds with fewer round-trips
- [ ] AI chat: add a chart widget filtered by a relative date (e.g.
deals created
in `PAST_7_DAY`) and confirm the chart is actually filtered
- [ ] Filter on a non-existent SELECT option is rejected with a clear
error
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22411?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
|
||
|
|
3c3a8078fe |
fix email alias guard with message channel availibility (#22521)
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22521?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
90f35658c5 |
fix(ai) - sync AI agent step output schema when agent response format changes (#22466)
## Summary
When an AI agent workflow step is built via the AI chat tools, its
persisted
`settings.outputSchema` was left empty (or stale as a text `{ response
}` schema)
even after the agent was given a structured JSON `responseFormat`. The
workflow
still executed correctly (runtime uses actual step results), but the
builder UI
resolves downstream variables (`{{stepId.fieldName}}`) exclusively from
the
persisted `outputSchema`, so those variables showed as **"Not Found"**.
Root cause: the `update_agent` tool only mutated the agent entity and
never
re-derived the linked step's `outputSchema`, and `enrichOutputSchema`
did not
handle `AI_AGENT` steps at all.
## What changed
- **Enrich AI_AGENT output schema on the backend**: added `AI_AGENT` to
`BACKEND_ENRICHED_TYPES` in
`WorkflowSchemaWorkspaceService.enrichOutputSchema`,
so a step's `outputSchema` is computed from the agent's `responseFormat`
on
every create/update (text → `{ response }`, JSON → one field per
property).
- **Re-sync the step when the agent's response format changes**: after
`update_agent` sets a `responseFormat`, the tool now finds the draft
workflow
version(s) whose `AI_AGENT` step references that agent and re-runs the
step
update so the persisted `outputSchema` is regenerated.
- **Fix stale-cache read**: `updateOneAgent` reads `flatAgentMaps`
before its
migration, which can leave a memoized/local stale copy for a few
seconds. The
resync now invalidates `flatAgentMaps` before re-enriching, so the fresh
`responseFormat` is used.
- **Surface failures**: resync errors are logged (`UpdateAgentTool`)
instead of
failing silently; the agent update itself still succeeds.
- Added unit tests for the `update_agent` resync behavior (fires on
`responseFormat` change, invalidates the cache, skips unrelated agents,
and
reports success when the resync fails).
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22466?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
|
||
|
|
f00b6ae185 |
use Temporal for date filter evaluation and fix IS operand (#22408)
## Summary - Refactored `evaluateDateFilter` in the workflow filter action from native `Date` to the Temporal API, using the shared `parseToInstantOrThrow` and `isSamePlainDate` utilities from `twenty-shared` (resolving the long-standing `// TODO: refactor this with Temporal`). - Fixed a bug in the `IS` operand: it previously compared only `getDate()` (day-of-month 1–31), so e.g. `2023-01-15` incorrectly matched `2023-02-15`. It now compares the full calendar day in UTC. - Removed server-local-timezone leakage: `IS_TODAY` and day comparisons now run in UTC (consistent with the neighbouring relative-date filter util), instead of relying on `toDateString()`/`getDate()`. ## Behavior changes (intended) - `IS` now matches on the full UTC calendar day, not day-of-month. - `DATE_TIME` `IS` matches on the same UTC day (not exact-instant equality). - Date comparisons are UTC-based, so evaluations near midnight in a non-UTC server locale may differ from the old local-timezone behavior. - Parsing is stricter (ISO + known formats via `parseToInstantOrThrow`); malformed operands resolve to "no match" instead of being loosely guessed by `new Date()`. <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22408?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
6f64be5751 |
Gate and meter email group: enterprise license (self-host) + credits (cloud) (#22390)
Email group (marketing email) was gated only by the `IS_EMAIL_GROUP_ENABLED` feature flag with no server-side enforcement. This adds real gating, split by deployment: - **Self-hosted** (`IS_BILLING_ENABLED=false`): requires a valid Enterprise plan. - **Cloud** (billing enabled): metered by credits, mirroring the existing AI credit system. Priced on AWS SES cost ($0.10/1,000 outbound) × 3 margin = $0.30/1,000 (300 micro-credits/email). Pre-flight blocks sends when out of credits; each email is charged after SES accepts it, in the async send job — matching how AWS bills us (no refund on bounce). Enforcement is applied at every email group resolver, and denials surface as proper client errors through a dedicated GraphQL exception filter. |
||
|
|
7cf8b58f1b |
feat(emailing): local unsubscribe URL + full-content log driver (#22412)
In LOG mode, emit a working http://unsubscribe.<subdomain>.localhost/emailing/unsubscribe link (from SERVER_URL + workspace subdomain) instead of empty content, and log the full text/html body + List-Unsubscribe header so the flow is inspectable locally. buildUnsubscribeUrls now takes a full base URL (field renamed httpsUrl -> webUrl). <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22412?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
7a5896ff5d |
feat(ai) - add delete_workflow tool (#22432)
## Summary - Add a new `delete_workflow` agent tool that soft-deletes a workflow and cleans up its sub-entities (versions, runs, triggers) via `WorkflowCommonWorkspaceService.handleWorkflowSubEntities` - Update the workflow skill system prompt to document the new capability and instruct the agent to always confirm with the user before deleting - Wire `WorkflowCommonModule` / `WorkflowCommonWorkspaceService` into the workflow-tools dependency graph ## Test plan - [x] Unit tests added (`delete-workflow.tool.spec.ts`) covering successful deletion and error handling - [ ] Verify the agent can resolve a workflow by name via `list_workflows` then delete it with `delete_workflow` - [ ] Confirm the agent asks for user confirmation before executing the deletion - [ ] Confirm sub-entities (versions, runs, triggers) are removed after deletion <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22432?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
4fef02394f |
Backfill webhook subscriptions for existing connected accounts (#22314)
Add command iterating workspaces, enqueuing staggered per-channel jobs for Google/Microsoft channels still on polling <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22314?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
59d708e324 |
fix(workflow): stop relative date filter from crashing on empty/invalid date values (#22384)
## Problem
A workflow **Filter** step on a `DATE`/`DATE_TIME` field using
`IS_RELATIVE` crashes with a `RangeError` when the referenced step
output is empty or invalid. The empty value is coerced into an `Invalid
Date` (`new Date("undefined")`),
whose `.getTime()` is `NaN`, and
`Temporal.Instant.fromEpochMilliseconds(NaN)` throws, failing the
affected workflow runs.
This is a latent regression from the Date → Temporal migration (#16544):
the previous `date-fns` implementation silently returned `false` on an
invalid date, but Temporal is strict and throws. The guard was never
carried over.
## Fix
Validate the coerced date once at the boundary in `evaluateDateFilter` —
the single place arbitrary/empty step output is turned into a `Date`. An
unparseable date now resolves to "does not match" for every comparison
operand (`IS`, `IS_IN_PAST`, `IS_IN_FUTURE`, `IS_TODAY`, `IS_BEFORE`,
`IS_AFTER`, `IS_RELATIVE`), restoring the pre-migration contract.
`IS_EMPTY` / `IS_NOT_EMPTY` are intentionally excluded so emptiness is
still evaluated on the raw operand.
## Tests
Added a parameterized regression test covering every date comparison
operand with empty and missing step output, asserting no throw and a
`false` result.
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22384?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
|
||
|
|
101b85db7b |
messaging remove dead workspace entities (#22366)
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22366?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> --------- Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com> |
||
|
|
d55ef3063b |
Fix draft send: read messageChannel from core, not workspace ORM (#22365)
messageChannel moved to a core-schema entity, so resolving it via the workspace ORM by name throws 'object metadata missing'. Query the core MessageChannelEntity repository scoped by workspaceId instead. <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22365?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
9f3ebaaf22 |
feat(messaging): sync draft emails and edit them in the thread composer (#22178)
Stop excluding drafts from sync across all three providers (Gmail DRAFT label, Microsoft/IMAP Drafts folder) and add an isDraft boolean field on Message so drafts are queryable by the API and AI agents. Drafts render in the thread with a Draft tag; clicking one opens the existing reply composer pre-filled with the draft's recipients, subject and body, and Send reuses the existing send-email flow. <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22178?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
66edd96213 |
microsoft webhook ttl fix (#22300)
In dev testing it worked fine but on production the TTL is failing we add a 1 hour buffer for safety <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22300?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
0e22ae0521 |
feat: create calendar events on Google and Microsoft accounts (#22231)
## Context Twenty can import calendar events and send emails, but cannot create calendar events. This adds calendar event creation on connected **Google** and **Microsoft** accounts, mirroring the existing email-send architecture (`message-outbound-manager`). ## What it adds The capability is exposed three ways, all backed by the same composer → driver → persist pipeline: - **GraphQL mutation** `createCalendarEvent` (metadata API) - **AI agent tool** `create_calendar_event` (flows to MCP automatically), gated by a new `CREATE_CALENDAR_EVENT_TOOL` permission flag - **Workflow builder node** "Create Calendar Event" in the **Core** section, with a full settings form (variable interpolation supported) CalDAV/IMAP is intentionally out of scope for now (different long pole). ## Design notes - **Reuse over reinvention** — the created event is run through the existing inbound formatters (`formatGoogleCalendarEvents` / `formatMicrosoftCalendarEvents`) and persisted immediately via the existing `CalendarSaveEventsService`, so it appears in Twenty right away and is reconciled by the next provider sync (dedup on external id). Persistence is best-effort. - **OAuth scopes** — Google already requests `calendar.events` (read+write), so no change there. Microsoft moves `Calendars.Read` → `Calendars.ReadWrite`; existing Microsoft accounts must re-consent (surfaced as a clear "reconnect" error via a missing-scope check). - **Deliberate invitation semantics** — `sendInvitations` is off by default. When off, the event is created with **no attendees** on either provider, so creating an event never silently emails external people. When on, attendees are attached and notified (Google `sendUpdates: all`, Microsoft's default). This sidesteps Microsoft Graph having no per-request suppression. - **Timezone correctness** — Microsoft Graph interprets `dateTime` as wall-clock in the supplied `timeZone` and ignores the offset, so the absolute instant is converted to its wall-clock form before sending (Google honors the offset directly). Both providers end up scheduling the same instant. - **Conferencing** — optional Google Meet (`conferenceData.createRequest`, with a follow-up `events.get` to resolve the async link) / Microsoft Teams (`isOnlineMeeting`). - Attendees are a comma-separated string everywhere (tool input, GraphQL DTO, workflow input), consistent with `send_email` recipients; the composer parses to its internal list. ## Test plan - **Unit**: 45 tests covering the composer (validation, all-day boundaries, offset enforcement, timezone, scope checks, default-account resolution), both provider drivers, the dispatcher, and the workflow step-log builder. - **Integration**: `createCalendarEvent` on the `/metadata` API fails closed with a structured error for a non-existent account (the auth/ownership/validation path that doesn't require provider mocking). - **Manual**: verified the workflow node appears in the Core section, the settings form renders and round-trips (edit → autosave → reload), and the live mutation returns a structured failure for a bogus account. ## Open question for reviewers The metadata mutation `createCalendarEvent` shares a name with the core schema's auto-generated `createCalendarEvent(data:)` CRUD mutation for the CalendarEvent object — they live on different endpoints (`/metadata` vs `/graphql`) so there's no runtime conflict, but it's a potential point of confusion for API consumers. Happy to rename (e.g. `createCalendarEventOnConnectedAccount`) if preferred. ## Out of scope / follow-ups - CalDAV/IMAP support - Event update/delete and recurrence - Existing Microsoft accounts need re-consent for the widened scope <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22231?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> --------- Co-authored-by: neo773 <neo773@protonmail.com> |
||
|
|
c891258f34 |
Add v2 onboarding create profile page (#22221)
<img width="3024" height="1498" alt="CleanShot 2026-06-26 at 15 30 23@2x" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8b4863a9-66ed-4da1-851b-473cedf71511" /> <img width="3022" height="1500" alt="CleanShot 2026-06-26 at 15 29 43@2x" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/22fc0e94-f670-4638-975c-f06b2b2e25e8" /> Adds the v2 onboarding **Create profile** page, shown right after the import-contacts step (`PROFILE_CREATION`) for the onboarding-v2 cohort. It renders full-screen under `BlankLayout` via the shared `OnboardingV2Layout`, matching the Figma (340px column, inline round avatar uploader + First/Last row, Job Title, dark Continue). The v1 modal flow is untouched and still used for non-v2 users. Job Title is wired end-to-end: it adds a real `jobTitle` field to the `WorkspaceMember` standard object (shared metadata constant + flat field metadata + entity property) and a `2-17` workspace upgrade command to backfill the field on existing workspaces. Continue persists name + jobTitle through the existing `updateWorkspaceMemberSettings` mutation, whose allow-list picks up the new standard field automatically. Routing mirrors `SyncEmailsV2`: new `AppPath.CreateProfileV2`, lazy route, and an `isOnboardingV2`-gated branch in `usePageChangeEffectNavigateLocation` (+ tests and a Storybook story). Reviewer notes: - `jobTitle` is **write-only** for now (no read-back path: core DTO/transpiler/fragment unchanged), and the field is `isSystem`/non-UI-editable to match its siblings. Easy to surface later if wanted. - New `OnboardingProfilePictureUploader` is a compact round avatar uploader reusing the same upload mutation flow as `WorkspaceMemberPictureUploader`. <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22221?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
9747e3a7a3 |
feat(messaging): link emails by Reply-To as a REPLY_TO participant (#22216)
Relay senders (e.g. a website form sending as a shared address with the real contact in Reply-To) never linked to the contact because matching only used From/To/Cc/Bcc. Record Reply-To addresses under a new REPLY_TO participant role across the Gmail, Microsoft and IMAP drivers, excluding any that just repeat the sender. Adds the REPLY_TO option to the messageParticipant role field and a 2.17 workspace command to backfill it for existing workspaces. QAed with real test run <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22216?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
b3e39e2198 |
fix: relative date picker calendar display (#21895)
Part of https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/19739#issuecomment-4652034526 (Bug 1-3). Maybe it feels like theses bugs are not actually bugs, but we can maybe say it as UX improvements: specially needed in case when an user will choose any past options. ### Bug 1: calendar open on wrong month With Is Relative (e.g. Past 1 Quarter), the calendar opened on today’s month instead of the range start. After the fix, it now opens on the first month of the filtered range. **Testing:** View filter → Date field → Is Relative → Past 1 Quarter. Calendar opens on January (range start), not today’s month https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8849d00a-4d5c-4f8a-8d31-3a62535eb311 ### Bug 2: Dates not highlighted Ranges older than ~2 months (e.g. Q1 when today is June) showed no highlighted days. Highlighting now covers the full resolved range. **Testing:** Same setup: past 1 Quarter on a date when Q1 is outside the old 2‑month window. Jan 1 - Mar 31 will highlight. https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d21e2272-c923-4493-80ff-bdf4228842b1 ### Bug 3: No month navigation Relative mode only showed Past - 1 - Quarter controls with no way to browse months. Now see the new arrows move through months without changing the filter. <img width="377" height="455" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-20 181107" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/eb51feb9-af10-489a-b166-8b8d6c642e05" /> > [!NOTE] > 1. We can't do the fixes by one by one, i have to fix them within one PR because all the fixes are inter-related, like we can't test the bug 1 fix alone without implementing bug 3. > 2. Bug 4 will be done in a separate PR which is actually the issue #19739. See https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/19739#issuecomment-4652034526 for better understanding. > 3. If you see the screen recordings, they are actually done with the alignment fixes from #21881 . So without that changes you will see the alignmemt issues in the calendar grid in your local. --------- Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com> |
||
|
|
6e2df0654b |
[Workflows] Allow iterator to take whole item as variable (#22031)
**Select the whole item in iterator loops, and iterate over a step's array output** ## Summary Two related improvements to working with lists in workflows: - Pick the current item as a whole inside an iterator loop. Previously, in a node inside the loop, you could only reference individual fields of the Iterator's current item. Now you can select the whole item (e.g. a full record) — useful for passing it straight into a downstream step. <img width="1270" height="744" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-23 at 17 02 47" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6b92e72e-ec25-4c1a-9841-3a438210e753" /> - Iterate over a step's array output. A Code / Logic Function step that returns a top-level array couldn't be fed to the Iterator: its output was flattened into indexed entries (0, 1, …) with no way to select the array as a whole. A new "Whole list" option selects the step's entire output, and the Iterator infers the per-iteration item shape from it. <img width="1026" height="728" alt="Screenshot 2026-06-23 at 17 17 53" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/db07dcd8-4fb8-4db9-8b45-aa56051d9f3b" /> Together these complete the loop ergonomics: select a list → iterate → reference the current item (whole or by field) downstream — matching the model used by tools like Windmill. ## What changed - The variable picker offers a "Use the whole item" option when viewing an iterator's current item, and a "Whole list" option when a step returns a top-level array. - The Iterator's current-item schema can now be inferred from a variable pointing at a step's whole output. ## Risks for existing workflows None expected. The change is purely additive: - No DB migration and no change to how output schemas are stored or read — existing schemas, variables, and iterators behave identically. - No change to runtime variable resolution; existing {{step.field}} and current-item references are untouched. - The new options only apply to new selections (whole item / whole list); all existing paths take the unchanged code path. - The only edge case: array detection is heuristic (an output whose keys are exactly 0…n-1), so an object that happens to have those keys would also show "Whole list". This is rare for real outputs, affects nothing unless a user selects it, and fails safe — the Iterator validates its input and throws a clear "items must be an array" error if a non-array is passed. <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22031?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com> |
||
|
|
eedd838189 |
Fix threaded draft email replies (#22175)
## Summary Fixes Gmail and Microsoft draft replies so workflow-created drafts stay attached to the existing provider thread. Fixes twentyhq/core-team-issues#2597. ## Root cause The email composer already resolved `threadExternalId` and `references` from `inReplyTo`, but `DraftEmailTool` only forwarded `inReplyTo` to the outbound draft service. Gmail therefore created a raw draft without `message.threadId`, which lets the draft appear as a standalone compose instead of an inline thread reply. For Microsoft, the draft path used Graph `createReply`, but parent lookup filtered on a URL-encoded `internetMessageId`. That can miss the parent message and fall back to creating a new draft message instead of a reply draft. ## Changes - Forward `threadExternalId` and `references` from `DraftEmailTool` to outbound draft creation. - Set Gmail draft `message.threadId` when `threadExternalId` is available. - Make Microsoft parent lookup use Graph request query builders with OData string escaping, so `createReply` is reached reliably. - Add targeted Jest coverage for the Draft Email tool, Gmail draft threading, and Microsoft reply-draft creation. ## Validation - `NX_DAEMON=false /Users/thomascolasdesfrancs/.cache/codex-runtimes/codex-primary-runtime/dependencies/node/bin/node ../../node_modules/nx/dist/bin/nx.js jest twenty-server -- --runTestsByPath src/engine/core-modules/tool/tools/email-tool/__tests__/draft-email-tool.spec.ts src/modules/messaging/message-outbound-manager/drivers/gmail/services/__tests__/gmail-message-outbound.service.spec.ts src/modules/messaging/message-outbound-manager/drivers/microsoft/services/__tests__/microsoft-message-outbound.service.spec.ts --runInBand` - `NX_DAEMON=false /Users/thomascolasdesfrancs/.cache/codex-runtimes/codex-primary-runtime/dependencies/node/bin/node ./node_modules/nx/dist/bin/nx.js lint:diff-with-main twenty-server` <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22175?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> --------- Co-authored-by: claude[bot] <41898282+claude[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <FelixMalfait@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
24c042f0ef |
feat(messaging): skip webhook-active channels in list-fetch crons until sync is stale (#22183)
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22183?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
ee71a382de |
IMAP support non RFC compliant servers (#22153)
Some non complaint IMAP server don't send `UIDNEXT` UIDNEXT is the next message id you subtract with 1 to get total current messages This does a fallback to searching all UIDs and taking the highest <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22153?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
dc371ef6e7 |
rename sync-completion methods to avoid confusion with stage setters (#22138)
`markAsCompletedAndMarkAsCalendarEventListFetchPending` was just `markAsCalendarEventListFetchPending` with a prefix, so dropping the prefix silently turned a sync-completion into a plain stage reset Renamed to markAsCalendarEventSyncCompleted / markAsMessageSyncCompleted so they no longer share a tail with the stage setters. Mirrors the existing markAsFailed naming. No behavior change. Sanity check: replayed the original #22015 diff through two isolated review agents, identical prompt, only the names differing. With the old names the reviewer explicitly cleared the branch as safe; with the new names it flagged the missing completion as high severity. The rename makes the mistake visible. <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22138?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
885effb3d8 |
fix(calendar): mark channel completed on no-events fetch (#22137)
No-events branch left channels stuck on syncStatus=ONGOING and stopped bumping the active metric (flatlined dashboard), since markAsCalendarEventListFetchPending only resets the stage. Switched it to markAsCompletedAndMarkAsCalendarEventListFetchPending so status, syncedAt, throttle and the metric reset properly, matching the messaging side. Regression from #22015. |
||
|
|
ad61d6d8a3 |
fix(server): dispatch each cron trigger exactly once (#22113)
## Problem
App/logic-function crons occasionally fire **twice, ~1 minute apart**.
The most visible symptom is a notification cron sending the same Discord
DM (or channel post) at e.g. `17:00` and again at `17:01`.
## Root cause
`CronTriggerCronJob` runs every minute (`* * * * *`) and re-dispatches
any logic function whose pattern is "due" according to `shouldRunNow`:
```ts
const diff = Math.abs(prevTriggerDate.getTime() - now.getTime());
return diff < rootCronIntervalMs; // 60_000
```
The detection window (`60_000ms`) is **equal to** the 60s tick interval.
So when a root tick drifts across a minute boundary (runs slightly
early/late, or BullMQ fires a catch-up), two adjacent ticks can both see
the *same* trigger as "within the last 60s" and each enqueue a
`LogicFunctionTriggerJob`. The dispatch isn't idempotent, so the
function runs twice.
## Fix
Make dispatch idempotent, keyed on the trigger itself:
- New `getMatchingTriggerTimestamp(pattern, now)` returns the epoch-ms
of the matched trigger (stable regardless of *when* within the window
the root job runs), or `null`. `shouldRunNow` now delegates to it —
behaviour unchanged.
- Before enqueuing, `CronTriggerCronJob` claims a
`logic-function-cron:{workspace}:{function}:{triggerTs}` key in the
`EngineLock` cache. A second tick that resolves to the same trigger
finds the key and skips.
Distinct triggers always have distinct timestamps (hence distinct keys),
so a later legitimate run is never suppressed. The TTL (2 min) only
needs to outlive the detection window.
## Notes
- `WorkflowCronTriggerCronJob` uses the same `shouldRunNow` pattern and
has the same latent double-dispatch; left out of this PR to keep it
focused, but the new helper makes the same guard a small follow-up.
- The cache `get`-then-`set` isn't atomic; for the observed failure mode
(ticks ~1 min apart, sequential) it's reliable. A Redis `SET NX` would
also close the rare concurrent-multi-instance race.
## Test plan
- [x] `should-run-now.utils.spec.ts` extended: two ticks within one
window resolve to the same timestamp; out-of-window and invalid patterns
return `null`. All 8 pass.
- [x] `oxlint --type-aware` + `oxfmt` clean on changed files.
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22113?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
|
||
|
|
bf345bb177 |
Allow workflows listing in MCP (#22013)
This resolves https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/21986 Add `list_workflows `MCP tool Workflow objects are excluded from the generic database CRUD tools exposed via MCP, which meant the only way to list workflows was through a direct API call. This adds a `list_workflows `tool to the `WorkflowToolProvider`, making it available via MCP alongside the existing workflow builder tools. It supports optional filtering by status (`DRAFT`, `ACTIVE`, `DEACTIVATED`) and pagination (`limit`/`offset`). The status filter uses an array-membership predicate (`ANY`) since `statuses `is a multi-value field. --------- Co-authored-by: Souheyl Gouadria <souheyl.gouadria@medius.com> Co-authored-by: Etienne <45695613+etiennejouan@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
73e9374ef8 |
[BREAKING CHANGE] harden call recording failure handling (#22062)
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22062?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
0f2ea47335 |
Twenty standard backfill non searchable object search field metadata (#22063)
# Introduction This PR https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21964 introduces a search field metadata workspace command backfill that will recompute all the standard search field metadata but only for the searchable object Whereas the non searchable object still have a search vector as they can still be searched but internally Preserving their search vector by computing their search field metadata <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22063?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
855664daa2 |
feat(timeline): activity kind registry (Layer A) (#21950)
## What & why
The timeline-activity system's contract is a magic `name` string
(`"company.updated"`, `"linked-note.created"`, `"message.linked"`)
decoded by `String.split('.')` in **four** different frontend spots and
produced by a hardcoded `if`-ladder + two listeners. It is not
extensible and it already harbored a latent bug.
This PR replaces that stringly-typed protocol with an explicit,
persisted **`kind`** contract consumed through registries on both ends.
Adding a new timeline activity type becomes: add a producer + register a
presenter — no edits to a central switch.
This is **Layer A** of a larger plan (see
`packages/twenty-server/docs/TIMELINE_ACTIVITIES_REFACTOR.md` and
`TIMELINE_ACTIVITIES_PR_A.md`). Layer B (timeline projection /
"inheritance") and Layer C (user-defined aggregation rules) are
intentionally **out of scope** here.
## 🐛 Bug fixed along the way
`calendar-event-participant.listener.ts` was writing calendar-event
timeline rows with `name: 'message.linked'` (copy-paste from the message
listener). It rendered "correctly" only by luck — the frontend routed on
`linkedObjectMetadataId → nameSingular`, never on `name`. This PR fixes
it at the source (`calendarEvent.linked` / `kind:
'linkedCalendarEvent'`), and the shared resolver also corrects
historical rows that carry the wrong `name`.
## Changes
**`twenty-shared`** — new `timeline` module
- `TimelineActivityKind` (`recordChange | linkedNote | linkedTask |
linkedMessage | linkedCalendarEvent | linkedRecord`) +
`resolveTimelineActivityDescriptor`, the **single** place that decodes
an activity into `{ kind, action }`. Reads the persisted `kind` when
present and falls back to legacy `name`/`linkedObjectMetadataId` parsing
(back-compat shim). Unit-tested (20 cases).
**`twenty-server`**
- Persist a nullable `kind` field on the `timelineActivity` standard
object (entity shape + field-metadata builder + universalIdentifier).
- Producers (`timeline-activity.service.ts`, the two participant
listeners) set `kind` explicitly; dev seeder populates it.
- Fix the `calendarEvent.linked` mislabel.
**`twenty-front`**
- Static `TIMELINE_ACTIVITY_PRESENTERS` registry replaces the render
`switch`, the icon `if`-chain, the diff-validation name-parsing, and the
`name.match(/note|task/i)` title-prefetch hack.
- New `EventRowGenericLinked` so an unknown linked object type renders a
real "linked a {object}" row instead of falling through to the wrong
(main-object) renderer.
## Migration / compatibility
- The `kind` column on this **workspace** standard object is created by
the normal workspace metadata sync — no hand-written migration. It is
**nullable**, so pre-upgrade rows degrade gracefully through the
resolver shim (they resolve correctly from `linkedObjectMetadataId` +
`name`). An optional backfill workspace command could populate `kind` on
old rows later; not required for correctness.
- No GraphQL breaking change — `kind` is additive, `name` is retained
for display/search.
## Test plan
- `twenty-shared` unit tests (resolver) ✅
- `typecheck` + `lint:diff-with-main` green on `twenty-front`,
`twenty-server`, `twenty-shared` ✅
- Reset + reseed a workspace: `kind` is populated for all seeded rows
(recordChange / linkedMessage / linkedNote / linkedTask /
linkedCalendarEvent) with no nulls ✅
- Manual end-to-end verification via Playwright on person / company
record timelines — screenshots in a follow-up comment.
Screenshots attesting the rendering (incl. the calendar fix) are posted
as a comment below.
---
_Generated by [Claude
Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01YRueWMo4UyaX2em8R2cdio)_
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21950?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
|
||
|
|
c6aca3f0ea |
fix(calendar): ID-first chunked import for Google and CalDAV (#22015)
Google and CalDAV returned full events and imported them inline in the list-fetch job. Large/initial syncs overran BullMQ's lock, the job stalled, the workspace query runner was released mid-import, and TypeORM threw 'Query runner already released'. Mirror the messaging pipeline: every provider now returns event IDs only, cached in Redis; the import job drains them in CALENDAR_EVENT_IMPORT_BATCH_SIZE chunks and re-enqueues until empty, so no single job runs long. Adds Google/CalDAV import-by-id services and a provider dispatcher; removes the full-events inline path. <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/22015?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
4789ba6265 |
feat(ai): add AI tools to list and inspect workflow runs (#21983)
- Add `get_workflow_run` and `list_workflow_runs` AI tools so the workflow agent can troubleshoot failed or misbehaving workflow runs — listing runs with optional filters (workflow, status, limit) and inspecting a specific run's steps, errors, and failed step logs. - Enforce `rolePermissionConfig` on all three read tools (`get_workflow_run`, `list_workflow_runs`, `get_workflow_current_version`) instead of bypassing permission checks, consistent with how `create_complete_workflow` and database CRUD tools work. - Add unit tests for the three tools covering permission forwarding, success paths, and error paths. <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21983?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com> |
||
|
|
9e31ffdf68 |
feat(messaging): webhook push sync for Gmail, Calendar and Microsoft (#21970)
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21970?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
c171c62099 |
chore(twenty-server): upgrade typeorm to 0.3.29 (#21957)
## Summary Upgrades **typeorm `0.3.26` → `0.3.29`** and adapts the twenty-orm `update`/`upsert` overrides to typeorm's newly-added `options.returning`. Upgrading to resolve [this](https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/security/dependabot/1573) alert. ## Why `0.3.29` is the latest release compatible with `@ptc-org/nestjs-query-typeorm` (peers `typeorm@^0.3.15`; the `1.x` line has no compatible release, so it's blocked until that dependency moves). ## Changes **`chore` — bump** - `typeorm` patch descriptor `0.3.26 → 0.3.29` + `yarn.lock`. - Local patch carried over **unchanged** (pure rename) — both hunks (`PickKeysByType` nullable-awareness, `DeleteResult.generatedMaps`) are still absent upstream in `0.3.29`, so it remains load-bearing. **`refactor` — adapt overrides** - `0.3.29` adds `options?: UpdateOptions` (carrying `returning`) to `EntityManager`/`Repository` `update()`. The override must accept it at the base-mandated position, so it's added as its **own dedicated parameter** (not hidden inside `permissionOptions`), honoring `options.returning` with a fallback to Twenty's permission-aware `selectedColumns` (`'*'` default). - The same merge is applied to `upsert()`, which already received `UpsertOptions` but was dropping its `returning` field — so both write methods now treat the option identically. - Internal call sites + specs updated for the new parameter slot. ## Verification - `nx typecheck twenty-server` — **0 errors** - twenty-orm unit tests — **191 / 191 pass** - `oxlint` / `oxfmt` — clean |
||
|
|
2abf9c2930 |
feat(workflow): Pick Record load balanced strategy (3/3) (#21902)
## Overview Final PR in the Pick Record stack. Adds the **Load Balanced** strategy: pick the candidate that currently has the *fewest related records*. This is the "fair assignment" mode — e.g. assign a new company to the account owner who currently owns the fewest companies, or route a lead to the rep with the fewest open opportunities. **Stacked on #21900** (which is stacked on #21899) — merge in order. This PR's diff against `main` includes PRs 1 & 2 until they merge. ## What changed - Widened the `strategy` enum to add `LOAD_BALANCED`, and added an optional `loadBalance: { objectNameSingular, fieldName }` to the action input. - Editor: selecting **Load balanced** reveals a **Balance by** object picker and a **Count by** field picker (the related object's many-to-one relation fields). - Executor: for each candidate, counts records of the chosen related object whose chosen relation points at that candidate, then selects the least-loaded one. ## How it works Given pool = workspace members and config `{ objectNameSingular: "opportunity", fieldName: "pointOfContact" }`, the executor counts, per member, the opportunities whose `pointOfContact` is that member, and picks the member with the lowest count. ## Design decisions & tradeoffs 1. **No persistent state — computed live each run.** Unlike round robin, load balancing reads current data, so there's no cursor to store. Correct by construction even under concurrency (each run recomputes counts); the only caveat is two simultaneous runs can both see the same "least loaded" candidate before either assignment lands (a small, self-correcting skew), which is inherent to load-balancing and acceptable. 2. **Count via per-candidate queries.** One filtered count per candidate (`{ [relationField]: { id: { eq: candidateId } } }`), run in parallel. For the realistic pool sizes this targets (a team), this is simple and clear. A single `group_by` aggregate would scale better for very large pools — noted as a future optimization, deliberately not done to keep the logic obvious. 3. **Deterministic tie-break.** Candidates are pre-sorted by id (shared with round robin), and the first minimum wins — so equal-load ties resolve deterministically rather than arbitrarily. 4. **`Count by` lists all many-to-one relations of the chosen object** (not filtered to those targeting the pool object). Keeps the editor simple; picking an unrelated field just yields zero counts, which is visibly wrong. Filtering options to relations that target the pool object is a nice follow-up. 5. **Filter on the counted set** (e.g. only *open* opportunities) is intentionally out of scope for this first cut — documented as a follow-up. ## Testing Added `pick-record-load-balanced-workflow.integration-spec.ts`: creates two fresh companies (0 related opportunities each), attaches one opportunity to the second, configures `LOAD_BALANCED` counting opportunities by `company`, and asserts the step picks the **first** company (0 < 1). Passes locally alongside the random and round-robin tests (3 suites / 4 tests). `typecheck` + `lint:diff-with-main` green for shared/server/front. ## The full stack 1. #21899 — Random (the action + the whole scaffold) 2. #21900 — Round robin (atomic Redis cursor) 3. this — Load balanced Together these enable round-robin / load-balanced / random **assignment workflows** in Twenty, composed via the standard variable picker (assign the chosen record downstream with `{{step.<id>.id}}`). https://claude.ai/code/session_01MuPWZsqf2bmQSevk6fRbX8 --- _Generated by [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01MuPWZsqf2bmQSevk6fRbX8)_ <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21902?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
fa6d1394af |
feat(workflow): Pick Record round robin strategy (2/3) (#21900)
## Overview Second PR in the Pick Record stack. Adds a **Round Robin** selection strategy alongside Random, so an assignment workflow can distribute records *evenly* across a candidate pool (e.g. rotate company ownership across a set of workspace members) rather than just randomly. **Stacked on #21899** — review/merge that one first. This PR's diff against `main` includes PR 1's commits until #21899 merges. ## What changed - Widened the `strategy` enum (`RANDOM` → `RANDOM | ROUND_ROBIN`) in the shared schema and the server input type. - Editor now shows a **Strategy** selector (Random / Round robin). The candidate-pool label changed from "Pick at random from" to the neutral "Pick from" since random is no longer the only mode. - Executor implements round robin. ## Design decisions & tradeoffs 1. **State store: Redis `incrBy` (atomic), keyed `pick-record:round-robin:{workspaceId}:{stepId}`.** Round robin needs a persistent cursor, and workflow runs are **not** serialized — two runs can execute the same step concurrently — so the increment must be atomic. `CacheStorageService.incrBy` (workflow cache namespace) is a single atomic Redis op, needs no schema change, and is already injectable. Index = `(cursor - 1) % poolSize`. **Tradeoff — durability:** a Redis flush/eviction resets the cursor, which restarts the cycle from an offset. That causes a one-time *fairness drift*, never a *correctness* bug (no double-assignment, since each increment is atomic). If strict durability is ever required, the cursor can move to a Postgres counter table with `INSERT … ON CONFLICT … DO UPDATE SET cursor = cursor + 1 RETURNING cursor` (atomic + durable) — deliberately **not** done here to avoid a migration for what is, in practice, an acceptable reset. 2. **Deterministic pool ordering.** The resolved pool is sorted by `id` before the cursor is applied, so position→record mapping is stable run-to-run regardless of fetch order. Without this, round robin wouldn't reliably cycle. 3. **Cursor key uses `stepId`.** Stable across runs of a published version. Republishing a version may mint new step ids, which resets the cursor — acceptable and documented here. 4. **Slot-on-increment.** The cursor increments when the step runs (reserving a position); if a later step in the run fails, that position is effectively skipped. Minor, acceptable unfairness — flagged rather than adding cross-step compensation. ## Testing Added `pick-record-round-robin-workflow.integration-spec.ts`: builds a workflow with a 3-record pool and `ROUND_ROBIN`, runs it 4 times sequentially, and asserts the picks are exactly `[p0, p1, p2, p0]` (full cycle + wraparound) against the deterministically-ordered pool. Passes locally alongside PR 1's random test (2 suites / 3 tests). `typecheck` + `lint:diff-with-main` green for shared/server/front. ## Follow-up - PR 3: `LOAD_BALANCED` (fewest related records wins). https://claude.ai/code/session_01MuPWZsqf2bmQSevk6fRbX8 --- _Generated by [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01MuPWZsqf2bmQSevk6fRbX8)_ <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21900?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
573fd00ea7 |
feat(workflow): add Pick Record action (1/3 — random selection) (#21899)
## Overview
Adds a new workflow action, **Pick Record**, that selects **one** record
from a configured candidate pool and exposes the chosen record as the
step's output. Downstream steps can then reference it through the normal
variable picker — e.g. assign an owner in an _Update Record_ step by
setting **Account Owner = `{{step.<pickRecordId>.id}}`**.
This is the foundation for building **assignment workflows**
(round-robin / load-balanced owner assignment, reviewer rotation, etc.)
in Twenty.
## This is PR 1 of a 3-PR stack
| PR | Strategy | Adds |
|----|----------|------|
| **1 (this one)** | `RANDOM` | The whole `PICK_RECORD` action,
end-to-end, stateless |
| 2 | `ROUND_ROBIN` | A persistent, atomically-incremented per-step
cursor + the strategy selector UI |
| 3 | `LOAD_BALANCED` | "fewest related records wins" via an aggregate
count |
Each PR widens the `strategy` enum (a backward-compatible change), so no
data migration is needed between them.
## How it works
- **Editor**: pick an Object, then pick the candidate records (a
multi-record selector). A random record is selected from that pool at
run time.
- **Output**: a single record of the chosen object — the same output
shape as `CREATE_RECORD`/`UPDATE_RECORD` — so it drills into
`{{step.x.id}}`, `{{step.x.name}}`, … in the variable picker.
- **Execution**: reuses `FindRecordsService` to fetch the pool (`id IN
(recordIds)`, which also transparently drops any deleted candidates),
then returns one at random.
## Design decisions & tradeoffs
1. **Standalone step that outputs a variable, not an inline "random"
mode on the relation field.** This mirrors Attio's round-robin block.
The decisive reason is composition: the chosen record is almost always
reused (assign owner **and** create a follow-up task for them **and**
email them). A variable is chosen once and reused everywhere; an inline
per-field value would re-roll independently in each place. It also keeps
the (stateful) round-robin/load-balanced logic out of the field inputs.
Tradeoff: one extra step to wire up vs. an inline control — accepted for
the composability win. An inline "Assign automatically" entry point can
still be layered on later as sugar that inserts this step.
2. **Co-located in the `record-crud` action module and reuses
`FindRecordsService`.** Avoids duplicating module wiring (auth context,
permissions, object-metadata resolution) and the data-access path.
Tradeoff: "Pick" is a selection rather than a CRUD op, so the folder
name is slightly broad; chose reuse + low risk over a separate module.
Can be extracted if the family grows.
3. **`strategy` exists in the schema (defaulted `RANDOM`) but the
selector is hidden in this PR.** A dropdown with a single option would
be UX slop, and adding the field only in PR 2 would force a data
backfill for any `PICK_RECORD` steps created in between. Keeping the
field now (hidden) avoids both. PR 2 introduces the selector once
there's a real choice.
4. **Pool is an explicit static list (`recordIds`) for v1.** Matches the
most common assignment case ("rotate among these N people") and reuses
the existing `FormMultiRecordPicker`. A filter-based pool (reusing the
Find Records filter UI) and a list-from-a-previous-step pool are natural
follow-ups, intentionally out of scope here to keep the stack focused on
the three strategies.
5. **Output schema is computed on the frontend** (like `CREATE_RECORD`),
derived from `input.objectName` — so it is **not** added to
`PERSISTED_OUTPUT_SCHEMA_TYPES` and needs no server-side schema
computation.
6. **Validation**: `PICK_RECORD` is added to object-name metadata
validation (so a deleted/invalid target object is flagged) via a
dedicated `OBJECT_TARGETING_ACTION_TYPES` set — deliberately **not** to
`VARIABLE_CONSUMING_ACTION_TYPES`, because a static pool legitimately
references no upstream variable and would otherwise raise a spurious "no
variable reference" warning.
7. **Empty pool → step error** at run time (respecting the step's
error-handling options) rather than a silent no-op, since an empty pool
is a misconfiguration or fully-deleted set.
8. **`Math.random`** is used for selection — no cryptographic guarantee
is needed for assignment fairness.
## Testing
Per our testing convention (integration test over service/`.spec`
tests): added `pick-record-workflow.integration-spec.ts`, which builds a
workflow with a manual trigger + a `PICK_RECORD` step, configures a
known two-record pool, runs it, and asserts the run completes and the
picked record is **always** within the configured pool (verifying the
pool filter) across repeated runs.
Local verification (typecheck + lint for shared/server/front) is green;
running the integration suite and attaching editor screenshots in a
follow-up comment.
## Follow-ups
- PR 2: `ROUND_ROBIN` + persistent atomic cursor (Redis `incrBy` vs. a
Postgres counter table — tradeoff to be documented on that PR) +
strategy selector.
- PR 3: `LOAD_BALANCED`.
- Later (not in this stack): filter-based / variable-list pools, an
inline "Assign automatically" entry point on relation fields, OOO-skip /
weighting.
https://claude.ai/code/session_01MuPWZsqf2bmQSevk6fRbX8
---
_Generated by [Claude
Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_01MuPWZsqf2bmQSevk6fRbX8)_
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21899?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
|
||
|
|
a0689d1577 |
feat(workflow): condition filter on database-event triggers (#21868)
## Problem
Connecting a mailbox bulk-creates contacts via the email/calendar sync,
and each `person.upserted` fires the seeded **"Create company when
adding a new person"** workflow. The trigger enqueues one run per record
(no batching) and each run bills several `WORKFLOW_NODE_RUN` events — so
a single mailbox connect can rack up tens of thousands of runs and
exhaust credits on a brand-new workspace. The workflow is also redundant
on that path: the sync already creates the company from the email domain
and links the person to it.
## What this does
Adds an optional, user-defined **filter** to database-event (listener)
triggers, evaluated in the listener **before a run is enqueued**.
Non-matching events never create a run, so they consume zero execution
credits. This is the Filter node's capability, lifted to the trigger
level, and available for all event types (created / updated / upserted /
deleted).
The seeded "Create company when adding a new person" workflow now
carries a visible trigger filter — `Created by → Source is not Email`
**and** `is not Calendar` — so it no longer runs for sync-created
contacts, while still running for manually / API / CSV-added people.
## How (reuse)
- **Backend:** extracted `evaluateStepFilters()`, shared by the Filter
action and the trigger listener's new `eventMatchesRecordFilter` gate.
The record is exposed under the `trigger` key so filters reference it
exactly like steps do (`{{trigger.properties.after.…}}`).
- **Shared:** one optional `filter` added to the database-event trigger
zod schema; the front-end type derives from it (settings stay JSON — no
codegen).
- **Frontend:** extracted `WorkflowStepFilterBuilder` from the Filter
action's body; both the Filter action and the trigger editor render it.
The field picker needed no changes — at the trigger it already resolves
to the record's own fields via `TRIGGER_STEP_ID`.
## Scope / decisions
- **No migration for existing workspaces** (by request) — only newly
created workspaces get the filtered default; already-created workspaces
keep the always-on workflow.
- Deliberately did **not** add relation-enrichment to the upsert path
(it would add a DB lookup to the very bulk-sync path we're relieving).
Trigger filters work on the record's own scalar/composite fields (e.g.
`createdBy.source`); relation-based filters work on created/updated
where enrichment already runs.
## Verification
- Typecheck: `twenty-shared`, `twenty-server`, `twenty-front` all green.
- Lint (diff, autofix): 0 warnings / 0 errors across all three.
- Unit tests: a new `evaluate-step-filters` spec exercising the exact
`createdBy.source IS_NOT` seed mechanism, plus new listener specs
proving non-matching events are not enqueued. All backend
filter/listener suites pass.
- Not run here: integration tests (need a DB) and Storybook.
https://claude.ai/code/session_013k36vfekDppwRCgM6Ha7De
---
_Generated by [Claude
Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_013k36vfekDppwRCgM6Ha7De)_
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21868?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
4075018834 |
fix(workflow): label manual trigger record output as Record/Records (#21832)
## What
The manual trigger output schema exposed the triggering record(s) under
a node labeled **Payload**. Relabels it to match what the node actually
contains:
- **Single-record** availability → **Record**
- **Bulk-records** availability → **Records**
## Why
"Payload" was a misnomer — the node holds the record(s) that triggered
the workflow. This is a display-label-only change.
## Notes for reviewers
- **No migration.** The persisted output schema key stays `payload`, so
existing variable references (`{{trigger.payload.x}}`) are unaffected.
- The front recomputes the output schema on the fly
(`computeStepOutputSchema`), so the variable picker shows the new labels
immediately, including for existing triggers.
- The backend (`workflow-schema.workspace-service`) is updated to match
for newly persisted/re-saved schemas. Previously persisted schemas keep
"Payload" until re-saved.
- Added `WORKFLOW_TRIGGER_RECORD_LABEL` /
`WORKFLOW_TRIGGER_RECORDS_LABEL` and removed the now-unused
`WORKFLOW_TRIGGER_PAYLOAD_LABEL`.
- Unit tests updated for both single and bulk cases (55/55 passing).
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21832?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
|
||
|
|
3675f264f1 |
Infer record pickers for record-typed logic function workflow inputs (#21494)
## Context Logic functions can declare workflow inputs typed as records or arrays of records (e.g. the People Data Labs enrichment functions), but the workflow builder rendered those as a plain text input with a variable picker, which is not usable. ## What this does - Adds an `objectUniversalIdentifier` link on input schema properties, so a record-typed input is tied to a workspace object. - The SDK build infers it from a `TwentyRecord<'objectUniversalIdentifier'>` marker type in the handler signature, reading the object's universal identifier straight from the source; explicit input schemas can still set the field directly. - The workflow builder renders these inputs as a single record picker or a record multi-select with the variable picker on the right. Selected records are stored as record ids; `TwentyRecord<UID>` is a branded `string`, so the handler signature reflects that it receives ids (a bound variable resolves to whatever the referenced step produced). - The multi-select collapses overflowing chips into a `+N` badge (reusing `ExpandableList`) and its variable picker offers both record objects and fields. - Updates the People Data Labs enrichment inputs as the reference implementation. <img width="802" height="824" alt="CleanShot 2026-06-12 at 16 54 10@2x" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a0896d74-0aab-49bd-a173-14c578a2e533" /> <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21494?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
616d58bc7e |
messaging: gmail folder backfill (#21753)
demo https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a157cee1-a8fa-4050-af1b-c31a83fb75da /closes #17095 <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21753?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
c6309fd92b |
feat(workflow): auto-layout steps on AI workflow creation via shared tidy-up (#21756)
## Context
The workflow builder has a "Tidy up" action that auto-positions steps
using a
Dagre layout. However, this lived entirely in the frontend and depended
on node
dimensions measured by React Flow after rendering in the browser.
As a result, workflows (and steps) created through AI Chat / MCP tools
were never
laid out: `create_complete_workflow` accepted optional `stepPositions`
that the
LLM had to invent, and `create_workflow_version_step` stored an optional
position
verbatim. In practice this produced overlapping / poorly positioned
steps.
## What this does
Extracts the tidy-up layout into a pure, frontend-free util in
`twenty-shared` and
reuses it from both the frontend tidy-up and the server, so
AI/MCP-created
workflows are auto-laid out at creation time.
### twenty-shared
- New `computeWorkflowLayout({ nodes, edges, options? })` — a pure Dagre
layout over
a minimal `{ id, width, height }` / `{ source, target }` graph,
returning
top-left-anchored positions (matching React Flow). Ignores edges
pointing to
unknown nodes.
- New constants: `WORKFLOW_LAYOUT_DEFAULT_OPTIONS`
(ranksep/nodesep/rankdir) and
`WORKFLOW_DIAGRAM_DEFAULT_NODE_DIMENSIONS` (estimated node size for
server-side
layout, where measured sizes are unavailable).
- Added `@dagrejs/dagre` dependency.
### twenty-front
- `getOrganizedDiagram` now delegates to `computeWorkflowLayout`,
passing real
measured node sizes. No behavior change for users.
### twenty-server
- New `WorkflowVersionWorkspaceService.autoLayoutWorkflowVersion(...)`
builds the
graph topology via the existing `buildWorkflowGraph` (covers if-else
branches and
iterator loops), feeds estimated node sizes into
`computeWorkflowLayout`, and
persists through the existing `updateWorkflowVersionPositions`.
- `create_complete_workflow`: removed `stepPositions` from the tool
schema; the
server always auto-lays out after creation/edges.
- `create_workflow_version_step`: re-tidies the whole version after each
added step
(wired at the tool level so the builder UI is unaffected) and dropped
the now
redundant `position` field.
## Notes
- Server-side layout uses estimated node sizes, so it is "good enough";
opening the
workflow and running the existing FE tidy-up refines it with real
measured sizes.
- Auto-layout is wired in the MCP tools, not in the shared creation
service, so
manual step creation in the builder UI is unchanged.
## Test plan
- [x] `twenty-shared` unit tests for `computeWorkflowLayout` (linear
chain, if-else
spread, dangling-edge safety)
- [x] `twenty-shared` builds; `twenty-server` and `twenty-front`
typecheck
- [x] Lint/format clean on changed files
- [ ] Create a workflow via AI Chat / MCP and confirm steps are laid out
without
overlap
- [x] Add a step via MCP and confirm the version is re-tidied
- [ ] Frontend "Tidy up" still behaves as before
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21756?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
|
||
|
|
d67aa2889b |
feat(workflow): add update_agent tool and responseFormat-aware AI Agent step schema (#21755)
## Summary
Brings the workflow AI/MCP tooling for **AI Agent steps** to parity with
the existing **CODE / logic-function** flow, and makes AI Agent output
references reliable in validation and the variable picker.
Just like a CODE step needs a logic function, an `AI_AGENT` step needs
an agent. The agent is already created as a side effect of step
creation; this PR adds the missing "configure it" tooling and fixes the
output schema so it reflects the agent's actual response format.
## Changes
### New `update_agent` MCP tool
- `update-agent.tool.ts`: lets the assistant configure the agent backing
an `AI_AGENT` step — `prompt` (system prompt), optional `modelId`,
optional `responseFormat` (text or structured json) — via
`AgentService.updateOneAgent`. Direct analog of
`update_logic_function_source`.
- Wired through: added `agentService` to `WorkflowToolDependencies`,
injected `AgentService` and registered the tool in
`workflow-tool.workspace-service.ts`, imported `AiAgentModule` in
`workflow-tools.module.ts`.
### Guided creation flow (mirrors CODE)
- `create-workflow-version-step.tool.ts`: `enrichResultWithNextStep` now
returns an `AI_AGENT` hint instructing the assistant to call
`update_agent` with the step's `settings.input.agentId` (and to set the
task prompt via `update_workflow_version_step` if needed).
- `create-complete-workflow.tool.ts`: rejects `AI_AGENT` steps (it
inserts steps directly and never runs the side effect that creates the
agent), with a description note pointing to
`create_workflow_version_step` + `update_agent`. Same treatment CODE
already gets.
### Correct output schema for AI Agent steps
- Backend `computeStepOutputSchema`
(`workflow-schema.workspace-service.ts`): the `AI_AGENT` case now
derives the output schema from the agent's `responseFormat` instead of a
hardcoded `{ response }`:
- text → `{ response: string }`
- json → one leaf per `responseFormat.schema.properties` field
This makes workflow validation resolve `{{stepId.fieldName}}` references
against the agent's real output (previously json agents validated wrong:
real fields rejected, `{{stepId.response}}` accepted but undefined at
runtime).
- Frontend `useStepsOutputSchema.ts`: when an `AI_AGENT` step has no
persisted `outputSchema`, fall back to generating it from the agent's
`responseFormat` (via `FindManyAgents` + the existing
`agentResponseSchemaToOutputSchema`) instead of the hardcoded `{
response }`. Keeps the variable picker correct for structured agents.
## Why output schema matters
Validation resolves every `{{stepId.path}}` against the referenced
step's `settings.outputSchema` (`validateWorkflowVariableReferences`).
The agent step's output schema is therefore the single source of truth
for "is the right output referenced." Because the runtime output depends
on `responseFormat` (text → `{ response }`, json → schema fields
directly), the schema must be derived from `responseFormat` to be
accurate.
## Not solved issue
We want each AI_AGENT step's settings.outputSchema to always match the
backing agent's responseFormat:
- text → { response }
- json → one field per responseFormat.schema.properties
That output schema is what everything downstream relies on: validation
(validateWorkflowVariableReferences resolves {{stepId.field}} against
it), the frontend variable picker (useStepsOutputSchema), and it's also
persisted inside workflowVersion.steps.
Agent should be unique source of truth but syncing agent -> step is not
possible
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21755?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
|
||
|
|
39e00d5853 |
feat(workflow): expected output schema for runtime-output steps + validation (#21744)
## Summary Extends the workflow validation layer (introduced in #21422) and adds a new "expected output schema" capability for steps whose output structure is only known at runtime. Some workflow steps (HTTP Request, Code, Logic Function, AI Agent (coming soon), Webhook trigger) don't have a statically known output shape, so downstream steps can't resolve `{{step.x.y}}` variable paths or validate them. This PR lets users declare a **sample/expected output** for those steps, derives an output schema from it, and uses that schema both to power variable resolution and to surface validation issues at build time. ## What's included ### Expected output schema (shared schemas + types) - New `expectedOutputSchemaShape` reused across the HTTP request, code, logic function and AI agent action settings schemas, plus the webhook trigger schema (`expectedOutputSchema` optional loose object). - Mirrored on the server-side action/trigger settings types. ### Output schema computation (server) - `workflow-schema.workspace-service` now computes a step's output schema from the user-declared `expectedOutputSchema` sample (via `getOutputSchemaFromValue`) when no statically computed schema is available. ### Validation layer (server) - `STEP_HAS_NO_VARIABLE_REFERENCE` (warning): flags steps of `VARIABLE_CONSUMING_ACTION_TYPES` (HTTP_REQUEST, CODE, LOGIC_FUNCTION, SEND_EMAIL, record CRUD) that reference no upstream variable. - `LOGIC_FUNCTION_OUTPUT_SCHEMA_MISMATCH` / `AI_AGENT_OUTPUT_SCHEMA_MISMATCH` (warnings): compare the declared output schema against the expected sample using the new shared `getOutputSchemaMismatchIssues` util (missing keys, leaf/object mismatches, type mismatches). - Trigger is now validated alongside steps (trigger type requirements + trigger variable references). - Validation issues no longer return both `suggestions` and `availablePaths` when they are identical (avoids redundant, costly payloads). ### Shared utilities - New `getOutputSchemaMismatchIssues` (+ tests) in `twenty-shared/logic-function`. - Moved `agentResponseSchemaToOutputSchema` from `twenty-front` into `twenty-shared/ai` so it can be reused on both sides. ### Frontend - New `WorkflowExpectedOutputBodyInput` component (JSON sample editor with validation) used by HTTP request, code, logic function and AI agent step editors. - New `resolvePersistedStepOutputSchema` util + `useStepsOutputSchema` update: resolves a step's output schema from `outputSchema`, falling back to `expectedOutputSchema`, with an AI_AGENT default. - HTTP request / code / logic function editors persist `expectedOutputSchema` and derive `outputSchema` from it. - Webhook trigger default settings include `expectedOutputSchema`. BONUS : iterator loop validation <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21744?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
177afde866 |
[BREAKING CHANGE] fix chart cache collisions with key-based data plumbing (#21743)
closes https://discord.com/channels/1130383047699738754/1514946035317997709 This fixes Apollo cache collisions for pie slices and line series by keeping chart bucket identity as key end-to-end, matching how bar chart already works. What changed -- - Renamed pie/line chart response identity from id to key in the chart data path. - Kept key through frontend chart hooks, types, stories, and tooltip/drilldown logic. - Only adapt key to id at actual external boundaries like Nivo and GraphWidgetLegend. - Added/updated tests covering cache normalization and chart data behavior. before - <img width="2600" height="844" alt="CleanShot 2026-06-17 at 20 17 14@2x" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b9ee83e9-db4b-423e-8668-a7beb4c4c62e" /> after - <img width="2614" height="800" alt="CleanShot 2026-06-17 at 20 16 17@2x" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/674a5417-ffc2-441d-9484-e1126438254c" /> <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21743?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
105f9565a5 |
feat(workflow): surface manual-trigger payload + metadata in variable picker (#21692)
## Summary Step 2 of the manual-trigger output schema restructuring (expand → display → migrate → contract). Builds on the now-merged #21676 (which expanded the runtime payload to serve `payload` and `metadata` siblings at the trigger root). This PR **surfaces** those in the variable picker as nested, expandable nodes: - `trigger.payload.{record fields}` — the record(s) that triggered the run - `trigger.metadata.workspaceMemberId` — who triggered it The flat root fields (`trigger.id`, etc.) remain available, so existing saved variable references keep working until a later migration phase moves them. ### Changes - **twenty-shared**: metadata/payload label constants + `build-manual-trigger-metadata-node` util + barrel exports. - **twenty-front**: `computeStepOutputSchema` MANUAL branch now nests `payload` (RecordNode for SINGLE_RECORD, array Node for BULK_RECORDS, omitted for GLOBAL) and `metadata`; `ManualTriggerOutputSchema` type updated to `{ payload?; metadata }`. - **twenty-server**: `computeTriggerOutputSchemaFromAvailability` mirrors the same nested shape for server-side validation. The key is `metadata` (not `_metadata`) — custom fields can't start with `_`, so collision risk was deemed acceptable. ## Test plan - [x] `npx nx build twenty-shared` - [x] `computeStepOutputSchema` unit tests pass (55) - [x] Manual: create a manual-trigger workflow (GLOBAL / single-record / bulk), confirm the picker shows `payload` and `metadata` as expandable folders and that selecting a field yields `{{trigger.payload.<field>}}` / `{{trigger.metadata.workspaceMemberId}}` > Note: server typecheck has pre-existing unrelated failures on main (Stripe billing mocks, gmail mocks); none touch workflow files. <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21692?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
102c530d0f |
Add limit on view widget (#21718)
<img width="1345" height="463" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a5d9ac2f-6375-4956-895d-3675aa9bebc1" /> <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21718?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> --------- Co-authored-by: cubic-dev-ai[bot] <191113872+cubic-dev-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
8130fa1c45 |
feat(workflow): use workspace member as variable sender for emails (#21582)
## Summary
Lets the email workflow node sender be driven by a variable: the
connected-account field accepts a `{{variable}}`, and the backend
resolves it to a connected account at run time.
<img width="436" height="195" alt="Capture d’écran 2026-06-16 à 11 59
27"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/18eee21e-aed6-4447-9bf4-5cb0e2cfc371"
/>
### Email sender by variable
- The connected-account field now accepts a `{{variable}}` via the
variable picker (uses `FormSelectFieldInput` with
`WorkflowVariablePicker`), with a hint to pick a connected account or
set a workspace member as a variable.
- The email workflow action resolves the stored sender value explicitly:
if it is a `workspaceMemberId` (a UUID matching a workspace member), it
resolves that member's first connected account; otherwise the value is
used directly as a `connectedAccountId`.
- Resolution lives in `EmailWorkflowActionBase` and applies to both
`SEND_EMAIL` and `DRAFT_EMAIL`. If a matching member has no connected
account, the run fails fast with a clear message (no silent fallback).
- `DRAFT_EMAIL` also fails fast when the resolved connected account is
missing the required OAuth scopes (`gmail.compose` / `Mail.Send`), via a
server-side `getMissingDraftEmailScopes` util that mirrors the front-end
check.
- Existing workflows with a hardcoded `connectedAccountId` keep working
unchanged (no migration needed).
> Note: exposing the running workspace member as a manual-trigger
variable (`_metadata.workspaceMemberId`) is split into a follow-up PR.
## Test plan
- [x] Backend unit tests for `draft-email-tool`,
`get-missing-draft-email-scopes`, and the `send-email` / `draft-email`
workflow actions (incl. workspace-member sender resolution)
- [x] Lints clean on all changed files
- [x] Manual: configure an email node with a workspace-member variable
sender and confirm it resolves and drafts/sends
- [x] Manual: confirm a member lacking compose permission fails the run
with the permission message
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. -->
<a
href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21582?utm_source=github"
target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"
data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source
media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)"
srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img
alt="Review in cubic"
src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a>
<!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. -->
---
### Update — scoped to Draft Email only
The sender variable picker is now exposed **only on the Draft Email
node**. The Send Email node keeps a plain account select (no variable
picker, no variable hint) until we enable it there in a follow-up.
Backend resolution still lives in `EmailWorkflowActionBase` and remains
generic, so enabling the picker for Send Email later requires no backend
change.
|
||
|
|
35c2a24afb |
perf(onboarding): compute invite suggestions on-demand (#21696)
## Summary Follow-up to #21640. In production, invite suggestions took ~1 minute to appear because `FetchOnboardingInviteSuggestionsJob` ran on the shared `calendarQueue` behind heavy calendar-sync jobs. - **Drop the background job entirely.** `getInviteSuggestions` now resolves the connected account from the authenticated `@AuthUserWorkspaceId()` and computes suggestions on demand: cache-first, with a bounded calendar fetch + cache write on a miss. Removes the Google/Microsoft enqueues, the `shouldComputeInviteSuggestions` threading through the auth controllers, and the now-unused `shouldComputeInviteSuggestionsOnConnect` / `isOnboardingConnectAccountPending` helpers. - **Prefetch one step earlier.** New `usePrefetchInviteSuggestions` hook fires the query from `CreateProfile` so the server cache is warm by the time the invite step renders. `InviteTeam` switches from `network-only` → `cache-first`. If the profile step is skipped, the invite step still computes on-demand (~1–3s, no queue) — no more minute-long waits. No GraphQL schema change. ## Test plan - [ ] Connect Google calendar in onboarding → invite step renders prefilled teammates with no perceivable wait - [ ] Connect Microsoft calendar in onboarding → same - [ ] Onboard with workspace name already set so profile step is skipped → invite step still prefills (just with a brief on-demand fetch instead of 1 min) - [ ] Connect a non-work-email account → invite step renders empty form (no suggestions) - [ ] `npx nx typecheck twenty-server` ✅ - [ ] `npx nx lint:diff-with-main twenty-server` ✅ - [ ] `npx nx lint:diff-with-main twenty-front` ✅ (changed files clean) - [ ] `google-apis.service.spec.ts` + `microsoft-apis.service.spec.ts` pass https://claude.ai/code/session_019MyY3bfAEij4AwSXMCLtWY --- _Generated by [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code/session_019MyY3bfAEij4AwSXMCLtWY)_ <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21696?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
b076c35848 |
fix(messaging): pin Google OAuth2 client to native fetch (#21668)
/closes TWENTY-SERVER-HFH <!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21668?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |
||
|
|
1ad919955a |
Support variables file email attachment (#21613)
<!-- This is an auto-generated description by cubic. --> <a href="https://cubic.dev/pr/twentyhq/twenty/pull/21613?utm_source=github" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-no-image-dialog="true"><picture><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"><source media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" srcset="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-light.svg"><img alt="Review in cubic" src="https://www.cubic.dev/buttons/review-in-cubic-dark.svg"></picture></a> <!-- End of auto-generated description by cubic. --> |