## Summary
Now that Twenty has fully migrated from Emotion to Linaria, the theme
system has been simplified to remove unnecessary complexity that existed
only to support the old runtime injection pattern.
### What changed
- **Deleted** `generateThemeConstants.ts` script and the entire
`generated/` directory — no more auto-generation
- **Added** `theme-light.css` and `theme-dark.css`: static CSS files
with 991 custom properties each, scoped under `.light` and `.dark`
selectors respectively
- **Moved** `themeCssVariables.ts` out of `generated/` and hand-maintain
it as a static `as const` object of `var(--t-*)` references (Linaria can
statically evaluate these at build time)
- **Extracted** numeric constants (`MOBILE_VIEWPORT`, `ICON_SIZES`,
`ICON_STROKES`) into a new `constants.ts` — CSS variables can't be used
in media queries or as numeric icon size props
- **Simplified** `ThemeContextProvider`: removed
`ThemeCssVariableInjectorEffect` entirely; now uses a single
`useLayoutEffect` to toggle `.light`/`.dark` class on `<html>`
- **Added** `class="light"` to `index.html` as default to prevent FOUC
before React hydration
### Why
The previous setup maintained a dual system: JS theme objects
(`THEME_LIGHT`/`THEME_DARK`) used at runtime, plus a generation script
that produced CSS variable entry arrays, which were then injected into
the DOM by `ThemeCssVariableInjectorEffect`. With Linaria, theme values
only need to be CSS custom properties — the JS objects were redundant.
This PR removes ~250 lines of infrastructure while keeping the same
theming capabilities.
## Reduce type leakage between GraphQL schemas
### Why
Twenty runs two separate GraphQL schemas: **core** and **metadata**.
NestJS's `@nestjs/graphql` uses a global `TypeMetadataStorage` that
accumulates all decorated types across all modules. When each schema is
built, every registered type leaks into both schemas regardless of which
module it belongs to.
This means the core schema's generated TypeScript
(`generated/graphql.ts`) contained ~2,700 lines of types that only
belong to the metadata schema (and vice versa). This creates confusion
about type ownership, inflates generated code, and makes it harder to
reason about which API surface each schema actually exposes.
### How
**1. Patch `@nestjs/graphql` to support schema-scoped type resolution**
- **(Already done)** Added a `resolverSchemaScope` option to
`GqlModuleOptions`, allowing each schema to declare a scope (e.g.
`'metadata'`)
- `ResolversExplorerService` now filters resolvers by a
`RESOLVER_SCHEMA_SCOPE` metadata key, so each schema only sees its own
resolvers
- `GraphQLSchemaFactory` now performs a **reachability walk**
(`computeReachableTypes`) starting from scoped resolver return types and
arguments, only including types that are transitively referenced —
handling unions, interfaces, and prototype chains
- Type definition storage and orphaned reference registry are cleared
between schema builds to prevent cross-contamination
**2. Register `ClientConfig` as orphaned type in metadata schema**
Since `ClientConfig` is needed in the metadata schema but not directly
returned by a resolver, it's explicitly declared via
`buildSchemaOptions.orphanedTypes`.
**3. Regenerate frontend types and fix imports**
- `generated/graphql.ts` shrank by ~2,700 lines (types moved to where
they belong)
- `generated-metadata/graphql.ts` gained types like `ClientConfig` that
were previously missing
- ~500 frontend files updated to import from the correct generated file
## Summary
This PR adds the `lingui/no-unlocalized-strings` ESLint rule to detect
untranslated strings and fixes translation issues across multiple
components.
## Changes
### ESLint Configuration (`eslint.config.react.mjs`)
- Added comprehensive `ignore` patterns for non-translatable strings
(CSS values, HTML attributes, technical identifiers)
- Added `ignoreNames` for props that don't need translation (className,
data-*, aria-*, etc.)
- Added `ignoreFunctions` for console methods, URL APIs, and other
non-user-facing functions
- Disabled rule for debug files, storybook, and test files
### Components Fixed (~19 files)
- Object record components (field inputs, pickers, merge dialogs)
- Settings components (accounts, admin panel)
- Serverless function components
- Record table and title cell components
## Status
🚧 **Work in Progress** - ~124 files remaining to fix
This PR is being submitted as draft to allow progressive fixing of
remaining translation issues.
## Testing
- Run `npx eslint "src/**/*.tsx"` in `packages/twenty-front` to check
remaining issues
[Figma
Design](https://www.figma.com/design/xt8O9mFeLl46C5InWwoMrN/Twenty?node-id=81380-344641&t=FpjWNOK2gZuDQQfr-0)
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> Adds a side panel layout for the Command Menu, routes modals into a
local container, updates the top bar and context chips, and standardizes
small button sizes.
>
> - **Command Menu**:
> - **Side Panel Layout**: Introduces `CommandMenuSidePanelLayout` with
animated width, hosts `CommandMenuRouter`, and provides a modal
container via `ModalContainerContext`.
> - **Top Bar**: Redesign (`CommandMenuTopBar`) with back icon, optional
AI sparkles action, compact height
(`COMMAND_MENU_SEARCH_BAR_HEIGHT=40`), and updated placeholder.
> - **Context Chips**: Adds `CommandMenuLastContextChip` and
`CommandMenuRecordInfo`; extends `CommandMenuContextChip` with `page`
prop; updates `CommandMenuContextChipGroups` to render last chip as
record info when applicable.
> - **Container Simplification**: `CommandMenuContainer` simplified to
just provide contexts and `AgentChatProvider`.
> - **Modal System**:
> - Adds `ModalContainerContext` and updates `Modal` to portal into
provided container; `Modal.Backdrop` supports `isInContainer`.
> - Updates usages (e.g., `UserOrMetadataLoader`, `ActionModal`) to
align with new modal behavior.
> - **Page Integration**:
> - Replaces `PageBody` with `CommandMenuSidePanelLayout` in
`RecordShowPage` and `RecordIndexContainerGater`.
> - Removes global `CommandMenuRouter` from `DefaultLayout` (keeps
keyboard shortcuts).
> - **UI/Styling**:
> - Standardizes several buttons to `size="small"` (e.g., command
actions, open record, options, reply, workflow footer).
> - Adjusts `ShowPageSubContainer` styling when rendered inside command
menu.
> - Storybook tests updated for new placeholder text.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
81fcaa145618a2fa1c3e11e2dc88fe832c51374c. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Devessier <baptiste@devessier.fr>
Co-authored-by: Aman Raj <92664006+araj00@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Etienne <45695613+etiennejouan@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Paul Rastoin <45004772+prastoin@users.noreply.github.com>
## What I've Implemented
I've added tooltips that show the original action type when you hover
over workflow step icons in the side panel. Now even if you rename an
action to something custom, you can still see what type of action it
actually is by hovering over the icon.
## The Problem This Solves
Before this change, once you renamed a workflow action (like changing
"Create Record" to "Add New Customer"), there was no way to tell what
the original action type was. This made it really confusing when
collaborating with others or when coming back to your own workflows
after some time - you couldn't tell if an action was a "Create Record"
or "Update Record" or something else.
## What Changed
Updated action type labels: Instead of showing just "Action" for all
record operations, the system now shows specific types like "Create
Record", "Update Record", "Delete Record", etc.
Added hover tooltips: When you hover over the action icons in the
workflow side panel, a tooltip appears showing the original action type,
even if you've renamed the step title.
## Before vs After
Before: All actions showed "Action" in the side panel, making it
impossible to distinguish between different types after renaming.
After: Each action shows its specific type in tooltips, so you always
know what you're working with.
This should make workflow management much clearer, especially when
multiple people are collaborating on the same workflow!
Resolves#14878
## Demo Video
See it in action:
https://www.loom.com/share/c0e0ec24e4524d0685b841e9ceb011d0?t=65&sid=dc05e58a-8869-4969-aa67-9772242fe697
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomas.trompette@sfr.fr>
When updating an active version, we :
- create a draft
- update the draft
Issue is that after the creation, workflow is shortly null. So the
component is re-rendered and the form data are lost.
Removing the check on the null allow to keep the form data.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d6c565eb-9a29-4830-9396-5f979c8caa7b
- Added a new component for manual trigger (mostly duplicated from
previous one). Will remove the old one once all data are migrated
- Updated schema output so the current item of the iterator can be typed
Todo left:
- migrate old triggers
- add an util to search iterator output. Today current item fields will
be displayed as not found
- set new manual triggers for workflow runs
Workflow, workflow version and workflow runs should not be passed
through props or context. These are set in recoil component states and
that's where all hooks should look for these.
This PR stop propagating workflow with version through all components.
When the target is not in the direct next step ids of the source (step
or trigger), check if there is a filter between both. If yes, delete the
filter and remove it from source next step ids.
Also refactored the existing.
This PR cleans a few parts of the workflow features and fixes a few
improper behaviors.
Here is a non-exaustive list of improved things:
- Clicking on an action will always reset the command menu's navigation
stack. Previously, the behavior wasn't unified between workflows,
workflow versions and workflow runs.
- Opening a step in the side panel is now down in the `onClick` event
handler put on individual Reactflow nodes. This makes interoperability
between filters (which are buttons on edges) and traditional actions.
- Simplified the code that automatically opens pending forms in the side
panel. This feature should now work more predictably.
- Splitted the `WorkflowDiagramEmptyTrigger` component into
`WorkflowDiagramEmptyTriggerEditable` and
`WorkflowDiagramEmptyTriggerReadonly`. This makes handling events easier
as the behavior isn't the same in both cases.
- Dropped all `useOnSelectionChange` hooks that were used to open steps
in the side panel upon user selection.
- Created a specific `WorkflowRunDiagramStepNode` instead of using
`WorkflowDiagramStepNodeReadonly` in `WorkflowRunDiagramCanvas`
- Deleted `useHandleWorkflowRunDiagramCanvasInit` as it was used to open
the initially selected step in the command menu, which is now handled in
an effect that works for all cases, including workflow run's state
refreshing.
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1227
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/11923
This PR removes any V2 naming in state management logic and some minor
utils and hooks.
It has a lot of changes but nearly all of them were made by the rename
functionality of vscode which is deterministic, so it shouldn't
introduce any regression.
QA has been made on this PR on the main features of the app without any
noticeable issue.
Also renamed some other v2 naming related items :
- TextInputV2 => TextInput
- TextInput => SettingsTextInput
- ObjectFilterDropdownFilterSelectMenuItemV2 =>
ObjectFilterDropdownFilterSelectMenuItem
- useInitDraftValueV2 => useInitDraftValue
- useOpenRecordTableCellV2 => useOpenRecordTableCell
This PR does not produce any functional changes for our users. It
prepares the branches for workflows by:
- decommissioning `output` and `context` fields or `workflowRun` records
and use newly created `state` field from front-end and back-end
- use `stepStatus` computed by `back-end` in `front-end`
- add utils and types in `twenty-shared/workflow` (not completed, a
follow-up is scheduled
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1211)
- add concurrency to `workflowQueue` message queue to avoid weird branch
execution when using forms in workflow branches
- add a WithLock decorator for better dev experience of
`CacheLockService.withLock` usage
Here is an example of such a workflow running (front branch display is
not yet done that's why it looks ugly) ->
https://discord.com/channels/1130383047699738754/1258024460238192691/1392897615171158098
follow up #12033
in #12033, SettingsDataModelFieldRelationForm I changed the the use of
objectMetadataItems to activeObjectMetadataItems, which filtered out
system objects. The naming was one factor for this confusion
Renaming it everywhere to specify that they don't include system objects
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
- Migrated all workflow Recoil states to component states to isolate
each workflow visualizer instance. The use case of having two workflow
visualizers displayed at the same time appeared recently and will grow
in the near future.
- We chose to use the `recordId` as the value for the `instanceId` of
the component states. Currently, there are a few cases where two
workflows or two workflow runs are rendered at the same time. As a
consequence, relying on the `recordId` is enough for the moment.
- However, there is one case where it's necessary to have a component
state scoped to a workflow visualizer instance: the
`workflowVisualizerStatusState`. This component is tightly coupled to
the `<Reactflow />` component instance rendered in the workflow
visualizer, and it must be set to its default value when the component
first renders. I achieved that by using another component instance
context whose instanceId is an identifier returned by the `useId()` hook
in the Workflow Run Card component.
Charles Bochet