Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Charles Bochet 9e21e55db4 Prevent leak between /metadata and /graphql GQL schemas (#17845)
## Fix resolver schema leaking between `/metadata` and `/graphql`
endpoints

### Summary
- Patch `@nestjs/graphql` to support a `resolverSchemaScope` option that
filters resolvers at both schema generation and runtime, preventing
cross-endpoint leaking
- Introduce `@CoreResolver()` and `@MetadataResolver()` decorators to
explicitly scope each resolver to its endpoint
- Move most resolvers (auth, billing, workspace, user, etc.) to the
metadata schema where the frontend expects them; only workflow and
timeline calendar/messaging resolvers remain on `/graphql`
- Fix frontend `SSEQuerySubscribeEffect` to use the default (metadata)
Apollo client instead of the core client

### Problem
NestJS GraphQL's module-based resolver discovery traverses transitive
imports, causing resolvers from `/metadata` modules to leak into the
`/graphql` schema and vice versa. This made the schemas unpredictable
and tightly coupled to module import order.

### Approach
- Added `resolverSchemaScope` to `GqlModuleOptions` via a patch on
`@nestjs/graphql`, filtering in both `filterResolvers()` (runtime
binding) and `getAllCtors()` (schema generation)
- Each resolver is explicitly decorated with `@CoreResolver()` or
`@MetadataResolver()`
- Organized decorator, constant, and type files under `graphql-config/`
following project conventions


Core GQL Schema: (see: no more fields!)
<img width="827" height="894" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/668f3f0f-485e-43f0-92be-4345aeccacb6"
/>

Metadata GQL Schema (see no more getTimelineCalendarEventsFromCompany)
<img width="827" height="894" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/443913db-e5fe-4161-b0e7-4a971cc80a71"
/>
2026-02-11 10:05:24 +00:00
Félix Malfait 8b59fcaea7 Remove preconstruct, update wyw (#13844)
To simplify our setup, moving back to Vite to build twenty-shared.

Also upgrading wyw

---------

Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
2025-08-12 12:43:35 +02:00
Félix Malfait 8b4b9ef8da Change type import rule (#13751)
Forcing "type" to be explicit, works best will rollup on the frontend to
exclude depdendencies
2025-08-08 01:27:05 +02:00
Charles Bochet 7e419337b5 Delete userWorkspace when removed from workspace (#13131)
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/13024
2025-07-09 18:34:50 +02:00
nitin 1c64b7b072 feat: implement dynamic driver configuration + fix integration test log pollution (#12104)
### Primary Changes: Dynamic Driver Configuration
Refactors FileStorageService and EmailSenderService to support dynamic
driver configuration changes at runtime without requiring application
restarts.

**Key Architectural Change**: Instead of conditionally registering
drivers at build time based on configuration, we now **register all
possible drivers eagerly** and select the appropriate one at runtime.

### What Changed:
- **Before**: Modules conditionally registered only the configured
driver (e.g., only S3Driver if STORAGE_TYPE=S3)
- **After**: All drivers (LocalDriver, S3Driver, SmtpDriver,
LoggerDriver) are registered at startup
- **Runtime Selection**: Services dynamically choose and instantiate the
correct driver based on current configuration

### Secondary Fix: Integration Test Log Cleanup
Addresses ConfigStorageService error logs appearing in integration test
output by using injected LoggerService for consistent log handling.
2025-05-28 14:19:20 +05:30
Paul Rastoin 442f8dbe3c [QRQC_2] No implicitAny in twenty-server (#12075)
# Introduction
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/12068
Related with https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/975

We're enabling `noImplicitAny` handled few use case manually, added a
`ts-expect-error` to the others, we should plan to handle them in the
future
2025-05-15 18:23:22 +02:00
nitin 9ed6edc005 Twenty config integration tests + conversion refactor (#11972)
- In this PR the default value of IS_CONFIG_VARIABLES_IN_DB_ENABLED has
been changed to true,
    
- This is my first time writing integration tests, so I’d appreciate a
thorough review. :)
I’ve tried to follow the existing test patterns closely, but there might
be some small mistakes I may have missed.
Also let me know if I have missed any important test cases that should
be tested

UPDATE - 
### Config Value Converter Refactoring
- Created a centralized type transformers registry with bidirectional
validation
- Refactored ConfigValueConverterService to support validation in both
directions:
- Maintained existing DB-to-app conversion behavior
- Added validation for app-to-DB conversion
- Added integration tests to verify validation works in both directions

---------

Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
2025-05-13 13:34:27 +05:30