## Fix resolver schema leaking between `/metadata` and `/graphql`
endpoints
### Summary
- Patch `@nestjs/graphql` to support a `resolverSchemaScope` option that
filters resolvers at both schema generation and runtime, preventing
cross-endpoint leaking
- Introduce `@CoreResolver()` and `@MetadataResolver()` decorators to
explicitly scope each resolver to its endpoint
- Move most resolvers (auth, billing, workspace, user, etc.) to the
metadata schema where the frontend expects them; only workflow and
timeline calendar/messaging resolvers remain on `/graphql`
- Fix frontend `SSEQuerySubscribeEffect` to use the default (metadata)
Apollo client instead of the core client
### Problem
NestJS GraphQL's module-based resolver discovery traverses transitive
imports, causing resolvers from `/metadata` modules to leak into the
`/graphql` schema and vice versa. This made the schemas unpredictable
and tightly coupled to module import order.
### Approach
- Added `resolverSchemaScope` to `GqlModuleOptions` via a patch on
`@nestjs/graphql`, filtering in both `filterResolvers()` (runtime
binding) and `getAllCtors()` (schema generation)
- Each resolver is explicitly decorated with `@CoreResolver()` or
`@MetadataResolver()`
- Organized decorator, constant, and type files under `graphql-config/`
following project conventions
Core GQL Schema: (see: no more fields!)
<img width="827" height="894" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/668f3f0f-485e-43f0-92be-4345aeccacb6"
/>
Metadata GQL Schema (see no more getTimelineCalendarEventsFromCompany)
<img width="827" height="894" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/443913db-e5fe-4161-b0e7-4a971cc80a71"
/>
# Introduction
While removing the v1 https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15823 I've
encountered the method `objectMetadataService.deleteObjectsMetadata`
that I didn't wanted to migrate as it is and if it's not challenging its
existence legitimacy.
## Motivations
In a nutshell on a workspace deletion object metadata and field metadata
cascading deletion is correclty handled
But that's not the case for all of a workspaces entities ( roles,
workspaceMigrations ) I suspect that we did not defined the foreignKey
explicitly through `typeorm`
## Battle testing v2
I still decided to give a try to a complex operation in the v2 such as a
workspace all object metadata deletion.
Spoiler it failed due to object being interdependent between them and
not being topologically sorted ( morph relation can introduce circular
dep anw ).
Note: Even after removing the delete field on delete object aggregator
we end up with an equivalent circular dep error which an object and its
field metadata identifier connection.
## Elegant `DEFERRED` and `DEFERRABLE` foreign keys
The most safe, low level solution would be to make all field relations
deferrable and start the runner transaction as deferred. But this
requires a quite invasive migration of existing FK
## On cascade solution
I've opted for the quick fix, on object or field deletion spread
cacasde.
It's pretty safe as the builder priorly validates the deletion and and
its related entities integrity
Only for both field and object deletion action types in v2 runner
## Integration coverage
Added a test that will scan a new workspace database core schema tables
and expect now result after workspace deletion through its only user
deletion
# Introduction
Refactoring the standard overrides dispatcher to only pass over fields
to has to be dispatched in the standardOverrides entry and let the other
side effects resulting from out of standard overrides mutation trigger
Related to https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1753
## This allows
- standard field settings, options etc updates and so on
## Remark
- Determine what we should do on object deactivation ( right now in
production we can still access deactivated object relation properties
and so on e.g deactivate opportunities still accessible from a view
field on company ( still have to re-create it as it has been deleted )
=> decided to leave as it is right now, `isActive` could be considered
as uiDeactivated in the end
- We should also add forbidden standard field mutations validation
inside the builder itself ( here we want to early return in the api
input transpiler too as we don't want to spread invalid side effects )
=> or in the end we could just centralize both but it will generate
several errors
## Coverage
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/object-metadata/successful-update-one-standard-object-metadata.integration-spec.ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/successful-update-one-standard-field-metadata.integration-spec.ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/object-metadata/failing-update-one-standard-object-metadata.integration-spec.ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/failing-update-one-standard-field-metadata.integration-spec.ts
Test Suites: 4 passed, 4 total
Tests: 18 passed, 18 total
Snapshots: 16 passed, 16 total
Time: 8.721 s, estimated 10 s
```
## Update post review
Faced a behavior where updating back the company label to its original
value would result in storing this value in the standard overrides
Refactored both field and object transpilation behavior to rather remove
the standard override value instead and let fallback on original value
Yes it's quite duplicated will factorize once we move this inside the
builder
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1560
If viewId is defined in a groupBy query, we want to apply all filters of
the view to the query.
This required to move a lot of code from twenty-front to twenty-shared
to convert the filters as stored in the db into graphql filters,
applying the right combinations between filters etc., which was
previously only done in the FE.
This PR does not handle any field filters, it will be done in a later pr
## Introduction
After enabling flag by default got following errors:
```ts
Test Suites: 48 failed, 1 skipped, 97 passed, 145 of 146 total
Tests: 499 failed, 1 skipped, 644 passed, 1144 total
Snapshots: 61 failed, 133 passed, 194 total
Time: 363.226 s
Ran all test suites.
```
## From
<img width="2952" height="1510" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7e3b20c6-2552-40a7-90bb-2d7b3002c895"
/>
## To
<img width="3134" height="1510" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4fc9ada4-3c14-4333-a1db-11daf87db8d6"
/>
There's a huge test bundle in the latest shard that we could split up
## Notes
- Set as failing morph relation field rename as for the moment we do not
handle relation field mutation
- fixed the object update and creation validation adding label
identifier field metadata id checks
- and more
Some integrations tests are still on the v1 ( they have before and after
all disabling and re-enabling the flat ) but mainly we now have more
coverage on the v2 than the v1.
Mainly related records, uniqueness have to be migrated the v2 and so
tests too
# Introduction
Honestly this implem is a mess, discussing a potential side effect
handler with @weiko before the build and run that would handle each side
effect per entity and operation
Handling:
- [ ] unique index is generated when a field is updated with the
`isUnique`
- [x] an index is generated when a relation is created
- [x] search vector index creation on custom object creation
- [x] renaming a field metadata or an object should re-create all
related indexes which are composed by their namings
- [x] delete object should remove any related indexes
- [x] delete field should update related indexes ( if index ends up
empty it should be removed )
- [ ] on object renaming that contains morph fields -> triggers update
field -> trigger index recompute
- [x] on update name renaming should recompute all related indexes
## TODO
- [x] Integration testing
- [ ] Refactor the index maps cache to be storing a
`idsByObjectMetadataId`
- [x] Refactor deterministic name to use order sorting
- [x] Remove flat index from flat object
## What's next
Will handle morph indexes in a new dedicated PR for the moment will
stick to this
Same for the cache improvement and uniqueness
# Introduction
Migrating and improving performances of field enum integrations tests
success and failing tests cases to be using the new v2 api
## Discovered issue
When deleting an object in v1 it will leave related enums until the
object is re-created
Something not done anymore within the create in v2 but in the delete
operation
We should implem an upgrade command to remove such relicas
## Bugs
- Update/create default value multi select runner wrong sql query -> FIX
- Update default value multi select regression, we should allow option
without an id to be inserted -> FIX
- default value compare dynamic json stringify convertion or not in
compare tools for object and fields
- Enable update to unique for composite field with defaultValue
different from default defaultValue on subfield not included in unique
constraint
- Enable update to unique for standard field + Disable update to
non-unique for standard index
- Fix typo
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1360
# Why
If we have a Morph Relation, like :
Opportunity <-> Company & People
Let's say it's a MANY_TO_ONE on Opportunity side
Then we have two joinColumnNames looking like
- ownerPersonId
- ownerCompanyId
Let's say someone renames the obejct Person (assume we can even though
standard obejcts cannot be renames per say at the moment in the API)
We need to update the joinColumnName and create the associated
migrations
This PR adapts teh deleteOneField to make sure morph relations can be
deleted, either
- from a relation type,
- or from a morph relation type (which is the most obvious case).
This PR covers
- the deletion of fieldMetadata
- and the migrationof workspace schemas, by using the already existing
definition of relation migrations
This PR implements a new test suite: "Delete Object metadata with morph
relation" and completes the other test suites for FieldMetadata and
ObjectMetadata creation/deletion.
Last, we added a nitpick from @paul I forgot on a previous PR on
process-nested-realtion-v2
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1197
# Introduction
From the moment replaced the FieldMetadataInterface definition to:
```ts
import { FieldMetadataType } from 'twenty-shared/types';
import { FieldMetadataEntity } from 'src/engine/metadata-modules/field-metadata/field-metadata.entity';
export type FieldMetadataInterface<
T extends FieldMetadataType = FieldMetadataType,
> = FieldMetadataEntity<T>;
```
After this PR merge will create a new one removing the type and
replacing it to `FieldMetadataEntity`.
Did not renamed it here to avoid conflicts on naming + type issues fixs
within the same PR
## Field metadata entity RELATION or MORPH
Relations fields cannot be null for those field metadata entity instance
anymore, but are never for the others see
`packages/twenty-server/src/engine/metadata-modules/field-metadata/types/field-metadata-entity-test.type.ts`
( introduced TypeScript tests )
## Concerns
- TS_VECTOR is the most at risk with the `generatedType` and
`asExpression` removal from interface
## What's next
- `FielMetadataInterface` removal and rename ( see introduction )
- Depcrecating `ObjectMetadataInterface`
- Refactor `FieldMetadataEntity` optional fiels to be nullable only
- TO DIG `never` occurences on settings, defaultValue etc
- Some interfaces will be replaced by the `FlatFieldMetadata` when
deprecating the current sync and comparators tools
# Introduction
Diff description: ~500 tests and +500 additions
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/731
## What has been done here
In a nutshell on a field metadata type ( `SELECT MULTI_SELECT` ) update,
we will be browsing all `ViewFilters` in a post hook searching for some
referencing related updated `fieldMetadata` select. In order to update
or delete the `viewFilter` depending on the associated mutations.
## How to test:
- Add FieldMetadata `SELECT | MULTI_SELECT` to an existing or a new
`objectMetadata`
- Create a filtered view on created `fieldMetadata` with any options you
would like
- Remove some options ( in the best of the world some that are selected
by the filter ) from the `fieldMetadata` settings page
- Go back to the filtered view, removed or updated options should have
been hydrated in the `displayValue` and the filtered data should make
sense
## All filtered options are deleted edge case
If an update implies that a viewFilter does not have any existing
related options anymore, then we remove the viewFilter
## Testing
```sh
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/update-one-field-metadata-related-record.integration-spec.ts (27 s)
update-one-field-metadata-related-record
SELECT
✓ should delete related view filter if all select field options got deleted (2799 ms)
✓ should update related multi selected options view filter (1244 ms)
✓ should update related solo selected option view filter (1235 ms)
✓ should handle partial deletion of selected options in view filter (1210 ms)
✓ should handle reordering of options while maintaining view filter values (1487 ms)
✓ should handle no changes update of options while maintaining existing view filter values (1174 ms)
✓ should handle adding new options while maintaining existing view filter (1174 ms)
✓ should update display value with options label if less than 3 options are selected (1249 ms)
✓ should throw error if view filter value is not a stringified JSON array (1300 ms)
MULTI_SELECT
✓ should delete related view filter if all select field options got deleted (1127 ms)
✓ should update related multi selected options view filter (1215 ms)
✓ should update related solo selected option view filter (1404 ms)
✓ should handle partial deletion of selected options in view filter (1936 ms)
✓ should handle reordering of options while maintaining view filter values (1261 ms)
✓ should handle no changes update of options while maintaining existing view filter values (1831 ms)
✓ should handle adding new options while maintaining existing view filter (1610 ms)
✓ should update display value with options label if less than 3 options are selected (1889 ms)
✓ should throw error if view filter value is not a stringified JSON array (1365 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 18 passed, 18 total
Snapshots: 18 passed, 18 total
Time: 27.039 s
```
## Out of scope
- We should handle ViewFilter validation when extracting its definition
from the metadata
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1009
## Concerns
- Are we able through the api to update an RATING fieldMetadata ? ( if
yes than that's an issue and we should handle RATING the same way than
for SELECT and MULTI_SELECT )
- It's not possible to group a view from a MULTI_SELECT field
The above points create a double nor a triple "lecture" to the post hook
effect:
- ViewGroup -> only SELECT
- VIewFilter -> only SELECT || MULTI_SELECT
- Rating nothing
I think we should determine the scope of all of that
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Introduction
Big diff a lot of tests and snapshots ( real diff < 500+ )
close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12117
close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12133
## What has been done here
Implemented a strong integration coverage on both fieldmetadata`SELECT`
`UPDATE` and `CREATE`.
Implemented server side validation for the options `value` `label` `id`
and collision issue with also `position`
We could improve:
- Position validation
- DefaultValue validation
## Update
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/update-one-field-metadata-select.integration-spec.ts (41.054 s)
Field metadata select update tests group
✓ Update should succeed with provided option id (2565 ms)
✓ Update should succeed with valid default value (1469 ms)
✓ Update should succeed with various options id (1257 ms)
✓ Update should succeed without option id (1286 ms)
✓ Update should trim option values (1366 ms)
✓ Update should succeed with default value and no options (1122 ms)
✓ Update should fail with unknown default value and no options (1075 ms)
✓ Update should fail with only white spaces id (1195 ms)
✓ Update should fail with empty string id (1058 ms)
✓ Update should fail with null id (1066 ms)
✓ Update should fail with not a string id (1098 ms)
✓ Update should fail with too long id (1373 ms)
✓ Update should fail with only white spaces label (1034 ms)
✓ Update should fail with empty string label (1057 ms)
✓ Update should fail with null label (1100 ms)
✓ Update should fail with not a string label (1144 ms)
✓ Update should fail with too long label (1273 ms)
✓ Update should fail with only white spaces value (1385 ms)
✓ Update should fail with empty string value (1035 ms)
✓ Update should fail with null value (1068 ms)
✓ Update should fail with not a string value (1021 ms)
✓ Update should fail with too long value (1134 ms)
✓ Update should fail with invalid option id (1137 ms)
✓ Update should fail with empty options (1238 ms)
✓ Update should fail with invalid option value format (1104 ms)
✓ Update should fail with comma in option label (1004 ms)
✓ Update should fail with duplicated option values (1015 ms)
✓ Update should fail with duplicated option ids (1079 ms)
✓ Update should fail with duplicated option positions (1266 ms)
✓ Update should fail with duplicated trimmed option values (1220 ms)
✓ Update should fail with undefined option label (1029 ms)
✓ Update should fail with an invalid default value (1142 ms)
✓ Update should fail with an unknown default value (1081 ms)
✓ Update should fail with undefined option value (1086 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 34 passed, 34 total
Snapshots: 28 passed, 28 total
Time: 41.079 s
```
## Create
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/create-one-field-metadata-select.integration-spec.ts (38.292 s)
Field metadata select creation tests group
✓ Create should succeed with provided option id (2096 ms)
✓ Create should succeed with valid default value (1316 ms)
✓ Create should succeed with various options id (1113 ms)
✓ Create should succeed without option id (1378 ms)
✓ Create should trim option values (1296 ms)
✓ Create should fail with only white spaces id (1000 ms)
✓ Create should fail with empty string id (1325 ms)
✓ Create should fail with null id (1060 ms)
✓ Create should fail with not a string id (1142 ms)
✓ Create should fail with too long id (1321 ms)
✓ Create should fail with only white spaces label (999 ms)
✓ Create should fail with empty string label (1163 ms)
✓ Create should fail with null label (1198 ms)
✓ Create should fail with not a string label (1678 ms)
✓ Create should fail with too long label (1527 ms)
✓ Create should fail with only white spaces value (1200 ms)
✓ Create should fail with empty string value (1102 ms)
✓ Create should fail with null value (1037 ms)
✓ Create should fail with not a string value (1462 ms)
✓ Create should fail with too long value (896 ms)
✓ Create should fail with invalid option id (997 ms)
✓ Create should fail with empty options (1058 ms)
✓ Create should fail with invalid option value format (1190 ms)
✓ Create should fail with comma in option label (1142 ms)
✓ Create should fail with duplicated option values (872 ms)
✓ Create should fail with duplicated option ids (860 ms)
✓ Create should fail with duplicated option positions (1002 ms)
✓ Create should fail with duplicated trimmed option values (1336 ms)
✓ Create should fail with undefined option label (754 ms)
✓ Create should fail with an invalid default value (696 ms)
✓ Create should fail with an unknown default value (678 ms)
✓ Create should fail with undefined option value (699 ms)
✓ Create should fail with null options (720 ms)
✓ Create should fail with undefined options (686 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 34 passed, 34 total
Snapshots: 29 passed, 29 total
Time: 38.314 s
```
## Conclusion
As always any suggestions are welcomed ! Please let me know
## Discussion about validation governance
### Front
Front side will be dealing with zod validations schema that he will
handle and maintain by himself
### Back validation instances
- Validation hold through DTO declarations ( run by yoga through the
resolvers )
- Server programmatic validation and exceptions handling ( run through
the services )
For this refactor/fix we decided to stick to the current implementation
only touching the `Server programmatic validation and exceptions
handling` we will handle validation centralization when we will onboard
the `nestjs-query` deprecation/integration refactor.
### Vision
In the best of the world we could think of an intermediary model that
will handle and take responsibility of the validation decorators that
would be run programmatically through the service, Yoga would still
consume it ? then we would need to have enough grain in the service to
know the input has already validated
## Notes
Introduced zod back side in order to handle very atomic and primitive
validation
In this PR:
- Remove deactivated objects from ActivityTargetInlineCell record picker
- Prevent users to deactivate createdAt, updatedAt, deletedAt fields on
any objects
Still left:
- write unit tests on the assert utils
- write integration tests on field metadata service
- prevent users to deactivate createdAt, updatedAt, deletedAt on FE
## Context
- Removing search* integration tests instead of fixing them because they
will be replaced by global search very soon
- Fixed billing + add missing seeds to make them work
- Fixed integration tests not using consistently the correct "test" db
- Fixed ci not running the with-db-reset configuration due to nx
configuration being used twice for different level of the command
- Enriched .env.test
- Fixed parts where exceptions were not thrown properly and not caught
by exception handler to convert to 400 when needed
- Refactored feature flag service that had 2 different implementations
in lab and admin panel + added tests
- Fixed race condition when migrations are created at the same timestamp
and doing the same type of operation, in this case object deletion could
break because table could be deleted earlier than its relations
- Fixed many integration tests that were not up to date since the CI has
been broken for a while
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Fixes#9827
Also uncovered a conflict with `@objectType('Relation')` and
`@objectType('relation)`
I don't want to address it in this PR so I will create a followup issue
when we close this but I think there's a confusion between
Relation/RelationMetadata, it's unclear what is what
---------
Co-authored-by: Antoine Moreaux <moreaux.antoine@gmail.com>
isLabelSyncedWithName should be nullable for fieldMetadata, as it is for
objectMetadata.
+ Adding missing validation on label and name sync in
fieldMetadataService for creation and update
+ adding metadata tests
martmull