Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Charles Bochet 9e21e55db4 Prevent leak between /metadata and /graphql GQL schemas (#17845)
## Fix resolver schema leaking between `/metadata` and `/graphql`
endpoints

### Summary
- Patch `@nestjs/graphql` to support a `resolverSchemaScope` option that
filters resolvers at both schema generation and runtime, preventing
cross-endpoint leaking
- Introduce `@CoreResolver()` and `@MetadataResolver()` decorators to
explicitly scope each resolver to its endpoint
- Move most resolvers (auth, billing, workspace, user, etc.) to the
metadata schema where the frontend expects them; only workflow and
timeline calendar/messaging resolvers remain on `/graphql`
- Fix frontend `SSEQuerySubscribeEffect` to use the default (metadata)
Apollo client instead of the core client

### Problem
NestJS GraphQL's module-based resolver discovery traverses transitive
imports, causing resolvers from `/metadata` modules to leak into the
`/graphql` schema and vice versa. This made the schemas unpredictable
and tightly coupled to module import order.

### Approach
- Added `resolverSchemaScope` to `GqlModuleOptions` via a patch on
`@nestjs/graphql`, filtering in both `filterResolvers()` (runtime
binding) and `getAllCtors()` (schema generation)
- Each resolver is explicitly decorated with `@CoreResolver()` or
`@MetadataResolver()`
- Organized decorator, constant, and type files under `graphql-config/`
following project conventions


Core GQL Schema: (see: no more fields!)
<img width="827" height="894" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/668f3f0f-485e-43f0-92be-4345aeccacb6"
/>

Metadata GQL Schema (see no more getTimelineCalendarEventsFromCompany)
<img width="827" height="894" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/443913db-e5fe-4161-b0e7-4a971cc80a71"
/>
2026-02-11 10:05:24 +00:00
Marie 2877b28afb [permissions] Enable permissionsV2 in seeds (#12623)
In this PR

- enable permissions V2 in seeds 
- remove permission V2 toggle in tests
2025-06-17 09:56:11 +00:00
Marie cdc4badec3 [permissions] Writing permission does not go without reading permission (#12573)
Closes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/868

We should not allow to grant any writing permission (update, soft
delete, delete) on an object or at role-level without the reading
permission at the same level.

This has been implemented in the front-end at role level, and is yet to
be done at object level (@Weiko)
2025-06-16 10:04:38 +00:00