## Recoil → Jotai progressive migration: infrastructure +
ChipFieldDisplay
### Benchmark
In the beginning, there was no hope:
<img width="1180" height="948" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f8635991-52e6-4958-8240-6ba7214132b2"
/>
Then the hope was reborn
<img width="2070" height="948" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/be1182b9-1c8d-4fdc-ab4c-1484ad74449d"
/>
### Approach
We introduce a **V2 state management layer** backed by Jotai that
mirrors the existing Recoil API, enabling component-by-component
migration without a big-bang rewrite.
#### V2 API (Jotai-backed, Recoil-ergonomic)
- `createStateV2` / `createFamilyStateV2` — drop-in replacements for
`createState` / `createFamilyState`, returning wrapper types over Jotai
atoms
- `useRecoilValueV2`, `useRecoilStateV2`, `useFamilyRecoilValueV2`, etc.
— thin wrappers around Jotai's `useAtomValue` / `useAtom` / `useSetAtom`
- A shared `jotaiStore` (via `createStore()`) passed to a
`<JotaiProvider>` wrapping `<RecoilRoot>`, also accessible imperatively
for dual-writes
#### Dual-write bridge for progressive migration
For state shared between migrated and non-migrated components, we use
**dual-write**: writers update both the Recoil atom and the Jotai V2
atom (via `jotaiStore.set()`). This avoids sync components or extra
subscriptions.
Write sites updated: `useUpsertRecordsInStore`, `useSetRecordTableData`,
`ListenRecordUpdatesEffect`, `RecordShowEffect`,
`useLoadRecordIndexStates`, `useUpdateObjectViewOptions`.
#### First migration: ChipFieldDisplay render path
- `useChipFieldDisplay` → reads `recordStoreFamilyStateV2` via
`useFamilyRecoilValueV2` (was `useRecoilValue(recordStoreFamilyState)`)
- `RecordChip` → reads `recordIndexOpenRecordInStateV2` via
`useRecoilValueV2` (was `useRecoilValue(recordIndexOpenRecordInState)`)
- `Avatar` (twenty-ui) and event handlers (`useOpenRecordInCommandMenu`)
left on Recoil — not on the render path / in a different package
#### Pattern for migrating additional state
1. Create V2 atom: `createStateV2` or `createFamilyStateV2`
2. Add `jotaiStore.set(v2Atom, value)` at each write site
3. Switch readers to `useRecoilValueV2(v2Atom)`
4. Once all readers are migrated, remove the Recoil atom and dual-writes
#### Why not jotai-recoil-adapter?
Evaluated
[jotai-recoil-adapter](https://github.com/clockelliptic/jotai-recoil-adapter)
— not production-ready (21 open issues, no React 19, forces providerless
mode, missing types). We built a purpose-built thin layer instead.
## Fix resolver schema leaking between `/metadata` and `/graphql`
endpoints
### Summary
- Patch `@nestjs/graphql` to support a `resolverSchemaScope` option that
filters resolvers at both schema generation and runtime, preventing
cross-endpoint leaking
- Introduce `@CoreResolver()` and `@MetadataResolver()` decorators to
explicitly scope each resolver to its endpoint
- Move most resolvers (auth, billing, workspace, user, etc.) to the
metadata schema where the frontend expects them; only workflow and
timeline calendar/messaging resolvers remain on `/graphql`
- Fix frontend `SSEQuerySubscribeEffect` to use the default (metadata)
Apollo client instead of the core client
### Problem
NestJS GraphQL's module-based resolver discovery traverses transitive
imports, causing resolvers from `/metadata` modules to leak into the
`/graphql` schema and vice versa. This made the schemas unpredictable
and tightly coupled to module import order.
### Approach
- Added `resolverSchemaScope` to `GqlModuleOptions` via a patch on
`@nestjs/graphql`, filtering in both `filterResolvers()` (runtime
binding) and `getAllCtors()` (schema generation)
- Each resolver is explicitly decorated with `@CoreResolver()` or
`@MetadataResolver()`
- Organized decorator, constant, and type files under `graphql-config/`
following project conventions
Core GQL Schema: (see: no more fields!)
<img width="827" height="894" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/668f3f0f-485e-43f0-92be-4345aeccacb6"
/>
Metadata GQL Schema (see no more getTimelineCalendarEventsFromCompany)
<img width="827" height="894" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/443913db-e5fe-4161-b0e7-4a971cc80a71"
/>
⚠️ **AI-generated PR — not ready for review** ⚠️
cc @FelixMalfait
---
## Changes
### System prompt improvements
- Explicit skill-before-tools workflow to prevent the model from calling
tools without loading the matching skill first
- Data efficiency guidance (default small limits, use filters)
- Pluralized `load_skill` → `load_skills` for consistency with
`load_tools`
### Token usage reduction
- Output serialization layer: strips null/undefined/empty values from
tool results
- Lowered default `find_*` limit from 100 → 10, max from 1000 → 100
### System object tool generation
- System objects (calendar events, messages, etc.) now generate AI tools
- Only workflow-related and favorite-related objects are excluded
### Context window display fix
- **Bug**: UI compared cumulative tokens (sum of all turns) against
single-request context window → showed 100% after a few turns
- **Fix**: Track `conversationSize` (last step's `inputTokens`) which
represents the actual conversation history size sent to the model
- New `conversationSize` column on thread entity with migration
### Workspace AI instructions
- Support for custom workspace-level AI instructions
---------
Co-authored-by: claude[bot] <41898282+claude[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
## Context
- Add RLS entitlement to billing
- Check value in the backend (for RLS predicate entity
queries/mutations)
- Expose billingEntitlements to the API inside currentWorkspace to check
available features to the workspace and display the role components
accordingly
- Cleanup RLS when plan changes back to one without RLS.
This should cover almost everything, imho we don't need to check in the
ORM because => We can't create RLS without the correct PLAN and
switching back to a PLAN without RLS deletes existing RLS through
stripes webhooks
## Overview
This PR replaces the dynamic agent handoff system with a more
predictable planning-based router that decides upfront how to handle
multi-agent coordination.
## Major Changes
### 🔄 Architecture Shift: Handoffs → Planning
**Removed:**
- `AgentHandoffEntity` and handoff tracking system
- `AgentHandoffService` and `AgentHandoffExecutorService`
- Dynamic agent-to-agent transfers during execution
- Handoff tool generation and description templates
**Added:**
- `AiRouterService` with two strategies: `simple` (single agent) and
`planned` (multi-agent)
- `AgentPlanExecutorService` for executing multi-step plans
- Plan validation (cycle detection, dependency resolution)
- `UnifiedRouterResult` type with discriminated union
### 🤖 New Standard Agents
Added two new specialized agents:
- **Researcher Agent**: Web search, fact-finding, competitive
intelligence
- **Code Agent**: TypeScript function generation for serverless
workflows
### 🏗️ Router Refactoring (Latest)
Split router responsibilities into focused services:
- `AiRouterStrategyDeciderService`: Decides simple vs planned strategy
- `AiRouterPlanGeneratorService`: Generates and validates execution
plans
- `AiRouterService`: Coordinates between services (reduced from 426→275
lines)
### ⚙️ Configuration Improvements
- Added `outputStrategy` to agent definitions (`direct` vs `synthesize`)
- Removed hardcoded special cases for workflow-builder
- Added `plannerModel` field to workspace entity
- Increased `MAX_STEPS` from 10 to 25 for complex workflows
### 📝 Agent Prompt Refinements
Significantly simplified prompts for better clarity:
- Workflow Builder: 51→36 lines
- Helper: 49→28 lines
- Data Manipulator: Enhanced with sorting guidance
### 🔍 Enhanced Debugging
- Plan reasoning and step count in data message parts
- Router debug info with token usage tracking
- Better logging throughout execution pipeline
## Benefits
1. **Simpler Mental Model**: Router decides upfront vs dynamic transfers
2. **Better Predictability**: Users see the plan before execution
3. **Cleaner Architecture**: SRP with focused services
4. **Configuration Over Code**: Agent behavior via config, not hardcoded
logic
5. **Plan Validation**: Catches invalid dependencies and cycles
## Migration Notes
- Database migration removes `agentHandoff` table
- Adds `plannerModel` column to workspace table
- No API breaking changes (agent endpoints unchanged)
## Testing
- Integration tests updated to remove handoff dependencies
- Agent tool test utilities simplified
- Plan validation covered by new logic
## Next Steps (Future PRs)
- Parallel execution of independent plan steps
- Dynamic re-planning based on results
- Plan caching for common routing patterns
- Error recovery strategies in plan executor
# Introduction
Two things:
- Enforcing non nullable workspace custom application Id for any
workspace
- Fixing front non editable data models following
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/15911 that associate any custom
entities to an applicationId. The front was putting everything as
readonly when under an app ( we will have to handle the twenty standard
application in the future too )
## Fallback
### Migration
The non nullable migration will fail when released, that's why it's
being swallowed and re-run in an upgrade command post workspace custom
application creation for those that miss one. Allowing the migration to
pass in the end
The typeorm migration still need to exists for any new workspaces
### GetCurrentUser
In order to dynamically display isReadOnly in data model settings we're
fetching the workspaceCustomApplicationId through the `getCurrentUser`
If not fallback this endpoint would throw until we're handling existing
workspaces that do not have a custom workspace application
The fallback should be removed post release
- Users with a single workspace are allowed to update their email across
`core.user` and `workspace_xyz.workspaceMember`.
- The latter happens asynchronously (built it like this for non-blocking
with multiple workspaces), but since we restrict the email update
functionality to a single user, we can also update the email in
workspaceMember synchronously - I left asynchronous there to receive
feedback on whether we should move to synchronous or not.
- Merged main and resolved conflicts to ensure we use the
`SettingsPermissionGuard` and the updated `workspace.service.ts` code.
One edge-case that I was trying to communicate on Discord:
Say that an admin is a member of multiple workspaces. Therefore, they
can allow roles with PROFILE_INFORMATION permission to update their
email.
<p align="center">
<img width="553" height="115" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/80382b1f-a9e3-4dac-b606-c2defeb2c330"
/>
</p>
However, since the admin is part of multiple workspaces, he/she cannot
even update own email - the field stays disabled, leading to some
confusion.
<p align="center">
<img width="545" height="255" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5e6d27db-c9a8-4d5e-9ab6-65c77beae5b4"
/>
</p>
However, the workspace can have another member with admin role or some
other role that has PROFILE_INFORMATION permission flag. That user will
be and should be allowed to update email, so we cannot hide `email` from
dropdown options.
<p align="center">
<img width="585" height="283" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a670d3ac-cf48-4865-a425-b909093d8420"
/>
</p>
The behavior is fine imo, just a little confusing for members with more
than one workspace.
I have also tested the flow by signing up to YC workspace with my org
google account (twenty.com), then changing email to my personal address.
- After changing, I need to login using Google with my personal account
to access YC workspace again.
- If I login using Google with org google account (twenty.com), a new
user account is created.
This behavior is consistent with Notion and Linear.
Finally, as for the verification of email, the user is asked to verify
email while they're logged in, but just in case they logout without
verifying, the next login would force them to verify their email in the
email/password flow.
However, for Social/SSO, they must verify before they logout or else
they'd have to contact support for assistance. I have not looked into
how to show verification screen while logging in via Social/SSO yet, but
if that's something critical for completeness here, I shall revisit it.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
## Overview
This PR strengthens our permission system by introducing more granular
role-based access control across the platform.
## Changes
### New Permissions Added
- **Applications** - Control who can install and manage applications
- **Layouts** - Control who can customize page layouts and UI structure
- **AI** - Control access to AI features and agents
- **Upload File** - Separate permission for file uploads
- **Download File** - Separate permission for file downloads (frontend
visibility)
### Security Enhancements
- Implemented whitelist-based validation for workspace field updates
- Added explicit permission guards to core entity resolvers
- Enhanced ESLint rule to enforce permission checks on all mutations
- Created `CustomPermissionGuard` and `NoPermissionGuard` for better
code documentation
### Affected Components
- Core entity resolvers: webhooks, files, domains, applications,
layouts, postgres credentials
- Workspace update mutations now use whitelist validation
- Settings UI updated with new permission controls
### Developer Experience
- ESLint now catches missing permission guards during development
- Explicit guard markers make permission requirements clear in code
review
- Comprehensive test coverage for new permission logic
## Testing
- ✅ All TypeScript type checks pass
- ✅ ESLint validation passes
- ✅ New permission guards properly enforced
- ✅ Frontend UI displays new permissions correctly
## Migration Notes
Existing workspaces will need to assign the new permissions to roles as
needed. By default, all new permissions are set to `false` for non-admin
roles.
**Before**
- any user with workpace_members permission was able to remove a user
from their workspace. This triggered the deletion of workspaceMember +
of userWorkspace, but did not delete the user (even if they had no
workspace left) nor the roleTarget (acts as junction between role and
userWorkspace) which was left with a userWorkspaceId pointing to
nothing. This is because roleTarget points to userWorkspaceId but the
foreign key constraint was not implemented
- any user could delete their own account. This triggered the deletion
of all their workspaceMembers, but not of their userWorkspace nor their
user nor the roleTarget --> we have orphaned userWorkspace, not
technically but product wise - a userWorkspace without a workspaceMember
does not make sense
So the problems are
- we have some roleTargets pointing to non-existing userWorkspaceId
(which caused https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14608 )
- we have userWorkspaces that should not exist and that have no
workspaceMember counterpart
- it is not possible for a user to leave a workspace by themselves, they
can only leave all workspaces at once, except if they are being removed
from the workspace by another user
**Now**
- if a user has multiple workspaces, they are given the possibility to
leave one workspace while remaining in the others (we show two buttons:
Leave workspace and Delete account buttons). if a user has just one
workspace, they only see Delete account
- when a user leaves a workspace, we delete their workspaceMember,
userWorkspace and roleTarget. If they don't belong to any other
workspace we also soft-delete their user
- soft-deleted users get hard deleted after 30 days thanks to a cron
- we have two commands to clean the orphans roleTarget and userWorkspace
(TODO: query db to see how many must be run)
**Next**
- once the commands have been run, we can implement and introduce the
foreign key constraint on roleTarget
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/14608
Here is what the PR does:
- Surface password state in validatePasswordResetToken, returning
hasPassword so the client can tell whether a user is setting or changing
their password.
- Consume that flag throughout the front end (mock data, stories,
GraphQL types) and update the Reset/Set Password modal to swap the
heading/button label and success toast accordingly.
- After a successful password set/reset, immediately update the
logged-in user’s hasPassword flag so the Settings screen reflects the
new state without a reload.
Modal has two states now - reset password modal uses change password
state since it made intuitive sense.
<p align="center">
<img width="404" height="397" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c54cc581-1248-4395-833d-0202758e1947"
/>
</p>
<p align="center">
<img width="403" height="393" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d8a39a95-27e6-4037-86f2-1f74176002ba"
/>
</p>
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Closes [Core Issue
#1772](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1772).
<!-- CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---
> [!NOTE]
> Introduces SSO bypass with a new permission flag and workspace-level
provider toggles, enabling permitted users to log in via
Google/Microsoft/Password when SSO-only, with backend enforcement and
frontend UI/hooks/queries.
>
> - **Backend**:
> - **Permission & Enforcement**: Add `PermissionFlagType.SSO_BYPASS`;
update `AuthService` to allow login via non-SSO providers when workspace
bypass is enabled and user has `SSO_BYPASS`.
> - **Workspace Model**: Add `isGoogleAuthBypassEnabled`,
`isMicrosoftAuthBypassEnabled`, `isPasswordAuthBypassEnabled`
(migration, entity, update input, service validation).
> - **Public API**: Extend `PublicWorkspaceDataOutput` with
`authBypassProviders`; resolver computes it; permissions defaults
include `SSO_BYPASS`.
> - **Frontend**:
> - **GraphQL/State**: Generate new types/fields; add
`authBypassProviders` to `GetPublicWorkspaceDataByDomain`; new states
`workspaceAuthBypassProvidersState`, `workspaceBypassModeState`.
> - **Auth UI/Logic**: Add `useWorkspaceBypass`; update sign-in form and
footer to offer "Bypass SSO" and use merged providers when enabled;
remove auto-redirect when single SSO.
> - **Settings**: Add Security section to toggle bypass methods per
provider; conditionally show Change Password via `useCanChangePassword`.
> - **Tests/Mocks**: Update mocks and tests to include bypass
flags/providers.
>
> <sup>Written by [Cursor
Bugbot](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot) for commit
8c393b2bad387fb6e8b8f40027f8637dd6e85723. This will update automatically
on new commits. Configure
[here](https://cursor.com/dashboard?tab=bugbot).</sup>
<!-- /CURSOR_SUMMARY -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Adds intelligent routing system that automatically selects the best
agent for user queries based on conversation context.
### Changes:
- Added `routerModel` column to workspace table for configurable router
LLM selection
- Implemented `RouterService` with conversation history analysis and
agent matching logic
- Created router settings UI in AI Settings page with model dropdown
- Removed agent-specific thread associations - threads are now
agent-agnostic
- Added real-time routing status notification in chat UI with shimmer
effect
- Removed automatic default assistant agent creation
- Renamed GraphQL operations from agent-specific to generic (e.g.,
`agentChatThreads` → `chatThreads`)
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Closes#14726
### Added
- `trashRetentionDays` field to workspace entity (default: 14 days)
- Automated trash cleanup using BullMQ jobs
- Daily cron (00:10 UTC) that enqueues cleanup jobs for all active
workspaces
- Per-workspace limit: 100k records deleted per day
- Calendar-based retention: records deleted on day X are cleaned up X+14
days later (at midnight UTC boundaries)
### Architecture
- **Cron (WorkspaceTrashCleanupCronJob):** Runs daily, enqueues jobs in
parallel for all workspaces
- **Job (WorkspaceTrashCleanupJob):** Processes individual workspace
cleanup
- **Service (WorkspaceTrashCleanupService):** Discovers tables with
`deletedAt`, deletes old records with quota enforcement
- **Command:** `npx nx run twenty-server:command
cron:workspace:cleanup-trash` to register the cron
### Testing
- Unit tests for service with 100% coverage of public API
- Tested quota enforcement, error handling, and edge cases
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
## Context
We are experiencing bad performance on Twenty. One of the root cause
hypothesis is that computing `currentUser.currentWorkspace.views` is CPU
consuming. Without views, the GetCurrentUser response is ~1000 lines.
With its ~10000 lines.
As graphql is going through all fields recursively this can be quite
heavy on CPU. We had a similar issues on ObjectMetadataItems 2 years ago
and came with storing the response in redis.
Note: I thought there was also a cache in RAM but this is not the case,
so to invalidate the cache we can just empty redis.
## How
- Extract getting all views from GetCurrentUser and update frontend to
perform both queries
- Add views to cached graphql operations
- invalidate the cache manually on view or related core entities update
/ create / delete / destroy
## Tests
I have tested a lot on v1
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/14306 , working on the
deprecation of objectRecordsPermissions + renaming of objectPermissions
-> objectsPermissions
In this PR
- Removal of objectRecordsPermissions (was not used in the FE any
longer)
- Addition of objectsPermissions, same as objectPermission but renamed.
objectPermission is no longer used in the FE.
Next step
- Remove unused objectPermissions
## Problem
**CRITICAL:** Two PRs were accidentally reverted when PR #14347 "Prevent
csv export injections" was merged:
1. **PR #14348** "[Page Layout] - Review Refactor" - ✅ **RESTORED**
2. **PR #14352** "Fix wrong path used by backend" - ✅ **RESTORED**
## Root Cause Analysis
During the merge of PR #14347, there was a complex merge conflict with
PR #14352 "Fix wrong path used by backend". The merge commit
`324d7204bb` in the PR #14347 branch brought in changes from PR #14352,
but during the conflict resolution, **BOTH PR #14348 and PR #14352's
changes were accidentally overwritten**.
## What This PR Restores
This PR restores **BOTH** PRs by cherry-picking their commits:
### ✅ PR #14348 Changes Restored:
- `GraphWidgetRenderer.tsx` - was deleted, now restored
- `WidgetRenderer.tsx` - was missing, now restored
- `SettingsPageLayoutTabsInstanceId.ts` - was deleted, now restored
- `useUpdatePageLayoutWidget.ts` - was renamed back, now restored with
correct name
- Multiple test files that were deleted
- Several hook files that were renamed/reverted
- File renames: `usePageLayoutWidgetUpdate.ts` →
`useUpdatePageLayoutWidget.ts`
- Hook refactoring and test file organization
- Page layout component improvements
### ✅ PR #14352 Changes Restored:
- **Types moved to twenty-shared:**
- `packages/twenty-shared/src/types/AppBasePath.ts` ✅ RESTORED
- `packages/twenty-shared/src/types/AppPath.ts` ✅ RESTORED
- `packages/twenty-shared/src/types/SettingsPath.ts` ✅ RESTORED
- **Navigation utilities moved to twenty-shared:**
- `packages/twenty-shared/src/utils/navigation/getAppPath.ts` ✅ RESTORED
- `packages/twenty-shared/src/utils/navigation/getSettingsPath.ts` ✅
RESTORED
- **200+ import statements updated** across the codebase to use
twenty-shared
- **Old type files deleted** from twenty-front/src/modules/types/
## Evidence of Complete Restoration
**Before (reverted state):**
- ❌ Types were in `packages/twenty-front/src/modules/types/`
- ❌ Page layout files missing
- ❌ Hook files incorrectly named
**After (this PR):**
- ✅ Types correctly in `packages/twenty-shared/src/types/`
- ✅ All page layout files restored
- ✅ Hook files correctly named
- ✅ All import statements updated
## Verification
**Total changes:**
- PR #14348: 36 files changed, 863 insertions(+), 442 deletions(-)
- PR #14352: 243 files changed, 492 insertions(+), 461 deletions(-)
- **Combined: 279 files changed, 1355 insertions(+), 903 deletions(-)**
## Impact
This completely restores both PRs that were accidentally lost, ensuring:
1. Page layout refactoring work is back
2. Type organization and path utilities are correctly in twenty-shared
3. Backend email paths work correctly again
4. No functionality is lost
Fixes the reversion caused by the merge conflict in PR #14347.
---------
Co-authored-by: nitin <142569587+ehconitin@users.noreply.github.com>
**Small Security Issue:** CSV exports were vulnerable to formula
injection attacks when users entered values starting with =, +, -, or @.
(only happens if a logged-in user injects corrupted data)
Solution:
- Added ZWJ (Zero-Width Joiner) protection that prefixes dangerous
values with invisible Unicode character
- This is the best way to preserve original data while preventing Excel
from executing formulas
- Added import cleanup to restore original values when re-importing
Changes:
- New sanitizeValueForCSVExport() function for security
- Updated all CSV export paths to use both security + formatting
functions
- Added comprehensive tests covering attack vectors and international
characters
- Also added cursor rules for better code consistency
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
After moving a section on the frontend, this broke the path that was
sent by email on the backend.
This kind of error comes back every ~2-3 month under different forms so
we need a more robust solution: I moved routes to the shared folder,
that way we will share one common source of truth between the frontend
and the backend.
Fixes#14343
The goal of this PR is to test if Twenty can support a large number of
members, a question which was raised by a large company that is
considering moving away from Salesforce.
I was expecting the currentWorkspaceMembersState to cause a lot more
issue. It would be very hard to get rid of it in the context of actors,
I think that would require a big refactoring. I thought we'd have to do
it but it turns out the perf are pretty good. One thing we need to
improve is the pagination on the roles page, we'll wait for @Bonapara to
update that
## TODO:
- [x] display "yearly" or "monthly" wording everywhere it's needed
- [ ] Add button with "downgrade" or "upgrade" to save the change of
credits price + modal to validate
- [x] Add renewal date
- [ ] Implement
https://docs.stripe.com/billing/subscriptions/subscription-schedules for
`switchFromYearlyToMonthly` and decrease number of credits
Parallel code path to read and write core views when
IS_CORE_VIEW_ENABLED.
Migrated view key to an enum.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
In this PR
- Introduction of readableFields and updatableFields in
objectMetadataItem selector to ease filtering from a developer
experience perspective ( + to help developers think to do it). In
discussion @lucasbordeau @charlesBochet
- Remove non-updatable field from CSV import process (@etiennejouan)
- QA fix / Non-readable fields should not show on show page
- QA fix / It should not be offered to create a kanban view on a
non-readable field
- QA fix / It should not be offered to create view groups on a
non-readable field
- QA fix / Rating field should have a readonly mode
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Implementation is very simple
Established authentication dynamic is intercepted at
getAuthTokensFromLoginToken. If 2FA is required, a pattern similar to
EmailVerification is executed. That is, getAuthTokensFromLoginToken
mutation fails with either of the following errors:
1. TWO_FACTOR_AUTHENTICATION_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED
2. TWO_FACTOR_AUTHENTICATION_PROVISION_REQUIRED
UI knows how to respond accordingly.
2FA provisioning occurs at the 2FA resolver.
2FA verification, currently only OTP, is handled by auth.resolver's
getAuthTokensFromOTP
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charlesBochet@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions <github-actions@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Jean-Baptiste Ronssin <65334819+jbronssin@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
Moves system-level operations (auth, billing, admin) to use the
/metadata endpoint instead of /graphql.
This cleans up the endpoint separation so /graphql is purely for core
objects (Company, People, etc.) and /metadata handles all system
operations.
Part of prep work for webhook/API key core migration.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/11566 + translates dates
- Date display bug: We had an issue with date (not date time) display
depending on the timezone the user had selected. The date is stored in
the db as yyyy-mm-dd, eg. 2025-05-01 for **May 1st, 2025**. When
returned this date is formatted in a UTC DateTime at midnight, so
2025-05-1 00:00:00. Then when displaying the date we were converting
this date using the timeZone, so 2025-04-30 17:00:00, thus displaying
**April 30th, 2025**. The fix chosen is that we should not take into
account the timezone for date (not date time!) displays as we always
want to show the same date.
- Date translation: dates were not translated, not in their default
display (_May 1st, 2025_) nor in their relative display (_about a month
ago_). The lib we use for date formatting, date-fns, offers a
translation option with pre-built `Locale`s from their lib.
Unfortunately and surprisingly we cannot just use directly string locale
codes (like `fr-FR`), cf [open issue on
date-fns](https://github.com/date-fns/date-fns/issues/3660). A util was
introduced to offset this by dynamically importing the right date-fns
Locale based on the locale code.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/950
This issue was due to the memoization inside `useIsMatchingLocation`,
which was rerendered only if the pathname changed but not the search
params.
After discussion with @lucasbordeau, we decided to remove the hook
`useIsMatchingLocation` and to create an equivalent util function which
takes the location as an argument.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
# Display "Soft-Deleted Workspace Members" in Actor Field Display
Reminder of the issue :
<img width="154" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-07 at 12 11 59"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/168f8743-2684-4d9a-b1a4-e86bb335f7a4"
/>
- `ActorFieldDisplay` component : display soft-deleted members
- `UserService` includes soft-deleted records when fetching workspace
members. This is the tricky part : do we want that for all workspace
members or maybe i could create another property dedicated to workspace
members and softdeleted ones. To be discussed
Result looks like this (we loose the source and the context in this
impleentation)
<img width="114" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-07 at 12 05 28"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3cdddd91-454f-4e96-8d6d-6fe671658945"
/>
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/11870
Another way we could also get into :
We could also, when a workspace user is softDeleted, change the current
implementation : we could avoid to delete the ActorMetadata like
CreatedByName (and context and source) in the "Person" table.
It would look more like this
<img width="111" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-07 at 12 06 16"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/daa4ece2-200a-41f0-ba24-177375c72983"
/>
However, this implementation is requires more work, and IMO harder to
maintain since is decouples completely the record from the workspace
member. This could be an issue in case we want tohard delete a user, or
decide another logic to display the Actor name.
Since the usecase should be pretty rare, I chose the first one but
willing to discuss it
---------
Co-authored-by: prastoin <paul@twenty.com>
After investiagting the different options ([see related
issue](https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/660#issuecomment-2766030972))
I decided to add a "Verify Component" and a to build a custom Layout for
this route.
Reason I cannot use the default one is to have all preloaded once the
user changes website and lands on the verify route.
Reason I did not modify the DefaultLayout to match our need is that is
would require many changes in order to avoid preloading states for our
specific usecase.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/660
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Charles Bochet