- Replace soft-deletion (deletedAt) with isActive boolean for
overridable entities (tabs, widgets, viewFieldGroups, viewFields).
Standard entities are deactivated (isActive: false) when removed from
update payloads, while custom entities are hard-deleted.
- When a viewFieldGroup is deactivated/deleted, its viewFields are
reassigned to the next section by position (or null if none remain).
- Add isActive: true filters to viewFieldGroup and viewField API queries
so deactivated entities are excluded from responses.
Next:
- fields-widget-upsert.service.ts should be refactored a bit
- Add restore logic
Fixes
https://github.com/twentyhq/private-issues/issues/410#issuecomment-3781085655
Currently, JSON keys with spaces like { "toto toto": 123 } are rejected
with "JSON keys cannot contain spaces" error. This is problematic for
HTTP requests and webhook triggers where users cannot control the
response structure.
We use Handlebars to eval variables, segment-literal bracket notation to
escape keys with special characters:
Normal: {{step.normalKey}}
With spaces: `{{step.[key with space]}}`
So we simply need to wrap segments with spaces with brackets.
This PR:
- Create shared path utilities to wrap the variable segments when needed
- Use it in all variable generation places
- Remove the restrictions
This body is now supported:
<img width="609" height="457" alt="Capture d’écran 2026-01-22 à 16 10
13"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e7653c0a-df1e-49af-9c9a-4b7d59a99726"
/>
- Create resolvers for each type of charts which needs data
transformation after the group by operation: Bar Chart, Line Chart and
Pie Chart
- Move all the utils to the backend and refactored some into services
This allows all the computation to be done in the backend, improving
performances in the frontend.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/16110
This PR implements Temporal to replace the legacy Date object, in all
features that are time zone sensitive. (around 80% of the app)
Here we define a few utils to handle Temporal primitives and obtain an
easier DX for timezone manipulation, front end and back end.
This PR deactivates the usage of timezone from the graph configuration,
because for now it's always UTC and is not really relevant, let's handle
that later.
Workflows code and backend only code that don't take user input are
using UTC time zone, the affected utils have not been refactored yet
because this PR is big enough.
# New way of filtering on date intervals
As we'll progressively rollup Temporal everywhere in the codebase and
remove `Date` JS object everywhere possible, we'll use the way to filter
that is recommended by Temporal.
This way of filtering on date intervals involves half-open intervals,
and is the preferred way to avoid edge-cases with DST and smallest time
increment edge-case.
## Filtering endOfX with DST edge-cases
Some day-light save time shifts involve having no existing hour, or even
day on certain days, for example Samoa Islands have no 30th of December
2011 : https://www.timeanddate.com/news/time/samoa-dateline.html, it
jumps from 29th to 31st, so filtering on `< next period start` makes it
easier to let the date library handle the strict inferior comparison,
than filtering on `≤ end of period` and trying to compute manually the
end of the period.
For example for Samoa Islands, is end of day `2011-12-29T23:59:59.999`
or is it `2011-12-30T23:59:59.999` ? If you say I don't need to know and
compute it, because I want everything strictly before
`2011-12-29T00:00:00 + start of next day (according to the library which
knows those edge-cases)`, then you have a 100% deterministic way of
computing date intervals in any timezone, for any day of any year.
Of course the Samoa example is an extreme one, but more common ones
involve DST shifts of 1 hour, which are still problematic on certain
days of the year.
## Computing the exact _end of period_
Having an open interval filtering, with `[included - included]` instead
of half-open `[included - excluded)`, forces to compute the open end of
an interval, which often involves taking an arbitrary unit like minute,
second, microsecond or nanosecond, which will lead to edge-case of
unhandled values.
For example, let's say my code computes endOfDay by setting the time to
`23:59:59.999`, if another library, API, or anything else, ends up
giving me a date-time with another time precision `23:59:59.999999999`
(down to the nanosecond), then this date-time will be filtered out,
while it should not.
The good deterministic way to avoid 100% of those complex bugs is to
create a half-open filter :
`≥ start of period` to `< start of next period`
For example :
`≥ 2025-01-01T00:00:00` to `< 2025-01-02T00:00:00` instead of `≥
2025-01-01T00:00:00` to `≤ 2025-01-01T23:59:59.999`
Because, `2025-01-01T00:00:00` = `2025-01-01T00:00:00.000` =
`2025-01-01T00:00:00.000000` = `2025-01-01T00:00:00.000000000` => no
risk of error in computing start of period
But `2025-01-01T23:59:59` ≠ `2025-01-01T23:59:59.999` ≠
`2025-01-01T23:59:59.999999` ≠ `2025-01-01T23:59:59.999999999` =>
existing risk of error in computing end of period
This is why an half-open interval has no risk of error in computing a
date-time interval filter.
Here is a link to this debate :
https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/issues/2568
> For this reason, we recommend not calculating the exact nanosecond at
the end of the day if it's not absolutely necessary. For example, if
it's needed for <= comparisons, we recommend just changing the
comparison code. So instead of <= zdtEndOfDay your code could be <
zdtStartOfNextDay which is easier to calculate and not subject to the
issue of not knowing which unit is the right one.
>
> [Justin Grant](https://github.com/justingrant), top contributor of
Temporal
## Application to our codebase
Applying this half-open filtering paradigm to our codebase means we
would have to rename `IS_AFTER` to `IS_AFTER_OR_EQUAL` and to keep
`IS_BEFORE` (or even `IS_STRICTLY_BEFORE`) to make this half-open
interval self-explanatory everywhere in the codebase, this will avoid
any confusion.
See the relevant issue :
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/2010
In the mean time, we'll keep this operand and add this semantic in the
naming everywhere possible.
## Example with a different user timezone
Example on a graph grouped by week in timezone Pacific/Samoa, on a
computer running on Europe/Paris :
<img width="342" height="511" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9e7d5121-ecc4-4233-835b-f59293fbd8c8"
/>
Then the associated data in the table view, with our **half-open
date-time filter** :
<img width="804" height="262" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/28efe1d7-d2fc-4aec-b521-bada7f980447"
/>
And the associated SQL query result to see how DATE_TRUNC in Postgres
applies its internal start of week logic :
<img width="709" height="220" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4d0542e1-eaae-4b4b-afa9-5005f48ffdca"
/>
The associated SQL query without parameters to test in your SQL client :
```SQL
SELECT "opportunity"."closeDate" as "close_date", TO_CHAR(DATE_TRUNC('week', "opportunity"."closeDate", 'Pacific/Samoa') AT TIME ZONE 'Pacific/Samoa', 'YYYY-MM-DD') AS "DATE_TRUNC by week start in timezone Pacific/Samoa", "opportunity"."name" FROM "workspace_1wgvd1injqtife6y4rvfbu3h5"."opportunity" "opportunity" ORDER BY "opportunity"."closeDate" ASC NULLS LAST
```
# Date picker simplification (not in this PR)
Our DatePicker component, which is wrapping `react-datepicker` library
component, is now exposing plain dates as string instead of Date object.
The Date object is still used internally to manage the library
component, but since the date picker calendar is only manipulating plain
dates, there is no need to add timezone management to it, and no need to
expose a handleChange with Date object.
The timezone management relies on date time inputs now.
The modification has been made in a previous PR :
https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/15377 but it's good to
reference it here.
# Calendar feature refactor
Calendar feature has been refactored to rely on Temporal.PlainDate as
much as possible, while leaving some date-fns utils to avoid re-coding
them.
Since the trick is to use utils to convert back and from Date object in
exec env reliably, we can do it everywhere we need to interface legacy
Date object utils and Temporal related code.
## TimeZone is now shown on Calendar :
<img width="894" height="958" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/231f8107-fad6-4786-b532-456692c20f1d"
/>
## Month picker has been refactored
<img width="503" height="266" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cb90bc34-6c4d-436d-93bc-4b6fb00de7f5"
/>
Since the days weren't useful, the picker has been refactored to remove
the days.
# Miscellaneous
- Fixed a bug with drag and drop edge-case with 2 items in a list.
# Improvements
## Lots of chained operations
It would be nice to create small utils to avoid repeated chained
operations, but that is how Temporal is designed, a very small set of
primitive operations that allow to compose everything needed. Maybe
we'll have wrappers on top of Temporal in the coming years.
## Creation of Temporal objects is throwing errors
If the input is badly formatted Temporal will throw, we might want to
adopt a global strategy to avoid that.
Example :
```ts
const newPlainDate = Temporal.PlainDate.from('bad-string'); // Will throw
```
Since we now store rich text value in blocknote rather than markdown,
variables need to be resolved accordingly.
Replacing the variable tag pattern
`{"type":"variableTag","attrs":\{"variable":"(\{\{[^{}]+\}\})"\}\}` by a
blocknote text `{"type":"text","text":"${escapedText}"}`
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/16583
To test :
- build a workflow that creates a note/ sends an email with a variable
in the body
- make sure the result is properly formatted once run
---------
Co-authored-by: cubic-dev-ai[bot] <191113872+cubic-dev-ai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Title: "feat: Add second, minute & hour resolution options to relative
date Filter action"
---
## Summary
This PR enables support for smaller time units — **Seconds, Minutes, and
Hours** — in the *Relative Date* filter used in workflows, rather than
being limited to days only.
---
## What Changed
This PR extends the relative date filter to include support for the
following units:
✔️ `SECOND`
✔️ `MINUTE`
✔️ `HOUR`
✔️ (Existing: `DAY`, `WEEK`, `MONTH`, etc.)
Changes include:
- Adding `SECOND`, `MINUTE`, and `HOUR` options to the internal relative
date unit enum/constant.
- Updating utility functions and parsers to correctly interpret and
evaluate these new units.
- Enhancing existing tests and adding new tests to cover second, minute,
and hour relative filters.
---
## Testing
New and updated tests include:
- Unit tests for serialization of relative filter values including
seconds, minutes, and hours.
- Workflow filter evaluation tests that verify minute/hour resolution
behaves correctly.
Tests are included in the changeset.
---
## Backward Compatibility
This change is fully backward compatible:
- All existing relative date filters using days or larger units behave
exactly as before.
- Adding finer units does not alter existing stored data or workflow
definitions.
---
## Issue Reference
Fixes: **twentyhq/twenty#15525**
<img width="1909" height="896" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/328d03dc-ca0b-4c3f-84e5-58961c178398"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Guillim <guillim@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: guillim <guigloo@msn.com>
- moves applicationRoleId to application entity
- add new `APPLICATION` FieldActorSource and `APPLICATION`
JwtTokenTypeEnum value
- create a new token with applicationId when executing a function
- when applicationId is in token, check for application.defaultRole
permissions
-use twenty-shared types in `twenty-sdk/application`
- create a new import from generate called "Twenty" that you can use
directly without having to set TWENTY_API_KEY AND TWENTY_API_URL (keep
metadata or core parameter only)
- provide to serverless unique one time BEARER TOKEN to run it
Result
<img width="977" height="566" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e78428a0-5b13-4975-aa13-58ee3b32450c"
/>
<img width="910" height="596" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6ec72bf5-7655-4093-a45e-ad269595a324"
/>
<img width="741" height="568" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7683944c-fd79-4417-8fb2-8e4815cc112f"
/>
This PR fixes a bug which could happen if two people were editing a page
layout at the same time.
If one person deletes a widget or a tab and saves first, and the second
person saves after but doesn't delete this widget or tab, an error is
raised.
This is because, in the backend, a diff is computed to know which tab or
widget to create, update or delete. But the logic was maid without
considering soft deletion. So, when the second person saves, the diff
tries to create the widget or tab which had been soft deleted by the
first use. Since they have the same id, a duplicate primary key error is
raised.
Now we always consider that the last user to save has the truth. So we
restore the tab/widget and update it.
This PR implements the necessary tools to have `react-datepicker`
calendar and our date picker components work reliably no matter the
timezone difference between the user execution environment and the user
application timezone.
Fixes https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1781
This PR won't cover everything needed to have Twenty handle timezone
properly, here is the follow-up issue :
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1807
# Features in this PR
This PR brings a lot of features that have to be merged together.
- DATE field type is now handled as string only, because it shouldn't
involve timezone nor the JS Date object at all, since it is a day like a
birthday date, and not an absolute point in time.
- DATE_TIME field wasn't properly handled when the user settings
timezone was different from the system one
- A timezone abbreviation suffix has been added to most DATE_TIME
display component, only when the timezone is different from the system
one in the settings.
- A lot of bugs, small features and improvements have been made here :
https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1781
# Handling of timezones
## Essential concepts
This topic is so complex and easy to misunderstand that it is necessary
to define the precise terms and concepts first. It resembles character
encoding and should be treated with the same care.
- Wall-clock time : the time expressed in the timezone of a user, it is
distinct from the absolute point in time it points to, much like a
pointer being a different value than the value that it points to.
- Absolute time : a point in time, regardless of the timezone, it is an
objective point in time, of course it has to be expressed in a given
timezone, because we have to talk about when it is located in time
between humans, but it is in fact distinct from any wall clock time, it
exists in itself without any clock running on earth. However, by
convention the low-level way to store an absolute point in time is in
UTC, which is a timezone, because there is no way to store an absolute
point in time without a referential, much like a point in space cannot
be stored without a referential.
- DST : Daylight Save Time, makes the timezone shift in a specific
period every year in a given timezone, to make better use of longer days
for various reasons, not all timezones have DST. DST can be 1 hour or 30
min, 45 min, which makes computation difficult.
- UTC : It is NOT an “absolute timezone”, it is the wall-clock time at
0° longitude without DST, which is an arbitrary and shared human
convention. UTC is often used as the standard reference wall-clock time
for talking about absolute point in time without having to do timezone
and DST arithmetic. PostgreSQL stores everything in UTC by convention,
but outputs everything in the server’s SESSION TIMEZONE.
## How should an absolute point in time be stored ?
Since an absolute point in time is essentially distinct from its
timezone it could be stored in an absolute way, but in practice it is
impossible to store an absolute point in time without a referential. We
have to say that a rocket launched at X given time, in UTC, EST, CET,
etc. And of course, someone in China will say that it launched at 10:30,
while in San Francisco it will have launched at 19:30, but it is THE
SAME absolute point in time.
Let’s take a related example in computer science with character
encoding. If a text is stored without the associated encoding table, the
correct meaning associated to the bits stored in memory can be lost
forever. It can become impossible for a program to guess what encoding
table should be used for a given text stored as bits, thus the glitches
that appeared a lot back in the early days of internet and document
processing.
The same can happen with date time storing, if we don’t have the
timezone associated with the absolute point in time, the information of
when it absolutely happened is lost.
It is NOT necessary to store an absolute point in time in UTC, it is
more of a standard and practical wall-clock time to be associated with
an absolute point in time. But an absolute point in time MUST be store
with a timezone, with its time referential, otherwise the information of
when it absolutely happened is lost.
For example, it is easier to pass around a date as a string in UTC, like
`2024-01-02T00:00:00Z` because it allows front-end and back-end code to
“talk” in the same standard and DST-free wall-clock time, BUT it is not
necessary. Because we have date libraries that operate on the standard
ISO timezone tables, we can talk in different timezone and let the
libraries handle the conversion internally.
It is false to say that UTC is an absolute timezone or an absolute point
in time, it is just the standard, conventional time referential, because
one can perfectly store every absolute points in time in UTC+10 with a
complex DST table and have the exactly correct absolute points in time,
without any loss of information, without having any UTC+0 dates
involved.
Thus storing an absolute point in time without a timezone associated,
for example with `timestamp` PostgreSQL data type, is equivalent to
storing a wall-clock time and then throwing away voluntarily the
information that allows to know when it absolutely happened, which is a
voluntary data-loss if the code that stores and retrieves those
wall-clock points in time don’t store the associated timezone somewhere.
This is why we use `timestamptz` type in PostgreSQL, so that we make
sure that the correct absolute point in time is stored at the exact time
we send it to PostgreSQL server, no matter the front-end, back-end and
SQL server's timezone differences.
## The JavaScript Date object
The native JavaScript Date object is now officially considered legacy
([source](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Date)),
the Date object stores an absolute point in time BUT it forces the
storage to use its execution environment timezone, and one CANNOT modify
this timezone, this is a legacy behavior.
To obtain the desired result and store an absolute point in time with an
arbitrary timezone there are several options :
- The new Temporal API that is the successor of the legacy Date object.
- Moment / Luxon / @date-fns/tz that expose objects that allow to use
any timezone to store an absolute point in time.
## How PostgreSQL stores absolute point in times
PostgreSQL stores absolute points in time internally in UTC
([source](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-datetime.html#DATATYPE-DATETIME-INPUT-TIME-STAMPS)),
but the output date is expressed in the server’s session timezone
([source](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-set.html)) which
can be different from UTC.
Example with the object companies in Twenty seed database, on a local
instance, with a new “datetime” custom column :
<img width="374" height="554" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4394cb43-d97e-4479-801d-ca068f800e39"
/>
<img width="516" height="524" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b652f36a-d2e2-47a4-8950-647ca688cbbd"
/>
## Why can’t I just use the JavaScript native Date object with some
manual logic ?
Because the JavaScript Date object does not allow to change its internal
timezone, the libraries that are based on it will behave on the
execution environment timezone, thus leading to bugs that appear only on
the computers of users in a timezone but not for other in another
timezone.
In our case the `react-datepicker` library forces to use the `Date`
object, thus forcing the calendar to behave in the execution environment
system timezone, which causes a lot of problems when we decide to
display the Twenty application DATE_TIME values in another timezone than
the user system one, the bugs that appear will be of the off-by-one date
class, for example clicking on 23 will select 24, thus creating an
unreliable feature for some system / application timezone combinations.
A solution could be to manually compute the difference of minutes
between the application user and the system timezones, but that’s not
reliable because of DST which makes this computation unreliable when DST
are applied at different period of the year for the two timezones.
## Why can’t I compute the timezone difference manually ?
Because of DST, the work to compute the timezone difference reliably,
not just for the usual happy path, is equivalent to developing the
internal mechanism of a date timezone library, which is equivalent to
use a library that handles timezones.
## Using `@date-fns/tz` to solve this problem
We could have used `luxon` but it has a heavy bundle size, so instead we
rely here on `@date-fns/tz` (~1kB) which gives us a `TZDate` object that
allows to use any given timezone to store an absolute point-in-time.
The solution here is to trick `react-datepicker` by shifting a Date
object by the difference of timezone between the user application
timezone and the system timezone.
Let’s take a concerte example.
System timezone : Midway, ⇒ UTC-11:00, has no DST.
User application timezone : Auckland, NZ ⇒ UTC+13:00, has a DST.
We’ll take the NZ daylight time, so that will make a timezone difference
of 24 hours !
Let’s take an error-prone date : `2025-01-01T00:00:00` . This date is
usually a good test-case because it can generate three classes of bugs :
off-by-one day bugs, off-by-one month bugs and off-by-one year bugs, at
the same time.
Here is the absolute point in time we take expressed in the different
wall-clock time points we manipulate
Case | In system timezone ⇒ UTC-11 | In UTC | In user application
timezone ⇒ UTC+13
-- | -- | -- | --
Original date | `2024-12-31T00:00:00-11:00` | `2024-12-31T11:00:00Z` |
`2025-01-01T00:00:00+13:00`
Date shifted for react-datepicker | `2025-01-01T00:00:00-11:00` |
`2025-01-01T11:00:00Z` | `2025-01-02T00:00:00+13:00`
We can see with this table that we have the number part of the date that
is the same (`2025-01-01T00:00:00`) but with a different timezone to
“trick” `react-datepicker` and have it display the correct day in its
calendar.
You can find the code in the hooks
`useTurnPointInTimeIntoReactDatePickerShiftedDate` and
`useTurnReactDatePickerShiftedDateBackIntoPointInTime` that contain the
logic that produces the above table internally.
## Miscellaneous
Removed FormDateFieldInput and FormDateTimeFieldInput stories as they do
not behave the same depending of the execution environment and it would
be easier to put them back after having refactored FormDateFieldInput
and FormDateTimeFieldInput
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
# Introduction
Migrating `viewFilter` to v2 in order to migrate later the field update
side effect on view to v2 too
## What's done
- Created flat-view-filter
- flat view filter runner
- flat view filter builder
- create view filter service v2 and input transpilers
- refactor the existing view filter resolver to fix standard (
BREAKING_CHANGE on graphql api update especially ) REST stays the same
- refactored the front to consume the mutations autogenerated
## New generic tools
### Compare two flat entity
Introducing a new util to compare two flat entity, it's strictly typed
and will be added to the generic builder in a following PR
This will ease flat entity addition as won't required to create a
specific abstraction for comparison
Generic builder will expect specific constant: properties to compare and
properties to stringify
### Transform flat entity for comparison
Forked and refactor the initial existing method for flat entity business
scope and type safety
## Coverage
Migrated existing integration tests to fit new contract API
This PR does not add strong coverage on validation exceptions
Deadlines are too short
close https://github.com/twentyhq/core-team-issues/issues/1666
This PR follows the multiSelect PR merged previously. It will enable
morph relation Many to One to be handled from the table, using a
singleSelect picker
Main point : I decided to change the singleSelect API to take an array
of **objectMetadataName** instead of only one to deal with both our
usecases.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/14762
In this PR
- moved logic around any field filter formatting to twenty-shared
- added any field filter to the filters applied to groupBy when viewId
is defined
- added integration test
This PR should fix optimistic rendering issues on step updates:
- compute a diff for trigger and steps on mutations
- build an util that applies that diff (built a more robust version from
https://github.com/AsyncBanana/micropatch)
- apply diff in cache
Add a new graphql mutation in the pageLayout resolver to handle page
layout update with tabs and widgets.
Later we will add validation inside the service to check if the page
layout tab structure is correct (for instance check widgets don't
overlap or aren't out of the grid, or to check that they have a correct
configuration ...).
This mutation will be plugged to the save action of the dashboards in
the frontend.
Parallel code path to read and write core views when
IS_CORE_VIEW_ENABLED.
Migrated view key to an enum.
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
# Introduction
The workspace migration runner v2 now computes the next
flatObjectMetadataMaps post current ws migration action has been run
So the following one have an up to date informations
## Still TODO
~~Remove any contextual information from workspace migration v2 and
consume the optimistic cache to retrieve them~~
## Next steps
- Create flat-object-metadata-maps testing toolbox and flat-object/field
testing toolbox
- Implement strong coverage on every created utils/transpiler and
applyWorkspaceMigrationAction method
# Introduction
- FlatFieldMetadataType validators hashmap
- Do not fail fast on validation but aggregate errors
- Implemented `enum` validation
- Plugged the new v2 dynamic call in the field metadata service v2
## What's next:
- Implem integration tests to make things run 🙃
- migrate existing settings valdiation
- Finish the create object metadata service
- Handle update input transpilation and validation
## Open question
Should we implement, not covered validation ?, adding strictness now or
never.
This will be required by the import anw
## Discovered issue with cache
Currently the cache is not accurately typed, `fieldsById` map are not
storing any relations.
Which means the current transpilation tools are hitting undefined at
runtime
In the best of the world we will refactor the cache to be storing
`FlatObjectMetadata` and `FlatFieldMetadata` so we don't even have to
transpile them for validation and so on
But it would require to refactor the loaders that returns the cache to
the front on hit as FieldMetadataEntity, so we might land on a lighter
solution to rather add a new `getExistingFlatCache` that handles the
transpilation itself
About to do that in an other PR to be discussed with Coco
# Introduction
Following https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/13420
What has been done:
- `CreateFieldInput` transpilation to `FlatFieldMetadata`
- `FlatFieldMetadata` validator service
- A lof of transpilation utils from `input` to `flatObject` or
`flatField`
- Created dedicated v2 api metadata services
- Introducing `inferDeletionFromMissingObjectFieldIndex` in the builder,
to avoid diffing every object and field of the current workspace we
allow only generating create/update migration operations, usefull when
passing by the api metadata
## We still need to in another PR:
- Implement a strong unit test coverage and critical functions and
services
- Finalize flat field metadata validation exception for `options`
`defaultValue` `settings` and `relations`
- Finalize `flatObjectMetadata` validation and v2 service refactor
- Plug the new service when feature flag is enabled
# Introduction
In this PR we create basic transpilation methods and utils to handle
input to flat, entity to flat, object maps to flat. In order to
transpile everything into a common validation that will be implemented
in another PR
## FieldMetadataEntity typing
Added `never | null` to fields that should never be in order to ease
general abstracted method to pass null, as anw it's what is in the
database
## Todo
- ~~Create a feature flag~~
- Integration test for object creation through metadata api + pg col
introspection and snapshoting
# Introduction
close https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/12343
Adding a transform step for any field phone in order to infer country
code and calling code from the number if they're provided
## Edges cases
```ts
RecordTransformerExceptionCode.INVALID_PHONE_NUMBER:
RecordTransformerExceptionCode.INVALID_PHONE_COUNTRY_CODE:
RecordTransformerExceptionCode.CONFLICTING_PHONE_COUNTRY_CODE:
RecordTransformerExceptionCode.CONFLICTING_PHONE_CALLING_CODE:
RecordTransformerExceptionCode.CONFLICTING_PHONE_CALLING_CODE_AND_COUNTRY_CODE:
RecordTransformerExceptionCode.INVALID_PHONE_CALLING_CODE:
RecordTransformerExceptionCode.INVALID_URL:
```
## Coverage
Note: Will handle REST api integration testing pivot and UPDATE
operation later in the afternoon, critical bug appeared that I prefer
handling before improving this PR coverage, also would be too many
updates
Note2: Haven't fuzzed all of the string inputs, would seem overkill for
such a use case, to be debated
```ts
PASS test/integration/metadata/suites/field-metadata/phone/create-one-field-metadata-phone.integration-spec.ts (23.609 s)
Phone field metadata tests suite
✓ It should succeed create primary phone field (1397 ms)
✓ It should succeed create primary phone field with number and other information (930 ms)
✓ It should succeed create primary phone field with full international format and other information (893 ms)
✓ It should succeed create primary phone field with full international and infer other information from it but not the countryCode as its shared (825 ms)
✓ It should succeed create primary phone field with full international and infer other information from it (818 ms)
✓ It should succeed create primary phone field with empty payload (827 ms)
✓ It should succeed create additional phone field with number and other information (894 ms)
✓ It should succeed create additional phone field with full international format and other information (1024 ms)
✓ It should succeed create additional phone field with full international and infer other information from it but not the countryCode as its shared (808 ms)
✓ It should succeed create additional phone field with full international and infer other information from it (751 ms)
✓ It should succeed create additional phone field with empty payload (739 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field without country or calling code at all (776 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with invalid country code (782 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with invalid calling code (858 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with conflicting country code and calling code (872 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with invalid phone number format (1489 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with conflicting phone number country code (1425 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with conflicting phone number calling code (1553 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field without country or calling code at all (814 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with invalid country code (813 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with invalid calling code (742 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with conflicting country code and calling code (783 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with invalid phone number format (731 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with conflicting phone number country code (947 ms)
✓ It should fail to create primary phone field with conflicting phone number calling code (822 ms)
Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total
Tests: 25 passed, 25 total
Snapshots: 14 passed, 14 total
Time: 23.627 s
```
# Introduction
Avoid having multiple `isDefined` definition across our pacakges
Also avoid importing `isDefined` from `twenty-ui` which exposes a huge
barrel for a such little util function
## In a nutshell
Removed own `isDefined.ts` definition from `twenty-ui` `twenty-front`
and `twenty-server` to move it to `twenty-shared`.
Updated imports for each packages, and added explicit dependencies to
`twenty-shared` if not already in place
Related PR https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/9941
Weiko